Please refer to RP-234007 for detailed scope of the WI.
[116-R19-MIMO] – Eko (Samsung)
Email discussion on Rel-19 MIMO Phase 5
- To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc
R1-2400725 Rel-19 NR MIMO Phase 5: initial rapporteur assessment Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2400507 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management MediaTek Inc.
· Proposal 1: For Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management, both reporting delay reduction and beam application delay reduction should be considered
· Proposal 2: Support at least event-driven triggering manner for beam reporting
o An event-driven beam report will be triggered when the event condition(s) is satisfied
o Study the event condition and the corresponding use case(s)
· Proposal 3: For UL medium and container of UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, support to report via UCI on PUSCH/PUCCH
· Proposal 4: For UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, at least support pre-configured transmission occasion(s)/resource(s) dedicated for beam reporting
o Pre-configured transmission occasion(s)/resource(s) dedicated for beam reporting could be CG-PUSCH or PUCCH
· Proposal 5: For UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, support to reserve the pre-configured transmission occasion(s)/occasion(s) dedicated for beam reporting via an UL indication
o Whether or not the pre-configured transmission occasion(s)/resource(s) dedicated for beam reporting is reserved by a UE is determined according to an UL indication before the pre-configured transmission occasion(s) dedicated for beam reporting
§ A UE is expected to transmit a beam report in PUSCH/PUCCH on a reserved pre-configured transmission dedicated for beam reporting
§ A UE is not allowed to transmit PUSCH/PUCCH on a non-reserved pre-configured transmission dedicated for beam reporting
o FFS: design of UL indication
· Proposal 6: In a UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting instance, support reporting of a synchronization state along with each reported pair of a RS index (e.g., SSBRI/CRI) and a value of L1 measurement quantity (e.g., L1-RSRP/L1-SINR).
o The synchronization state indicates “synchronized” or “unsynchronized” for a TCI state associated with the reported RS
§ If the reported RS is indicated as “synchronized”, the associated TCI state is applicable after the beam reporting instance
§ If the reported RS is indicated as “unsynchronized”, the associated TCI state will be applicable after the UE receives the first SSB transmission after reporting
§ FFS: How to determine the association between a measurement/reporting RS and a TCI state
Decision: The document is noted.
R1-2400912 Enhancements for UE-initiated beam management Ericsson
· Proposal 1: The event(s) for UE-initiated beam reporting are specified in the standard, i.e., the events are not up to UE implementation.
· Proposal 2: RAN1 provides RAN2 with a high-level description of a minimum set of events by RAN2#127.
· Proposal 3: RAN2 specifies a minimum set of events for UE-initiated beam reporting based on high-level input from RAN1.
· Proposal 4: It should be possible to configure more than one event in parallel.
· Proposal 5: RAN1 studies postprocessing of measurements used for events, and ways to control the amount of event triggering.
· Proposal 6: The NW provides UL resources for the UE-initiated report dynamically.
· Proposal 7: The UE requests UL resources for the transmission of the UE-initiated report using legacy mechanisms.
· Proposal 8: The legacy beam report content, complemented by information about the triggering event, is the starting point for the report content.
· Proposal 9: RAN1 to study how to reduce the number of spurious beam measurement reports, e.g., by measurement filtering.
· Proposal 10: After sending a UE-initiated beam report, the UE would store the QCL properties of the SSB associated with the reference signal that triggered the measurement report.
Decision: The document is noted.
R1-2400049 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Spreadtrum Communications
R1-2400100 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management FUTUREWEI
R1-2400104 On UE initiated/event-driven beam management Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2400161 On UE/Event-Driven Beam Management InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2400194 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Lenovo
R1-2400204 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Transsion Holdings
R1-2400237 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management vivo
R1-2400278 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ZTE
R1-2400321 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CMCC
R1-2401469 Enhancements for event driven beam management Intel Corporation (rev of R1-2400381)
R1-2400428 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CATT
R1-2400467 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management NEC
R1-2400553 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management xiaomi
R1-2400623 Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management OPPO
R1-2400726 Views on Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management enhancements Samsung
R1-2400771 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Fujitsu
R1-2400848 Considerations on UE initiated beam management Sony
R1-2400917 UE-initiated beam management LG Electronics
R1-2400933 Discussions on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Ruijie Network Co. Ltd
R1-2400938 Enhancements to facilitate UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell
R1-2400959 Enhancements for UE-initiated/Event-Driven Beam Management Panasonic
R1-2401007 Views on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Apple
R1-2401044 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Sharp
R1-2401049 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Hyundai Motor Company
R1-2401078 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management NICT
R1-2401112 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2401187 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ITRI
R1-2401201 Discussion on UE initiated beam management ASUSTeK
R1-2401226 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ETRI
R1-2401243 Views on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management KDDI Corporation
R1-2401256 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management Google
R1-2401271 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CEWiT
R1-2401436 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2401625 Moderator Summary #1 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
Presented in Tuesday session
R1-2401681 Moderator Summary #2 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam report, at least of following aspects should be included:
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam report, the following aspects may be included:
Other procedure(s) as required
R1-2401787 Moderator Summary #3 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Thursday session
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding trigger-event detection for beam reporting, RAN1 further study at least the following aspects: quality metrics, event-definition and threshold.
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, at least support L1-RSRP as a measurement quantity on SSB for intra-cell and inter-cell, and periodic CSI-RS for beam management
· Notes: measurement results may be contained in the beam report and/or used as quality metric(s) to initiate/trigger the reporting.
· FFS: Semi-persistent CSI-RS and aperiodic CSI-RS.
· FFS: Whether/how to support L1-SINR measurement, assuming legacy RS or RS combination (e.g., CMR only, CMR+ZP/NZP-IMR) for Rel-16 SINR is reused.
· FFS: Whether/how to specify filtering operation for L1-RSRP.
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding signaling content(s), at least support DL RS resource indicator and L1-RSRP
Including support for up to 128 CSI-RS ports on FR1 and UE reporting enhancement for CJT
R1-2400105 On 128 CSI-RS ports and UE reporting enhancement Huawei, HiSilicon
Proposal 1: Support CSI-RS ports with
CSI-RS resources, with
P/K ports in each resource.
Proposal 2: Support Type-I/Type-II codebook refinement with 48/64/96/128 CSI-RS ports, and
· For 64 CSI-RS ports, 2 32-port CSI-RS resources are configured;
· For 128 CSI-RS ports, 4 32-port CSI-RS resources are configured;
· For 48 CSI-RS ports, 2 24-port CSI-RS resources are configured;
· For 96 CSI-RS ports, 3 32-port CSI-RS resources are configured.
Proposal 3: For Type-I/Type-II codebook refinement, CSI-RS ports from 3000 to 3000+X-1 are mapped to multiple CSI-RS resources, where X is the supported number of CSI-RS ports larger than 32.
Proposal 4: Support the
combinations of and
in Table 2 for larger
than 32 ports.
Proposal 5: Enhance both Rel-16 eType-II and Rel-17 FeType-II codebooks to support up to 128 CSI-RS ports for CSI enhancement.
Proposal 6: Support combinations of and
in Table 2 for Rel-16 eType-II codebook.
Proposal 7: Complexity reduction for high rank should be supported, especially for 64/128 antenna ports.
Proposal 8: The limitation on the number of CSI-RS ports per resource in current spec. should be relaxed to support following configurations:
·
For
CSI-RS resources, up to 32 CSI-RS
ports per resource;
·
For
CSI-RS resources, up to 16 CSI-RS
ports per resource;
·
For
CSI-RS resources, up to 8 CSI-RS
ports per resource.
Proposal 9: For multi-beam CSI measurement, transmitting less CSI-RS resources than the total number of analog beams can be considered to reduce the CSI-RS overhead.
Proposal 10: For multi-beam CSI reporting, support to report the CRIs and associated RIs/PMIs/CQIs for up to 6 beams.
Proposal 11: For multi-beam CSI reporting, support both Type I and Type II codebook.
Proposal 12: Multi-beam joint CSI reporting should be supported to reduce the reporting overhead.
Proposal 13: Support the reporting of frequency /delay offset between TRPs.
Proposal 14: Support reporting of the phase offsets of the DL measured channels between TRPs for joint DL/UL reciprocity calibration.
Proposal 15: Support to reuse TRS for frequency and delay offset measurement.
Proposal 16: Support to configure multiple resource sets where each set corresponds to one TRP.
Proposal 17: Support a reference resource/time for reporting of frequency/time offsets.
Proposal 18: Adopt Table 9 in Appendix C as working assumption for LLS evaluation.
Decision: The document is noted.
R1-2400939 CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5 Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell
·
Proposal 1: Regarding CSI extension for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, support the
following combinations of : (8,4), (16,2), (8,8) and (16,4) with oversampling
.
·
Proposal 2: Regarding the CSI Resource Setting linked to a CSI report for up to
128 CSI-RS ports, for both Type-I and Type-II extensions, support a single
CSI-RS resource set with up to 32-port resources.
·
Proposal 3: Regarding the CSI-RS resource aggregation for a CSI report for up to
128 CSI-RS ports, for both Type-I and Type-II extensions, support a simple
mapping of the ports across the resources to the
PMI ports following the order in which the resources are configured
in the resource set.
· Proposal 4: Regarding the CSI-RS resource set configured to support up to 128 ports, consider the same timing restrictions adopted for NCJT and CJT resource setting, i.e., the resources are configured in the same slot or two adjacent slots.
· Proposal 5: For Type-I codebook extension for up to 128 ports, consider extending the set of orthogonal beams for the selection of the second beam.
·
Proposal 6: For Type-I codebook extension for up to 128 ports, with Mode 1,
consider a simple codebook extension as a starting point, obtained by
increasing the values of .
·
Proposal 7: For Type-I codebook extension for up to 128 ports, with Mode 1,
consider extending the candidate beams for the second beam by reusing the
existing beam selection indicators to identify the first beam and
to identify an
cluster for the second beam, and introducing a new indicator to
locate the second beam within this cluster.
·
Proposal 8: For Type-I codebook extension for up to 128 ports, with Mode 1,
consider extending the candidate beams for the second beam by using an extended
Type-II-style beam selection mechanism, where the legacy indicators and
of Type-II are reused to identify the first beam and an
cluster for the second beam and a new indicator is introduced to
identify the second beam within this cluster.
·
Proposal 9: For Type-I codebook extension for up to 128 ports, with Mode 2,
consider a simple codebook extension as a starting point, obtained by
increasing the values of .
·
Proposal 10: For Type-I codebook extension for up to 128 ports, with Mode 2,
consider extending the candidate beam groups for the second beam group by
reusing the existing beam group selection indicators to identify the first beam group and
to identify an
cluster of the second beam group, and introducing a new indicator
to locate the second beam group within this cluster.
·
Proposal 11: For Type-I codebook extension for up to 128 ports, with Mode 2,
consider extending the candidate beam groups for the second beam group by using
an extended Type-II-style beam selection mechanism, where the legacy Type-II
indicators and
are reused to identify the first beam group and an
cluster for the second beam group and introducing a new indicator
to identify the second beam group within this cluster.
·
Proposal 12: Regarding Type-I and Type-II extensions for up to 128 ports, for the
EVM assumptions, consider the following transmit array and port layouts. For 64
ports: and
. For 128 ports:
and
.
·
Proposal 13: For Rel-16 Type-II codebook refinement supporting up to 128 ports,
support spatial domain codebook extension for , and the selection of
beams of length
. For the remaining codebook description, reuse Rel-16 Type-II
codebook.
·
Proposal 14: For Rel-16 Type-II codebook refinement supporting up to 128 ports,
evaluate the trade-off between performance and feedback overhead for the
existing parameter combinations and determine if any additional parameter value restrictions are
needed.
· Proposal 15: No extension of Rel-17 Type-II PS is needed because 32 pairs of angles and delays per UE are sufficient to capture the spatial and frequency characteristics of a DL channel for a single TRP.
· Proposal 16: For the extension of CRI-based CSI reporting for up to 128 ports, consider extending the existing CRI-based reporting for Type-I codebook only.
· Proposal 17: For the extension of CRI-based CSI reporting for up to 128 ports, regarding the reporting format, reuse the solution adopted for Rel-17 NCJT with one or more CSI(s), each corresponding to a CRI, reported in the same report.
· Proposal 18: For the evaluation methodology of inter-TRP frequency offset measurement and reporting, model the frequency errors for the TRPs as i.i.d. random variables, uniformly distributed within the frequency range determined by the minimum frequency error requirements of Table 6.5.1.2-1 of TS 38.104.
· Proposal 19: For inter-TRP frequency offset measurement and reporting, support measurement configuration from a single TRS set per TRP.
· Proposal 20: For the evaluation methodology for inter-TRP frequency offset measurement and reporting, maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of frequency offsets for each TRP can be assumed, obtained from measurements of two or four TRS resources of the same TRS set, depending on TRS configuration.
· Proposal 21: For the evaluation methodology of inter-TRP timing offset measurement and reporting, model the relative time alignment error (TAE) between TRPs in an inter-site scenario as i.i.d. random variables, uniformly distributed between 0 and one CP length.
Decision: The document is noted.
R1-2400050 Discussion on CSI enhancements Spreadtrum Communications
R1-2400162 On Extension of CSI Ports InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2400195 Discussion on CSI enhancements Lenovo
R1-2400205 Discussion on CSI enhancement for 128 CSI-RS ports Transsion Holdings
R1-2400238 Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements vivo
R1-2400279 Discussion on CSI enhancements ZTE
R1-2400322 Discussion on CSI enhancements CMCC
R1-2400382 CSI enhancements for MIMO Intel Corporation
R1-2400397 CSI Enhancement for NR MIMO Google
R1-2400429 Discussion on CSI enhancements in Rel-19 CATT
R1-2400471 Discussion on CSI enhancements NEC
R1-2400508 CSI enhancements to support up to 128 CSI-RS ports MediaTek Inc.
R1-2400512 CSI enhancements TCL
R1-2400522 Discussion on CSI enhancements Honor
R1-2400554 Discussion on CSI enhancement for larger scale transmit antenna ports and CJT xiaomi
R1-2400624 CSI enhancements for Rel-19 MIMO OPPO
R1-2400658 Discussion on CSI enhancement for R19 MIMO evolution China Telecom
R1-2400728 Views on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Samsung
R1-2400753 CSI enhancements for large antenna arrays and CJT Ericsson
R1-2400772 Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Fujitsu
R1-2400849 Views on CSI enhancements Sony
R1-2400918 Discussions on CSI enhancements LG Electronics
R1-2400957 UE Reporting Enhancement for CJT Panasonic
R1-2401008 Views on R19 MIMO CSI enhancement Apple
R1-2401045 CSI enhancements Sharp
R1-2401113 Discussion on CSI enhancements NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2401244 CSI enhancements for Rel.19 MIMO Fraunhofer IIS, Fraunhofer HHI
R1-2401254 Discussion on CSI enhancements KDDI Corporation
R1-2401272 Discussion on Type-II codebook refinement for 128 port CSI-RS CEWiT
R1-2401357 Views on CSI Enhancements for MIMO Phase 5 AT&T
R1-2401437 CSI enhancements for up to 128 ports and UE-assisted CJT with non-ideal TRP synchronization Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2401480 Overview of CSI Enhancements for NR MIMO Evolution Kyocera (rev of R1-2400817)
R1-2401574 Moderator Summary for Monday offline session on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2400727 Moderator summary on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
From Tuesday session
Agreement
For the Rel-19 NR Type-I/II codebook refinement and CRI-based CSI for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, reuse the EVM agreed for Rel-18 NR Type-II Doppler codebooks (cf. R1-2205289) for SLS with the following refinement:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 NR CJT calibration reporting, reuse the EVM agreed for Rel-18 NR Type-II CJT codebooks (cf. R1-2205289) for SLS with the following refinement:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 NR CJT calibration reporting, use the following EVM for LLS with the following refinement:
· Purpose: alternative to SLS to observe the impact of misalignment and gain by proposed solutions, as the frequency offset/time misalignment have impacts in granularities of subcarrier/symbol levels
Parameter |
Value |
Duplex, Waveform |
TDD, OFDM |
Carrier Frequency |
3.5 GHz |
Channel Model |
CDL-C channel model in TR 38.901 |
Delay Spread |
300ns |
BS antenna configuration |
(M, N, P, Mg, Ng; Mp, Np) = (2, 8, 2, 1, 1; 2, 8), (dH, dV) = (0.5, 0.8) |
TRP number |
2 |
UE antenna configuration |
(M, N, P, Mg, Ng; Mp, Np) = (1, 2, 2, 1, 1; 1, 2), (dH, dV) = (0.5, 0.5) |
UE number |
1, 4 |
MCS |
Link Adaption |
Bandwidth |
20RB, 145RB |
Numerology |
14 OFDM symbol per slot, 30kHz SCS |
MIMO Rank |
rank = 2 per UE |
UE speed |
3km/h |
Precoding granularity |
2RB, 4RB, 8RB, 16RB, 32RB |
SRS periodicity |
10ms |
DMRS |
Type 2 DMRS, double-symbol, or Type 1 DMRS |
DL DMRS channel estimation |
LMMSE channel estimation |
Frequency offset |
Uniformly distributed delay difference between [0, x], companies should state the assumed value of x, e.g., 0.05ppm, 0.1ppm. |
Delay difference |
a uniformly distributed delay difference between [0, y], companies should state the assumed value of y, e.g., CP length, 1.67us, 65ns. |
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding NZP CSI-RS resource aggregation to attain 32 < P (or PCSI-RS) ≤ 128, support aggregating at least K=2, 3, or 4 legacy NZP CSI-RS resources with equal number of ports
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, in accordance to the WID, the following enhancement areas are supported:
· Adding new (N1, N2) values for the Rel-16 eType-II regular and Rel-18 Type-II Doppler regular codebooks where 2N1N2 (>32) is the total number of CSI-RS ports across aggregated NZP CSI-RS resources, and O1=O2=4
o FFS: How to configure the aggregated NZP CSI-RS resources when AP-CSI-RS resources are configured as CMR for Rel-18 Type-II Doppler codebooks
· Adding new PCSI-RS values for Rel-17 FeType-II Port Selection (PS) codebook where PCSI-RS (>32) is the total number of CSI-RS ports across aggregated NZP CSI-RS resources
There will be separate UE feature groups for each of the enhanced codebooks.
Note: Per WID objective 2b,
Agreement (modified on Thursday as shown)
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, the following use cases are assumed:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, support the following:
·
The
UE is configured with NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets via
higher-layer (RRC) signalling where NTRP{1, 2, 3, 4}
o FFS (by RAN1#116bis): Whether further restriction(s) on applicable NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets need to be introduced (e.g. number of ports, only TRS with multiple resource sets, TD/FD locations, QCL assumptions)
· For the purpose of CJT calibration reporting, decide, by RAN1#116bis, from the following
o Opt1: The UE reports for all the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets
o Opt2: The UE reports for N out of NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets where the selection of N resources/resource sets is dynamically signalled by the NW to the UE
o Opt3: The UE reports for N out of NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets where the selection of N resources/resource sets is performed by the UE and included in the CSI report
· Interference measurement is not supported, hence neither CSI-IM nor NZP CSI-RS resource for interference measurement can be configured (analogous to Rel-18 TDCP)
· FFS: One-part or two-part UCI on PUSCH (analogous to Rel-18 TDCP)
· The priority of the CSI report(s) is the same as CSI report(s) not carrying L1-RSRP or L1-SINR (analogous to Rel-18 TDCP)
R1-2401649 Moderator Summary for Tuesday offline session on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2401650 Moderator Summary#2 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: ROUND 2 Moderator (Samsung)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, given the NTRP configured NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets and the selected N resources/resource sets, support reporting, in one CSI reporting instance, {(Dn,offset, dn), n=0, 1, …, N – 1} where
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, in addition to the already agreed use cases, the following use cases are assumed:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I codebook refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, at least for RI=1-4, study and decide, by RAN1#116bis, from the following:
· Scheme1 (baseline): Adding new (N1, N2) values for the Rel-15 Type-I single-panel codebook where 2N1N2 (>32) is the total number of CSI-RS ports across aggregated NZP CSI-RS resources
o FFS: Whether to further down-select between mode-1 (L=1) and mode-2 (L=4)
o FFS: For rank-3/4, follow legacy mechanisms for <16 ports, or for >=16 ports
· Scheme2: Adding new (N1, N2) values where 2N1N2 (>32) is the total number of CSI-RS ports across aggregated NZP CSI-RS resources, and
o W1 structure:
§ For each layer, reuse legacy Rel-16 eType-II SD basis with L=1 to determine the DFT-based SD basis candidates
· FFS: Whether the indication of selected SD basis indices follows Rel-16 eType II or Rel-15 Type I
§ For 4≥RI>1, L=1 SD basis vector is independently selected for different layers
· FFS: SD basis selection restriction to reduce SD overhead for RI>4
o W2 structure: Layer-specific inter-polarization M-PSK co-phasing where M is further down-selected from {2, 4, 8, 16}
o FFS: Common SD vector selection for a pair of layers (reduced total number of bits for SD basis vector selection); layer multiplexing via orthogonal polarization co-phasing for the layer pairs with common SD vector (reduced number of bits for co-phasing indication for the layer pairs with common SD vector).
o FFS: Additional support for L>1
· Scheme2B: Adding new (N1, N2) values where 2N1N2 (>32) is the total number of CSI-RS ports across aggregated NZP CSI-RS resources, and
o W1 structure:
§ For each layer, determine L=1 DFT-based SD basis candidate
· FFS: Whether the indication of selected SD basis indices follows Rel-16 eType-II or Rel-15 Type-I
§
§ For 4≥RI>1, L=1 SD basis vector is independently selected for different layers
§ FFS: Common SD vector selection for a pair of layers (reduced total number of bits for SD basis vector selection), SD basis selection restriction to reduce SD overhead for RI>4
o W2 structure:
§ Option 1: Layer-specific inter-polarization amplitude and phase scaling (single scaling coefficient per polarization)
· FFS: WB/SB amplitude and phase reporting.
§ Option 2: Layer-specific intra-polarization (two scaling coefficients per polarization) amplitude and phase scaling.
· FFS: WB/SB amplitude and phase reporting.
§ FFS: Rel-15 3-bit WB amplitude and M-PSK co-phasing and M is further down-selected from {2, 4, 8, 16}.
· Scheme3: Adding new (N1, N2) values where 2N1N2 (>32) is the total number of CSI-RS ports across aggregated NZP CSI-RS resources, and
o W1 structure:
§ Reuse legacy Rel-16 eType-II SD basis with L>1 to determine the DFT-based SD basis candidates, and indication of SD basis indices follows Rel-16 eType-II
§ For 4≥RI>1, L>1 SD basis vectors are commonly selected across layers
· FFS: SD basis selection restriction to reduce SD overhead for RI>4
o W2 structure:
§ Option 1: Layer-specific sub-band SD basis selection (1 out of L) and inter-polarization M-PSK co-phasing where M is further down-selected from {2, 4, 8, 16}
§ Option 2: Layer-specific wideband SD basis linear combination and inter-polarization scaling coefficient (e.g., amplitude scaling + M-PSK co-phasing) where M is further down-selected from {2, 4, 8, 16}
· Scheme4: Using legacy Rel-15 Type-I codebook including legacy (N1, N2) values per NZP CSI-RS resource (or port group) where the PMI (associated with W1 and W2) is calculated according to
o W1 structure: Reuse legacy Rel-15 Type-I SD basis with L=1 or L=4 for either each or some of the NZP CSI-RS resources (or port groups)
o W2 structure: inter-NZP CSI-RS resource (or port group) co-phasing along with reusing legacy Rel-15 Type-I inter-polarization co-phasing per NZP CSI-RS resource (or port group)
§ inter-CSI-RS resource (or port group) co-phasing is used to combine the different PMIs to come up with a single precoder with >32 ports
· Scheme5: Adding new (N1, N2) values where 2N1N2 (>32) is the total number of CSI-RS ports across aggregated NZP CSI-RS resources, and extending the set of orthogonal beams for the selection of the second beam based on the Rel-15 Type-I single-panel codebook
o (i1,1, i1,2) is used to refer to the 1st beam as in legacy Rel-15 Type-I
o The 2nd beam
is selected from the extended set of orthogonal beams of size:
o FFS: whether to apply any restrictions to the extended orthogonal set of beams
· Scheme6: Adding new (N1, N2) values where 2N1N2 (>32) is the total number of CSI-RS ports across aggregated NZP CSI-RS resources, and
o Beam(s) is(are) selected for each antenna group or NZP CSI-RS resource.
o Inter-group (or CSI-RS resource) co-phasing along with inter-polarization co-phasing per group (or CSI-RS resource) are used to combine different beam(s), FFS using scalar quantization or vector quantization for the co-phasings
FFS (by RAN1#116bis): Down-select (O1, O2) value between (2,2) and (4,4), whether (O1, O2) and/or (q1, q2) is layer-common or layer-specific
FFS (by RAN1#116bis): Whether extension of Rel-15 Type-I MP codebook for Rel-19 Type-I is also supported
FFS (by RAN1#116bis): Whether to introduce larger L values (e.g. 6, 8, 10)
FFS: Whether to refine CBSR design to reduce RRC overhead
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports,
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I codebook refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, support also RI=5-8, with lower priority than RI=1-4:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, at least support the legacy time-domain behaviours for CSI reporting (and the applicable CSI-RS time-domain behaviors). That is,
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, in accordance to the WID, extend the Rel-15 CRI-based CSI reporting as follows:
FFS: detailed UCI design/optimization (e.g. overhead reduction)
FFS: Whether solution to allow CSI reporting for larger number of CSI-RS resources across multiple CSI reports is supported
FFS: whether further restriction(s) on CMR configuration is needed, including relation with IMR
FFS: the packing order of the information of M “quadruplets”, CSI omission rule
FFS: Whether all the K CSI-RS resources are associated with a same CSI-RS resource set or not
FFS: Whether KS, maximum # ports per resource, and X depend on codebook type
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, the supported combinations of KS value and the maximum number of ports per NZP CSI-RS resource are as follows:
KS |
Maximum # ports per resource |
2, 3, 4 |
32 |
5, 6, 7, 8 |
16 |
Conclusion
The Rel-17 NCJT CSI is not extended to accommodate the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports.
Agreement (further modified on Thursday as shown in red)
For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement based on Rel-16 eType-II and Rel-18 Type-II Doppler for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, as well as Rel-19 Type-I codebook refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, support the following (N1, N2) values:
Total # CSI-RS ports across aggregated resources (=P) |
(N1, N2) |
48 |
(8,3) |
(6,4) |
|
64 |
(16,2) |
(8,4) |
|
128 |
(16,4) |
(8,8) |
The support of total # CSI-RS ports across aggregated resources (=P) and (N1, N2) is subject to UE capability.
R1-2401723 Moderator Summary for Thursday offline session on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2401724 Moderator Summary#3 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: ROUND 3 Moderator (Samsung)
From Thursday session
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, in addition to the already agreed use cases, the following use cases are assumed for study:
Whether there is any spec support associated with this use case is FFS
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, given the NTRP configured NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets and the selected N resources/resource sets, support reporting, in one CSI reporting instance, {FOn , n=0, 1, …, N – 1, n≠nref}, where FOn denotes the measured frequency offset associated with the n-th CSI-RS resource/resource set relative to the reference CSI-RS resource/resource set nref
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, given the NTRP configured NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets and the selected N resources/resource sets, study and decide, by RAN1#116bis, whether to support reporting, in one CSI reporting instance, {n,m n=0, 1, …, N – 1, n≠nref, m=0,1,…,M-1}, where n,m denotes the measured phase offset between the n-th CSI-RS resource/resource set and the reference CSI-RS resource/resource set/ nref for the m-th frequency unit
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding the supported codebook(s) for calculating CQI/PMI/RI on each of the M CRI(s), decide, in RAN1#116bis, between the two alternatives:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-II refinement based on Rel-17 FeType-II PS, support the following PCSI-RS value(s) {48, 64}.
· For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement based on Rel-17 FeType-II PS, PCSI-RS =64 is supported as a part of the respective basic feature, while PCSI-RS =48 is supported as a separate UE capability.
R1-2400625 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions OPPO
· Proposal 1: Following non-coherent codebooks involving different transmission layers can be used for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmission.
Transmission layers |
Precoding matrix |
||
Single layer |
|
|
|
Two layers |
|
|
|
Three layers |
|
· Proposal 2: TPMI field could be 2 or 3bits for 3-antenna-port transmission
o For maxRank equals to 1, TPMI field could be 2 bits for DFT-s-OFDM and CP-OFDM.
o For maxRank equals to 2 or 3, TPMI field could be 3 bits for CP-OFDM.
· Proposal 3: Following two alternatives are considered to achieve 3-port SRS resource
o Alt 1: Adapt a 4-port SRS resource to function as a 3-port SRS resource.
§ A predefined rule is required to utilize three of the four SRS ports.
o Alt 2: Combine 1-port and/or 2-port SRS resources to achieve a 3-port SRS resource.
§ Further study is required on the configuration of the SRS resource set and SRI enhancement.
Decision: The document is noted.
R1-2400163 On Support of CB-based UL for 3TX UE InterDigital, Inc.
· Proposal 1: 3TX sounding procedure is based on the 4-port SRS resources with the mapping of 3TX to the 4 ports.
·
Proposal 2: An SRS resource set for 3TX is
configured with 4-port
SRS resources, where
.
· Proposal 3: Study the UE behaviour for power control with 3TX.
· Proposal 4: The baseline precoders for 3TX ‘nonCoherent’ are:
o Single layer:
o Two layers:
o Three layers: .
· Proposal 5: Rel-19 specifies new codebooks for 3TX which include TPMIs for 1-, 2-, and 3-layer transmission configured with the ‘nonCoherent’ codebook subset.
Decision: The document is noted.
R1-2400051 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Spreadtrum Communications
R1-2400106 On codebook for 3-antenna-port UL transmission Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2400196 Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Lenovo
R1-2400206 Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Transsion Holdings
R1-2400239 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based uplink transmissions vivo
R1-2400280 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions ZTE
R1-2400323 Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions CMCC
R1-2400383 Support for 3Tx UL MIMO Intel Corporation
R1-2400398 Uplink 3 Port Codebook based Transmission Google
R1-2400430 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions CATT
R1-2400472 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions NEC
R1-2400509 Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions MediaTek Inc.
R1-2400513 Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions TCL
R1-2400523 Discussion on 3-port codebook-based transmissions Honor
R1-2400555 Discussion on the support of 3-antenna-port CB based transmissions xiaomi
R1-2400729 Views on Rel-19 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Samsung
R1-2400773 Discussion on uplink enhancement for UE with 3Tx Fujitsu
R1-2400850 Considerations on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Sony
R1-2400919 Discussions on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions LG Electronics
R1-2400940 On the support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell
R1-2401009 Views on R19 3Tx codebook based transmission Apple
R1-2401046 Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmission Sharp
R1-2401077 Support for 3 Tx UL transmissions Ericsson
R1-2401114 Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2401438 3 Tx UL MIMO transmissions Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2401578 FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; First Round Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
From Tuesday session
Agreement
For non-coherent uplink precoding by a 3TX UE, at least following precoders are supported for single-layer transmission.
Agreement
For non-coherent uplink precoding by a 3TX UE, at least following precoders are supported for two-layer transmission.
,
,
Agreement
For non-coherent uplink precoding by a 3TX UE, at least following precoders are supported for three-layer transmission.
Agreement
For SRS configuration supporting codebook-based UL transmission by a 3TX UE, down-select one of
· Alt1 – Support configuration of X 4-port SRS resources in a resource set where one the ports is muted
· Alt2 – Support configuration of X SRS resources with equal/unequal number of ports (e.g. 2 + 1 or 1 + 1 + 1) in a resource set,
The value for X is FFS, and it will be determined according to the selected alternative.
Agreement
For a 3TX UE, down-select one of the following options for the number of PTRS ports,
· Option-1: A single PTRS port is supported.
· Option-2: Up to 2 PTRS port may be configured.
Agreement
For a 3-antenna-port codebook-based UL transmission, study PTRS-DMRS association.
Agreement
For a 3-antenna-port codebook-based UL transmission, study power split for each port of SRS and PUSCH.
Agreement
For codebook-based uplink transmission by a 3TX UE, support full-power Mode 0, subject to UE capability.
Conclusion
There is no consensus in RAN1 to support antenna switching for 3TX UE in Rel-19
Agreement
For performance evaluation of 3TX UE, adopt the following Table as the reference EVM for LLS evaluation
· Companies may provide additional evaluation results per their case of interest
· LLS is optionally used for 3Tx UL evaluation, if needed
Parameter |
Value |
Carrier Frequency |
3.5 GHz |
Waveform |
CP-OFDM |
SCS |
30 KHz |
System bandwidth |
20 MHz, 100 MHz |
Scheduled PRBs |
5, 25, 50, 260 PRBs |
gNB RX antenna setup and port layouts (𝑀,𝑁,𝑃,𝑀𝑔,𝑁𝑔,𝑀𝑝,𝑁𝑝) |
(8,8,2,1,1,4,8) with (𝑑H, 𝑑V) = (0.5, 0.8)𝜆 (4,4,2,1,1,4,4) with (𝑑H, 𝑑V) = (0.5, 0.8)𝜆 (2,2,2,1,1,2,2) with (dH , dV ) = (0.5, 0.5)λ |
UE speed |
3 Km/h |
Number of Layers |
Adaptive, Fixed (reported by company) |
AMC |
Adaptive, Fixed (reported by company) |
DMRS configuration |
Type 1; 1 front loaded + 1 additional symbol |
Channel estimation |
Real |
Channel Model |
CDL-A (30ns), CDL-B (100ns), CDL-C (300ns) |
R1-2401579 FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; Second Round Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
For performance evaluation of 3TX UE, adopt the following Table as the reference EVM for SLS evaluation.
· Companies may provide additional evaluation results per their case of interest.
Note: The considered EVM is to be used as a baseline set of assumption for future potential studies related to 3TX.
Parameter |
Value |
Frequency range |
3.5 GHz |
Multiple access |
OFDMA |
Numerology |
14 CP-OFDM symbol slot SCS , 30 KHz |
Scenario |
eMBB: Dense Urban (200m), 3.5GHz
Outdoor FWA: UMa (500m), 3.5GHz |
UE Outdoor/Indoor (%) |
eMBB: 80%, 20%
Outdoor FWA: 100%, 0% |
System bandwidth |
20 MHz, 100 MHz |
gNB RX antenna setup and port layouts (𝑀,𝑁,𝑃,𝑀𝑔,𝑁𝑔,𝑀𝑝,𝑁𝑝) |
(8,8,2,1,1,4,8) with (𝑑H, 𝑑V) = (0.5, 0.8)𝜆 (4,4,2,1,1,4,4) with (𝑑H, 𝑑V) = (0.5, 0.8)𝜆
Optional: Classical: two 8x1 xpols, 4λ apart; 4 TXRUs tilt=[104°] |
gNB antenna radiation pattern parameters |
- Outdoor/Indoor Per 38.901, Table 7.3-1 |
gNB receiver noise figure |
5dB |
gNB receiver |
MMSE-IRC |
gNB scheduler |
Single user with proportional fair |
Modulation |
- Up to 64 QAM - Up to 256QAM |
MIMO scheme |
SU-MIMO with rank adaptation |
UE speed |
3 Km/h |
UE antenna config
|
eMBB: - Xpol+1pol; isotropic ULA - Xpol+1pol; 110°, 4 dBi
Outdoor FWA: - Xpol+1pol; isotropic ULA - 3 directional 1pol: 110°, 4 dBi |
Traffic model |
- FTP model 1: Packet size 500KB, RU= 50% and suggested low/high RU of values of 20% and 70% - Full buffer (optional) |
Suggested benchmarking |
Rel-15 2Tx non-coherent |
Precoder granularity |
Wideband |
Power control |
Open loop, - alpha = 0.8 - P0 = -50, -80 dBm to be selected according to the deployment scenario |
UE power rating |
eMBB: 23 dBm, UL FPTx mode 0 or Rel-15 power scaling
Outdooe FWA: 31 dBm, UL FPTx mode 0 |
Metric |
UL mean-user throughput, 5%-ile and 95%-ile UPT |
Agreement
For performance evaluation of 3TX UE, consider following reference configurations,
Agreement
For SRS configuration supporting codebook-based UL transmission by a 3TX UE, one SRS resource set is configured for single TRP operation.
R1-2401798 FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; Third Round Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
From Thursday session
Agreement
For codebook-based transmission by a 3TX UE,
Above is only for single panel transmission.
R1-2401580 Recommended Direction on 3TX CB-based Uplink in RAN1#116bis Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
R1-2400281 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios ZTE, China Telecom
Proposal 1: Support to configure a second separate closed loop for SRS in SRS resource set, i.e., the higher layer parameter srs-PowerControlAdjustmentStates in SRS-ResourceSet.
Proposal 2: Support to introduce a closed loop indicator field with 1-bit size in DCI format 2_3 to indicate TPC command for SRS power adjustment if configured with two separate closed loops, regardless of whether the higher layer parameter SRS-CarrierSwitching is configured or not.
Proposal 3: Support to configure pathloss offset for PL-RS in UL TCI state.
Proposal 4: Support to further justify whether/how to apply dedicated pathloss offset values for different UL channels/signals.
Proposal 5: Support to further discuss whether/how to dynamically indicate/update pathloss offset values for UL transmission towards to UL TRP(s).
Proposal 6: For asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios, at least separate DL/UL TCI indication framework should be supported for both cases of ‘Rel-17 unified TCI for sTRP/ICBM’ and ‘Rel-18 unified TCI for sDCI based mTRP’.
· To clarify TCI indication for the above cases, e.g.,
o When Rel-17 unified TCI applied for sTRP/ICBM: one DL TCI state + one UL TCI state
§ Note: Rel-17 mechanism(s) to update spatial relation of the SRS not sharing the indicated Rel-17 TCI state can be used to update UL TCI state of SRS for DL CSI acquisition.
o When Rel-18 unified TCI applied for sDCI based mTRP: one DL TCI state + up to two UL TCI states
Decision: The document is noted.
R1-2401115 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios NTT DOCOMO, INC.
Proposal 1: For asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios, at least the following Rel-17/18 unified TCI framework should be supported.
· For intra-cell TCI state indication:
o Rel-17 unified TCI for single TRP or Rel-18 unified TCI for single DCI based multi-TRP/panel.
· For inter-cell (intra-DU) TCI state indication:
o Rel-17 unified TCI for single TRP.
· Note: Rel-18 unified TCI for multi-DCI based multi-TRP/panel is not suitable, because gNB needs to send PDCCH corresponding to each coresetPoolIndex, which is not aligned with the scenario of “DL sTRP” in the WID.
Proposal 2: Support configuration of “one or two SRS resource set(s) with same CL-PC adjustment state as PUSCH” and the other “one or two SRS resource set(s) with CL-PC adjustment state separate from PUSCH” in a BWP in a CC.
· Introduce 2nd CL-PC adjustment state separate from PUSCH (e.g. k={0,1}).
· Index of {1st, 2nd} CL-PC adjustment state separate from PUSCH is configured per SRS resource set.
Proposal 3: Support {1st, 2nd} CL-PC adjustment states separate from PUSCH as independent feature from SRS carrier switching.
· Note: This feature can be applied regardless of the configuration of PUSCH or SRS carrier switching.
· Introduce new RRC parameter to enable {1st, 2nd} CL-PC adjustment state separate from PUSCH per SRS resource set.
o Support both srs-TPC-PDCCH-Group = {typeA, typeB}.
Proposal 4: Whether to support joint configuration of the following features in a CC should be discussed.
· UE feature 1: Legacy one CL-PC adjustment state separate from PUSCH for SRS carrier switching.
· UE feature 2: New {1st, 2nd} CL-PC adjustment states separate from PUSCH.
Proposal 5: DCI format 2_3 is used to indicate TPC commands for CL-PC adjustment states separate from PUSCH.
· Alt.1: One group common DCI (e.g. DCI format 2_3) can indicate two TPC commands associated with both 1st and 2nd CL-PC adjustment states separate from PUSCH in a CC.
o Introduce 2nd TPC command (2-bit) for the 2nd CL-PC adjustment state separate from PUSCH.
· Alt.2: One group common DCI (e.g. DCI format 2_3) can indicate one TPC command associated with either 1st or 2nd CL-PC adjustment state separate from PUSCH in a CC.
o Alt.2-1: Introduce 1-bit to indicate which one of {1st, 2nd} CL-PC adjustment states separate from PUSCH is associated to the TPC command.
o Alt.2-2: Implicit indication of which one of {1st, 2nd} CL-PC adjustment states separate from PUSCH is associated to the TPC command (e.g. by SRS request field).
Proposal 6: MAC CE/DCI can indicate PL-offset value, depending on which UL/DL TRP UE transmits. The number of PL-offset values configured in a BWP/CC is at least larger than or equal to 4.
Proposal 7: PL-offset configuration should be applied to all UL CH/RS (i.e. SRS, PUSCH, PUCCH, PRACH) after RRC connection set up.
Proposal 8: For PUSCH/PUCCH/SRS, PL-offset is configured in a UL TCI state.
· If PL-offset is configured in a UL TCI state applied to PUSCH/PUCCH/SRS, and if the UL TCI state is applied to the UL transmission, UE calculates PL using the PL-offset value when UE transmits the PUSCH/PUCCH/SRS.
Proposal 9: For PRACH, a set of PL-offsets is configured in PRACH-Config.
· PDCCH can indicate one of PL-offset values for PDCCH order PRACH.
Proposal 10: Support two TA for single DCI based multi-TRP/panel or single TRP.
· Reuse Rel-18 spec. of two TA for multi-DCI based multi-TRP/panel and remove the restriction that coresetPoolIndex needs to be configured.
Decision: The document is noted.
R1-2400052 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Spreadtrum Communications
R1-2400107 On power control enhancements for DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2400164 On Asymmetric mTRP Deployment InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2400197 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Lenovo
R1-2400240 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios vivo
R1-2400267 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios TCL
R1-2400324 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios CMCC
R1-2400384 Enhancements for asymmetric DL/UL scenarios Intel Corporation
R1-2400431 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios CATT
R1-2400468 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios NEC
R1-2400510 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios MediaTek Inc.
R1-2400521 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP scenarios Ericsson
R1-2400556 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios xiaomi
R1-2400626 Enhancements on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios OPPO
R1-2400659 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios China Telecom
R1-2400730 Views on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Samsung
R1-2400774 Discussion on UL-only mTRP operation Fujitsu
R1-2400851 Considerations on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Sony
R1-2400920 Discussions on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios LG Electronics
R1-2400941 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell
R1-2400958 Enhancement for Asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Scenarios Panasonic
R1-2401010 Views on R19 enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Apple
R1-2401047 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Sharp
R1-2401050 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Hyundai Motor Company
R1-2401472 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP deployment scenarios NTPU (rev of R1-2401052)
R1-2401257 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios Google
R1-2401439 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment scenarios Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2401489 Summary #1 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
Presented in Tuesday session
R1-2401490 Summary #2 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
For the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP deployment scenarios, support to associate a UL TCI state with a PL offset:
Further study whether/how to apply a PL offset on PDCCH-order PRACH transmission too.
Agreement
To
facilitate the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP deployment scenarios, support configuring two
closed-loop PC adjustment states for SRS in one CC, both of which are separate
from that of the PUSCH.
Agreement
Study how to indicate TPC command for those two SRS CLPC adjustment states through DCI when the UE is configured two SRS CLPC adjustment states, down-select from the following options:
For the Options1, 2, 3 and 5, consider at least the following Alts as possible examples:
Agreement
To support two SRS CLPC adjustment states, study and possibly down-select at least one from the following Alts:
Note: Other alternatives are not precluded
R1-2401491 Summary #3 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
From Thursday session
Agreement
Down-select one from the following alternatives:
Agreement
For the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP deployment scenarios, separate DL/UL TCI state mode of Rel-17/18 unified TCI framework can be configured for both FR1 and FR2.
· Joint TCI state mode can be configured at least for FR1
Please refer to RP-240087 for detailed scope of the WI.
[116bis-R19-MIMO] – Eko (Samsung)
Email discussion on Rel-19 MIMO Phase 5
- To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc
R1-2402017 On UE initiated/event-driven beam management Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2402051 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management FUTUREWEI
R1-2402063 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ZTE
R1-2402079 Rel-19 UE/Event-Driven Beam Management InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2402098 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Spreadtrum Communications
R1-2402138 Enhancements for event driven beam management Intel Corporation
R1-2402155 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management MediaTek Inc.
R1-2402235 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management vivo
R1-2402321 Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management OPPO
R1-2402376 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CATT
R1-2402457 Views on Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Samsung
R1-2402496 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Lenovo
R1-2402529 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Langbo
R1-2402558 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CMCC
R1-2402632 UE-initiated beam management LG Electronics
R1-2402659 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Xiaomi
R1-2402684 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Transsion Holdings
R1-2402718 Discussion on UE initiated report ASUSTeK
R1-2402721 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Honor
R1-2402758 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management NEC
R1-2402791 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Fujitsu
R1-2402806 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ITRI
R1-2402838 Enhancements to facilitate UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Nokia
R1-2402874 Views on UE-initiated beam management Apple
R1-2402961 Discussion on UE initiated beam management Sony
R1-2402982 Enhancements for UE-initiated beam management Ericsson
R1-2403015 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ETRI
R1-2403055 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CEWiT
R1-2403068 Discussions on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Ruijie Networks Co. Ltd
R1-2403088 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management Google
R1-2403108 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Sharp
R1-2403113 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Panasonic
R1-2403187 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2403237 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2403354 Views on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management. KDDI Corporation
R1-2402711 Offline summary for Rel-19 MIMO UEIBM Moderator (ZTE)
R1-2402712 Moderator Summary #1 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
Presented in Monday session
R1-2402713 Moderator Summary #2 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Tuesday session
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, following modes are supported:
· Mode A (dynamically scheduling UCI by gNB):
o Step 1: UE transmits a first PUCCH (one-bit/multi-bit) to request a resource for a second UL channel to carry beam report
§ FFS: Request format, e.g., SR or a new UCI type.
o Step 2: UE detects the DCI format to indicate a resource for a second UL channel to carry beam report.
o Step 3: Beam report is transmitted in second UL channel.
§ FFS: Details on the second UL channel, e.g., whether the second UL channel is PUCCH, PUSCH or both
o This option is basic UE capability (i.e. all UE supporting UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting should support this feature).
o No new DCI format is introduced.
· Mode B (UCI in pre-configured resource(s) for second UL channel):
o Step 1: UE transmits a first PUCCH (one-bit/multi-bit) notifying a second UL channel to carry beam report
§ FFS: Notification format, e.g., SR or a new UCI type.
o Step 2: UE transmits the beam report in the second UL channel.
§ FFS: Details on the second UL channel, e.g., whether the second UL channel is PUCCH, PUSCH or both
o The notification in Step1 is in a separate reporting instance from the beam report in Step 2.
FFS: Whether UE receives acknowledge information with response to each step for all options
For above procedures, cross-CC beam reporting is supported for both options.
R1-2402714 Moderator Summary #3 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Wednesday session
Agreement (updated as shown in red in Thursday session)
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding trigger-event detection for beam reporting, at least support Event-2: Quality of at least one new beam, such as L1-RSRP, becomes a threshold value better than the current beam.
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, the threshold value is RRC configured.
R1-2403690 Summary #4 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Thursday session
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, ‘current beam’ is a beam corresponding to the indicated TCI state.
· Regarding RS measurement for the current beam for Event-2, Option-2a is supported:
o Option-2a (implicit manner): The RS for current beam is implicitly derived from a QCL RS of indicated TCI state.
§ FFS: The RS for current beam can be either the QCL RS in the indicated TCI state or the SSB which is QCLed with the QCL RS in the indicated TCI state.
o FFS: Option-2c (explicit manner): The RS for current beam is explicitly configured by RRC or MAC-CE.
§ Note: SSB or CSI-RS can be configured
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, further study the following trigger events:
· Event-1: Quality of the current beam is worse than a certain threshold.
· Event-3: Quality of a new beam is better than a certain threshold.
· Event-4: Quality of the current beam is worse than a threshold 1, and quality of at least one new beam is better than a threshold 2.
· Event-5: Absolute value of the difference between the quality of the current beam and the quality of at least one new beam is lower than a threshold.
· Event-6: When the current beam is not in the best K>1 beams (out of configured beams for measurement and reporting).
· Event-7a: Quality of at least one new beam, such as L1-RSRP, becomes a threshold value better than the RS derived from the activated TCI state with the worst quality.
· Event-7b: Quality of at least one new beam, such as L1-RSRP, becomes a threshold value better than the RS derived from the activated TCI state with the best quality.
· Event-8: Quality of M>1 new beams, such as L1-RSRP, become a threshold value better than the current beam.
· Event-9: Quality of at least one new beam, such as L1-RSRP, becomes a threshold value better than the configured reference RS (can be SSB or CSI-RS).
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding UL signaling content(s) of L1-RSRP report depending on Event-2, in a report instance, the following options are provided for down-selection (other options are not precluded) in RAN1#117
Including support for up to 128 CSI-RS ports on FR1 and UE reporting enhancement for CJT
R1-2402018 On 128 CSI-RS ports and UE reporting enhancement Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2402064 Discussion on CSI enhancements ZTE
R1-2402080 Rel-19 Enhancements of CSI InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2402099 Discussion on CSI enhancements Spreadtrum Communications
R1-2402127 CSI Enhancements for NR MIMO Evolution Kyocera Corporation
R1-2402139 CSI enhancements for MIMO Intel Corporation
R1-2402156 CSI enhancements to support up to 128 CSI-RS ports MediaTek Inc.
R1-2402180 Discussion on CSI enhancements TCL
R1-2402236 Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements vivo
R1-2402281 CSI Enhancement for NR MIMO Google
R1-2402322 CSI enhancements for Rel-19 MIMO OPPO
R1-2402377 Discussion on Rel-19 MIMO CSI enhancements CATT
R1-2402406 CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5 Tejas Network Limited
R1-2403485 Views on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Samsung (rev of R1-2403424; rev of R1-2402460)
R1-2402497 Discussion on CSI enhancements Lenovo
R1-2402538 Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements New H3C Technologies Co., Ltd.
R1-2402559 Discussion on CSI enhancements CMCC
R1-2402633 Discussions on CSI enhancements LG Electronics
R1-2402660 Discussion on CSI enhancement for up to 128 ports and CJT Xiaomi
R1-2402722 Discussion on CSI enhancements Honor
R1-2402767 Discussion on CSI enhancements NEC
R1-2402792 Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Fujitsu
R1-2403555 CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5 Nokia (rev of R1-2403452; rev of R1-2402839)
R1-2402875 Views on R19 MIMO CSI enhancement Apple
R1-2403476 CSI enhancements for large antenna arrays and CJT Ericsson (rev of R1-2402928)
R1-2402962 Further views on CSI enhancements Sony
R1-2403056 CSI Enhancements CEWiT
R1-2403109 CSI enhancements Sharp
R1-2403130 Discussion on UE reporting enhancement for CJT Panasonic
R1-2403145 Views on Rel-19 CSI enhancements AT&T
R1-2403425 CSI enhancements for >32 ports and UE-assisted CJT with non-ideal TRP synchronization Qualcomm Incorporated (rev of R1-2403188)
R1-2403238 Discussion on CSI enhancements NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2403327 CSI enhancements for Rel.19 MIMO Fraunhofer IIS, Fraunhofer HHI
R1-2403365 Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5 KDDI Corporation
R1-2402458 Moderator summary for OFFLINE discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2402459 Moderator summary on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
From Monday session
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, given the NTRP configured NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets and the selected N resources/resource sets, support reporting, in one CSI reporting instance, {Fn,s , n=0, 1, …, N – 1, n≠nref, s=0,1,…,S-1}, where Fn,s denotes the measured phase offset between the n-th CSI-RS resource/resource set and the reference CSI-RS resource/resource set nref for the s-th frequency unit
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, for a given CJT calibration report of one [or more] CJT calibration report type, the nref is selected by the UE and reported as a part of the CJT calibration report
· Note: CJT calibration report type refers to the Doffset/d report, FO report, and, TDD PO report
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting of {FOn , n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref}, the value of FOn indicates a uniformly quantized frequency offset between 0 and AFO.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone
CJT calibration reporting of {(Dn,offset, dn), n=0, 1, …,
NTRP – 1, n≠nref}, regarding the
interval which Dn,offset
falls into,
is uniformly spaced
between 0 and AD, i.e.
, with
and
represent
‘out-of-range’.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, the UE reports for all the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets.
· FFS (by RAN1#116bis): Whether an ‘invalid’ or ‘out-of-range’ quantization state/hypothesis is supported for all the types of CJT calibration reporting. Note that ‘out-of-range’ is supported for the (Dn,offset, dn) reporting.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I single-panel (SP) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, for RI=1-4, support the following:
· Scheme-B (based on Scheme2 in RAN1#116 agreement): Adding new (N1, N2) values where 2N1N2 (>32) is the total number of CSI-RS ports across aggregated NZP CSI-RS resources, and
o W1 structure:
§ For each layer, reuse legacy Rel-16 eType-II SD basis with L=1 to determine the DFT-based SD basis candidates
§ For 1<RI≤4, L=1 SD basis vector is independently selected for different layers
·
The
SD basis selection indication includes layer-common (q1,q2)
and bits for each layer
· Note: This implies that each of the SD basis vectors is selected from a group of N1N2 orthogonal basis vectors
o W2 structure: Layer-specific inter-polarization co-phasing with the alphabet {+1, +j, -1, -j}
FFS (RAN1#116bis): For Rel-19 Type-I SP, whether to support Mode-C based on Scheme5 in RAN1#116 agreement with L=1 for RI=2-4
FFS (RAN1#116bis): For Rel-19 Type-I SP, whether inter-polarization amplitude for Mode-B can also be supported
FFS: Discuss further if Rel-19 Type-I MP extension based on scheme 4 is needed
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I single-panel (SP) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, for RI=1-4, O1=O2 is 4
· FFS: Additional support for O1=O2 is 2 when RI=1-4 (including separate UE capability)
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding the mapping from CSI-RS resource index/port index per resource and port index to CSI/PMI calculation, support NW to configure UE with one of the following mapping methods via higher-layer (RRC) signaling,
· Mapping method 1: Sequential ordering/indexing within (1st resource, 1st polarization), then (2nd resource, 1st polarization), …, then (Kth resource, 1st polarization), then (1st resource, 2nd polarization), then (2nd resource, 2nd polarization), …, then (Kth resource, 2nd polarization)
· Mapping method 2: Sequential ordering/indexing within (where K*n2 = N2):
o for the 1st polarization, (1st n2 ports in 1st resource, 1st polarization), (1st n2 ports in 2nd resource, 1st polarization), …, (1st n2 ports in Kth resource, 1st polarization), then (2nd n2 ports in 1st resource, 1st polarization), (2nd n2 ports in 2nd resource, 1st polarization), …, (2nd n2 ports in Kth resource, 1st polarization), … then (N1th n2 ports in 1st resource, 1st polarization), (N1th n2 ports in 2nd resource, 1st polarization), …, (N1th n2 ports in Kth resource, 1st polarization) ,
o and then for the 2nd polarization, (1st n2 ports in 1st resource, 2nd polarization), (1st n2 ports in 2nd resource, 2nd polarization), …, (1st n2 ports in Kth resource, 2nd polarization), then (2nd n2 ports in 1st resource, 2nd polarization), (2nd n2 ports in 2nd resource, 2nd polarization), …, (2nd n2 ports in Kth resource, 2nd polarization), … then (N1th n2 ports in 1st resource, 2nd polarization), (N1th n2 ports in 2nd resource, 2nd polarization), …, (N1th n2 ports in Kth resource, 2nd polarization)
FFS: Exact port indexing within each CSI-RS resource or across K CSI-RS resources
FFS: Whether the following is also supported:
o for the 1st polarization, (1st n2 ports in 1st resource, 1st polarization), (1st n2 ports in 2nd resource, 1st polarization), then (2nd n2 ports in 1st resource, 1st polarization), (2nd n2 ports in 2nd resource, 1st polarization), …, then (n1th n2 ports in 1st resource, 1st polarization), (n1th n2 ports in 2nd resource, 1st polarization),
o for the 1st polarization, (1st n2 ports in 3rd resource, 1st polarization), (1st n2 ports in 4th resource, 1st polarization), then (2nd n2 ports in 3rd resource, 1st polarization), (2nd n2 ports in 4th resource, 1st polarization), then (n1th n2 ports in 3rd resource, 1st polarization), (n1th n2 ports in 4th resource, 1st polarization),
o and then for the 2nd polarization, (1st n2 ports in 1st resource, 2nd polarization), (1st n2 ports in 2nd resource, 2nd polarization), then (2nd n2 ports in 1st resource, 2nd polarization), (2nd n2 ports in 2nd resource, 2nd polarization), … then (n1th n2 ports in 1st resource, 2nd polarization), (n1th n2 ports in 2nd resource, 2nd polarization),
o and then for the 2nd polarization, (1st n2 ports in 3rd resource, 2nd polarization), (1st n2 ports in 4th resource, 2nd polarization), then (2nd n2 ports in 3rd resource, 2nd polarization), (2nd n2 ports in 4th resource, 2nd polarization), then (n1th n2 ports in 3rd resource, 2nd polarization), (n1th n2 ports in 4th resource, 2nd polarization),
· Other methods are not precluded
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding NZP CSI-RS resource aggregation to attain 32 < P (or PCSI-RS) ≤ 128, all K NZP CSI-RS resources shall be located within 1 slot or 2 consecutive slots (following legacy principle from Rel-18 Type-II CJT), and are associated with a same CSI-RS resource set:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, the legacy resource configuration for interference measurement is reused, i.e. only one NZP CSI-RS resource for interference measurement or only one CSI-IM resource can be configured where the one IM resource is associated with all the K CSI-RS resources in the CSI-RS resource set for channel measurement.
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook
refinement for 48,
64, and 128
CSI-RS ports, on SD basis selection indication, there is no consensus on
additional spec enhancement. Therefore, the same approach as legacy (using a
layer-common -bit indicator) is
reused.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, on CBSR, refine the legacy CBSR as follows:
FFS: Whether/how to enable shared CBSR in RRC configuration for Type-I/-II codebooks with a same (N1,N2).
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports based on Rel-18 Type-II Doppler codebook,
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, the (N1,N2) values for P=64 are supported as a part of the respective basic feature, while those for P=48 and P=128 are supported as two separate UE capabilities.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports,
FFS: The determination of M reported beams
Note: Selection algorithm of CRI(s) from measurement of KS>1 NZP-CSI-RS resources is up to UE implementation.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, support the following time-domain behaviours:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, the following report quantities are supported:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, on the configured KS>1 NZP CSI-RS resources, reuse the legacy CMR and IMR rules for the Rel-15 CRI-based reporting. This includes:
· All the KS NZP CSI-RS resources are associated with a same CSI-RS resource set
· KS CSI-IM resources can be configured (implying one-to-one correspondence between KS CMRs and KS CSI-IMs)
FFS: Whether all the KS NZP CSI-RS resources share a same Pcoffset and PcoffsetSS
FFS: Whether or not NZP CSI-RS resource for interference measurement can be configured. FFS further details.
R1-2403524 Moderator Summary for Tuesday OFFLINE session on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2403523 Moderator Summary#2 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: ROUND 2 Moderator (Samsung)
From Tuesday session
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, assuming the Rel-17/18 unified TCI framework, regarding TCI/QCL, the following is assumed:
· Based on the legacy support of up to 2 TCI states for PDSCH-CJT.
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the applicable type(s) of the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd’ (Doffset+d) or ‘cjtc-F’ (frequency offset), periodic TRS (‘CSI-RS for tracking’) resource set is used for each of the NTRP NZP CSI-RS resource sets
· Extend the maximum allowed number of TRS resource sets to 4 (note: legacy supports max. 3 from Rel-18 TDCP)
· FFS: Whether all the resources across the NTRP TRS resource sets are configured with the same bandwidth
· FFS: Whether aperiodic TRS resource set can also be used
· FFS: Whether CSI-RS for CSI can also be used
· FFS: Whether different RE locations (FDM) are supported for the RSs
· FFS: additional time separation between RSs
· FFS: The exact number of CSI-RS resource(s) within each TRS resource set
· FFS: applicable type(s) if joint reporting of both Doffset/d and FO is supported
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the applicable type(s) of the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), single-port CSI-RS(s) for CSI is used.
· FFS: Whether multi-port CSI-RS for CSI can also be used
· FFS: Whether all the ‘CSI-RS for CSI’ resources within each resource set follow the legacy pre-Rel-19 rules of CSI-RS resources associated with a same resource set, and whether only 1 or NTRP >1 resource sets are used
· FFS: The exact number of CSI-RS resource(s) within each resource set
· FFS: Whether different RE locations (FDM) are supported for the RSs
· FFS: additional restrictions e.g. time separation between RSs, bandwidth
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding phase offset reporting, the value Fn,s indicates a uniformly quantized phase between 0 and 2p.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, the dynamic range and resolution parameters for delay offset reporting Dn,offset, i.e. (AD, MD), are NW-configured via higher-layer (RRC) signalling from the following candidate values:
In addition, the inside/outside range for the 1-bit indicator dn is equal to [0, CP].
FFS: Further implicit/explicit restriction(s) on candidate value(s) depending on the CSI-RS configuration.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, an ‘invalid’ quantization state/hypothesis is supported for frequency offset and phase offset CJT calibration reporting.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, at least for a CJT calibration report consisting only one type, support one-part UCI on PUSCH.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I multi-panel (MP) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, for RI=1-4, decide, by RAN1#117, whether to support Type-I multi-panel (MP) codebook refinement in Rel-19.
If supported, decide from the following alternatives:
o W1 structure: Reuse legacy Rel-15 Type-I SP SD basis selection with L=1 independently for each of the K NZP CSI-RS resources
o W2 structure:
If so, decide, by RAN1#117, whether port mapping scheme similar to, e.g. Rel-18 Type-II CJT, needs to be specified.
Note: This topic is lower priority compared to the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement.
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports with RI=1-4, there is no consensus on supporting the following additional enhancements: Mode-C, inter-polarization amplitude for Scheme-B, larger values of L (>1, including 2, …, 10).
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding NZP CSI-RS resource aggregation to attain 32 < P (or PCSI-RS) ≤ 128, support the following refinement on the K>1 CSI-RS resources associated with a same CSI-RS resource set:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding NZP CSI-RS resource aggregation to attain 32 < P (or PCSI-RS) ≤ 128, all the K>1 NZP CSI-RS resources also share the same QCL, PCoffset, and PCoffsetSS. In addition:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports based on the Rel-18 Type-II Doppler codebook, support the following aperiodic CMR configuration:
FFS: the determination of CSI-RS resource group that a CSI-RS resource is associated with.
Agreement
For the Rel-19
CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, for M>1, the M
CRIs (each with bits) are separated indicated
·
FFS: whether to support NW
configuring/requesting the UE to report CRI/RI/PMI/CQI associated with MR
(<M) of KS CSI-RS resources, including whether
further reduction in the number of hypotheses is supported, i.e. reporting (M
– MR) CRIs (each with bits)
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP and Type-II codebook refinements for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports via aggregating K>1 CSI-RS resources, regarding timeline, introduce two UE capabilities:
FFS: CPU occupation and active resource counting
Note:
R1-2403603 Moderator Summary for Wednesday OFFLINE session on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2403602 Moderator Summary#3 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: ROUND 3 Moderator (Samsung)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone
CJT calibration reporting, regarding frequency offset reporting, and
represents an ‘invalid’ state.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, the dynamic range and resolution parameters for frequency offset reporting FOn, i.e. (AFO, MFO), are NW-configured via higher-layer (RRC) signalling from the following candidate values:
· AFO = {0.01ppm, 0.1ppm, 0.2ppm, f, f/2, f/4,f/8, 1/(4t), 1/(8t), 1/(16t), 1/(32t), 1/(512t)} where f and t denote the SCS and duration of one OFDM symbol, respectively
o FFS: Further down-selection of the above candidate values for AFO, including the use of a same unit for all supported values
· MFO = {16,32}
FFS: Whether additional restriction(s) based on CSI-RS configuration is supported, including implicit configuration of quantization range.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone
CJT calibration reporting,
the resolution parameters for n, i.e. M,
are NW-configured via higher-layer (RRC) signalling from the candidate values
{16, 32}, where
.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding QCL assumptions, each of the NTRP DL-RSs can be configured with a TCI state via RRC signaling
· ‘The DL-RS’ refers to the CSI-RS configured for CJT calibration measurement
· FFS: Whether additional constraints are needed for the TCI state of the ‘DL-RS’
Agreement
For a UE indicated with two TCI states, regarding QCL assumptions for PDSCH, at least the following are supported:
Per Rel-18, the support of two TCI states is a UE capability
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, the UCI parameters are captured in the tables below for Scheme-A and Scheme-B:
Scheme-A
Parameter |
UCI |
Details/description |
Status |
RI |
Part 1 |
Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP: RI=v |
Complete |
Wideband CQI for the first TB |
Part 1 |
Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP |
Complete |
Subband differential CQI for the first TB (*) |
Part 1 |
Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP |
Complete |
Wideband CQI of the second TB |
Part 2
|
Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP Only present when v >4 |
Complete |
Subband CQI of the second TB (*) |
Part 2
Subband |
Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP Only present when v >4 |
Complete |
First SD basic vector selection indicator |
Part 2
Wideband |
v=1-4: Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP with the scheme following < 16-port design of Rel-15 Type-I SP codebookMode=1 v=5-8: FFS |
v=1-4: Complete v=5-8: Pending |
Second SD basis vector selection indicator |
Part 2
Wideband |
v=1-4: Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP with the scheme following < 16-port design of R15 Type-I codebookMode=1 v=5-8: FFS |
v=1-4: Complete v=5-8: Pending |
Inter-pol co-phase selection indicator |
Part 2
Wideband or Subband (**) |
v=1-4: Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP with the scheme following < 16-port design of R16 Type-I codebookMode=1 v=5-8: FFS |
v=1-4: Complete v=5-8: Pending |
Scheme-B
Parameter |
UCI |
Details/description |
Status |
RI |
Part 1 |
Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP: RI=v |
Complete |
Wideband CQI for the first TB |
Part 1 |
Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP |
Complete |
Subband differential CQI for the first TB (*) |
Part 1 |
Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP |
Complete |
Wideband CQI of the second TB |
Part 2
|
Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP Only present when v>4 |
Complete |
Subband CQI of the second TB (*) |
Part 2
Subband |
Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP Only present when v >4 |
Complete |
SD basis oversampling (rotation) factor q1, q2 |
Part 2
|
v=1-4: Values of q1, q2 follow Rel-16
eType-II, v=5-8: FFS |
v=1-4: Complete v=5-8: Pending |
SD basis vector selection indicator for each layer |
Alt1: Part 1 Alt2: Part 2
Wideband |
v=1-4: -
Alt1: -
Alt2: v=5-8: FFS |
Pending |
Inter-pol co-phase selection indicator for each layer |
Part 2
Wideband or Subband (**) |
v=1-4: - Alt1: QPSK with orthogonality constraints across v layers - Alt2: QPSK: 2-bit indicator per layer l=1,…,v v=5-8: FFS |
Pending |
(*): Not included when CQI reporting granularity is set to ‘wideband’
(**): Wideband when PMI reporting is set to ‘wideband’, Subband when PMI reporting granularity is set to ‘subband’
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports with RI=5-8, decide, by RAN1#117, from the following schemes:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, except for Parameter Combination 8 from Rel-17 FeType-II PS, all legacy Parameter Combinations from Rel-16 eType-II (regular), Rel-18 Type-II Doppler (regular), and Rel-17 FeType-II PS are supported.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding CBSR design:
FFS: Whether/how to enable shared CBSR in RRC configuration for Type-I/II codebooks with a same (N1,N2).
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, on the configured KS>1 NZP CSI-RS resources, Pcoffset and PcoffsetSS are CSI-RS-resource-specific (i.e. configured independently across resources).
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, for M>1, SD basis selection is independently signalled per CRI (per CSI-RS resource).
Thursday
R1-2403649 DRAFT LS to RAN2 on CBSR for Rel-19 MIMO Samsung
Decision: Draft LS in 3649 is endorsed. Final LS is approved in R1-2403650.
R1-2403642 Moderator Summary for Thursday OFFLINE session on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2403641 Moderator Summary#4 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: ROUND 4 Moderator (Samsung)
From Thursday session
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, in addition to reporting one type of CJT calibration report in one report, at least support reporting {(Dn,offset, dn), n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref1} and {FOn , n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref2} in one report
Agreement
For a UE indicated with two TCI states, regarding QCL assumptions for PDSCH, support the following QCL assumption for PDSCH:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports,
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, for a given massive TXRU/antenna array, there is no consensus on the need for specification support for cell-specific precoder(s) for many-to-one mapping (virtualization) from multiple TXRUs to each CSI-RS port to facilitate full usage of all TXRUs for a pre-Rel-19 UE (i.e. cell-specific beamformed CSI-RS for pre-Rel-19 UEs).
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding the mapping from CSI-RS resource index/port index per resource and port index to CSI/PMI calculation, there is no consensus on supporting mapping method#3 (for K=4, 2x2 aggregation).
R1-2402019 On codebook for 3-antenna-port UL transmission Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2402065 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions ZTE
R1-2402081 Rel-19 CB-based UL for 3TX UE InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2402100 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Spreadtrum Communications
R1-2402140 Support for 3Tx UL MIMO Intel Corporation
R1-2402157 Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions MediaTek Inc.
R1-2402179 Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions TCL
R1-2402237 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based uplink transmissions vivo
R1-2402282 Uplink 3 Port Codebook based Transmission Google
R1-2402323 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions OPPO
R1-2402378 Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions CATT
R1-2402461 Views on Rel-19 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Samsung
R1-2402498 Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Lenovo
R1-2402530 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Langbo
R1-2402560 Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions CMCC
R1-2402634 Discussions on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions LG Electronics
R1-2402661 Discussion on the support of 3-antenna-port CB based transmissions Xiaomi
R1-2402685 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Transsion Holdings
R1-2402723 Discussion on the 3-port codebook-based transmission Honor
R1-2402768 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions NEC
R1-2402793 Discussion on uplink enhancement for UE with 3Tx Fujitsu
R1-2402840 On the support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Nokia
R1-2402876 Views on R19 3Tx codebook based transmission Apple
R1-2403099 Support for 3 Tx UL transmissions Ericsson
R1-2403110 Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmission Sharp
R1-2403189 3 Tx UL MIMO transmissions Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2403239 Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2402083 FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; Preparatory Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
From Monday session
Agreement
To support codebook-based UL transmission by a 3TX UE, the agreed rank1 precoders in RAN1#116 can also be used when transform precoding is enabled (DFT-s-OFDM ).
Agreement
To indicate precoding information for codebook-based UL transmission by a 3TX UE,
Agreement
For SRS configuration supporting codebook-based UL transmission by a 3TX UE, support Alt1,
where X can be up to 2, subject to UE capability.
R1-2402084 FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; First Round Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
From Tuesday session
Agreement
For codebook-based UL transmission by a 3TX UE, when 2 PTRS ports are configured by maxNrofPorts in PTRS-UplinkConfig, PTRS-DMRS association indication is as follows:
Value of MSB |
DMRS port |
|
|
0 |
1st DMRS port which shares PTRS port 0 |
|
|
1 |
2nd DMRS port which shares PTRS port 0 |
|
|
· Note: PUSCH antenna port 1000 and 1002 in indicated TPMI(s) share PT_RS port 0, and PUSCH antenna port 1001 is associated with PT_RS port 1
· Number of bits used for the indication:
o 1 bit
Agreement
For a 3TX UE, to support 3-port SRS transmission with reusing a 4-port SRS resource, support the following for muting one of the ports of the configured 4-port SRS resource.
· Option 3: Always a same port is muted, e.g., the 4th port.
Agreement
For a 3TX UE, to support 3-port SRS transmission with reusing a 4-port SRS resource, UE splits a linear SRS power equally across the 3 unmuted antenna ports of the 4-port SRS resource.
Agreement
For 3-port codebook-based PUSCH transmission for a 3TX UE, scale factor s should be the ratio of the number of antenna ports with a non-zero PUSCH transmission power to 3 (except for full-power Mode 0).
· FFS: Whether specification needs to be updated to reflect the above.
R1-2402085 FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; Second Round Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
For codebook-based UL transmission by a 3TX UE, when 1 PTRS port is configured by maxNrofPorts in PTRS-UplinkConfig, PTRS-DMRS association indication is as follows:
· Alt2: 2-bit indication
PTRS-DMRS association when 1 PT-RS port is configured
Value |
DMRS port |
0 |
1st scheduled DMRS port |
1 |
2nd scheduled DMRS port |
2 |
3rd scheduled DMRS port |
3 |
Reserved |
Agreement
For a 3TX UE, support Rel-17 M-TRP PUSCH repetition where,
· Two SRS resource sets, each with up to 2 of 4-port SRS resources are configured,
Note: The configured 4 port SRS resources are used to enable 3-port SRS transmission.
R1-2402086 Recommended Direction on 3TX CB-based Uplink in RAN1#117 Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
R1-2402020 Discussion on power control enhancements for DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2402066 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios ZTE, China Telecom
R1-2402070 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Ericsson
R1-2402082 Rel-19 Asymmetric mTRP Operation InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2402101 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Spreadtrum Communications
R1-2402141 Enhancements for asymmetric DL/UL scenarios Intel Corporation
R1-2402158 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios MediaTek Inc.
R1-2402238 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios vivo
R1-2402288 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios TCL
R1-2402324 Enhancements on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios OPPO
R1-2402379 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios CATT
R1-2402462 Views on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Samsung
R1-2402499 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Lenovo
R1-2402507 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios China Telecom, ZTE
R1-2402531 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Langbo
R1-2402561 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios CMCC
R1-2402635 Discussions on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios LG Electronics
R1-2402662 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Xiaomi
R1-2402686 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Transsion Holdings
R1-2402719 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP ASUSTeK
R1-2402724 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Honor
R1-2402759 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios NEC
R1-2402794 Discussion on UL-only mTRP operation Fujitsu
R1-2402841 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Nokia
R1-2402877 Views on R19 enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Apple
R1-2402963 Considerations on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Sony
R1-2403016 Discussion on asymmetric DL_UL mTRP operation ETRI
R1-2403089 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios Google
R1-2403111 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Sharp
R1-2403132 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Panasonic
R1-2403190 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment scenarios Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2403240 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2403414 Summary #1 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
From Monday session
Agreement
For a UE configured with two SRS CLPC adjustment states, support Alt2 for indicating one of the SRS CLPC adjustment states to SRS:
Ericsson raised concerns on Alt2 due to potential issues with beam management.
Agreement
For indicating TPC command for those two SRS CLPC adjustment states through DCI when the UE is configured with two SRS CLPC adjustment states, support Option3:
· Option 3: enhance the legacy DCI format 2_3 of higher layer parameter srs-TPC-PDCCH-Group = typeA and typeB,
Agreement
For enhancing DCI format 2_3 for indicating TPC command for two SRS CLPC adjustment states, support Alt2:
Note: this 1-bit indicator is present for the CC where two SRS CLPC adjustment states are configured.
Agreement
For FR1, a joint TCI state can be associated with a PL offset.
R1-2403415 Summary #2 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
From Tuesday session
Agreement
Support applying PL offset on PDCCH-order PRACH towards a UL TRP in FR1.
Agreement
Consider and down-select one from the following alts for indicating a PL offset for PDCCH-order PRACH transmission at least for FR1.
Note: Other alternatives are not precluded.
R1-2403416 Summary #3 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
For the association between PL offset and joint/UL TCI state, consider and down-select one from the following Alts:
Other alternatives are not precluded.
Agreement
For the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP deployment scenarios, study whether and how to indicate TPC command for SRS CLPC adjustment states through DCI format 1_1 and/or 0_1 when the UE is configured two SRS CLPC adjustment states.
Please refer to RP-240087 for detailed scope of the WI.
[117-R19-MIMO] – Eko (Samsung)
Email discussion on Rel-19 MIMO Phase 5
- To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc
R1-2403846 Discussion on Rel-19 UE/Event-Driven Beam Management InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2403872 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management FUTUREWEI
R1-2403877 Discussion on Rel-19 Enhancement for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management New H3C Technologies Co., Ltd.
R1-2403900 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management MediaTek Inc.
R1-2403944 On UE initiated/event-driven beam management Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2403985 Enhancements for event driven beam management Intel Corporation
R1-2404019 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Spreadtrum Communications
R1-2404106 Views on Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Samsung
R1-2404170 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management vivo
R1-2404239 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ZTE
R1-2404277 Enhancements for UE-initiated beam management Apple
R1-2404336 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Lenovo
R1-2404394 Views on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CATT
R1-2404449 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CMCC
R1-2404475 Enhancements for UE-initiated/Event-Driven Beam Management Panasonic
R1-2404494 Discussion on UE initiated beam management Sony
R1-2404550 UE-initiated beam management LG Electronics
R1-2404574 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management HONOR
R1-2404587 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Fujitsu
R1-2404611 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Xiaomi
R1-2404657 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management NEC
R1-2404739 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Hyundai Motor Company
R1-2404746 Enhancements for UE-initiated beam management Ericsson
R1-2404770 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ETRI
R1-2404813 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Transsion Holdings
R1-2404882 Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management OPPO
R1-2404918 Enhancements to facilitate UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Nokia
R1-2404970 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Sharp
R1-2405035 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2405111 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ITRI
R1-2405122 Discussions on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Ruijie Networks Co. Ltd
R1-2405148 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2405187 Discussion on UE initiated beam management ASUSTeK
R1-2405205 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management NICT
R1-2405238 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CEWiT
R1-2405258 Discussions on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management KDDI Corporation
R1-2405271 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management Google
R1-2404712 Offline summary for Rel-19 MIMO UEIBM (9.2.1) pre-RAN1#117 Moderator (ZTE)
R1-2404713 Moderator Summary #1 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Monday session
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding UL signaling content(s) of L1-RSRP report depending on Event-2, in a report instance, at least Option-3 is supported
R1-2404714 Moderator Summary #2 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Tuesday session
Working Assumption
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting
Agreement
Regarding RS measurement for the current beam for Event 2, for Option-2a, support the both schemes as follows.
Agreement
Regarding RS measurement for the new beam for Event 2, at least Option-3a is supported
R1-2404715 Moderator Summary #3 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding L1-RSRP report format Option-3 depending on Event-2, for a report instance where N ≥ 1 beam(s) are reported, the following is supported.
· RRC can enable or disable whether current beam is always reported
o When enabled by RRC, the current beam + N beams from the measurement RSs for new beam(s) are reported
§ Note: The reported current beam is NOT counted in the N reported beams.
o When disabled by RRC, N beams are reported.
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Mode-A, the DCI format in Step-2 comprises UL-grant DCI format, and the second channel in Step-3 is at least PUSCH.
R1-2405638 Moderator Summary #4 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Thursday session
Agreement
Regarding the triggering event determination for Event 2:
Above feature is subject to UE capability.
· Basic feature: Once the L1-RSRP of the new beam becomes a threshold value better than the current beam, UE initiated beam report occurs
FFS: Whether the above is captured in RAN1 or RAN2 specification.
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding trigger events, the following Event-1 and 7a/7b, are provided for down-selection or combination in RAN1#118 (possible outcome is that no new event is supported)
· Event-1: Quality of the current beam is worse than a certain threshold.
· Event-7a: Quality of at least one new beam, such as L1-RSRP, becomes a threshold value better than the RS derived from the activated TCI state with the worst quality.
· Event-7b: Quality of at least one new beam, such as L1-RSRP, becomes a threshold value better than the RS derived from the activated TCI state with the best quality.
Agreement
Regarding explicit RS configuration for new beam measurement for Event 2, down-select the following options in the RAN1#118:
· Option-1: The RS(s) for new beam(s) are explicitly configured in one RS resource set associated with an CSI reporting configuration;
o FFS: The RS in the RS resource set can be updated by MAC-CE.
· Option-2: A list of RS(s) for new beam measurement can be configured by RRC, and a subset can be activated for new beam measurement by MAC-CE.
o FFS: If a list size is small, MAC-CE activation is not needed
·
Option-3: A list of RS
resource (s) for new beam measurement can be configured by RRC, and a
subset of RS resource(s) in the list can be provided for new beam measurement
by indicated TCI state.
· Others are not precluded.
· FFS: Each RS for new beam measurement should be associated with a configured joint/DL TCI state which can be used as the indicated TCI state
Agreement
Regarding RS measurement for the current beam for Event 2, for Option-2a, besides for scheme-1 and scheme-2, further study the following for handling the case that only one TRS is configured in the indicated TCI state.
· Option-1: Introducing additional scheme: the RS for current beam can be a CSI-RS for beam management derived from the QCL RS in the indicated TCI state;
· Option-2: Further support TRS as measurement RS of current beam for determining L1-RSRP
· Option-3: Introducing additional scheme: The RS for current beam is explicitly configured by RRC or MAC-CE (Option-2C in RAN1 116b agreement).
· Option-4: No further enhancement (i.e., in such case, Scheme-2 is used)
· Others are not precluded.
Including support for up to 128 CSI-RS ports on FR1 and UE reporting enhancement for CJT
R1-2403847 Discussion on Rel-19 Enhancements of CSI InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2403876 Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements New H3C Technologies Co., Ltd.
R1-2403884 CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5 Tejas Networks Limited
R1-2405340 CSI enhancements to support up to 128 CSI-RS ports MediaTek Inc. (rev of R1-2403901)
R1-2405445 On 128 CSI-RS ports and UE reporting enhancement Huawei, HiSilicon (rev of R1-2403945)
R1-2403981 CSI enhancements for MIMO Intel Corporation
R1-2404004 Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements TCL
R1-2404020 Discussion on CSI enhancements Spreadtrum Communications
R1-2405382 Views on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Samsung (rev of R1-2405365; rev of R1-2404109)
R1-2404171 Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements vivo
R1-2404240 Discussion on CSI enhancements ZTE
R1-2404278 Views on R19 MIMO CSI enhancement Apple
R1-2404337 Discussion on CSI enhancements Lenovo
R1-2404395 Views on MIMO CSI enhancements in Rel-19 CATT
R1-2404450 Discussion on CSI enhancements CMCC
R1-2404495 Additional views on CSI enhancements Sony
R1-2404551 Discussions on CSI enhancements LG Electronics
R1-2404575 Discussion on CSI enhancements HONOR
R1-2404588 Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Fujitsu
R1-2404612 Discussion on CSI enhancement Xiaomi
R1-2404668 Discussion on CSI enhancements NEC
R1-2404687 CSI Enhancement for NR MIMO Google
R1-2404883 CSI enhancements for Rel-19 MIMO OPPO
R1-2404919 CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5 Nokia
R1-2404923 CSI enhancements for Rel.19 MIMO Fraunhofer IIS, Fraunhofer HHI
R1-2404971 CSI enhancements Sharp
R1-2405005 CSI enhancements for large antenna arrays and CJT Ericsson
R1-2405036 Discussion on CSI enhancements NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2405149 CSI enhancements for >32 ports and UE-assisted CJT Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2405206 CSI enhancements NICT
R1-2405239 CSI Enhancements CEWiT
R1-2405255 Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5 KDDI Corporation
R1-2404107 Moderator summary for OFFLINE discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2404108 Moderator summary on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
From Monday session
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the dynamic range for delay offset reporting Dn,offset, i.e. AD, at least support the following values: {0.5CP, CP}
·
Decide, by RAN1#117,
whether any of the following candidate values are supported: {0.75CP, 1.5CP, ,
}
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the dynamic range for frequency offset reporting FOn, i.e. AFO, at least support the following values: {0.1ppm, 0.2ppm}
· Decide, by RAN1#117, whether any of the following candidate values are supported: {0.025ppm, 0.05ppm, 1/(8Dt), 1/(16Dt), 1/(32Dt)}
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), =1 only (agreed in RAN1#116bis) implies that the measured/reported phase offsets {n,, n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref} are associated with the entire configured CSI reporting band (i.e. ‘wideband’).
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), decide, by RAN1#117, whether to also support S>1 (sub-band reporting) as follows:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset),
Agreement (further modified as shown in red in Tuesday session)
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding active resource counting and OCPU, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd’ (Doffset+d) or cjtc-F’ (frequency offset), fully reuse those from Rel-18 TDCP reporting
·
For
OCPU, Y=NTRP for each CJT calibration report type
· OCPU =X.NTRP where X≥1 is defined based on UE capabilities and determined by the UE for each CJT calibration report type
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports based on the Rel-18 Type-II Doppler codebook,
· Ordering the KDOPPK CSI-RS resources ascendingly by the CSI-RS resource ID and kDOPP ={0,1,…, KDOPP –1}, CSI-RS resources { kDOPPK, kDOPPK +1, …, (kDOPP+1)K –1} are associated with the kDOPP-th CSI-RS resource group
· FFS: If the CSI-RS resources in a resource group span two consecutive slots, m is 2.
· FFS: If the CSI-RS resources in a resource group are located in one slot, m can be configured from {1, 2}
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding aggregation of K NZP CSI-RS resources to attain 32 < P (or PCSI-RS) ≤ 128, support only the following combinations of K and P (or PCSI-RS):
· For P (or PCSI-RS) = 48, K = 2 (each resource 24 ports) and 3 (each resource 16 ports)
· For P (or PCSI-RS) = 64, K = 2 (each resource 32 ports) and 4 (each resource 16 ports)
· For P (or PCSI-RS) = 128, K = 4 (each resource 32 ports)
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding port mapping,
·
Following legacy principle,
“sequential ordering/indexing within” a group of Q indices {i0, i1,
…, iQ-1} is a linearly increasing sequence such that iq
< iq+1 (where q=0, 1, …, Q-2 is the port
index within a CSI-RS resource, and iq or
iq+1 {0, 1,…, KQ-1}) is the port index for the
codebook, across the K>1 CSI-RS resources).
· After resource aggregation, P (=48, 64, or 128) ports are numbered in accordance to Table 7.4.1.5.3-1 from TS 38.211.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, for RI=v=1, support the following:
FFS: Whether this can be extended to RI=v>1 as well as Type-II codebook refinement.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, on CBSR, the value of X1 and X2) are separately NW-configured via higher-layer (RRC) signalling from {1, 2, 4, [8, 16]}
· FFS: Dependence on each supported (X1, X2) value on the configured (N1, N2) value
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP and Type-II codebook refinements (except based on Rel-18 Type-II Doppler) for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding CPU occupation
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding UCI omission, fully reuse the legacy rules for Rel-15 Type-I SP codebook.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding UCI parameters for Scheme-B RI=v=1-4:
·
SD basis vector selection
indicator for each layer is in Part 2 (wideband) and bits per layer l=1, …, v
· Inter-pol co-phase selection indicator for each layer is in Part 2 (wideband or subband) and 2 bits (representing {+1, +j, -1, -j}) per layer l=1,…,v
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I single-panel (SP) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, for Scheme-A RI=3-4 only, the legacy mapping of i1,3 to (k1,k2) for (N1=3,N2=2) from Table 5.2.2.2.1-4 of TS 38.214 is used for all of the newly supported (N1,N2) values.
· FFS: whether the i1,3 table (Table 5.2.2.2.1-4 of TS 38.214) needs to be further extended.
Agreement
On the NZP CSI-RS resource aggregation of K=2, 3 or 4 legacy NZP CSI-RS resources to attain a total of 48, 64, and 128 ports (for Rel-19 Type-I/II codebook refinement), support to configure a CSI-RS resource set with the K CSI-RS resources as the associated NZP CSI-RS for each of the SRS resource set(s) with higher layer parameter usage in SRS-ResourceSet set to 'nonCodebook',
· The previously agreed restrictions on the K resources for Rel-19 Type-I/II codebook refinement apply.
· Reuse the legacy approach for triggering of the NZP-CSI-RS resources and the legacy timeline for the NZP-CSI-RS resources and SRS.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports with RI=5-8, support the following schemes:
Proposal 1.A.2:
For a UE configured with a total of PSRS=6 or 8 ports across ≥1 SRS resources for antenna switching intended for xT6R or xT8R, respectively, support the following fixed SRS port grouping where (with the PSRS ports indexed in an ascending order according to SRS resource ID and port number within each SRS resource):
No other spec enhancement is introduced, e.g. new CW-to-layer mapping, DL resource allocation, DCI format
Note: The above grouping assumption is to align NW and UE on the association between SRS ports and reported CQIs for the two CWs when reportQuantity = ‘cri-RI-CQI’.
Note: different SRS ports are associated with different UE antenna ports.
Note: if one single CW is scheduled, both SRS port groups can correspond to the same CW
Note: This feature is a separate UE capability and, for UEs supporting this capability, configured via RRC (FFS details on the extend of RRC configuration)
Companies are encouraged to evaluate for further discussion in RAN1#118.
R1-2405487 Moderator summary of Tuesday morning offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2405484 Moderator Summary#2 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 2 Moderator (Samsung)
From Tuesday session
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 Type-I single-panel (SP) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, there is no consensus on additionally supporting O1=O2=2.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, on CBSR, the following (X1, X2) values are supported: (1,1), (2,1), (2,2), (4,1), (4,2), (4,4),
· FFS: (1,2), (1,4), (2,4)
Agreement
For the 3-bit scaling scheme for Type-I codebook, the following (X1, X2) values are supported: (2,1), (2,2), (4,1), (4,2), (4,4),
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 Type-I codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, on the agreed 3-bit group-based scaling factor for RI=v=1, there is no consensus on supporting this feature for codebooks other than for Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, for M>1, support the following:
· Resource-specific RI, i.e. RI is independently calculated and indicated for each of the selected M NZP CSI-RS resources
o FFS: If resource-common RI indication is also supported
· 4-bit wideband CQIs are independently calculated and reported for each of the M selected NZP CSI-RS resources
· 2-bit differential SB CQIs are independently calculated and reported for each of the M selected NZP CSI-RS resource
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, for M=2, when Rel-16 eType-II codebook is configured, FD basis selection and indication are resource-specific (per resource).
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, for M=2, when Rel-16 eType-II codebook is configured, RRC configuration of Parameter Combination is resource-common.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports:
· Active resource counting = KS (following legacy)
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, the UCI parameters are captured in the tables below:
· FFS: Mapping order
· FFS: Whether it is possible not to report dn
When ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd’ (Doffset+d)
Parameter |
Details/description |
nref |
Reference TRS resource set index, based on
the ordering from RRC configuration: |
{Dn,offset, n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref } |
Delay offset for CSI-RS resource n:
|
{dn, n=0, 1, …, N TRP – 1, n≠nref } |
1-bit inside/outside indicator for CSI-RS
resource n: |
When ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-F’ (frequency offset)
Parameter |
Details/description |
nref |
Reference TRS resource set index, based on
the ordering from RRC configuration: |
{FOn , n=0, 1, …, NTRP –1, n≠nref} |
Frequency offset for CSI-RS resource n:
|
When ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd-F’ (joint Doffset+d and FO)
Parameter |
Details/description |
nref1 |
Reference TRS resource set index for Doffset+d, based on the ordering from RRC configuration:
|
nref2 |
Reference TRS resource set index for FO,
based on the ordering from RRC configuration: |
{Dn,offset, n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1 n≠nref1} |
Delay offset for CSI-RS resource n:
|
{dn, n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref1 } |
1-bit inside/outside indicator for CSI-RS
resource n: |
{FOn , n=0, 1, …, NTRP –1, n≠nref2} |
Frequency offset for CSI-RS resource n:
|
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the ‘out of range’ or ‘invalid’ quantization state/hypothesis, there is no consensus on specifying a condition/event for such state.
R1-2405488 Moderator summary of Tuesday afternoon offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2405485 Moderator Summary#3 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 3 Moderator (Samsung)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset),
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding timeline, fully reuse those from Rel-18 TDCP reporting.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the applicable type(s) of the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd’ (Doffset+d) or ‘cjtc-F’ (frequency offset), all the resources across the NTRP TRS resource sets are configured with the same bandwidth.
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the applicable type(s) of the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd’ (Doffset+d) or ‘cjtc-F’ (frequency offset), there is no consensus on:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the applicable type(s) of the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset),
· all the ‘CSI-RS for CSI’ resources within each resource set follow the legacy pre-Rel-19 rules of CSI-RS resources associated with a same resource set
· all the resources across the NTRP CSI-RS resources/resource sets are configured with the same bandwidth.
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the applicable type(s) of the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), there is no consensus on:
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports based on the Rel-18 Type-II Doppler codebook, there is no consensus on specifying further restriction on m values based on the slot location(s) of the CSI-RS resources in a resource group.
For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, on CBSR,
P |
(N1, N2) |
(X1, X2) |
48 |
(8,3) |
(1,1), (2,1), (4,1) |
(6,4) |
(1,1), (2,1), (2,2), |
|
64 |
(16,2) |
(1,1), (2,1), (2,2), (4,1), (4,2) |
(8,4) |
(1,1), (2,1), (2,2), (4,1), (4,2) |
|
128 |
(16,4) |
(1,1), (2,1), (2,2), (4,1), (4,2) |
(8,8) |
(1,1), (2,1), (2,2), (4,1), (4,2) |
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, there is no consensus on supporting the following report quantities when Rel-15 Type-I SP codebook: ‘cri-RI-i1-CQI’, ‘cri-RI-i1’, ‘cri-RI-CQI’.
R1-2405678 Moderator summary of Thursday offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2405486 Moderator Summary#4 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 4 Moderator (Samsung)
From Thursday session
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the applicable type(s) of the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), one ‘CSI-RS for CSI’ resource set with NTRP resources is supported
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the applicable type(s) of the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), there is no consensus on supporting any additional time separation between RSs beyond what’s already permissible by the use of TRS resource sets.
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the applicable type(s) of the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd’ (Doffset+d) or ‘cjtc-F’ (frequency offset), there is no consensus on supporting the following:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd-F’ (joint Doffset+d and FO)
· Fully reuse timeline and active resource counting from Rel-18 TDCP reporting.
· OCPU = 2X.NTRP where X≥1 is defined based on UE capabilities and determined by the UE for each CJT calibration report type.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, for A-CSI only, the NW can configure MR (<M) of KS CSI-RS resources to be selected as part of reporting the M “quadruplets”:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I multi-panel (MP) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, for RI=1-4, support the following (compromise between Scheme1 and Scheme2 described in RAN1#116bis):
Rel-19 Type-I MP does not support RI=5-8.
Reuse Rel-15 Type-I MP legacy designs for UCI omission, and CBSR.
For CSI calculation, reuse Rel-18 Type II CJT CSI-RS port ordering for UE assumption on the transmitted PDSCH symbols across antenna ports.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding CBSR and RI restriction, down-select (by RAN1#118) one from the following alternatives:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), if S>1 (sub-band reporting) is supported, select one from option 1 and option 2, by RAN1#118, from the following:
Note: Companies to report whether their evaluation is based on precoded or non-precoded CSI-RS.
R1-2403848 Discussion on Rel-19 CB-based UL for 3TX UE InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2403902 Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions MediaTek Inc.
R1-2403946 On codebook for 3-antenna-port UL transmission Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2403983 Support for 3Tx UL MIMO Intel Corporation
R1-2404021 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Spreadtrum Communications
R1-2404046 Discussion on Rel-19 CB-based UL transmission for 3TX UE TCL
R1-2404110 Views on Rel-19 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Samsung
R1-2404172 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based uplink transmissions vivo
R1-2404241 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions ZTE
R1-2404279 Views on R19 3Tx codebook based transmission Apple
R1-2404338 Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Lenovo
R1-2404396 Views on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions CATT
R1-2404451 Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions CMCC
R1-2404552 Discussions on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions LG Electronics
R1-2404589 Discussion on uplink enhancement for UE with 3Tx Fujitsu
R1-2404613 Discussion on the support of 3-antenna-port CB based transmissions Xiaomi
R1-2404669 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions NEC
R1-2404688 Uplink 3 Port Codebook based Transmission Google
R1-2404814 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Transsion Holdings
R1-2404884 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions OPPO
R1-2404920 On the support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Nokia
R1-2404972 Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmission Sharp
R1-2405037 Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2405119 Support for 3 Tx UL transmissions Ericsson
R1-2405150 3 Tx UL MIMO transmissions Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2403850 Summary of Offline Discussions on 3TX CB-based Uplink Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
R1-2403851 FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; First Round Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
From Monday session
Agreement
· Update the agreement made in RAN1 #116bis as the following.
Agreement For a 3TX UE, to support 3-port SRS transmission with reusing a 4-port SRS resource, support the following for muting one of the ports of the configured 4-port SRS resource, Option
3: Always a same port is muted, |
Agreement
For codebook-based M-TRP PUSCH repetition by a 3TX UE, scheduled by DCI format 0_1/0_2,
· Reuse Rel-17 M-TRP PUSCH repetition design, where the second precoding information field only indicates TPMI index, and applies same rank as indicated by the first precoding information field.
Agreement
For codebook-based M-TRP PUSCH repetition by a 3TX UE, scheduled by DCI format 0_1/0_2,
Bit field |
codebookSubset=NonCoherent |
0 |
1 layer: TPMI=0 |
1 |
1 layer: TPMI=1 |
2 |
1 layer: TPMI=2 |
3 |
Reserved |
o Table II: Second precoding information for 3 antenna ports if maxRank=2
Bit field |
codebookSubset=NonCoherent |
0 |
1 layer: TPMI=0 |
1 |
1 layer: TPMI=1 |
2 |
1 layer: TPMI=2 |
3 |
1 layer: Reserved |
0 |
2 layer: TPMI=0 |
1 |
2 layer: TPMI=1 |
2 |
2 layer: TPMI=2 |
3 |
2 layer: Reserved |
o Table III: Second precoding information for 3 antenna ports if maxRank=3
Bit field |
codebookSubset=NonCoherent |
0 |
1 layer: TPMI=0 |
1 |
1 layer: TPMI=1 |
2 |
1 layer: TPMI=2 |
3 |
1 layer: Reserved |
0 |
2 layer: TPMI=0 |
1 |
2 layer: TPMI=1 |
2 |
2 layer: TPMI=2 |
3 |
2 layer: Reserved |
0 |
3 layer: TPMI=0 |
1~3 |
3 layer: reserved |
Agreement
For codebook-based M-TRP PUSCH repetition by a 3TX UE, for indication of PTRS-DMRS association,
Agreement
For codebook-based UL transmission by a 3TX UE, subject to its capability,
Note: SRS resource definition is not changed nor the number of SRS ports in the SRS resource.
R1-2403852 FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; Second Round Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
Presented in Wednesday session.
R1-2403853 Recommended Direction on 3TX CB-based Uplink in RAN1#118 Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
R1-2403849 Discussion on Rel-19 Asymmetric mTRP Operation InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2403903 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios MediaTek Inc.
R1-2403947 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2403984 Enhancements for asymmetric DL/UL scenarios Intel Corporation
R1-2404022 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Spreadtrum Communications
R1-2404111 Views on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Samsung
R1-2404173 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios vivo
R1-2404242 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios ZTE, China Telecom
R1-2404280 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Apple
R1-2404339 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Lenovo
R1-2404397 Views on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios CATT
R1-2404424 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios China Telecom, ZTE
R1-2404452 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios CMCC
R1-2404476 Enhancement for Asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Scenarios Panasonic
R1-2404496 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Sony
R1-2404532 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP scenarios Ericsson
R1-2404553 Discussions on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios LG Electronics
R1-2404568 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios TCL
R1-2404590 Discussion on UL-only mTRP operation Fujitsu
R1-2404614 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Xiaomi
R1-2404658 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios NEC
R1-2404771 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP operation ETRI
R1-2404815 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Transsion Holdings
R1-2404885 Enhancements on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios OPPO
R1-2404921 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Nokia
R1-2404973 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Sharp
R1-2405038 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2405151 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment scenarios Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2405188 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP ASUSTeK
R1-2405272 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios Google
R1-2405346 Summary #1 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
From Tuesday session
Proposal 3.1:
To fulfil the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP deployment scenarios, support two TAs for single DCI based multi-TRP/panel and single TRP.
Companies are encouraged to consider above for further discussion in RAN1#118.
Agreement
For indicating a PL offset for PDCCH-order PRACH transmission at least for FR1, further study and down-select one from the Alt1 and Alt3 by RAN1#118 meeting:
Agreement
In Rel-19, the value range of starting bit of block in DCI format 2-3 is extended from 1~31 to 1~X.
FFS: Condition under which the above is applicable.
Agreement
Introduce a new RRC parameter per BWP/CC to indicate that two separate SRS CLPC adjustment states are configured for SRS in a BWP/CC.
Agreement
For the association between PL offset and joint/UL TCI state, support the following
Conclusion
There is no consensus on the following proposal:
Proposal 1.6: Support to update a UL PL for a joint/UL TCI state as follows:
· When this joint/UL TCI state is activated and it is not in the current active TCI state list, a UL PL is calculated as: UL PL = PL estimated from DL PL RS – the value of PL offset.
· When this joint/UL TCI state is activated and it is in the current active TCI state list, the UE updates the UL PL as: new UL PL = current UL PL + the updated delta indicated by the NW.
R1-2405347 Summary #2 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
From Thursday session
Agreement
For the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios, study and decide the value range and candidate values of PL offset value.
Agreement
For the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios, study whether/how to consider PL offset in PHR calculation, including Type 1 PHR based on actual PUSCH transmission, Type 1 PHR based on reference PUSCH, Type 3 PHR based on actual SRS and Type 3 PHR based on reference SRS.
Conclusion
For the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP deployment scenario, reuse the rel-17 unified TCI/ICBM and rel-18 unified TCI framework:
Final summary in R1-2405348.
Please refer to RP-240087 for detailed scope of the WI.
[118-R19-MIMO] – Eko (Samsung)
Email discussion on Rel-19 MIMO Phase 5
- To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc
R1-2406648 List of RRC and MAC CE impact for Rel-19 MIMO Ph5 Samsung
From Thursday session
R1-2407284 DRAFT LS to RAN2 on RRC and MAC CE impacts for Rel-19 NR MIMO Ph5 Moderator (Samsung)
Decision: The draft LS to RAN2 is endorsed. Final LS is approved in R1-2407285.
R1-2405814 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management FUTUREWEI
R1-2405870 On UE initiated/event-driven beam management Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2405875 On Rel-19 UE/Event-Driven Beam Management InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2405887 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management MediaTek Inc.
R1-2405903 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Spreadtrum Communications
R1-2405980 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CMCC
R1-2406027 Enhancements for event driven beam management Intel Corporation
R1-2406028 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ZTE Corporation, Sanechips
R1-2406043 Offline summary for Rel-19 MIMO UEIBM (9.2.1) pre-RAN1#118 Moderator (ZTE)
R1-2406177 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management vivo
R1-2406260 Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management OPPO
R1-2406279 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Xiaomi
R1-2406310 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Fujitsu
R1-2406363 On UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CATT
R1-2406420 UE-initiated beam management LG Electronics
R1-2406454 Enhancements for UE-initiated/Event-Driven Beam Management Panasonic
R1-2406467 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Sony
R1-2406521 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Lenovo
R1-2406531 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management TCL
R1-2406543 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management NEC
R1-2406574 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Hyundai Motor Company
R1-2406576 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management HONOR
R1-2406595 Discussions on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Ruijie Networks Co. Ltd
R1-2406642 Views on Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Samsung
R1-2406682 Discussions on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management KDDI Corporation
R1-2406700 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Transsion Holdings
R1-2406722 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ETRI
R1-2406745 Enhancements to facilitate UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Nokia
R1-2406831 Enhancements for UE-initiated beam management Apple
R1-2406887 Enhancements for UE Initiated Beam Management Meta Ireland
R1-2406925 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2407002 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Sharp
R1-2407024 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2407066 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ITRI
R1-2407075 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CEWiT
R1-2407111 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management Google
R1-2407122 Discussion on UE initiated beam report ASUSTeK
R1-2407143 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management NICT
R1-2407145 Enhancements for UE-initiated beam management Ericsson
R1-2406044 Moderator Summary #1 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Monday session
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, for regarding Mode-B, the pre-configured resource(s) for the second channel in Step-2 is at least type 1 CG-PUSCH.
· FFS: PUCCH as the second channel
· FFS: Whether the PUSCH can be with UL data
Agreement
Regarding explicit RS configuration for new beam measurement for Event 2, at least Option-1 is supported
· Option-1: The RS(s) for new beam(s) are explicitly configured in one RS resource set associated with an CSI reporting configuration
o If legacy UE capability signaling cannot be reused, introduce a UE capability signaling of indicating the maximum number of the configured RS(s) in the RS resource set.
o FFS: The RS in the RS resource set can be updated by MAC-CE
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding L1-RSRP report format Option-3 depending on Event-2, the following differential L1-RSRP report format is supported.
CRI or SSBRI #1 |
CRI or SSBRI #2 |
… |
CRI or SSBRI #N |
L1-RSRP #1 |
Differential L1-RSRP #2 |
… |
Differential L1-RSRP #N |
Differential L1-RSRP for current beam, if report mode that current beam is always reported is enabled by RRC |
Note: Other contents are not precluded |
.
· Differential L1-RSRP #2~#N/current beam is determined based on the difference between measured L1-RSRP corresponding to the CRI/SSBRI #2~#N/current beam and the measured L1-RSRP corresponding to CRI/SSBRI #1
o L1-RSRP#1 is the largest measured RSRP among reported ones, and an absolute L1-RSRP.
o FFS: range and step size of differential L1-RSRP
· FFS: Whether/how to report additional indication of which CRI/SSBRI(s) satisfy the condition of Event-2.
· FFS: Additional report content(s) (e.g., reporting configuration ID, indication for synchronization state, event ID, or cell ID).
R1-2406045 Moderator Summary #2 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Tuesday session
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the dedicated RRC signaling for first PUCCH channel configuration for Mode-A, down-select one of the following
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the dedicated RRC signaling for first PUCCH channel configuration for Mode-B, down-select one of the following
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the triggering procedure in Step-2 of Mode-A, select one of the following options
· Option-1: Introduce a new 1-bit field in DCI format 0_1/0_2 to trigger the transmission of the UEI beam report
o FFS: DCI format 0_3
· Option-2: Reuse CSI request field in DCI format 0_1/0_2 to trigger the transmission of the UEI beam report
o FFS: DCI format 0_3
· FFS: Whether/how to handle the case that multiple CSI report configuration(s) for the UE-initiated/event-driven beam report are associated with the same first PUCCH resource and/or the same scheduled PUSCH
Comeback on Thursday for down-selection: agreement stays as is.
Conclusion
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Mode-A, there is no RAN1 consensus on additionally supporting that the DCI format in Step-2 comprises DL-grant DCI format, and the second channel in Step-3 is PUCCH.
R1-2406046 Moderator Summary #3 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding L1-RSRP report format Option-3 depending on Event-2, the candidate value of ‘N’ at least comprises {1, 2, 3, 4}
Agreement
Regarding RS measurement for the current beam for Event 2, for Option-2a, besides for scheme-1 and scheme-2, further down-select one of the following for handling the case that only one TRS is configured in the indicated TCI state in RAN1#118bis
Note: If there is no consensus in RAN1 on one of Options 1/2/3, Option 4 will be taken.
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, for the case the pre-configured Type-1 CG PUSCH carry the beam report, for the second UL channel in Mode-B, at least one or both of the following should be supported:
· Option-1: The same Type-1 CG PUSCH can carry UL-SCH and the beam report.
· Option-2: The Type-1 CG PUSCH is a dedicated type-1 CG PUSCH for carrying the beam report.
o Note: This PUSCH can NOT carry UL-SCH. This PUSCH can NOT carry any other UCI.
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Mode-B, UEI beam report is carried on a first available transmission occasion of the second UL channel X symbols after sending the last symbol of report notification on the first PUCCH channel.
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding resource mapping/configuration between first and second channel in Mode-B, for a given CSI report configuration, the following is provided for down-selection.
· Option-1 (one-to-one): Only one first PUCCH resource and only one pre-configured resource for second UL channel can be associated with the CSI report configuration for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting.
· Option-2 (one-to-M): Only one first PUCCH resource and one or more pre-configured resource(s) for second UL channel can be associated with CSI report configuration for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting.
R1-2407470 Moderator Summary #4 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Thursday session
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, for at least Mode-B, the beam report should be carried in the second UL channel in the CC where the corresponding CSI report configuration is configured.
· Above applies to both cross-CC and same-CC beam report.
· Note: Above is applied to the case that second UL channel is PUSCH.
· FFS: Whether the first and second channels can be from the same/different CC.
Working Assumption
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding trigger events, besides for Event-2, Event-1 and Event-7 are both supported.
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Mode-A and/or Mode-B, further study the following for first PUCCH transmission
Whether/how to apply prohibit-timer or maximum number of (re)transmission(s) for first PUCCH channel.
Including support for up to 128 CSI-RS ports on FR1 and UE reporting enhancement for CJT
R1-2405871 On 128 CSI-RS ports and UE reporting enhancement Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2405876 On Rel-19 Enhancements of CSI InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2405888 CSI enhancements to support up to 128 CSI-RS ports MediaTek Inc.
R1-2405904 Discussion on CSI enhancements Spreadtrum Communications
R1-2405936 CSI enhancements Tejas Networks Limited
R1-2405943 CSI enhancements for Rel. 19 MIMO Fraunhofer IIS, Fraunhofer HHI
R1-2405955 CSI Enhancement for NR MIMO Google
R1-2405981 Discussion on CSI enhancements CMCC
R1-2406024 CSI enhancements for MIMO Intel Corporation
R1-2406029 Discussion on CSI enhancements ZTE Corporation, Sanechips
R1-2406178 Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements vivo
R1-2406261 CSI enhancements for Rel-19 MIMO OPPO
R1-2406280 Views on CSI enhancement Xiaomi
R1-2406311 Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Fujitsu
R1-2406364 Views on Rel-19 MIMO CSI enhancements CATT
R1-2406431 CSI enhancements TCL
R1-2406468 More views on CSI enhancements Sony
R1-2406522 Discussion on CSI enhancements Lenovo
R1-2406548 Discussion on CSI enhancements NEC
R1-2406577 Discussion on CSI enhancements HONOR
R1-2406643 Moderator summary for OFFLINE discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2407262 Views on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Samsung (rev of R1-2406645)
R1-2406723 Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements ETRI
R1-2406746 CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5 Nokia
R1-2406832 Views on R19 MIMO CSI enhancement Apple
R1-2407308 CSI enhancements for large antenna arrays and CJT Ericsson (rev of R1-2406907)
R1-2406926 Discussion on CSI enhancements NTT DOCOMO, INC., NTT CORPORATION
R1-2407003 CSI enhancements Sharp
R1-2407184 CSI enhancements for >32 ports and UE-assisted CJT Qualcomm Incorporated (rev of R1-2407025)
R1-2407074 CSI Enhancements CEWiT
R1-2407126 Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5 KDDI Corporation
R1-2407144 CSI enhancements NICT
R1-2406644 Moderator summary on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
From Monday session
Conclusion:
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), regarding the number of configured associated SRS resource(s) (=Q) for antenna switching xTyR and the number of SRS ports (=PSRS) corresponding to the ‘reference UE antenna port’, there is no consensus to support the following:
Note: This implies no support for configuring >1 SRS resource sets for associated SRS when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset).
Note: There is a source R1-2407184 showing performance benefit of using multiple UE antenna ports non-coherent with each other.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset),
FFS:
· Whether/how to identify the transmission occasion of the Q=1 associated SRS resource to determine the reference UE antenna port in relation to the CSI request and/or SRS triggering
· The supported time-domain behaviour(s) for the associated SRS resource (periodic, semi-persistent, aperiodic)
o In case the NW configures the Q=1 associated SRS resource from an existing SP and/or AP SRS antenna switching resource configuration for DL CSI acquisition (which utilizes dynamic signalling), whether/how to identify the Q=1 associated SRS resource
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, to facilitate UE-specific delay offset pre-compensation on PDSCH by the NW, decide, by RAN1#118, whether to support configuring a UE (via RRC signaling) to perform PMI calculation for the Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI report assuming pre-compensation using the UE-reported delay offset (when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd’). And if supported, whether any of the following is additionally supported or not:
FFS: AP-CSI-RS can be configured for the Rel-18 eType-II CJT report.
The above only applies when the CMRs do not share common QCL source for average delay indication.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, to facilitate UE-specific frequency offset pre-compensation on PDSCH by the NW, decide, by RAN1#118, whether to support configuring a UE (via RRC signaling) to perform PMI calculation for the Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI report assuming pre-compensation using the UE-reported frequency offset (when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-F’). And if supported, whether any of the following is additionally supported or not:
FFS: AP-CSI-RS can be configured for the Rel-18 eType-II CJT report.
The above only applies when the CMRs do not share common QCL source for Doppler shift indication.
Conclusion:
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, there is no consensus to support the following reporting formats:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the resolution for frequency offset reporting FOn, additionally support MFO = 256.
Conclusion:
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the dynamic range for delay offset reporting Dn,offset and frequency offset reporting FOn, there is no consensus on supporting additional values of dynamic range.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, the UCI mapping order is as follows:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports with RI=5-8, regarding Scheme-B, reuse the legacy Rel-15 Type-I layer pairing scheme, and fixed mapping between SD basis vectors and layers:
LG denotes the number of layer groups per previous agreement.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement based on Rel-18 Type-II Doppler for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports,
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I MP codebook refinements for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding OCPU, timeline, active resource counting, and CMR restriction (FDM/TDM, EPRE offset), fully reuse those for the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I MP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, the UCI parameters are captured in the tables below:
· Note: The second column includes the location of the parameters when reported with two-part UCI.
Parameter |
UCI |
Details/description |
RI |
Part 1 |
Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP: RI=v={1,2,3,4} |
Wideband CQI for the first TB |
Part 1 |
Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP |
Subband differential CQI for the first TB (*) |
Part 1 |
Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP |
First SD basis vector selection indicator |
Part 2
Wideband |
One indicator per each of the Ng resources: · Each of the Ng indicators is the same as Rel-15 Type-I SP with the scheme following < 16-port design of Rel-15 Type-I SP codebookMode=1 |
Second SD basis vector selection indicator |
Part 2
Wideband |
One indicator per each of the Ng resources: · Each of the Ng indicators is the same as Rel-15 Type-I SP with the scheme following < 16-port design of R15 Type-I SP codebookMode=1 |
Inter-pol co-phase selection indicator |
Part 2
Wideband or Subband (**) |
One (set of) indicator per each of the Ng resources: · Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP with the scheme following < 16-port design of R15 Type-I codebookMode=1 |
Inter-resource co-phasing |
Part 2
Wideband |
QPSK (2-bit) co-phasing on resource k=2,…,K relative to the first resource, layer-common |
(*): Not included when CQI reporting granularity is set to ‘wideband’
(**): Wideband when PMI reporting is set to ‘wideband’, Subband when PMI reporting granularity is set to ‘subband’
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, the UCI parameters are captured in the tables below for Scheme-A for RI=5-8:
Scheme-A
Parameter |
UCI |
Details/description |
First SD basis vector selection indicator |
Part 2
Wideband |
v=5-8: Decide (by RAN1#118) Alt1 vs Alt2 Alt1. Same as legacy
Rel-15 Type-I SP, separate (i1, i2) indicators of Alt2:
Separate (i1, i2) indicators of |
Second SD basis vector selection indicator |
Part 2
Wideband |
v=5-8: Freely select the other nSDBV=2 (v=5-6) or 3 (v=7-8) SD basis vectors such that they are orthogonal in at least one dimension (horizontal or vertical).
Decide (by RAN1#118) the indication scheme. |
Inter-pol co-phase selection indicator |
Part 2
Wideband or Subband (**) |
v=5-8: Same as legacy Rel-15 Type-I SP |
(*): Not included when CQI reporting granularity is set to ‘wideband’
(**): Wideband when PMI reporting is set to ‘wideband’, Subband when PMI reporting granularity is set to ‘subband’
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding NZP CSI-RS resource aggregation to attain 32 < P (or PCSI-RS) ≤ 128, for AP-CSI-RS where the K NZP CSI-RS resources are located in two consecutive slots,
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding the port subset indication (from the Rel-18 SD NES Type-1), extend the bitmap (i.e., port-subsetIndicator) by adding p48, p64, and p128 along with their appropriate lengths
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I multi-panel (MP) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding the W2 structure, clarify that:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding UCI parameters when two-part UCI/CSI is used:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, if MR is configured, the supported value(s) of MR are as follows:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding CBSR and RI restriction, support resource-specific specific CBSR.
· FFS (by RAN1#118): Whether RI restriction is resource-common or resource-specific.
R1-2407282 Moderator Summary on Tuesday offline for Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2407279 Moderator Summary#2 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 2 Moderator (Samsung)
From Tuesday session
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook
refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding first SD basis vector
selection indicator for Scheme-A for RI=5-8, reuse the legacy Rel-15 Type-I SP
scheme, i.e. separate (i1, i2) indicators of bits and
bits, respectively.
Agreement
At least for type 1 single panel, for the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding UCI omission for the UCI reported in CSI part-2, other than priority 0 (G0), the UCI packing order and the 2M consecutive priority levels are defined w.r.t the M CRIs (including the non-reported MR CRIs) as follows:
Note: For UCI fields in wideband (G0), even sub-bands (G1), and odd sub-bands (G2), legacy design is fully reused.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, the UCI parameters are captured in the tables below for Scheme-B for RI=5-8:
· Note: The second column includes the location of the parameters when reported with two-part UCI
Scheme-B
Parameter |
UCI |
Details/description |
SD basis oversampling (rotation) factor q1, q2 |
Part 2
|
v=5-8: Values of q1, q2 follow Rel-16
eType-II, |
SD basis vector selection indicator for each layer |
Part 2
Wideband |
v=5-8:
|
Inter-pol co-phase selection indicator for each layer |
Part 2
Wideband or Subband (**) |
v=5-8: QPSK:
2-bit indicator per layer group l=1, …, |
(*): Not included when CQI reporting granularity is set to ‘wideband’
(**): Wideband when PMI reporting is set to ‘wideband’, Subband when PMI reporting granularity is set to ‘subband’
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, conditioned in UE capabilities, a UE can be configured with either the group-based hard CBSR, or the 3-bit SD basis group-based scaling factor, or both, or none of the two.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), the selection of PSRS=1 SRS port corresponding to the ‘reference UE antenna port’ (out of available port(s)) is NW-configured via higher-layer (RRC) signalling.
Working Assumption
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), the configured associated SRS resource can be either periodic, semi-persistent, or aperiodic.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the resolution for delay offset reporting Dn,offset, additionally support MD = {128, 256}.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), regarding the support of sub-band reporting (S>1):
Note: UE is not required to perform DO/FO compensation for sub-band phase offset calculation
Note: There is a source R1-2407184 showing for frequency-domain-MRT-precoded CSI-RSs, inter-TRP phase has a linear rotation in frequency-domain, and is associated with a single delay component.
Agreement
For the 3-bit scaling scheme for Type-I SP codebook, support, in addition, (X1, X2)=(8,1).
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, support resource-specific RI restriction.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, OCPU = KS.
R1-2407283 Moderator Summary on Wednesday offline for Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2407280 Moderator Summary#3 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 3 Moderator (Samsung)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook
refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, for Scheme-A RI=5-8, the UCI
parameters for the selection scheme for the other SD basis vectors (in Part 2 UCI, wideband) are as follows:
Note: It is up to the editor how this is captured in the specification
Note: (q1,q2) is analogous to (q1,q2) for Type-II CSI
Note (from previous agreement): nSDBV=2 (v=5-6) or 3 (v=7-8)
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding UCI omission for the UCI reported in CSI part-1, CSI part-1 is either reported entirely or dropped entirely, with the following UCI packing order:
· CSI part-1 associated with the first configured CMR among the non-reported MR CRIs
· …
· CSI part-1 associated with the last configured CMR among the non-reported MR CRIs
· CSI part-1 of the 1st reported CRI,
· …
· CSI part-1 of the (M-MR)th reported CRI,
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), regarding the support of sub-band reporting (S>1) {(Fn,0, Fn,1, ..., Fn,NSB-P -1), n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref}:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports based on Rel-16 eType-II, regarding UCI omission for the UCI reported in CSI part-2, other than priority 0 (G0), the UCI packing order and the 2M consecutive priority levels are defined w.r.t the M CRIs (including the non-reported MR CRIs) as follows:
Note: For UCI fields in wideband (G0), G1 PMI components (based on Rel-16 eType-II CB in Section 6.3.2.1.2, TS 38.212), and G2 PMI components, legacy design is fully reused.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (PO) and S=1:
Parameter |
Details/description |
nref |
Reference CSI-RS
resource index, based on the ordering from RRC configuration: |
{Fn, n=0, 1, …, NTRP –1, n≠nref} |
DL/UL phase offset for CSI-RS resource n:
|
o nref,
o {Fn, n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref} ordered from the lowest to highest CSI-RS resource ID
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding timeline:
· Multiply legacy Z’ by a factor of 2
· Multiply legacy Z by a factor of 2
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, to facilitate UE-specific delay offset pre-compensation on PDSCH by the NW, support configuring a UE (via RRC signaling) to perform PMI calculation for the Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI report assuming pre-compensation using the UE-reported delay offset (when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd’).
FFS: NW indicates the delay offset value to be compensated for the Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI report
FFS: Whether only AP-CSI-RS, or any type of CSI-RS (P, SP, or AP) can be configured as the CMR for the Rel-18 eType-II CJT reporting
FFS: Support for SP-CSI for CJTC report
FFS: Whether this is also applicable for Rel-19 Type-I MP codebook
The above only applies when the CMRs do not share common QCL source for average delay indication
The above is UE optional feature.
R1-2407466 Moderator Summary on Thursday offline for Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2407281 Moderator Summary#4 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 4 Moderator (Samsung)
From Thursday session
Agreement
For
the Rel-19 Type-I codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, study,
for RI= >1, applying the
3-bit scaling factor(s) as agreed in RAN1#117, where a per-layer scaling factor
applied to the
selected SD basis
vector is given by e.g.
, where unit scaling
factor “1” is associated with the PDSCH-to-CSIRS EPRE offset “portion”
contributed by the
selected SD basis
vector without the 3-bit scaling factor
configured, e.g.
is the scaling factor
associated with the
SD basis vector, and
is the number of layers
transmitted using the
SD basis vector.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding resource-specific CBSR,
R1-2405872 On codebook for 3-antenna-port UL transmission Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2405877 On Rel-19 CB-based UL for 3TX UE InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2405889 Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions MediaTek Inc.
R1-2405905 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Spreadtrum Communications
R1-2405956 Uplink 3 Port Codebook based Transmission Google
R1-2405982 Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions CMCC
R1-2406025 Support for 3Tx UL MIMO Intel Corporation
R1-2406030 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions ZTE Corporation, Sanechips
R1-2406179 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based uplink transmissions vivo
R1-2406262 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions OPPO
R1-2406281 Discussion on the support of 3-antenna-port CB based transmissions Xiaomi
R1-2406312 Discussion on uplink enhancement for UE with 3Tx Fujitsu
R1-2406365 On support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions CATT
R1-2406523 Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Lenovo
R1-2406549 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions NEC
R1-2406646 Views on Rel-19 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Samsung
R1-2406747 On the support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Nokia
R1-2406833 Views on R19 3Tx codebook based transmission Apple
R1-2406927 Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2407004 Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmission Sharp
R1-2407026 3 Tx UL MIMO transmissions Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2407182 Support for 3 Tx UL Transmissions Ericsson
R1-2405879 Summary of Offline Discussions on 3TX CB-based Uplink Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
R1-2405880 FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; First Round Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
From Monday session
Proposal:
Support introduction of a new RRC parameter for enabling a configured 4-port SRS resource with port 1003 disabled.
Objected by vivo, Xiaomi
Conclusion:
Support to reuse SRS features (i.e., cyclic shift hopping, and comb offset hopping) in Rel-18 for SRS resource set with usage of codebook based 3TX PUSCH transmission, without introducing new UE capabilities (i.e., reusing Rel-18 UE capabilities).
Note: The conclusion does not include the Rel-18 8-port-specific SRS features.
R1-2405881 FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; Second Round Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
From Wednesday session
Proposal:
Support introduction of a new RRC parameter for enabling a configured 4-port SRS resource with port 1003 disabled.
From Thursday session
Agreement
For a UE reporting UE capability of 3TX operation, support introduction of a new RRC parameter for enabling a configured 4-port SRS resource with port 1003 disabled.
R1-2405882 Recommended Direction on 3TX CB-based Uplink in RAN1#118b Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
R1-2405873 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2405878 On Rel-19 Asymmetric mTRP Operation InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2405890 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios MediaTek Inc.
R1-2405906 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Spreadtrum Communications
R1-2405937 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Tejas Networks Limited
R1-2405983 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios CMCC
R1-2406026 Enhancements for asymmetric DL/UL scenarios Intel Corporation
R1-2406031 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios ZTE Corporation, Sanechips, China Telecom
R1-2406086 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios China Telecom, ZTE
R1-2406180 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios vivo
R1-2406263 Enhancements on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios OPPO
R1-2406265 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios TCL
R1-2406282 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Xiaomi
R1-2406313 Discussion on UL-only mTRP operation Fujitsu
R1-2406366 On asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios CATT
R1-2406455 Enhancement for Asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Scenarios Panasonic
R1-2406469 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Sony
R1-2406524 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Lenovo
R1-2406544 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios NEC
R1-2406647 Views on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Samsung
R1-2406701 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Transsion Holdings
R1-2406724 Discussion on UL enhancement through asymmetric DL and UL ETRI
R1-2406748 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Nokia
R1-2406803 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP scenarios Ericsson
R1-2406834 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Apple
R1-2406928 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2407005 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Sharp
R1-2407027 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment scenarios Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2407112 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios Google
R1-2407123 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP ASUSTeK
R1-2407189 Summary #1 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
From Monday session
Agreement
For indicating a PL offset for PDCCH-order PRACH transmission at least for FR1, support Alt3:
Agreement
For the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios, the value range of PL offset includes at least [-10, 60] dB.
Agreement
For the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios, support to include PL offset in the calculation of Type 1 PHR based on actual PUSCH transmission and Type 1 PHR based on reference PUSCH.
R1-2407190 Summary #2 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
Study whether to support Type 3 PHR reporting in a serving cell/BWP where the UE is configured with two separate SRS CLPC adjustment states.
Agreement
About the extended value range 1~X of starting bit of blocks in DCI format 2_3 in Rel-19, down-select one from the following Alts in RAN1#118bis:
Agreement
Final summary in R1-2407191.
Please refer to RP-242394 for detailed scope of the WI.
[118bis-R19-MIMO] – Eko (Samsung)
Email discussion on Rel-19 MIMO Phase 5
- To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc
R1-2408641 List of RRC and MAC CE impact for Rel-19 MIMO Ph5 Samsung, MediaTek, CMCC, Interdigital, OPPO, ZTE
R1-2407622 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management FUTUREWEI
R1-2407678 On UE initiated/event-driven beam management Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2407698 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Spreadtrum Communications
R1-2407773 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ZTE Corporation, Sanechips
R1-2407812 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management MediaTek Inc.
R1-2407853 Remaining issues on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management vivo
R1-2407897 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CMCC
R1-2407961 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Xiaomi
R1-2408039 Enhancement for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CATT
R1-2408083 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management TCL
R1-2408108 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Fujitsu
R1-2408117 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Transsion Holdings
R1-2408164 Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management OPPO
R1-2408187 Discussion on Rel-19 UE/Event-Driven Beam Management InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2408199 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Lenovo
R1-2408223 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management NEC
R1-2408230 Discussion on the UE-initiated/event-driven beam management HONOR
R1-2408296 Enhancements for Event-driven Beam Management Intel Corporation
R1-2408317 Offline summary for Rel-19 MIMO UEIBM (9.2.1) pre-RAN1#118bis Moderator (ZTE)
R1-2408336 UE-initiated beam management LG Electronics
R1-2408348 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Sharp
R1-2408368 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management Google
R1-2408382 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Ruijie Networks Co. Ltd
R1-2408404 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Sony
R1-2408457 Enhancements for UE-initiated beam management Apple
R1-2408562 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ETRI
R1-2408610 Remaining issues for UE-initiated beam management Ericsson
R1-2408635 Views on Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Samsung
R1-2408738 Enhancements to facilitate UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Nokia
R1-2408748 Enhancements for UE Initiated Beam Management Meta
R1-2408778 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2408827 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ITRI
R1-2408842 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2408881 Enhancements for UE-initiated/Event-Driven Beam Management Panasonic
R1-2408890 Discussion on UE initiated beam report ASUSTeK
R1-2408911 Discussions on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management KDDI Corporation
R1-2408925 Enhancements for UEiBM CEWiT
R1-2408940 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management NICT
R1-2408318 Moderator Summary #1 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Monday session
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding L1-RSRP report format Option-3 depending on Event-2,
· The differential L1-RSRP is quantized to a 4-bit value with 2 dB step size
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the triggering procedure in Step-2 of Mode-A
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, resource mapping/configuration between first and second UL channel in Mode-B, at least Option-1 is supported
· Option-1 (one-to-one): Only one periodic PUCCH resource for the first channel and only one pre-configured resource for second UL channel can be associated with the CSI report configuration for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting.
o Down-select one of the following in RAN1#118bis
§ Option-1A: Same periodicity between first PUCCH resource and pre-configured resource for second UL channel.
§ Option-1B: No restriction in terms of periodicity.
R1-2408319 Moderator Summary #2 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Tuesday session
Agreement
On cross-CC beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, for both Mode-A and Mode-B, the first PUCCH and the second PUSCH can be from the same or different CC(s)
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, for the case the pre-configured Type-1 CG PUSCH carry the beam report, for the second UL channel in Mode-B, at least option3 is supported:
· Option-1: The same Type-1 CG PUSCH can carry UL-SCH, any other UCI, and the beam report.
· Option-2: The Type-1 CG PUSCH is a dedicated type-1 CG PUSCH for carrying the beam report
o Note: This PUSCH can NOT carry UL-SCH. This PUSCH can NOT carry any other UCI.
· Option-3: The Type-1 CG PUSCH is a type-1 CG PUSCH for carrying the beam report
o Note: This PUSCH can NOT carry UL-SCH. This PUSCH can carry any other UCI.
FFS: whether Type-1 CG PUSCH can be transmitted if the pre-configured Type-1 CG PUSCH does NOT carry the beam report.
Working Assumption
The following working assumption in RAN1#118 is revised in red.
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding trigger events, besides for Event-2, Event-1 and Event-7 are both supported.
· Event-1: Quality of the current beam is worse than a certain threshold.
·
Event-7: Quality of at least one new beam, such as L1-RSRP, becomes a threshold
value better than the RS derived from the activated TCI state with the M-th Q-th best
quality.
o
M Q is RRC configured with subjective to UE
capability signalling
§ UE may only indicate a single candidate value or not support Event-7.
· The additionally supported events will reuse the same design as event 2 – unless there is consensus to do otherwise
· The additionally supported events will be lower priority compared to event 2.
R1-2408320 Moderator Summary #3 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding resource mapping/configuration between first and second UL channel associated with a same CSI report configuration in Mode-B,
· The UE expects that there is the same periodicity (in ms) between first PUCCH resource and pre-configured resource for second UL channel.
o FFS: Whether first PUCCH resource and pre-configured resource for second UL channel can have different periodicities (in ms).
Agreement
Regarding RS measurement for the current beam for Event 2, for Option-2a, besides for scheme-1 and scheme-2, there is no RAN1 consensus on the following enhancement for handling the case that only one TRS is configured in the indicated TCI state in RAN1#118bis
Note 3: When only one TRS is configured in the indicated TCI state, either Scheme-1(working assumption) or Scheme-2 is used where enabling one of either Scheme-1 or Scheme-2 is selected by NW.
When the Scheme-1 is used, the UE assumes that the CSI-RS resource in the indicated TCI state is configured in a CSI-RS resource set configured with repetition.
R1-2409212 Moderator Summary #4 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Thursday session
Agreement
Regarding RS measurement for the current beam for Event 2, for Option-2a, confirm the following working assumption
·
Note 3: When only one
TRS is configured in the indicated TCI state, either Scheme-1(working assumption) or Scheme-2 is used
where enabling one of either Scheme-1 or Scheme-2 is selected by NW.
Agreement
Regarding RS measurement for the current beam for Event 2, for Option-2a, the following working assumption in RAN1#117 is confirmed with modification:
Agreement
Regarding RS measurement for the current beam for Event 2, for enabling one of either Scheme-1 or Scheme-2 by NW in Option-2a, the following implicit manner is supported:
· If the RS(s) for new beam are CSI-RS configured in a CSI-RS resource set configured with repetition, Scheme-1 is enabled; otherwise, Scheme-2 is enabled.
Agreement
Regarding the triggering event determination for Event 2, the event instance(s) counting is per new beam. Further study candidate condition(s) of resetting the counting including whether resetting is needed.
Agreement
Regarding the triggering event determination for Event 2, down-select among the following alternatives for the evaluation periodicity for determining Event-2 instance [at least when DRX is not configured]
FFS: Whether the periodicity of the
current beam RS should be the same as that of the new beam RS(s).
Note: There is the same periodicity for the new beam RS(s).
Agreement
On cross-CC beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, the following is supported
· For new beam measurement, in a CSI report configuration, configure legacy RRC parameter carrier that indicates the CC that the RS resource set associated with the CSI reporting configuration can be found
· FFS: Whether the current beam RS and new beam RS(s) can be in the same CC or in different CCs, regarding cross-CC beam measurement.
· FFS: Whether the indicated TCI state and new beam RS(s) can be in the same CC or in different CCs, regarding cross-CC beam measurement.
Conclusion
There is no RAN1 consensus on the following proposal:
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding L1-RSRP report format Option-3 depending on Event-2, the candidate value of ‘N’ can further comprise {5, 6, 7, 8}, besides for previously agreed candidate value of {1, 2, 3, 4}.
Including support for up to 128 CSI-RS ports on FR1 and UE reporting enhancement for CJT and SRS port grouping for TDD low-complexity 6/8RX receiver.
R1-2407679 On 128 CSI-RS ports and UE reporting enhancement Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2407699 Discussion on CSI enhancements Spreadtrum Communications
R1-2407755 CSI enhancements Tejas Network Limited
R1-2407774 Discussion on CSI enhancements ZTE Corporation, Sanechips
R1-2407813 CSI enhancements MediaTek Inc.
R1-2407824 Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements New H3C Technologies Co., Ltd.
R1-2407854 Remaining issues on Rel-19 CSI enhancements vivo
R1-2407898 Discussion on CSI enhancements CMCC
R1-2407962 Discussion on Rel-19 MIMO CSI enhancements Xiaomi
R1-2407993 CSI Enhancement for NR MIMO Google
R1-2408040 On Rel-19 MIMO CSI enhancements CATT
R1-2408109 Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Fujitsu
R1-2408165 CSI enhancements for Rel-19 MIMO OPPO
R1-2408188 Discussion on Rel-19 Enhancements of CSI InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2408200 Discussion on CSI enhancements Lenovo
R1-2408210 Discussion on CSI enhancements NEC
R1-2408231 Discussion on CSI enhancements HONOR
R1-2408295 CSI enhancements for MIMO Intel Corporation
R1-2408337 Discussions on CSI enhancements LG Electronics
R1-2408349 CSI enhancements Sharp
R1-2408395 CSI enhancements for Rel. 19 MIMO Fraunhofer IIS, Fraunhofer HHI
R1-2408405 More views on CSI enhancements Sony
R1-2408458 Views on R19 MIMO CSI enhancement Apple
R1-2408496 Discussion on CSI enhancements TCL
R1-2408563 Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements ETRI
R1-2408638 Views on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Samsung
R1-2408739 CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5 Nokia
R1-2408779 Discussion on CSI enhancements NTT DOCOMO, INC., NTT CORPORATION
R1-2408843 CSI enhancements for >32 ports and UE-assisted CJT Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2408876 CSI enhancements for large antenna arrays and CJT Ericsson
R1-2408926 CSI Enhancements CEWiT
R1-2408948 Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5 KDDI Corporation
R1-2408964 Discussion on CSI enhancements NICT
R1-2408636 Moderator summary for OFFLINE discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Samsung (Moderator)
R1-2408637 Moderator summary on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Samsung (Moderator)
From Monday session
Agreement
For a UE configured with a total of PSRS=6 or 8 ports across ≥1 SRS resources for antenna switching intended for xT6R or xT8R, respectively, support the following fixed SRS port grouping where (with the PSRS ports indexed in an ascending order according to SRS resource ID and port number within each SRS resource):
· SRS port group 0, corresponding to CW0, comprises the even PSRS/2 out of PSRS ports; and
· SRS port group 1, corresponding to CW1, comprises the odd PSRS/2 out of PSRS ports
The above feature is applicable only for reportQuantity = ‘cri-RI-CQI’.
No other spec enhancement is introduced on new CW-to-layer mapping, DL resource allocation, CSI feedback, and DCI format
Note: The above grouping assumption is to align NW and UE on the association between SRS ports and reported CQIs for the two CWs when reportQuantity = ‘cri-RI-CQI’.
Note: different SRS ports are associated with different UE antenna ports.
Note: if one single CW is scheduled, both SRS port groups can correspond to the same CW, i.e. no enhancement is needed for the single-CW case.
Note: This feature is a separate UE capability and, for UEs supporting this capability, configured via RRC (FFS details on the extend of RRC configuration).
Note: Whether to support 6Rx with more than 4 layers is to be decided in RAN4 Rel-19 RF enhancements WI.
FFS (by RAN1#118bis): Whether there is impact on mapping between CWs to CSI-RS ports.
For SRS antenna switching with multiple aperiodic SRS resource sets, PSRS ports indexed in an ascending order according to SRS resource set ID and SRS resource ID in a set and port number within each SRS resource.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP and Type-II codebook refinements (except based on Rel-18 Type-II Doppler) for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, active resource counting is:
· For Capability 1 timeline: 1
· For Capability 2 timeline: 1
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding the support for the 3-bit scaling factor(s) for RI=v >1, support only for RI=v=2 without per-SD-basis-vector/layer power adjustment/boosting
This feature is a separate UE capability from soft scaling for RI=v=1. Introduce new RRC parameter to enable the feature.
Note: This doesn’t preclude the use of power boosting at the NW side by implementation.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, the inter-pol co-phase selection indicator row from the UCI parameter table for Scheme-B for RI=5-8 is amended as follows:
Scheme-B
Parameter |
UCI |
Details/description |
… |
… |
… |
Inter-pol co-phase selection indicator for each layer |
Part 2
Wideband or Subband (**) |
v=5, 7: QPSK: · For a layer group with 2 layers: 1-bit indicator {(1, -1), (j, -j)} · For a layer group with 1 orphan layer: 2-bit indicator {1, -1, j, -j} v=6, 8: QPSK: · 1-bit indicator for each layer group {(1, -1), (j, -j)} |
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for P (the total number of aggregated ports)=48, 64, 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding timeline for the port subset indication for the SD NES Type-1,
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for P (the total number of aggregated ports)=48, 64, 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding active resource/port counting for the port subset indication for the SD NES Type-1,
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, when a CSI-RS resource set for aggregating K NZP CSI-RS resources (to attain a total of 48, 64, and 128 ports) is configured as the associated NZP CSI-RS for each of the SRS resource set(s) with higher layer parameter usage in SRS-ResourceSet set to ‘nonCodebook’, support to change the starting position of the time gap between CSI-RS and SRS from the last symbol of the reception of the aperiodic NZP-CSI-RS resource to the last symbol of the reception of the aperiodic NZP-CSI-RS resource set.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, except for that based on the Rel-18 Type-II Doppler, the following rule is supported:
· After the CSI report (re)configuration, serving cell activation, BWP change, or activation of SP-CSI, the UE reports a CSI report only after receiving at least one CSI-RS transmission occasion for each of the CSI-RS resources in the corresponding CSI-RS resource set for channel measurement and at least one CSI-RS and/or CSI-IM resource transmission occasion for each of the CSI-RS and/or CSI-IM resources in the corresponding resource set for interference measurement no later than the CSI reference resource and within the same DRX active time, when DRX is configured, and drops the report otherwise.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports based on the Rel-18 Type-II Doppler, the following rule is supported:
· After the CSI report (re)configuration, serving cell activation, BWP change, or activation of SP-CSI, the UE reports a CSI report only after receiving at least one aperiodic or KP consecutive periodic/semi-persistent CSI-RS transmission occasion(s) for each of the CSI-RS resources in each CSI-RS resource group in the corresponding CSI-RS resource set for channel measurement and at least one CSI-RS and/or CSI-IM resource transmission occasion for each of the CSI-RS and/or CSI-IM resources in the corresponding resource set for interference measurement no later than the CSI reference resource and within the same DRX active time, when DRX is configured, and drops the report otherwise.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding priority 0 (G0) in CSI part 2, the UCI packing order is as follows:
The entire G0 is either reported or dropped entirely, following the legacy principle.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports,
the following rule is supported:
· After the CSI report (re)configuration, serving cell activation, BWP change, or activation of SP-CSI, the UE reports a CSI report only after receiving at least one CSI-RS transmission occasion for each of the CSI-RS resources in the corresponding CSI-RS resource set for channel measurement and at least one CSI-RS and/or CSI-IM resource transmission occasion for each of the CSI-RS and/or CSI-IM resources in the corresponding resource set for interference measurement no later than the CSI reference resource and within the same DRX active time, when DRX is configured, and drops the report otherwise.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), the selection of PSRS=1 SRS port (corresponding to the ‘reference UE antenna port’) out of the y available SRS ports (from an xTyR SRS resource for antenna switching) can be configured per CSI reporting setting.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), regarding the configured associated SRS resource,
· When periodic or semi-persistent associated SRS resource is configured, the SRS transmission occasion for determining the reference UE antenna port corresponds to the latest SRS transmission occasion before the occasions of the NTRP CSI-RS resources used for measuring ‘cjtc-P’ report
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured, confirm the following working assumptions as agreement with the following refinement:
FFS: Whether an additional UE procedure is needed when the reported DO value is ‘out of range’
FFS: Whether the Dd report codepoints need to be reinterpreted from intervals/ranges to values when the linkage mechanism is configured, or in general, a rule is needed to determine the value of DO for the compensation for each CMR for CJT CSI report (including if multiple Dos are reported)
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured, support at least AP-CSI-RS as the CMR for the Rel-18 eType-II CJT reporting
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured with two separate triggers, support to include an indicator in the trigger for a Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI, which indicates whether the UE should perform delay offset (DO) compensation based on the linked CJTC Dd report when calculating the Rel-18 Type-II CJT CSI or not.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (PO) and >1:
· The UCI parameters are captured in the tables below:
Parameter |
Details/description |
nref |
Reference CSI-RS
resource index, based on the ordering from RRC configuration: |
{(n,, n,, n,NSB-P), n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref} |
DL/UL phase offsets for CSI-RS resource n, (n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref):
|
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding active resource counting and OCPU, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (phase offset), for both =1 and >1, fully reuse those from Rel-18 TDCP reporting
· OCPU =X.NTRP where X≥1 is defined based on UE capabilities and determined by the UE
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd’ (delay offset), ‘cjtc-F’ (frequency offset), or, ‘cjtc-Dd-F’ (joint delay + frequency offset),
·
after the CSI report (re)configuration, serving cell activation, BWP change, the UE
reports a CSI report only after receiving at least one CSI-RS transmission
occasion for each CSI-RS resource in the CSI-RS Resource Sets of the CSI-RS Resource Setting for channel
measurement no later than the CSI reference resource within the same DRX active
time, when DRX is configured, and drop the report otherwise
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset),
· after the CSI report (re)configuration, serving cell activation, BWP change, the UE reports a CSI report only after receiving at least one CSI-RS transmission occasion for each of the CSI-RS resources in the corresponding CSI-RS Resource Set for channel measurement no later than the CSI reference resource within the same DRX active time, when DRX is configured, and drop the report otherwise.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), regarding the support of sub-band reporting (>1), the maximum value of configured NSB-P is 16 per CSI reporting setting.
R1-2409061 Moderator Summary for 1st offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2409058 Moderator Summary#2 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 2 Moderator (Samsung)
From Tuesday session
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding one-part CSI wideband CQI/PMI reporting, the UCI packing order is as follows:
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone
CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI
reports is configured with a joint trigger, there is no consensus in
supporting P/SP CSI-RS as the CMR for the Rel-18 eType-II CJT reporting (in
addition to the agreed AP CSI-RS).
Agreement
For
the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports,
regarding per-layer
scaling factor applied to each of the selected SD basis vectors associated with
RI=v {2} for the 3-bit
scaling factor(s), decide, by RAN1#119, from the following alternatives:
Where ri denotes the number of layers associated with the i-th SD basis vector.
The same scheme applies to both Mode-A and Mode-B.
Note:
as agreed in RAN1#117.
Normalization of precoder should be taken into account in the final specification design.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for P (the total number of aggregated ports)=48, 64, 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding CPU occupation for the port subset indication for the SD NES Type-1,
|
Timeline capability 1 |
Timeline capability 2 |
P-report (L subConfigs) |
|
|
AP/SP-report (N triggered) |
|
|
R1-2409062 Moderator Summary for 2nd offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2409059 Moderator Summary#3 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 3 Moderator (Samsung)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured with two separate triggers, to indicate whether or not the UE should perform delay offset (DO) compensation based on the latest linked CJTC Dd report when calculating the Rel-18 Type-II CJT CSI, introduce a 1-bit indicator per CSI trigger state:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured with a joint trigger:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured, support linking the CMRs in the two CSI Report Settings so that UE knows which CMRs in the two report settings correspond to the same TRP.
FFS: linking, when the number of resources configured for CJT CSI is < number of resource sets configured for CJT Dd, in case of separate triggers.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP and Type-II codebook refinements (except based on Rel-18 Type-II Doppler) for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, change the maxNumberTxPortsPerResource to maxNumberTxPortsPerReport for Rel-19 codebook triplet capability
R1-2409063 Moderator Summary for 3rd offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2409060 Moderator Summary#4 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 4 Moderator (Samsung)
From Thursday session
Conclusion
For a UE configured with a total of PSRS=6 or 8 ports across ≥1 SRS resources for antenna switching intended for xT6R or xT8R, respectively, when SRS port grouping is configured, regarding the mapping between CSI-RS ports and SRS port groups, no additional specification support is introduced
- It is up to gNB implementation to ensure adequate operation of this feature
Thursday decision: The following are withdrawn; postponed to RAN1#119 (Orlando).
R1-2409064 DRAFT LS to RAN2 on RRC and MAC CE impacts for Rel-19 NR MIMO Ph5 Samsung
R1-2409065 LS to RAN2 on RRC and MAC CE impacts for Rel-19 NR MIMO Ph5 RAN1, Samsung
Including support 3T6R SRS antenna switching.
R1-2407680 Discussion on 3-antenna-port UL transmission Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2407700 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Spreadtrum Communications
R1-2407775 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions ZTE Corporation, Sanechips
R1-2407814 3-antenna-port UL transmissions MediaTek Inc.
R1-2407855 Remaining issues on 3-antenna-port codebook-based uplink transmissions vivo
R1-2407899 Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions CMCC
R1-2407963 Discussion on the support of 3-antenna-port CB based transmissions Xiaomi
R1-2407994 Uplink 3 Port Codebook based Transmission Google
R1-2408041 Enhancement for 3-antenna-port UL transmissions CATT
R1-2408110 Discussion on uplink enhancement for UE with 3Tx Fujitsu
R1-2408166 Discussion on 3-antenna-port uplink transmissions OPPO
R1-2408189 Discussion on Rel-19 CB-based UL for 3TX UE InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2408201 Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Lenovo
R1-2408211 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions NEC
R1-2408293 Support for 3Tx UL MIMO Intel Corporation
R1-2408338 Discussions on 3-antenna-port UE LG Electronics
R1-2408350 Support for 3-antenna-port transmission Sharp
R1-2408459 Views on R19 MIMO 3Tx transmission Apple
R1-2408639 Views on Rel-19 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Samsung
R1-2408740 On the support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Nokia
R1-2408768 Support for 3 Tx UL Transmissions Ericsson
R1-2408780 Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2408844 3 Tx UL MIMO transmissions Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2408191 FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; First Round Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
From Monday session
Agreement
To support 3T6R antenna switching for a 3TX UE,
Note: This is not meant to be a text proposal to be captured for the specifications.
R1-2408192 FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; Second Round Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
To support non-codebook-based PUSCH transmission by a 3TX UE,
- UE reports a capability of up to a maximum of 3 layers.
Conclusion
To support non-codebook-based precoding by a 3TX UE, for SRI indication, re-use the legacy-based solution according to NSRS ≤ maxNumberSRS-ResourcePerSet.
From Friday session
Conclusion
To support non-codebook-based PUSCH transmission by a 3TX UE,
· For sTRP, a single SRS resource set, with up to NSRS ≤ maxNumberSRS-ResourcePerSet single-port SRS resources, can be configured,
· For Rel-17 M-TRP PUSCH repetition, two SRS resource sets, each with up to NSRS ≤ maxNumberSRS-ResourcePerSet single-port SRS resources, can be configured.
Final summary in R1-2408193.
Including support for 2TA without CoresetPoolIdx association for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP.
R1-2407681 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2407701 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Spreadtrum Communications
R1-2407729 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios China Telecom, ZTE
R1-2407756 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Tejas Network Limited
R1-2407776 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios ZTE Corporation, Sanechips, China Telecom
R1-2407815 Asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP deployments MediaTek Inc.
R1-2407821 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios TCL
R1-2407856 Remaining issues on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios vivo
R1-2407900 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios CMCC
R1-2407964 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Xiaomi
R1-2408042 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios CATT
R1-2408111 Discussion on UL-only mTRP operation Fujitsu
R1-2408118 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Transsion Holdings
R1-2408167 Enhancements on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios OPPO
R1-2408190 Discussion on Rel-19 Asymmetric mTRP Operation InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2408202 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Lenovo
R1-2408224 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios NEC
R1-2408294 Enhancements for asymmetric DL/UL scenarios Intel Corporation
R1-2408339 Discussions on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios LG Electronics
R1-2408351 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Sharp
R1-2408369 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios Google
R1-2408406 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Sony
R1-2408460 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Apple
R1-2408564 Discussion on UL enhancement in asymmetric TRP scenarios ETRI
R1-2408584 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP scenarios Ericsson
R1-2408640 Views on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Samsung
R1-2408741 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Nokia
R1-2408781 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2408845 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment scenarios Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2408891 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP ASUSTeK
R1-2408995 Summary #1 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
From Monday session
Agreement
· The lower limit of the value range of PL offset is extended to -12 dB.
R1-2408996 Summary #2 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
From Tuesday session
Agreement
Support 2TA for the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP deployment scenarios:
Agreement
For indicating PL offset for PDCCH-order PRACH, introduce a new 1-bit DCI field in DCI format 1_0:
R1-2408997 Summary #3 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
For indicating PL offset for PDCCH-order PRACH, when two joint/UL TCI states are indicated in Rel-18 unified TCI, down-select one from the following Alts for the 1-bit DCI field in DCI 1_0 which indicates the application of PL offset on PRACH transmission:
FFS: If other information can be indicated by this same 1-bit DCI field for the PDCCH-order PRACH transmission
R1-2409254 Summary #4 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
From Thursday session
Agreement
About the extended value range 1~X of starting bit of blocks in DCI format 2_3 in Rel-19, support Alt1:
Agreement
Support DCI format 1_1 to indicate TPC command for SRS CLPC adjustment state(s) separate from PUSCH:
Please refer to RP-242394 for detailed scope of the WI.
[119-R19-MIMO] – Eko (Samsung)
Email discussion on Rel-19 MIMO Phase 5
- To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc
R1-2409592 List of RRC and MAC CE impact for Rel-19 MIMO Ph5 Samsung (Moderator)
From Thursday session
R1-2410757 DRAFT LS to RAN2 on RRC and MAC CE impacts for Rel-19 NR MIMO Ph5 Moderator (Samsung)
Decision: The LS to RAN2 on RRC and MAC CE impacts is endorsed. Final LS is approved in R1-2410758.
R1-2409370 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management MediaTek Inc.
R1-2409377 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ZTE Corporation, Sanechips
R1-2409427 On UE initiated/event-driven beam management Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2409459 Further Details on Rel-19 UE/Event-Driven Beam Management InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2409504 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CMCC
R1-2409563 Remaining issues for UE-initiated beam management Ericsson
R1-2409586 Views on Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Samsung
R1-2409629 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Spreadtrum, UNISOC
R1-2409673 Remaining issues on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management vivo
R1-2409710 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management TCL
R1-2409748 Enhancements for Event-driven Beam Management Intel Corporation
R1-2409792 Enhancements for UE-initiated beam management Apple
R1-2409842 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Ruijie Networks Co. Ltd
R1-2409857 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management NEC
R1-2409888 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Xiaomi
R1-2409933 Views on Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CATT
R1-2409961 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Transsion Holdings
R1-2409969 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Lenovo
R1-2410035 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management FUTUREWEI
R1-2410053 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Fujitsu
R1-2410108 Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management OPPO
R1-2410116 Offline summary for Rel-19 MIMO UEIBM (9.2.1) pre-RAN1#119 Moderator (ZTE)
R1-2410164 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management Google
R1-2410171 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Hyundai Motor Company
R1-2410175 Discussion on the UE-initiated/event-driven beam management HONOR
R1-2410197 UE-initiated beam management LG Electronics
R1-2410219 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Sony
R1-2410262 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ETRI
R1-2410315 Enhancements to facilitate UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Nokia
R1-2410346 Enhancements for UE Initiated Beam Management Meta
R1-2410381 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2410427 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ITRI
R1-2410435 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Sharp
R1-2410471 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2410533 Enhancements for UE-initiated/Event-Driven Beam Management Panasonic
R1-2410538 Discussion on UE initiated beam report ASUSTeK
R1-2410540 Discussions on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management KDDI Corporation
R1-2410573 Enhancements for UEiBM CEWiT
R1-2410585 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management NICT
From Monday session
R1-2410117 Moderator Summary #1 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, for the case the pre-configured Type-1 CG PUSCH does NOT carry the beam report, for the second UL channel in Mode-B, Option-2 is supported:
· Option-2: Type-1 CG PUSCH can NOT be transmitted
Agreement
On cross-CC beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, the following is supported
· the first PUCCH and the second PUSCH associated for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting are from the same PUCCH group.
· (working assumption) the first PUCCH and the second PUSCH associated for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting are from different PUCCH groups
o Subject to separate UE capability
Conclusion
On cross-CC beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, the case that the first PUCCH and the second PUSCH are from the different CG is NOT supported.
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding first PUCCH channel configuration, down-select one of Alt-1 and Alt-2 for both mode-A and mode-B.
Note: Further details on first PUCCH retransmission for mode A and mode B will be separately discussed.
R1-2410118 Moderator Summary #2 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Tuesday session
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, for Event 7, the scheme-1 and scheme-2 for deriving ‘RS for current beam’ on Event-2 is reused with the following further interpretation:
· Scheme-1: ‘RS for current beam’ is the QCL RS in the activated TCI state with the Q-th best quality.
· Scheme-2: ‘RS for current beam’ is the SSB which is QCLed with the QCL RS in the activated TCI state with the Q-th best quality.
· Basic feature of the triggering event determination for Event-7: Once quality of at least one new beam becomes a threshold value better than the RS derived from the activated TCI state with the Q-th best quality, UE initiated beam report occurs
Note: For Event-2, we have the following definition for scheme-1 and scheme-2
· Scheme-1: RS for current beam is the QCL RS in the indicated TCI state
· Scheme-2: RS for current beam is the SSB which is QCLed with the QCL RS in the indicated TCI state.
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, for Event 1, down-select at least one among the following options for RS measurement
· Option-1: RS resource set for new beam is NOT configured in the CSI reporting configuration, and an explicit RRC selection for scheme-1 and scheme-2 is introduced.
· Option-2: RS resource set for new beam is configured in the CSI reporting configuration, and the following implicit manner for enabling one of either scheme-1 or scheme-2 is used:
· If the RS(s) for new beam are CSI-RS configured in a CSI-RS resource set configured with repetition, Scheme-1 is enabled; otherwise, Scheme-2 is enabled.
R1-2410119 Moderator Summary #3 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding first PUCCH channel configuration, Alt-2 is supported for both mode-A and mode-B: the first PUCCH channel is a new UCI type
Note: Further details on first PUCCH retransmission (if supported) for mode A and mode B will be continue to be separately discussed in RAN1.
Agreement
Confirm the following working assumption in RAN1#117:
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting
· For mode-A, at least support one-bit indication in the first PUCCH channel to request a resource for a second UL channel to carry beam report.
o In such case, a periodic PUCCH resource (with PUCCH format 0/1) is configured by dedicated RRC signaling.
· For mode-B, at least support one-bit indication in the first PUCCH channel to notify a second UL channel to carry beam report.
o In such case, a periodic PUCCH resource (with PUCCH format 0/1) is configured by dedicated RRC signaling.
· FFS: Whether/how to support multi-bit indication in the first PUCCH for mode-A and mode-B, e.g., when multi-event(s) are approved.
· FFS: details on the dedicated RRC signaling
· Above applies at least for the single CC case.
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, at least one of the following is supported as an extension on L1-RSRP report format depending on Event-2.
· Option-1: For each of reported CRI/SSBRI, to introduce additional indication of whether the CRI/SSBRI satisfies the condition of Event-2.
o The presence of this field is enabled by RRC with subjective to UE capability.
o The presence of this field is only for the case that N > 1 and the time window and M are configured
· Option-2: For each of reported CRI/SSBRI, to introduce additional indication of the number of Event-2 instances for the CRI/SSBRI(s) within a time window.
o The presence of this field is enabled by RRC with subjective to UE capability.
o The presence of this field is only for the case that N > 1 and the time window and M are configured.
· Option-3: No further enhancement.
Note: As agreed in RAN1#117, at least one of the reported CRI/SSBRI(s) should satisfy the condition of Event-2
FFS: Whether/how to handle the case if UE has not sent any first PUCCH associated for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, for Mode-A.
R1-2410872 Moderator Summary #4 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Thursday session
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the triggering procedure in Step-2 of Mode-A, down-select one of the following options in RAN1#120
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the multiplexing/dropping rule(s) of 1-bit first PUCCH, further study at least the following cases:
· Case-1: The 1-bit first PUCCH is collided/overlapped with a PUCCH carrying normal SR and/or a PUCCH with normal LRR
· Case-2: The 1-bit first PUCCH is collided/overlapped with a PUSCH
· Case-3: The 1-bit first PUCCHs corresponding to different CSI configuration for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting are overlapping in the time domain.
Agreement
Study the following to reduce beam application latency after a UEI/ED beam report is sent
· Alt-1: After confirmation/acknowledgement from NW, apply new beam without RRC configuration signaling or MAC-CE signaling
o after sending a UE-initiated beam report, the UE could store the QCL properties of the SSB associated with the reference signal reported in the beam report
o update TCI state(s) with the reported new beam(s)
o activate new beam(s) without additional SSB reception
· Alt-2: After receiving a TCI state activation command to activate a TCI state(s), if the new beam(s) associated with the TCI state(s) is reported as synchronized in the UEI/ED beam report, the TCI state(s) becomes applicable for DL reception without additional SSB reception.
o Note: A reported new beam is determined as synchronized by UE, if the UE stores the QCL properties associated with the reported new beam(s) after the UEI/ED beam report is sent
o FFS: How to inform a reported new beam in a UEI/ED beam report (i.e., introducing one-bit indicator for each reported new beam or all the reported new beam are assumed to be synchronized)
· Alt-3: After sending a UE-initiated beam report, the UE could store the QCL properties of the SSB associated with the reference signal reported in the beam report.
o In such case, at the reception of a subsequent reception of Unified TCI States Activation/Deactivation MAC CE, the UE activates new beam(s) without additional SSB reception.
· Other alternatives are not precluded.
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding trigger events, the following working assumption in RAN1#118bis is confirmed:
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding trigger events, besides for Event-2, Event-1 and Event-7 are both supported.
Agreement
Regarding for the evaluation periodicity for determining Event-2 instance [at least when DRX is not configured], at least Alt-1 is supported for the single-CC beam reporting (for case that the CSI report configuration and RS for the current beam and new beam(s) are in the same CC).
· Alt-1: The periodicity of the current beam RS should be the same as that of the new beam RS(s).
o The evaluation periodicity is the same as the periodicity of the current and new beam RS(s).
· Alt-2: The periodicity of the current beam RS can be different from that of the new beam RS(s)
o Alt-2_1: The evaluation periodicity is the same as the periodicity of the current beam RS.
o Alt-2_2: The evaluation periodicity is the same as periodicity of the new beam RS.
o Alt-2_3: The evaluation periodicity is the same as shortest periodicity of the current beam RS and new beam RS(s).
o Alt-2_4: The evaluation periodicity is the maximum of {X ms, shortest periodicity of the current beam RS and new beam RS(s)}.
o Alt-2_5: The evaluation periodicity is the same as largest periodicity of the current beam RS and new beam RS(s).
Note: There is the same periodicity for the new beam RS(s).
FFS: Down-selection among above Alt(s) for cross-CC beam reporting.
Strong concerns were expressed by Huawei and CATT that if only Alt-1 is supported in the end, the feature will not be practical.
Send an LS to RAN4.
From Friday session
R1-2410913 [DRAFT] LS to RAN4 on event-instance evaluation periodicity for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
Decision: Draft LS is endorsed and final version is approved in R1-2410914.
Including support for up to 128 CSI-RS ports on FR1 and UE reporting enhancement for CJT and SRS port grouping for TDD low-complexity 6/8RX receiver.
R1-2409371 CSI enhancements MediaTek Inc.
R1-2409378 Discussion on CSI enhancements ZTE Corporation, Sanechips
R1-2409428 On 128 CSI-RS ports and UE reporting enhancement Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2409432 CSI enhancements for Rel. 19 MIMO Fraunhofer IIS, Fraunhofer HHI
R1-2409460 Further Details on Rel-19 Enhancements of CSI InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2409505 Discussion on CSI enhancements CMCC
R1-2409589 Views on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Samsung
R1-2409630 Discussion on CSI enhancements Spreadtrum, UNISOC
R1-2409674 Remaining issues on Rel-19 CSI enhancements vivo
R1-2409747 CSI enhancements for MIMO Intel Corporation
R1-2409761 CSI enhancements Tejas Networks Limited
R1-2409793 Views on R19 MIMO CSI enhancement Apple
R1-2409851 Discussion on CSI enhancements NEC
R1-2409889 Further discussion on Rel-19 MIMO CSI enhancements Xiaomi
R1-2410657 Views on NR MIMO CSI enhancements Phase 5 CATT (rev of R1-2409934)
R1-2409970 Discussion on CSI enhancements Lenovo
R1-2410040 CSI enhancements TCL
R1-2410054 Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Fujitsu
R1-2410109 CSI enhancements for Rel-19 MIMO OPPO
R1-2410154 CSI Enhancement for NR MIMO Google
R1-2410176 Discussion on CSI enhancements HONOR
R1-2410220 Further views on CSI enhancements Sony
R1-2410303 Discussion on Open Issues of CSI Enhancement Rakuten Mobile, Inc
R1-2410667 CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5 Nokia (rev of R1-2410316)
R1-2410353 Remaining issues on CSI enhancements for large antenna arrays and CJT Ericsson
R1-2410382 Discussion on CSI enhancements NTT DOCOMO, INC., NTT CORPORATION
R1-2410436 CSI enhancements Sharp
R1-2410472 CSI enhancements for >32 ports and UE-assisted CJT Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2410549 Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5 KDDI Corporation
R1-2410586 Discussion on CSI enhancements NICT
R1-2409587 Moderator summary for OFFLINE discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Samsung (Moderator)
R1-2409588 Moderator summary on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Samsung (Moderator)
From Monday session
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured with two separate triggers, to indicate whether or not the UE should perform delay offset (DO) compensation based on the latest linked CJTC Dd report when calculating the Rel-18 Type-II CJT CSI, the 1-bit indicator per CSI trigger state applies to all the NTRP configured CSI-RS resources.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured with a joint trigger, the timeline (Z/Z’) is determined as Z/Z’ associated with the Rel-18 eType-II CJT, plus Drelax
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, if the UCI associated with each of the M CRIs comprises two parts and is multiplexed on PUCCH, the UE determines the PUCCH resource, the number of PRBs for the PUCCH resource, assuming that the CSI associated with each of the M reported CRIs corresponds to rank 1.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured, regarding linking the CMRs in the two CSI Report Settings, for separate triggering, the UE expects that the number of configured CSI-RS resources associated with the Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI is always the same as the number of TRS resource sets associated with the Rel-19 CJTC Dd report.
Agreement
For
the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding UCI
reported in CSI part-1, if resource-specific RI restriction is configured, zero padding bits are
introduced in CSI part 1 for each of the (MMR) reported
CRIs:
·
For
a k-th CRI from the (MMR) reported
CRIs (where k=1, 2, …, (M
MR)),
zero padding bits are
inserted where:
o
§
, where
is the size of RI field
corresponding to the i-th CRI, and
is the set of CRIs
corresponding to the (Ks
MR) resources
§
is the size of RI field
corresponding to the k-th CRI
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured with two separate triggers, to indicate whether or not the UE should perform delay offset (DO) compensation based on the latest linked CJTC Dd report when calculating the Rel-18 Type-II CJT CSI, when a single CSI trigger state associated with >1 Rel-18 Type-II CJT CSI reports, the 1-bit indicator per CSI trigger state applies to all the Rel-18 Type-II CJT CSI reports linked with the CJTC Dd report(s).
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding per-layer scaling factor applied to each of the selected SD basis vectors associated with RI=v=2 for the 3-bit scaling factor(s):
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding packing order and priority levels of NRep CSI reports with M CRIs, the UCI packing order and the consecutive priority levels (higher to lower) follows the legacy specifications.
R1-2410754 Moderator Summary for 1st offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2410755 Moderator Summary for 2nd offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2410751 Moderator Summary#2 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 2 Moderator (Samsung)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding wideband P/SP-CSI reported using one-part CSI, if resource-specific RI restriction is configured, the zero padding bits for each of the M reported CRI are determined as follows:
Note: Here k, j=1, 2, …, KS
Note: How this is captured in the spec (including exact formulation) is up to the editor(s).
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding aperiodic CSI-RS resource configuration, an RRC-configured resource-level slot offset (relative to the resource-set-level slot offset, using the same design as Rel-19 Type-I/II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 ports) is supported for aperiodic CSI-RS resource set.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for P=48, 64, 128 CSI-RS ports, when the UE reports or multiplexes the CSI that include Part 2 CSI reports on PUCCH, the PUCCH resource, the number of PRBs for the PUCCH resource, and/or the number of Part 2 CSI reports are determined based on the RI value that results in the largest UCI payload.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured with a joint triggering carried on a same PUSCH (hence on a same slot), the UCI associated with the CJTC Dd report is multiplexed in CSI Part 1.
Note: The above proposal reuses the legacy UCI design principles, where the UCI associated with the CJTC Dd is placed in the part of UCI as TS 38212 Table 6.3.1.1.2-13; the CSI part 1 of Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI is placed in the part of UCI as TS 38.212 Table 6.3.1.1.2-13 and the CSI part 2 of Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI is placed in the part of UCI as TS 38.212 Table 6.3.1.1.2-14.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), the UE assumes that the NTRP CSI-RS resources are transmitted without DL/UL switching in between the NTRP resources.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook
refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding per-layer scaling factor applied to
each of the selected SD basis vectors associated with RI=v=2 for the
3-bit scaling factor(s),.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook
refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding per-layer scaling factor applied to
each of the selected SD basis vectors for the 3-bit scaling factor(s), the
configuration of the value (3-bit indicator
per SD basis vector group) is RI-common (a same configuration is used for RI=1
and RI=2).
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports with the Rel-15 Type-I SP codebook, joint operation with the Rel-18 NES framework is not supported.
R1-2410752 Moderator Summary#3 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 3 Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2410756 Moderator Summary for 3rd offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
Including support 3T6R SRS antenna switching.
R1-2409372 Enhancements for 3-antenna-port transmissions MediaTek Inc.
R1-2409379 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions ZTE Corporation, Sanechips
R1-2409429 Discussion on 3-antenna-port UL transmission Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2409461 Further Details on Rel-19 CB-based UL for 3TX UE InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2409506 Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions CMCC
R1-2409590 Views on Rel-19 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Samsung
R1-2409675 Remaining issues on 3-antenna-port codebook-based uplink transmissions vivo
R1-2409794 Remaining issues on R19 MIMO 3Tx transmission Apple
R1-2409890 Discussion on the support of 3-antenna-port CB based transmissions Xiaomi
R1-2409935 Views on 3-antenna-port uplink transmissions CATT
R1-2409971 Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Lenovo
R1-2410055 Discussion on uplink enhancement for UE with 3Tx Fujitsu
R1-2410110 Discussion on 3-antenna-port uplink transmissions OPPO
R1-2410155 Uplink 3 Port Codebook based Transmission Google
R1-2410317 On the support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Nokia
R1-2410341 Remaining issues for 3 Tx UL transmissions Ericsson
R1-2410383 Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2410437 Support for 3-antenna-port transmission Sharp
R1-2409463 FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; First Round Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
From Monday session
Conclusion
To support 3T6R antenna switching for a 3TX UE,
Agreement
The following capabilities are introduced for Rel-19
· 't3r3' for 3T3R.
· 't3r6' for 3T6R.
From AI 5
R1-2409353 LS on UE RF issues for Rel-19 MIMO enhancement RAN4, Huawei
From Monday session
Agreement
Support the following replies to Questions 2 and 3 in RAN4 LS,
Question 2: RAN4 would like to check with RAN1 whether a 3Tx UE supporting UL full power transmission mode 0 needs to achieve the same maximum output power with both 1Layer and 2Layers.
Question 3: RAN4 would like to check with RAN1 whether 3Tx UE can support UL full power transmission mode 0 with 2Layer 3-port codebooks but not support 1Layer 3-port codebooks. |
Reply to Q2: Yes, a 3Tx UE supporting UL full power transmission mode 0, delivers the same maximum output power with both 1- and 2-layer precoders.
Reply to Q3: No, a 3Tx UE supporting UL full power transmission mode 0, shall support full power with both 1- and 2-layer 3-port codebook.
R1-2409464 FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; Second Round Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
From Wednesday session
R1-2410762 Draft Reply to RAN4 LS on UE RF issues for Rel-19 MIMO Enhancement InterDigital, OPPO
Decision: The draft LS is endorsed and final version is approved in R1-2410870.
Agreement
For a UE operating with 3TX,
A UE does not expect an SRS resource to be configured in both codebook and antenna switching resource sets with conflicting (disabled state) configuration for the port 1003.
Final summary in R1-2409465.
Including support for 2TA without CoresetPoolIdx association for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP.
R1-2409373 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios MediaTek Inc.
R1-2409380 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios ZTE Corporation, Sanechips, China Telecom
R1-2409430 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2409462 Further Details on Rel-19 Asymmetric mTRP Operation InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2409507 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios CMCC
R1-2409591 Views on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Samsung
R1-2409631 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Spreadtrum, UNISOC
R1-2409676 Remaining issues on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios vivo
R1-2409709 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios TCL
R1-2409746 Enhancements for asymmetric DL/UL scenarios Intel Corporation
R1-2409762 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Tejas Networks Limited
R1-2409769 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP scenarios Ericsson
R1-2409795 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Apple
R1-2409858 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios NEC
R1-2409891 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Xiaomi
R1-2409936 Views on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios CATT
R1-2409962 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Transsion Holdings
R1-2409972 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Lenovo
R1-2409997 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios China Telecom, ZTE
R1-2410056 Discussion on UL-only mTRP operation Fujitsu
R1-2410111 Enhancements on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios OPPO
R1-2410165 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios Google
R1-2410198 Discussions on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios LG Electronics
R1-2410221 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Sony
R1-2410263 Discussion on DL single TRP and UL mTRP operation ETRI
R1-2410318 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Nokia
R1-2410384 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2410438 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Sharp
R1-2410473 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment scenarios Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2410534 "Enhancement for Asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Scenarios" Panasonic
R1-2410539 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP ASUSTeK
R1-2410649 Summary #1 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
Presented in Monday session
R1-2410650 Summary #2 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
From Tuesday session
Agreement
Support to apply PL offset on PDCCH-order PRACH in FR2
Note: there is no extra enhancement for Tx beam determination for PDCCH-order PRACH in FR2 in Rel-19.
Agreement
Support DCI format 1_1 to indicate TPC command for SRS CLPC adjustment state(s) separate from PUSCH:
Agreement
For a UE supporting the UE capability of “Overlapping UL transmission reduction” of Rel-19 2TA:
Agreement
For an SRS resource set not configured with followUnifiedTCI-StateSRS, regarding how to determine the PL offset and the CLPC adjustment state, down-select from the following Alts:
From AI 5
R1-2409353 LS on UE RF issues for Rel-19 MIMO enhancement RAN4, Huawei
From Tuesday session
(Question 1: RAN4 would like to inquire if the UL TRP(s) can transmit SSBs per the scope of the WID.)
Agreement
The answer to the Question 1 in LS R1-2409353 is:
· From the perspective of UE: if UE is configured with PL offset in joint/UL TCI state(s), UE does not expect to receive SSB from UL TRP(s), else, UE may expect to receive SSB from UL TRP(s).
See final reply LS in R1-2410870.
Final summary in R1-2410651.
Please refer to RP-242394 for detailed scope of the WI. Additional RAN guidance on Rel-19 NR MIMO can be found in RP-243265.
Rapporteur to provide initial input on higher layer signalling under agenda item 9.2. For input on higher layer signalling from any other source, please include it as part of your tdoc to relevant sub-agenda items.
[120-R19-MIMO] – Gilwon (Samsung)
Email discussion on Rel-19 MIMO Phase 5
- To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc
R1-2500844 List of RRC impact for Rel-19 MIMO Ph5 Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2500845 Draft LS to RAN2 on MAC impact for Rel-19 MIMO Ph5 Samsung, MediaTek
From Thursday session
Agreement
LS to RAN2 on MAC impacts for Rel-19 NR MIMO Ph5 is endorsed. Final LS is approved in R1-2500846.
R1-2500056 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management FUTUREWEI
R1-2500097 On UE initiated/event-driven beam management Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2500104 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management MediaTek Inc.
R1-2500115 Remaining Details on Rel-19 UE/Event-Driven Beam Management InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2500163 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Spreadtrum, UNISOC
R1-2500217 Views on enhancement for Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CATT
R1-2500240 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management TCL
R1-2500241 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ZTE Corporation, Sanechips
R1-2500279 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CMCC
R1-2500342 Remaining issues on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management vivo
R1-2500377 Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management China Telecom Corporation Ltd.
R1-2500470 Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management OPPO
R1-2500513 On UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Ofinno
R1-2500569 UE-initiated beam management LG Electronics
R1-2500592 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management NEC
R1-2500645 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Sony
R1-2500671 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Ruijie Networks Co. Ltd
R1-2500699 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Lenovo
R1-2500725 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Xiaomi
R1-2500771 Remaining issues for UE-initiated beam management Apple
R1-2500839 Views on Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Samsung
R1-2500896 Enhancements to facilitate UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Nokia
R1-2500905 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ETRI
R1-2500930 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Fujitsu
R1-2500963 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Transsion Holdings
R1-2500977 Enhancements for UE-initiated/Event-Driven Beam Management Panasonic
R1-2501084 Enhancements for UE Initiated Beam Management Meta
R1-2501087 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Hyundai Motor Company
R1-2501105 Discussion on the UE-initiated/event-driven beam management HONOR
R1-2501127 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Sharp
R1-2501149 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2501195 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2501230 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ITRI
R1-2501236 Discussion on UE initiated beam report ASUSTeK
R1-2501245 Remaining issues for UE-initiated beam management Ericsson
R1-2501264 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management KT Corp.
R1-2501309 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management NICT
R1-2501334 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management Google
R1-2501341 Discussions on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management KDDI Corporation
R1-2500942 Offline summary for Rel-19 MIMO UEIBM (9.2.1) pre-RAN1#120 Moderator (ZTE)
R1-2500943 Moderator Summary #1 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Monday session
Agreement
On cross-CC beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, the following working assumption is confirmed with the following modification.
· The first PUCCH and the second PUSCH associated for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting are from different PUCCH groups
o Subject to separate UE capability
· Note: From RAN1 perspective, the above does NOT introduce any spec impact except for UE capability signaling
Agreement
On cross-CC beam report measurement for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, the following is supported
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, for Event 7, the candidate value of RRC parameter Q = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8}
· Note: The UE does not expect that the configured Q is greater than the number of the activated DL/joint TCI state(s).
Conclusion
There is no RAN1 consensus on the following proposal:
· On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, multi-bit indication in the first PUCCH is supported.
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Mode-B, the value of X symbols for determining available transmission occasion of the second UL channel is configured by RRC (FFS: subject to a corresponding UE capability).
R1-2500944 Moderator Summary #2 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Tuesday session
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, support the following option of dropping rule for the Case-1: the 1-bit first PUCCH is collided/overlapped with a PUCCH carrying normal SR and/or a PUCCH with normal LRR
· Option-1: LRR > first PUCCH > normal SR
Note: When the 1-bit first PUCCH is collided/overlapped with a PUCCH carrying normal SR and/or a PUCCH with normal LRR, only one of them is transmitted based on the above priority rule
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the triggering procedure in Step-2 of Mode-A, the following Option-1 is supported.
· Option-1: A CSI trigger state corresponding to UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting can NOT be associated with legacy AP-CSI report configuration.
Agreement
Regarding triggering event determination for Event 2, at least Candidate #2 is supported for resetting the counting.
· Candidate#1: RS reconfiguration/update or MAC-CE signaling (if supported) for new beam is received;
o FFS: whether to reset the counting for all new beams.
o FFS: whether to maintain the counting whose new beam is NOT updated.
· Candidate#2: [The measured current beam based on] indicated TCI state is updated;
o In such case, the UE need to reset the counting for all new beams.
· Candidate#3: UEI beam report is transmitted;
o FFS: Only reset the counting of new beams fulfilling triggering condition and reported by the UEI beam report
· Candidate#4: NW response (e.g., DCI in step-2 of Mode-A) is detected.
· Candidate#5: The time window expires
· Candidate#6: The threshold for event evaluation is re-configured by RRC signaling
· (FFS) Candidate#7: The RRC parameter(s) associated with the CSI report configuration for UEI beam report is reconfigured.
o FFS: RRC parameter(s)
· FFS: Other candidates
Note: Whether this proposal is captured in RAN1 or RAN2 is a separate discussion point.
R1-2500945 Moderator Summary #3 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, for Event 1, support Option-2 for RS measurement:
Agreement
Regarding triggering event determination for Event 2, on the measurement window for initiating the UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting procedure, further study the following options for possible down-selection
R1-2501556 Moderator Summary #4 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Thursday session
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, Option-1 is supported as an extension on L1-RSRP report format depending on Event-2.
Above is NOT applicable for event 1.
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, one PUCCH resource of first PUCCH can be associated with one or multiple CSI report configurations, regarding Event-2.
FFS: Alt-2 Multiple UEI beam reports associated with the same PUCCH resource for first PUCCH can be transmitted in the second PUSCH.
· If RAN1 cannot converge on the support of Alt-2 in RAN1#120bis, this alternative will be dropped from Rel-19
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the multiplexing/dropping rule(s) of 1-bit first PUCCH, down-select one of the following rule for the Case-2: the 1-bit first PUCCH is collided/overlapped with a PUSCH
Including support for up to 128 CSI-RS ports on FR1 and UE reporting enhancement for CJT and SRS port grouping for TDD low-complexity 6/8RX receiver.
R1-2500098 On 128 CSI-RS ports and UE reporting enhancement Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2500105 CSI enhancements MediaTek Inc.
R1-2500116 Remaining Details on Rel-19 Enhancements of CSI InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2500164 Discussion on CSI enhancements Spreadtrum, UNISOC
R1-2500218 Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5 CATT
R1-2500242 Discussion on CSI enhancements ZTE Corporation, Sanechips
R1-2500280 Discussion on CSI enhancements CMCC
R1-2500343 Remaining issues on Rel-19 CSI enhancements vivo
R1-2500471 CSI enhancements for Rel-19 MIMO OPPO
R1-2500484 Discussion on Rel-19 CSI Enhancements Tejas Network Limited
R1-2500485 CSI enhancements for Rel. 19 MIMO Fraunhofer IIS, Fraunhofer HHI
R1-2500550 CSI Enhancement for NR MIMO Google
R1-2500598 Discussion on CSI enhancements NEC
R1-2500646 Discussion of CSI enhancements Sony
R1-2500700 Discussion on CSI enhancements Lenovo
R1-2500726 Further discussion on Rel-19 MIMO CSI enhancements Xiaomi
R1-2500772 Views on R19 MIMO CSI enhancement Apple
R1-2500841 Views on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Samsung
R1-2500897 CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5 Nokia
R1-2500906 Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5 ETRI
R1-2500931 Remaining issues on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Fujitsu
R1-2501073 Discussion on Open Issues of CSI Enhancement Rakuten Mobile, Inc
R1-2501106 Discussion on CSI enhancements HONOR
R1-2501128 CSI enhancements Sharp
R1-2501150 CSI enhancements for >32 ports and UE-assisted CJT Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2501196 Discussion on CSI enhancements NTT DOCOMO, INC., NTT CORPORATION
R1-2501272 Remaining issues on CSI enhancements for large antenna arrays and CJT Ericsson
R1-2501297 Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5 KDDI Corporation
R1-2501307 Discussion on CSI enhancements NICT
R1-2500840 Moderator Summary#1 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 1 Moderator (Samsung)
From Monday session
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured with a joint trigger, regarding timeline, the value of drelax will be decided in UE feature session.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), regarding the support of sub-band reporting (>1),
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for P=48, 64, 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding Scheme-B, when the UE is configured to report wideband CSI on PUCCH:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for P=48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding the CSI reference resource
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement based on Rel-18 Type-II Doppler for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, whether to change the maxNumberTxPortsPerResource to maxNumberTxPortsPerResourceGroup for Rel-19 codebook triplet capability is to be discussed in UE feature session.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding the value of the RRC-configured resource-level slot offset (relative to the resource-set-level slot offset) for aperiodic CSI-RS resource set, at least the following values are supported: {0, 1, 2, 3}
R1-2501362 Moderator Summary for 1st offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2501361 Moderator Summary#2 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 2 Moderator (Samsung)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for P=48, 64, 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding Scheme-B, when the UE is configured to report wideband CSI on PUCCH formats 3 and 4, one-part CSI is used.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding the value of the RRC-configured resource-level slot offset (relative to the resource-set-level slot offset) for aperiodic CSI-RS resource set, in addition to the agreed values of {0, 1, 2, 3}, the following values are supported: {4, 5, 6, 7}.
Agreement
For the Rel-19
Type-I SP codebook refinement for P=128 CSI-RS ports, with Capability 2
timeline, when periodic or semi-persistent CSI reporting is configured, nCSI_ref
is the smallest value greater than or equal to , such that it corresponds to a valid downlink slot.
R1-2501571 Moderator Summary#3 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 3 Moderator (Samsung)
From Thursday session
Agreement
Following agreement from RAN1#118bis is updated (in RED):
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), regarding the configured associated SRS resource,
· When periodic or semi-persistent associated SRS resource is configured, the SRS transmission occasion for determining the reference UE antenna port corresponds to the latest SRS transmission occasion before the occasions of the NTRP CSI-RS resources used for measuring ‘cjtc-P’ report
Including support for 3T3R and 3T6R SRS antenna switching.
R1-2500099 Discussion on 3-antenna-port UL transmission Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2500106 3-antenna-port UL transmissions MediaTek Inc.
R1-2500117 Remaining Details on Rel-19 CB-based UL for 3TX UE InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2500219 Views on 3Tx uplink transmissions CATT
R1-2500243 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions ZTE Corporation, Sanechips
R1-2500281 Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions CMCC
R1-2500344 Remaining issues on 3-antenna-port codebook-based uplink transmissions vivo
R1-2500472 Discussion on 3-antenna-port uplink transmissions OPPO
R1-2500539 Remaining issues for 3 Tx UL transmissions Ericsson
R1-2500551 Uplink 3 Port Codebook based Transmission Google
R1-2500701 Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Lenovo
R1-2500727 Discussion on the support of 3-antenna-port CB based transmissions Xiaomi
R1-2500773 Remaining issues on R19 MIMO 3Tx transmission Apple
R1-2500842 Views on Rel-19 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Samsung
R1-2500879 Discussions on 3-antenna-port codebook-based UL transmission China Telecom Corporation Ltd.
R1-2500898 On the support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Nokia
R1-2500932 Discussion on uplink enhancement for UE with 3Tx Fujitsu
R1-2501129 Support for 3-antenna-port transmission Sharp
R1-2501151 Remaining issues for 3Tx CB based PUSCH Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2501197 Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2500119 FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; First Round Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
From Monday session
Agreement
For 3T3R antenna switching, reuse the same mechanism as xTxR for the SRS configuration as follows:
· Up to two SRS resource sets each with one SRS resource can be configured, where the number of SRS ports for each resource is equal to 4 with port 1003 disabled if the UE is not indicating srs-AntennaSwitching2SP-1Periodic.
· Up to two SRS resource sets configured with resourceType in SRS-ResourceSet set to 'semi-persistent' and one SRS resource set configured with resourceType in SRS-ResourceSet set to 'periodic' can be configured and the two SRS resource sets configured with 'semi-persistent' are not activated at the same time, or up to two SRS resource sets can be configured, if the UE is indicating srs-AntennaSwitching2SP-1Periodic, where each SRS resource set has one SRS resource, the number of SRS ports for each resource is equal to 4 with port 1003 disabled.
· For 3T=3R, the UE shall not expect to be configured or triggered with more than one SRS resource set with higher layer parameter usage set as 'antennaSwitching' in the same symbol.
Note: This is not meant to be a text proposal to be captured for the specifications.
Conclusion
To support 3T3R antenna switching for a 3TX UE,
Conclusion
For a 3TX UE, following agreements for codebook-based transmission can also be extended for non-codebook-based transmission,
Agreement For codebook-based transmission by a 3TX UE, - Option- 2: Subject to UE capability, up to 2 PTRS ports may be configured in PTRS-UplinkConfig, o FFS whether a single bit or 2 bits are used for PTRS-DMRS association indication. Above is only for single panel transmission.
Agreement For codebook-based UL transmission by a 3TX UE, when 1 PTRS port is configured by maxNrofPorts in PTRS-UplinkConfig, PTRS-DMRS association indication is as follows: - Alt2: 2-bit indication PTRS-DMRS association when 1 PT-RS port is configured
|
Agreement
For non-codebook-based UL transmission for a 3TX UE, when 2 PTRS ports are configured by maxNrofPorts in PTRS-UplinkConfig, PTRS-DMRS association indication for the two DMRS ports that share a PTRS port is as follows:
Value of MSB |
DMRS port |
|
|
0 |
1st DMRS port which shares the PTRS port |
|
|
1 |
2nd DMRS port which shares the PTRS port |
|
|
Conclusion
For a 3TX UE, following agreements for codebook-based transmission can also be extended for non-codebook-based transmission,
Agreement For codebook-based M-TRP PUSCH repetition by a 3TX UE, for indication of PTRS-DMRS association, - When 1 PTRS port is configured by maxNrofPorts in PTRS-UplinkConfig, reuse Rel-17 multi-TRP TDM repetition, - When 2 PTRS ports are configured by maxNrofPorts in PTRS-UplinkConfig, and maxRank = 2 or 3, o A second PTRS-DMRS association field (1 bit) is used to indicate the association between PTRS ports and DMRS ports for the 2nd SRS resource set (i.e.,2nd TRP). |
Agreement
For 3T3R and 3T6R antenna switching, support the following separate UE capabilities for SRS configuration,
· “srs-AntennaSwitching3T6R2SP-1Periodic” to extend srs-AntennaSwitching2SP-1Periodic to the case of 3T6R.
· “srs-AntennaSwitching3T3R2SP-1Periodic” to extend srs-AntennaSwitching2SP-1Periodic to the case of 3T3R.
Final summary in:
R1-2500121 Summary of Discussion on 3TX CB-based Uplink in RAN1#120 Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
Including support for 2TA without CoresetPoolIdx association for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP.
R1-2500100 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2500107 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios MediaTek Inc.
R1-2500118 Remaining Details on Rel-19 Asymmetric mTRP Operation InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2500165 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Spreadtrum, UNISOC
R1-2500220 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios CATT
R1-2500239 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios TCL
R1-2500244 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios ZTE Corporation, Sanechips, China Telecom
R1-2500256 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios China Telecom, ZTE
R1-2500282 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios CMCC
R1-2500345 Remaining issues on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios vivo
R1-2500473 Enhancements on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios OPPO
R1-2500495 Remaining issues on asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP scenarios Ericsson
R1-2500498 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP Tejas Network Limited
R1-2500514 Enhancements on asymmetric DL STRP/UL MTRP scenarios Ofinno
R1-2500570 Discussions on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios LG Electronics
R1-2500593 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios NEC
R1-2500647 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Sony
R1-2500702 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Lenovo
R1-2500728 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Xiaomi
R1-2500774 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Apple
R1-2500843 Views on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Samsung
R1-2500899 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Nokia
R1-2500907 Discussion on UL mTRP and DL single TRP operation ETRI
R1-2500933 Discussion on UL-only mTRP operation Fujitsu
R1-2500964 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Transsion Holdings
R1-2500978 "Enhancement for Asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Scenarios " Panasonic
R1-2501121 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Sharp
R1-2501152 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment scenarios Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2501198 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2501237 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP ASUSTeK
R1-2501335 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios Google
R1-2501358 Summary #1 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
From Monday session
Agreement
For a UE provided with SSB-MTC-AddtionalPCI and not configured with multi-DCI based mTRP, support to reuse the DCI field ‘PRACH association indicator’ in DCI format 1_0 to indicate PL RS for PDCCH-order PRACH:
Conclusion
There is no RAN1 consensus to support the following proposal:
Support the UE to report either Type1 PHR or Type 3 PHR in a serving cell configured with one UL carrier and two separate SRS CLPC adjustment states. The UE determines to report Type1 PHR or Type 3 PHR according to:
This is subject to UE capability.
This is feature is enabled by one new RRC parameter.
R1-2501359 Summary #2 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
From Tuesday session
Conclusion
There is no consensus to introduce the restriction that only one of the indicated joint/UL TCI states can be configured with PL offset.
Conclusion
There is no consensus to include PL offset in Type 3 PHR calculation.
Conclusion
In asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP deployment scenario, the PDCCH-order PRACH to UL TRP is CFRA.
Agreement
7.3.1 UE behavior *** Unchanged parts are omitted *** -
*** Unchanged parts are omitted *** -
*** Unchanged parts are omitted *** |
o Note: how to capture this in specification is up to editor.
· In Rel-19, the TPC command for separate SRS CLPC adjustment state(s) indicated in DCI format 1_1 and the TPC command for separate SRS CLPC adjustment states indicated in DCI format 2_3 are applicable to periodic SRS, semi-persistent SRS and aperiodic SRS.
R1-2501360 Summary #3 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
From Thursday session
Agreement
Study whether/how to reset the CLPC of PUSCH/PUCCH/SRS based on the following alternatives (including if any enhancement is necessary and other alternatives are not precluded)
Please refer to RP-242394 for detailed scope of the WI. Additional RAN guidance on Rel-19 NR MIMO can be found in RP-243265.
[120bis-R19-MIMO] – Gilwon (Samsung)
Email discussion on Rel-19 MIMO Phase 5
- To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc
R1-2502361 List of RRC impact for Rel-19 MIMO Ph5 Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2502364 Draft Stage-2 CR for Rel-19 NR MIMO Ph5 in TS38.300 Samsung
R1-2503093 Summary of discussion on Draft CR on TS38.300 for Rel-19 MIMO Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2502362 Draft LS to RAN2 on MAC impact for Rel-19 MIMO Ph5 Moderator (Samsung)
Thursday decision: RAN1 consensus that such LS is not needed and not pursued.
R1-2501716 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management FUTUREWEI
R1-2501742 On Specifications of Rel-19 UE/Event-Driven Beam Management InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2501780 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ZTE Corporation, Sanechips
R1-2501799 Remaining issues on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management vivo
R1-2501850 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management MediaTek Inc.
R1-2501862 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Spreadtrum, UNISOC
R1-2501985 On enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CATT
R1-2502038 On UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Ofinno
R1-2502053 Remaining issues for UE-initiated beam management Ericsson
R1-2502065 Discussions on UEIBM China Telecom
R1-2502079 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management NEC
R1-2502103 UE-initiated beam management LG Electronics
R1-2502107 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Lenovo
R1-2502119 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Fujitsu
R1-2502153 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CMCC
R1-2502224 On UE initiated/event-driven beam management Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2502293 Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management OPPO
R1-2502312 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Sony
R1-2502356 Views on Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Samsung
R1-2502414 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Ruijie Networks Co. Ltd
R1-2502434 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Xiaomi
R1-2502505 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ETRI
R1-2502524 Enhancements to facilitate UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Nokia
R1-2502538 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Transsion Holdings
R1-2502545 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management TCL
R1-2502598 Remaining issues for UE-initiated beam management Apple
R1-2502665 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Sharp
R1-2502687 Discussion on the UE-initiated/event-driven beam management HONOR
R1-2502744 Offline summary for Rel-19 MIMO UEIBM (9.2.1) pre-RAN1#120b Moderator (ZTE)
R1-2502759 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2502793 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ITRI
R1-2502812 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Panasonic
R1-2502833 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2502877 Discussion on UE initiated beam report ASUSTeK
R1-2502888 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management Google
R1-2502897 Discussions on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management KDDI Corporation (TTC)
R1-2502745 Moderator Summary #1 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Monday session
Agreement
Regarding triggering event determination for Event 2, on resetting the counting, the following modification on the agreed Candidate #2 in RAN1#120 is supported.
·
Candidate#2: [The measured current beam RS is updated based on]
indicated TCI state is updated;
o In such case, the UE needs to reset the counting for all new beams.
o FFS: Further details on the update (if necessary).
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, support the following interpretation on each of the codepoints of the ‘1-bit’ condition met indicator as follows:
· ‘0’ – indicating that the Event-2 instances for corresponding CRI/SSBRI within the time window doesn’t reach the configured number M.
· ‘1’ – indicating that the Event-2 instances for corresponding CRI/SSBRI within the time window reach the configured number M.
FFS: whether/how to introduce the ‘1-bit’ condition met indicator for Event 7.
Agreement
On cross-CC beam report measurement for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, introduce an RRC parameter to indicate ServCellIndex on which the indicated TCI state used to determine the current beam RS is applied.
· FFS: Indication of the cell that corresponds to the configured first PUCCH resource in CSI report config including whether it is necessary
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, for the case the pre-configured Type-1 CG PUSCH carry the beam report, for the second UL channel in Mode-B, reuse the intra-UE multiplexing/prioritization rules of PUSCH with SP-CSI for Type-1 CG PUSCH with UEI-BR for Mode B.
Agreement
Regarding triggering event determination for Event 2, on the measurement window for initiating the UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting procedure, down-select one of the following options in RAN1#120bis.
R1-2502746 Moderator Summary #2 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Tuesday session
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, support the following for Event 1:
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding current beam report on Event 1, reuse RRC parameter enabledCurrentBeamReport-r19 to enable/disable the RSRP report of current beam.
Conclusion
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the case that one PUCCH resource of first PUCCH can be associated with one or multiple CSI report configurations, there is NO RAN1 consensus on supporting multiple UEI beam reports carrying in a second PUSCH.
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the multiplexing/dropping rule(s) of 1-bit first PUCCH, support the following rule for the Case-4: the 1-bit first PUCCH is collided/overlapped with a PUCCH format 0/1 carrying HARQ.
Conclusion
Regarding resource mapping/configuration between first and second UL channel associated with a same CSI report configuration in Mode-B, there is NO consensus on further supporting the case that first PUCCH resource and pre-configured resource for second UL channel can have different periodicities (in ms).
R1-2502747 Moderator Summary #3 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Wednesday session
Agreement
Regarding triggering event determination for Event 2, on the measurement window for initiating the UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting procedure, support Option-4.
Above agreement is captured in RAN1 specifications.
Agreement
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, the procedure of triggering event determination is captured in RAN1 spec.
R1-2503092 Moderator Summary #4 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
From Thursday session
Conclusion
There is no RAN1 consensus on the following proposal:
On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, support at least Option-1 of following for Event 7 as an extension on report format for Event-2
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting for a CSI report configuration, down-select at least one of the following candidates in RAN1#121:
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the multiplexing/dropping rule(s) of 1-bit first PUCCH, down-select one of the following rules for the Case-2: the 1-bit first PUCCH is collided/overlapped with a PUSCH, in RAN1#121
Conclusion
There is no RAN1 consensus on the following. No spec change needed.
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the multiplexing/dropping rule(s) of 1-bit first PUCCH, support one of the following rule for the Case-3: the 1-bit first PUCCHs corresponding to different CSI configuration for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting are overlapping in the time domain.
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, confirming the following working assumption with the following modification.
· For Mode-A, the multiple CSI report configurations associated with the same PUCCH resource should be associated with a same CSI-AperiodicTriggerState.
· FFS: For Mode-A, the multiple CSI report configurations associated with the same CSI-AperiodicTriggerState should be associated with a same PUCCH resource.
Conclusion
There is no RAN1 consensus on the following. No spec change needed.
For event 2, when one PUCCH resource of first PUCCH can be associated with one or multiple CSI report configurations, and if multiple UE initiated beam report procedures occur, down-select one of the following options:
Including support for up to 128 CSI-RS ports on FR1 and UE reporting enhancement for CJT and SRS port grouping for TDD low-complexity 6/8RX receiver.
R1-2501743 On Specifications of Rel-19 Enhancements of CSI InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2501781 Discussion on CSI enhancements ZTE Corporation, Sanechips
R1-2501800 Remaining issues on Rel-19 CSI enhancements vivo
R1-2501851 CSI enhancements MediaTek Inc.
R1-2501863 Discussion on CSI enhancements Spreadtrum, UNISOC
R1-2501950 CSI Enhancement for NR MIMO Google
R1-2501986 Remaining issues on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5 CATT
R1-2502011 Discussion on Rel-19 CSI Enhancements Tejas Network Limited
R1-2502074 Discussion on CSI enhancements NEC
R1-2502108 Discussion on CSI enhancements Lenovo
R1-2502120 Remaining issues on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Fujitsu
R1-2502154 Discussion on CSI enhancements CMCC
R1-2502225 On 128 CSI-RS ports and UE reporting enhancement Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2502294 CSI enhancements for Rel-19 MIMO OPPO
R1-2502313 Further discussion of CSI enhancements Sony
R1-2502358 Views on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Samsung
R1-2502435 Maintenance on CSI enhancement for up to 128 ports and CJT Xiaomi
R1-2502506 Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5 ETRI
R1-2502525 CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5 Nokia
R1-2502551 Discussion on the Remaining Issues of CSI Enhancement Rakuten Mobile, Inc
R1-2502599 Views on R19 MIMO CSI enhancement Apple
R1-2502666 CSI enhancements Sharp
R1-2502688 Discussion on CSI enhancements HONOR
R1-2502730 Discussion on Beamforming Template for CSI Enhancement China Unicom
R1-2502760 Discussion on CSI enhancements NTT DOCOMO, INC., NTT CORPORATION
R1-2502811 Maintenance on CSI for large antenna arrays and CJT Ericsson
R1-2502834 CSI enhancements for >32 ports and UE-assisted CJT Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2502904 CSI enhancements for Rel. 19 MIMO Fraunhofer IIS, Fraunhofer HHI
R1-2502932 Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5 KDDI Corporation
R1-2502357 Moderator Summary#1 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 1 Moderator (Samsung)
From Monday session
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I multi-panel
(MP) codebook refinement for a given P{48, 64, 128} CSI-RS
ports, the
mapping of i1,3 to (k1,k2) for RI=2-4 is the
same as that used in the Rel-19 Type-I SP Scheme-A for RI=2-4 and
.
· Note: How this is captured is up to the TS38.214 editor.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I multi-panel (MP) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, support only the following (Ng, N1, N2) values (revision from the current version of editor draft CR on TS 38.214):
Number of |
|
48 |
(2,4,3) |
(2,6,2) |
|
|
|
64 |
(2,4,4) |
(2,8,2) |
|
|
|
(4,4,2) |
|
|
|
128 |
(4,4,4) |
(4,8,2) |
|
|
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, when the Rel-18 SD NES Type-I is configured for the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook, the powerOffset parameter can be configured in all the respective subConfiguration IEs
· The supported values for powerOffset follow the legacy specification.
Conclusion
There is no RAN1 consensus on the following proposal:
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the dynamic range for delay offset reporting Dn,offset, i.e. AD, also support
AD = {0.1CP, 0.2CP}.
· Each of the above values of the dynamic ranges is subject to a separate UE capability.
· Each of the above values of the dynamic ranges is applicable when the bandwidth of configured TRS is no smaller than 52 PRBs
R1-2503013 Moderator Summary for 1st offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2503011 Moderator Summary#2 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 2 Moderator (Samsung)
From Wednesday session
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 Type-I multi-panel (MP) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, there is no need to support any mapping from CSI-RS resource index and CSI-RS resource port index per resource to port index for CSI/PMI calculation.
Conclusion
There is no consensus to support the following proposal:
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II (except for Type-II Doppler) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, when the K>1 aggregated NZP aperiodic CSI-RS resources for CMR are within two consecutive slots, the triggering offset of the associated aperiodic CSI-IM follows the associated NZP CSI-RS resource(s) for CMR in the first slot.
Including support for 3T3R and 3T6R SRS antenna switching.
R1-2501744 On Specifications of Rel-19 CB-based UL for 3TX UE InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2501782 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions ZTE Corporation, Sanechips
R1-2501801 Remaining issues on 3-antenna-port codebook-based uplink transmissions vivo
R1-2501852 3-antenna-port UL transmissions MediaTek Inc.
R1-2501941 Remaining issues for 3 Tx UL transmissions Ericsson Japan K.K.
R1-2501951 Uplink 3 Port Codebook based Transmission Google
R1-2501987 Remaining issues on 3-antenna-port uplink transmission CATT
R1-2502109 Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Lenovo
R1-2502155 Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions CMCC
R1-2502226 Discussion on 3-antenna-port UL transmission Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2502295 Discussion on 3-antenna-port uplink transmissions OPPO
R1-2502359 Views on Rel-19 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Samsung
R1-2502436 Discussion on the support of 3-antenna-port CB based transmissions Xiaomi
R1-2502526 On the support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Nokia
R1-2502600 Remaining issues on R19 MIMO 3Tx transmission Apple
R1-2502667 Support for 3-antenna-port transmission Sharp
R1-2502761 Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2501746 FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; First Round Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
From Monday session
Agreement
Adopt the following changes in Clause 6.3.1.5 in TS38.211.
6.3.1.5 Precoding The
block of vectors where
For
non-codebook-based transmission, the precoding matrix For
codebook-based transmission, the precoding matrix -
for single-layer transmission on a single antenna port, -
for transmissions using 2, or 4 antenna ports, -
for transmissions using 3 antenna ports
when 4portSRS_3TX is configured, |
Agreement
Adopt the following changes in Clause 6.2.1.2 in TS38.214.
6.2.1.2 UE sounding procedure for DL CSI acquisition -------------------------------------------Unchanged parts are omitted------------------------------------------- · - For 1T=1R, 2T=2R, 3T=3R, 4T=4R or 8T=8R, up to two SRS resource sets each with one SRS resource can be configured, where the number of SRS ports for each resource is equal to 1, 2, 4 with port 1003 disabled by higher layer parameter [RRC_parameter] is configured, 4 or 8 if the UE is not indicating srs-AntennaSwitching2SP-1Periodic or [srs-AntennaSwitching3T3R2SP-1Periodic]. Up to two SRS resource sets configured with resourceType in SRS-ResourceSet set to 'semi-persistent' and one SRS resource set configured with resourceType in SRS-ResourceSet set to 'periodic' can be configured and the two SRS resource sets configured with 'semi-persistent' are not activated at the same time, or up to two SRS resource sets can be configured, if the UE is indicating srs-AntennaSwitching2SP-1Periodic, srs-AntennaSwitching8T8R2SP-1Periodic, or [srs-AntennaSwitching3T3R2SP-1Periodic], where each SRS resource set has one SRS resource, the number of SRS ports for each resource is equal to 1, 2, 4 with port 1003 disabled by higher layer parameter [RRC_parameter] is configured, 4, or 8 or -------------------------------------------Unchanged parts are omitted------------------------------------------- · - For 3T6R, zero or one or two SRS resource sets configured with
a different value of resourceType in SRS-ResourceSet set to
'periodic' or 'semi-persistent' and with higher layer parameter
[RRC_parameter] is configured if the UE is not indicating · - For 3T6R, zero or one or two SRS resource sets configured with resourceType in SRS-ResourceSet set to 'aperiodic' and with higher layer parameter [RRC_parameter] is configured, where in the case of one resource set has two SRS resources transmitted in different symbols, each SRS resource in a given set consisting of a four SRS ports with port 1003 disabled, and the SRS ports of the resource in the set are associated with a different UE antenna ports. In the case of two resource sets a total of two SRS resources are transmitted in different symbols of two different slots, and where the SRS ports of each SRS resource in the given two sets are associated with a different UE antenna ports. -------------------------------------------Unchanged parts are omitted------------------------------------------- |
From Tuesday session
Agreement
For a 3TX UE, when configured to ‘nonCodebook’, to distinguish UE behavior for PTRS-DMRS association between the Rel-19 and Rel-18 behavior,
From Wednesday session
Agreement
Adopt the following changes in Clause 6.2.1 in TS38.214.
6.2.1 UE sounding procedure -------------------------------------------Unchanged parts are omitted-------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------Unchanged parts are omitted------------------------------------------- |
From Thursday session
Agreement
Adopt the following changes in Clause 7.1 - TS38.213 (Rel-19 endorsed draftCR in R1-2501661).
7.1 Physical uplink shared channel For a
PUSCH transmission on active UL BWP ·
- if
ul-FullPowerTransmission in PUSCH-Config is provided, the UE scales -------------------------------------------Unchanged parts are omitted------------------------------------------- ·
- else,
if each
SRS resource in the SRS-ResourceSet with usage set to 'codebook' has more than one SRS port, the UE scales the linear value by the ratio of the number of
antenna ports with a non-zero PUSCH transmission power to the maximum number
of SRS
ports supported by the UE in one SRS resource -------------------------------------------Unchanged parts are omitted------------------------------------------- |
R1-2501748 Summary of Discussion on 3TX CB-based Uplink in RAN1#120bis Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
Including support for 2TA without CoresetPoolIdx association for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP.
R1-2501745 On Specifications of Rel-19 Asymmetric mTRP Operation InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2501783 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios ZTE Corporation, Sanechips, China Telecom
R1-2501802 Remaining issues on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios vivo
R1-2501853 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios MediaTek Inc.
R1-2501864 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Spreadtrum, UNISOC
R1-2501988 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios CATT
R1-2502012 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP Tejas Network Limited
R1-2502019 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios China Telecom, ZTE
R1-2502039 Enhancements on asymmetric DL STRP/UL MTRP scenarios Ofinno
R1-2502080 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios NEC
R1-2502104 Discussions on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios LG Electronics
R1-2502106 Remaining issues on asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP scenarios Ericsson
R1-2502110 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Lenovo
R1-2502156 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios CMCC
R1-2502227 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2502296 Enhancements on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios OPPO
R1-2502314 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Sony
R1-2502360 Views on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Samsung
R1-2502437 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Xiaomi
R1-2502507 Discussion on asymmetric UL MIMO operation ETRI
R1-2502527 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Nokia
R1-2502536 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios TCL
R1-2502539 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Transsion Holdings
R1-2502601 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Apple
R1-2502670 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Sharp
R1-2502762 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2502813 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Panasonic
R1-2502835 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment scenarios Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2502889 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios Google
R1-2502953 Summary #1 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
From Monday session
Agreement
Answer the question of RAN4 as follows:
Agreement
Agreement
For an SRS resource set not configured with followUnifiedTCI-StateSRS, regarding how to determine the PL offset and the CLPC adjustment state
When the UE is configured with Rel-19 2 TA, the above design is also applied to TAG.
From Wednesday session
R1-2502956 Draft Reply to RAN4 LS on DL timing reference to support two TA enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/ UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
Agreement
Reply to RAN4 LS on DL timing reference to support two TA enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/ UL mTRP is approved in R1-2503091.
R1-2502954 Summary #2 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
From Thursday session
Conclusion
There is no RAN1 consensus on the following proposal:
If the PL offset associated with the indicated joint/UL TCI state is included in the PRACH transmission power for PDCCH-order PRACH transmission, the pathlossReferenceRS-Id in the same indicated joint/UL TCI state is used to determine PL RS for the PDCCH-order PRACH transmission.
Companies are encouraged to consider the following for RAN1#121:
Regarding whether/how to reset the CLPC of PUSCH/PUCCH/SRS, further study and down-select one from the following alternatives:
Please refer to RP-242394 for detailed scope of the WI. Additional RAN guidance on Rel-19 NR MIMO can be found in RP-243265.
[121-R19-MIMO] Email discussion on Rel-19 MIMO Phase 5 – Eko (Samsung)
- To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc
R1-2503559 List of RRC impact for Rel-19 MIMO Ph5 Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2503560 Draft LS to RAN2 on MAC impact for Rel-19 MIMO Ph5 Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2503561 LS to RAN2 on MAC impact for Rel-19 MIMO Ph5 Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2503562 Draft Stage-2 CR for Rel-19 NR MIMO Ph5 in TS38.300 Samsung
R1-2503721 AnImproved DOAEstimation Method Based on Sparse Reconstruction BUPT
Late submission
R1-2503722 An Improved DOA Estimation Method Based on Sparse Reconstruction BUPT
R1-2504568 Discussions on DOA estimation algorithm for MIMO BUPT
R1-2503237 Remaining issues for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management FUTUREWEI
R1-2503275 On UE initiated/event-driven beam management Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2503303 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management MediaTek Inc.
R1-2503351 Remaining issues on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management vivo
R1-2503433 Remaining Details of Rel-19 UE/Event-Driven Beam Management InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2503509 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Spreadtrum, UNISOC
R1-2503554 Views on Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Samsung
R1-2503612 Remaining issues for UE-initiated beam management Ericsson
R1-2503668 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ZTE Corporation, Sanechips
R1-2503729 On UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Ofinno
R1-2503786 Remaining issues on UE-initiated/event-driven beam report CATT
R1-2503816 Enhancements for UE-initiated/Event-Driven Beam Management Panasonic
R1-2503824 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management CMCC
R1-2503876 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Xiaomi
R1-2503912 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Lenovo
R1-2503928 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management NEC
R1-2503953 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Ruijie Networks Co. Ltd
R1-2503985 UE-initiated beam management LG Electronics
R1-2504061 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Sony
R1-2504076 Enhancements to facilitate UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Nokia
R1-2504084 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Fujitsu
R1-2504095 Discussion on the UE-initiated/event-driven beam management HONOR
R1-2504117 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Hyundai Motor Company
R1-2504133 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ETRI
R1-2504172 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Transsion Holdings
R1-2504228 Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management OPPO
R1-2504297 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management Google
R1-2504312 Remaining issues for UE-initiated beam management Apple
R1-2504388 UE-initated/event-driven beam management Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2504444 Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Sharp
R1-2504453 Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management China Telecom
R1-2504476 Remaining issues on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management KDDI Corporation (TTC)
R1-2504495 Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2504535 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management ITRI, Acer Incorporated
R1-2504572 Discussion on UE initiated beam report ASUSTeK
R1-2504579 Discussion on Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management NICT
R1-2504607 Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management TCL
R1-2504471 Moderator Summary #1 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the multiplexing a number of L (L>=1) PUCCH format 0/1 with UEIRIs are collided/overlapped with a PUCCH format 2/3/4 carrying HARQ/CSI, reuse the legacy SR multiplexing rule.
· The value of bits is based on an ascending order of the values of PUCCH resource
ID associated with the first PUCCHs.
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the multiplexing a number of L (L>=1) first PUCCH is collided/overlapped with a PUCCH format 2/3/4 carrying HARQ/CSI/SR.
·
Option-1:
Extend the SR field of bits to a field of
bits of representing at most one of positive SR
or positive UEIRI
o The value in the field is based the ascending order of SR ID first and then the ascending order of the PUCCH resource ID associated with the first PUCCHs.
o
If one
of the SRs is a positive LRR, the value of the bits indicates the positive LRR, else, if one
of the UEIBRs is a positive UEIBR, the value of the
bits indicates the positive UEIBR.
o
An
all-zero value for the bits represents a negative SR and UEIRI value
across all
LRR/SRs and/or L UEIRIs.
R1-2504472 Moderator Summary #2 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding occupied CPU(s), OCPU = 1 is occupied for a CSI report configuration.
- Note: That is the same number of occupied CPU for legacy L1-RSRP measurement.
Agreement
Regarding triggering event determination, on candidate values of supported RRC parameters,
- Support the following as RRC candidate values for a threshold value eventThreshold-r19 for trigger event detection regarding Event-2 or Event-7.
o Option-2: 0, 1, …, 30, 31 dB
- Support the following as RRC candidate values for a threshold value eventThreshold-Event1-r19 for trigger event detection regarding Event-1.
o Reusing RSRP-Range in RRC
§ Note: only values 14, …,113 in RSRP-Range are valid
- Support the following as RRC candidate values for the time window length for triggering event determination eventDetectionTimeWindowLength-r19
o 4, 5, 8, 10, 16, 20, 40, 80, 160, 320, 640, 1280 ms
- Support the following as RRC candidate values for the counting threshold eventInstanceCount-r19
o Option-1: 2, …, 16
Agreement
On cross-CC beam report measurement for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, introduce an RRC parameter to indicate one from {SpCell, PUCCH-Scell} as the cell of the configured PUCCH.
- Note: It is up to NW implementation to configure same or different PUCCH resource IDs in different serving cells
R1-2504473 Moderator Summary #3 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Moderator (ZTE)
Agreement
On cross-CC beam report measurement for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the evaluation periodicity for determining event instance, the periodicity of the current beam RS should be the same as that of the new beam RS(s).
- The evaluation periodicity is the same as the periodicity of the current and new beam RS(s).
Above applies for all events.
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the value of X symbols for determining available transmission occasion of the second UL channel on Mode-B
- Support Option-1 of the following as RRC candidate values for X symbols
· Option-1: 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512
· Note: X is based on the SCS of the first PUCCH.
· Minimum value of X is subject to UE capability
- Regarding ‘available’ transmission occasion of the second UL channel, the transmission restriction for of the second UL channel reuses the legacy rule of PUSCH with SP-CSI.
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the multiplexing/dropping rule(s) of 1-bit first PUCCH, support Option-3 of the following rules for the Case-2: the 1-bit first PUCCH is collided/overlapped with a PUSCH
- Option-3: Piggyback 1-bit indication of first PUCCH into the PUSCH.
o The 1-bit indication is always multiplexed in the PUSCH, regardless that UEI beam report procedure is triggered.
Agreement
On beam
report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting,
regarding CSI reference resource definition for a UEI beam report, the CSI
reference resource for a CSI reporting is defined by a single downlink slot , where slot n is determined according
to the uplink slot n’ in which the second PUSCH is transmitted, and
- For mode-A, the legacy CSI reference definition of aperiodic CSI reporting is used.
-
For mode-B, nCSI_ref
is the smallest value greater than or equal to , such that
slot n- nCSI_ref corresponds to a valid downlink slot,
where Z' corresponds to the delay requirement as defined in Clause 5.4.
In the report, a condition met indicator for new beam RS is determined according to the measurement(s) triggering the first PUCCH transmission.
Note: Strong concern was raised by vivo on the necessity of the above proposal especially considering the RAN4 status.
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-1 and Event-7, one PUCCH resource of first PUCCH can be associated with one or multiple CSI report configurations.
Agreement
On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding priority rules for CSI report multiplexing/dropping, UEI beam report for both mode-A and mode-B is prioritized over Semi-persistent CSI reports on PUCCH and Periodic CSI reports on PUCCH
- UEI beam report for mode-A > Aperiodic CSI report > UEI beam report (for mode-B) > Semi-persistent CSI reports on PUSCH
Note-1: The intra-UE multiplexing/prioritization rules of PUSCH with A-CSI for PUSCH is reused for UEI-BR for Mode A.
Note-2: How to capture the above is up to Editor.
Including support for up to 128 CSI-RS ports on FR1 and UE reporting enhancement for CJT and SRS port grouping for TDD low-complexity 6/8RX receiver.
R1-2503276 On 128 CSI-RS ports and UE reporting enhancement Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2503352 Remaining issues on Rel-19 CSI enhancements vivo
R1-2503434 Remaining Details of Rel-19 Enhancements of CSI InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2503510 Remaining issues on CSI enhancements Spreadtrum, UNISOC
R1-2503555 Moderator Summary#1 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 1 Moderator (Samsung)
R1-2503556 Views on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Samsung
R1-2503669 Discussion on CSI enhancements ZTE Corporation, Sanechips
R1-2503711 Discussion on Rel-19 CSI Enhancements Tejas Network Limited
R1-2503787 Remaining issues on Rel-19 CSI enhancements CATT
R1-2503825 Discussion on CSI enhancements CMCC
R1-2503860 Discussion on the Remaining Issues of CSI Enhancement Rakuten Mobile, Inc
R1-2503877 Further discussion on the remained issues for CSI enhancement Xiaomi
R1-2503910 CSI enhancements for Rel. 19 MIMO Fraunhofer IIS, Fraunhofer HHI
R1-2503913 Discussion on CSI enhancements Lenovo
R1-2503917 Discussion on CSI enhancements NEC
R1-2504028 CSI Enhancement for NR MIMO Google
R1-2504062 Discussion of CSI enhancements Sony
R1-2504077 CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5 Nokia
R1-2504085 Remaining issues on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Fujitsu
R1-2504096 Discussion on CSI enhancements HONOR
R1-2504134 Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5 ETRI
R1-2504229 CSI enhancements for Rel-19 MIMO OPPO
R1-2504389 Maintenance on CSI for >32 ports and UE-assisted CJT Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2504445 CSI enhancements Sharp
R1-2504451 Maintenance on CSI enhancements for large antenna arrays and CJT Ericsson
R1-2504496 Discussion on CSI enhancements NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2504549 Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5 KDDI Corporation
R1-2503555 Moderator Summary#1 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 1 Moderator (Samsung)
Agreement
For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd’ (delay offset), add the following definition of the measurement quantity in TS38.215 as follows (analogous to the Rel-18 TDCP):
- For FR1, the reference point shall be the antenna connector of the UE.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, when configured with port subset indication (from the Rel-18 SD NES Type-1), the actual number of ports (the number of 1s in the port-subsetIndicator bitmap) can correspond to a supported value of PCSI-RS for the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook (i.e. either 48, 64, or 128), or to a supported value of PCSI-RS for the Rel-15 Type-I SP codebook (i.e., either 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32), respectively
· The supported number of ports for port subset of the full PCSI-RS ports, is according to UE capability
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports based on the Rel-18 Type-II Doppler codebook, when the KDOPP CSI-RS resource groups are configured for aperiodic CMR, where each CSI-RS resource group comprises K>1 aggregated NZP aperiodic CSI-RS resources, the triggering offset of an associated aperiodic CSI-IM follows the associated NZP CSI-RS resource(s) for CMR in the first slot (in the time domain).
Agreement
For the
Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement based on Rel-18 Type-II Doppler for 48, 64,
and 128 CSI-RS ports, for Capability 1, further clarify the previous agreement
that
R1-2504728 Moderator Summary#2 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 2 Moderator (Samsung)
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II (except for Type-II Doppler) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, when the K>1 aggregated NZP aperiodic CSI-RS resources for CMR are within two consecutive slots, following the legacy spec, the aperiodic triggering offset configured with the NZP CSI-RS resource set for interference measurement is the same as that of the associated NZP CSI-RS resource set for CMR.
Conclusion
For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports based on the Rel-18 Type-II Doppler codebook, when the KDOPP >1 NZP aperiodic CSI-RS resource groups for CMR are configured, following the legacy spec, the aperiodic triggering offset configured with the NZP CSI-RS resource set for interference measurement is the same as that of the associated NZP CSI-RS resource set for CMR.
Agreement
For the Rel-19 Type-I SP and Type-II codebook refinement for P=48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports with K>1 aggregated NZP aperiodic CSI-RS resources for CMR, to implement the previous agreements on the mapping from CSI-RS resource index/port index per resource and port index to CSI/PMI calculation
· In TS38.211, extend the enumeration of antenna port p=3000+p’ with p’=0 …P–1
· In TS38.214, remove the term ‘port index for CSI/PMI calculation’
Including support for 3T3R and 3T6R SRS antenna switching.
R1-2503277 Discussion on 3-antenna-port UL transmission Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2503353 Remaining issues on 3-antenna-port codebook-based uplink transmissions vivo
R1-2503435 Remaining Details of Rel-19 CB-based UL for 3TX UE InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2503438 Summary of Discussion on 3TX CB-based Uplink in RAN1#121 Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
R1-2503557 Views on Rel-19 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Samsung
R1-2503670 Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions ZTE Corporation, Sanechips
R1-2503723 Remaining issues for 3 Tx UL transmissions Ericsson Japan K.K.
R1-2503788 Maintenance on 3-antenna-port uplink transmission CATT
R1-2503914 Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Lenovo
R1-2504029 Uplink 3 Port Codebook based Transmission Google
R1-2504078 On the support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions Nokia
R1-2504230 Discussion on 3-antenna-port uplink transmissions OPPO
R1-2504313 Remaining issues on R19 MIMO 3Tx transmission Apple
R1-2504446 Support for 3-antenna-port transmission Sharp
R1-2504456 Discussions on 3-antenna-port UL transmission China Telecom
R1-2503437 FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; First Round Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)
Conclusion
For codebook-based PUSCH transmission by a 3TX UE, PUSCH scheduling by DCI format 0_3 is not supported.
- Agreement: Adopt the following TP in red text for TS 38.214 section 6.1.1.1.
-------------------------------------------Unchanged parts are omitted---------------------------------- For codebook based transmission
with three antenna ports, the UE determines its codebook subsets based on
TPMI(s) and upon the reception of higher layer parameter codebookSubset in
pusch-Config for PUSCH associated with DCI format 0_1 -----------------------------------------Unchanged parts are omitted------------------------------------------ |
Including support for 2TA without CoresetPoolIdx association for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP.
R1-2503278 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Huawei, HiSilicon
R1-2503304 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios MediaTek Inc.
R1-2503354 Remaining issues on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios vivo
R1-2503436 Remaining Details of Rel-19 Asymmetric mTRP Operation InterDigital, Inc.
R1-2503511 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Spreadtrum, UNISOC
R1-2503558 Views on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Samsung
R1-2503671 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios ZTE Corporation, Sanechips, China Telecom
R1-2503712 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP Tejas Network Limited
R1-2503730 Enhancements on asymmetric DL STRP/UL MTRP scenarios Ofinno
R1-2503789 Remaining issues on asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios CATT
R1-2503817 Enhancement for Asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Scenarios Panasonic
R1-2503826 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios CMCC
R1-2503878 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Xiaomi
R1-2503915 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Lenovo
R1-2503929 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios NEC
R1-2503978 Remaining issues on asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP scenarios Ericsson
R1-2503986 Discussions on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios LG Electronics
R1-2504063 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Sony
R1-2504079 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Nokia
R1-2504135 Remaining issues in asymmetric UL MIMO operation ETRI
R1-2504173 Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Transsion Holdings
R1-2504231 Enhancements on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios OPPO
R1-2504298 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios Google
R1-2504314 Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Apple
R1-2504390 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment scenarios Qualcomm Incorporated
R1-2504458 Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Sharp
R1-2504462 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios TCL
Late submission
R1-2504463 Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios TCL
R1-2504497 Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios NTT DOCOMO, INC.
R1-2504655 Summary #1 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)
Conclusion
When the UE transmits a PUCCH with HARQ-ACK
information in slot n corresponding to the PDSCH carrying the MAC CE command
updating PL offset of TCI state(s), the updated PL offset(s) shall be applied
starting from the first slot that is after where μ is the SCS configuration for the PUCCH.
Conclusion
Regarding whether/how to reset the CLPC of PUSCH/PUCCH/SRS, no further additional enhancement in Rel-19
R1-2504656 Summary #2 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Moderator (OPPO)