MIMO Rel-19

 RAN1#116

9.2      NR MIMO Phase 5

Please refer to RP-234007 for detailed scope of the WI.

 

[116-R19-MIMO] – Eko (Samsung)

Email discussion on Rel-19 MIMO Phase 5

-        To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc

 

R1-2400725         Rel-19 NR MIMO Phase 5: initial rapporteur assessment              Moderator (Samsung)

9.2.1       Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management

R1-2400507         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       MediaTek Inc.

·       Proposal 1: For Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management, both reporting delay reduction and beam application delay reduction should be considered

·       Proposal 2: Support at least event-driven triggering manner for beam reporting

o   An event-driven beam report will be triggered when the event condition(s) is satisfied

o   Study the event condition and the corresponding use case(s)

·       Proposal 3: For UL medium and container of UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, support to report via UCI on PUSCH/PUCCH

·       Proposal 4: For UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, at least support pre-configured transmission occasion(s)/resource(s) dedicated for beam reporting

o   Pre-configured transmission occasion(s)/resource(s) dedicated for beam reporting could be CG-PUSCH or PUCCH

·       Proposal 5: For UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, support to reserve the pre-configured transmission occasion(s)/occasion(s) dedicated for beam reporting via an UL indication

o   Whether or not the pre-configured transmission occasion(s)/resource(s) dedicated for beam reporting is reserved by a UE is determined according to an UL indication before the pre-configured transmission occasion(s) dedicated for beam reporting

§  A UE is expected to transmit a beam report in PUSCH/PUCCH on a reserved pre-configured transmission dedicated for beam reporting

§  A UE is not allowed to transmit PUSCH/PUCCH on a non-reserved pre-configured transmission dedicated for beam reporting

o   FFS: design of UL indication

·       Proposal 6: In a UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting instance, support reporting of a synchronization state along with each reported pair of a RS index (e.g., SSBRI/CRI) and a value of L1 measurement quantity (e.g., L1-RSRP/L1-SINR).

o   The synchronization state indicates “synchronized” or “unsynchronized” for a TCI state associated with the reported RS

§  If the reported RS is indicated as “synchronized”, the associated TCI state is applicable after the beam reporting instance

§  If the reported RS is indicated as “unsynchronized”, the associated TCI state will be applicable after the UE receives the first SSB transmission after reporting

§  FFS: How to determine the association between a measurement/reporting RS and a TCI state

Decision: The document is noted.

 

R1-2400912         Enhancements for UE-initiated beam management              Ericsson

·       Proposal 1: The event(s) for UE-initiated beam reporting are specified in the standard, i.e., the events are not up to UE implementation.

·       Proposal 2: RAN1 provides RAN2 with a high-level description of a minimum set of events by RAN2#127.

·       Proposal 3: RAN2 specifies a minimum set of events for UE-initiated beam reporting based on high-level input from RAN1.

·       Proposal 4: It should be possible to configure more than one event in parallel.

·       Proposal 5: RAN1 studies postprocessing of measurements used for events, and ways to control the amount of event triggering.

·       Proposal 6: The NW provides UL resources for the UE-initiated report dynamically.

·       Proposal 7: The UE requests UL resources for the transmission of the UE-initiated report using legacy mechanisms.

·       Proposal 8: The legacy beam report content, complemented by information about the triggering event, is the starting point for the report content.

·       Proposal 9: RAN1 to study how to reduce the number of spurious beam measurement reports, e.g., by measurement filtering.

·       Proposal 10: After sending a UE-initiated beam report, the UE would store the QCL properties of the SSB associated with the reference signal that triggered the measurement report.

Decision: The document is noted.

 

R1-2400049         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Spreadtrum Communications

R1-2400100         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              FUTUREWEI

R1-2400104         On UE initiated/event-driven beam management        Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2400161         On UE/Event-Driven Beam Management     InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2400194         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Lenovo

R1-2400204         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Transsion Holdings

R1-2400237         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              vivo

R1-2400278         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        ZTE

R1-2400321         Discussion on  enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        CMCC

R1-2401469         Enhancements for event driven beam management     Intel Corporation         (rev of R1-2400381)

R1-2400428         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        CATT

R1-2400467         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management             NEC

R1-2400553         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              xiaomi

R1-2400623         Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              OPPO

R1-2400726         Views on Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management enhancements      Samsung

R1-2400771         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Fujitsu

R1-2400848         Considerations on UE initiated beam management     Sony

R1-2400917         UE-initiated beam management      LG Electronics

R1-2400933         Discussions on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Ruijie Network Co. Ltd

R1-2400938         Enhancements to facilitate UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell

R1-2400959         Enhancements for UE-initiated/Event-Driven Beam Management              Panasonic

R1-2401007         Views on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Apple

R1-2401044         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Sharp

R1-2401049         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Hyundai Motor Company

R1-2401078         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              NICT

R1-2401112         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2401187         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              ITRI

R1-2401201         Discussion on UE initiated beam management            ASUSTeK

R1-2401226         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              ETRI

R1-2401243         Views on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        KDDI Corporation

R1-2401256         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management             Google

R1-2401271         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              CEWiT

R1-2401436         UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Qualcomm Incorporated

 

R1-2401625         Moderator Summary #1 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

Presented in Tuesday session

 

R1-2401681         Moderator Summary #2 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam report, at least of following aspects should be included:

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam report, the following aspects may be included:

Other procedure(s) as required

 

 

R1-2401787         Moderator Summary #3 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Thursday session

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding trigger-event detection for beam reporting, RAN1 further study at least the following aspects: quality metrics, event-definition and threshold.

 

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, at least support L1-RSRP as a measurement quantity on SSB for intra-cell and inter-cell, and periodic CSI-RS for beam management

·          Notes: measurement results may be contained in the beam report and/or used as quality metric(s) to initiate/trigger the reporting.

·          FFS: Semi-persistent CSI-RS and aperiodic CSI-RS.

·          FFS: Whether/how to support L1-SINR measurement, assuming legacy RS or RS combination (e.g., CMR only, CMR+ZP/NZP-IMR) for Rel-16 SINR is reused.

·          FFS: Whether/how to specify filtering operation for L1-RSRP.

 

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding signaling content(s), at least support DL RS resource indicator and L1-RSRP

 

9.2.2       CSI enhancements

Including support for up to 128 CSI-RS ports on FR1 and UE reporting enhancement for CJT

 

R1-2400105         On 128 CSI-RS ports and UE reporting enhancement              Huawei, HiSilicon

Proposal 1: Support  CSI-RS ports with  CSI-RS resources, with P/K ports in each resource.

Proposal 2: Support Type-I/Type-II codebook refinement with 48/64/96/128 CSI-RS ports, and

·       For 64 CSI-RS ports, 2 32-port CSI-RS resources are configured;

·       For 128 CSI-RS ports, 4 32-port CSI-RS resources are configured;

·       For 48 CSI-RS ports, 2 24-port CSI-RS resources are configured;

·       For 96 CSI-RS ports, 3 32-port CSI-RS resources are configured.

Proposal 3: For Type-I/Type-II codebook refinement, CSI-RS ports from 3000 to 3000+X-1 are mapped to multiple CSI-RS resources, where X is the supported number of CSI-RS ports larger than 32.

Proposal 4: Support the combinations of and  in Table 2 for larger than 32 ports.

Proposal 5: Enhance both Rel-16 eType-II and Rel-17 FeType-II codebooks to support up to 128 CSI-RS ports for CSI enhancement.

Proposal 6: Support combinations of and  in Table 2 for Rel-16 eType-II codebook.

Proposal 7: Complexity reduction for high rank should be supported, especially for 64/128 antenna ports.

Proposal 8: The limitation on the number of CSI-RS ports per resource in current spec. should be relaxed to support following configurations:

·       For  CSI-RS resources, up to 32 CSI-RS ports per resource;

·       For  CSI-RS resources, up to 16 CSI-RS ports per resource;

·       For  CSI-RS resources, up to 8 CSI-RS ports per resource.

Proposal 9: For multi-beam CSI measurement, transmitting less CSI-RS resources than the total number of analog beams can be considered to reduce the CSI-RS overhead.

Proposal 10: For multi-beam CSI reporting, support to report the CRIs and associated RIs/PMIs/CQIs for up to 6 beams.

Proposal 11: For multi-beam CSI reporting, support both Type I and Type II codebook.

Proposal 12: Multi-beam joint CSI reporting should be supported to reduce the reporting overhead.

Proposal 13: Support the reporting of frequency /delay offset between TRPs.

Proposal 14: Support reporting of the phase offsets of the DL measured channels between TRPs for joint DL/UL reciprocity calibration.

Proposal 15: Support to reuse TRS for frequency and delay offset measurement.

Proposal 16: Support to configure multiple resource sets where each set corresponds to one TRP.

Proposal 17: Support a reference resource/time for reporting of frequency/time offsets.

Proposal 18: Adopt Table 9 in Appendix C as working assumption for LLS evaluation.

Decision: The document is noted.

 

R1-2400939         CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5  Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell

·       Proposal 1: Regarding CSI extension for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, support the following combinations of : (8,4), (16,2), (8,8) and (16,4) with oversampling .

·       Proposal 2: Regarding the CSI Resource Setting linked to a CSI report for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, for both Type-I and Type-II extensions, support a single CSI-RS resource set with up to  32-port resources.

·       Proposal 3: Regarding the CSI-RS resource aggregation for a CSI report for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, for both Type-I and Type-II extensions, support a simple mapping of the ports across the  resources to the  PMI ports following the order in which the resources are configured in the resource set.

·       Proposal 4: Regarding the CSI-RS resource set configured to support up to 128 ports, consider the same timing restrictions adopted for NCJT and CJT resource setting, i.e., the resources are configured in the same slot or two adjacent slots.

·       Proposal 5: For Type-I codebook extension for up to 128 ports, consider extending the set of orthogonal beams for the selection of the second beam.

·       Proposal 6: For Type-I codebook extension for up to 128 ports, with Mode 1, consider a simple codebook extension as a starting point, obtained by increasing the values of .

·       Proposal 7: For Type-I codebook extension for up to 128 ports, with Mode 1, consider extending the candidate beams for the second beam by reusing the existing beam selection indicators  to identify the first beam and  to identify an  cluster for the second beam, and introducing a new indicator to locate the second beam within this cluster.

·       Proposal 8: For Type-I codebook extension for up to 128 ports, with Mode 1, consider extending the candidate beams for the second beam by using an extended Type-II-style beam selection mechanism, where the legacy indicators  and  of Type-II are reused to identify the first beam and an  cluster for the second beam and a new indicator is introduced to identify the second beam within this cluster.

·       Proposal 9: For Type-I codebook extension for up to 128 ports, with Mode 2, consider a simple codebook extension as a starting point, obtained by increasing the values of .

·       Proposal 10: For Type-I codebook extension for up to 128 ports, with Mode 2, consider extending the candidate beam groups for the second beam group by reusing the existing beam group selection indicators  to identify the first beam group and  to identify an  cluster of the second beam group, and introducing a new indicator to locate the second beam group within this cluster.

·       Proposal 11: For Type-I codebook extension for up to 128 ports, with Mode 2, consider extending the candidate beam groups for the second beam group by using an extended Type-II-style beam selection mechanism, where the legacy Type-II indicators  and  are reused to identify the first beam group and an  cluster for the second beam group and introducing a new indicator to identify the second beam group within this cluster.

·       Proposal 12: Regarding Type-I and Type-II extensions for up to 128 ports, for the EVM assumptions, consider the following transmit array and port layouts. For 64 ports:  and . For 128 ports:  and .

·       Proposal 13: For Rel-16 Type-II codebook refinement supporting up to 128 ports, support spatial domain codebook extension for , and the selection of  beams of length . For the remaining codebook description, reuse Rel-16 Type-II codebook.

·       Proposal 14: For Rel-16 Type-II codebook refinement supporting up to 128 ports, evaluate the trade-off between performance and feedback overhead for the existing parameter combinations  and determine if any additional parameter value restrictions are needed.

·       Proposal 15: No extension of Rel-17 Type-II PS is needed because 32 pairs of angles and delays per UE are sufficient to capture the spatial and frequency characteristics of a DL channel for a single TRP.

·       Proposal 16: For the extension of CRI-based CSI reporting for up to 128 ports, consider extending the existing CRI-based reporting for Type-I codebook only.

·       Proposal 17: For the extension of CRI-based CSI reporting for up to 128 ports, regarding the reporting format, reuse the solution adopted for Rel-17 NCJT with one or more CSI(s), each corresponding to a CRI, reported in the same report.

·       Proposal 18: For the evaluation methodology of inter-TRP frequency offset measurement and reporting, model the frequency errors for the TRPs as i.i.d. random variables, uniformly distributed within the frequency range determined by the minimum frequency error requirements of Table 6.5.1.2-1 of TS 38.104.

·       Proposal 19: For inter-TRP frequency offset measurement and reporting, support measurement configuration from a single TRS set per TRP.

·       Proposal 20: For the evaluation methodology for inter-TRP frequency offset measurement and reporting, maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of frequency offsets for each TRP can be assumed, obtained from measurements of two or four TRS resources of the same TRS set, depending on TRS configuration.

·       Proposal 21: For the evaluation methodology of inter-TRP timing offset measurement and reporting, model the relative time alignment error (TAE) between TRPs in an inter-site scenario as i.i.d. random variables, uniformly distributed between 0 and one CP length.

Decision: The document is noted.

 

R1-2400050         Discussion on CSI enhancements    Spreadtrum Communications

R1-2400162         On Extension of CSI Ports InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2400195         Discussion on CSI enhancements    Lenovo

R1-2400205         Discussion on CSI enhancement for 128 CSI-RS ports              Transsion Holdings

R1-2400238         Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      vivo

R1-2400279         Discussion on CSI enhancements    ZTE

R1-2400322         Discussion on CSI enhancements    CMCC

R1-2400382         CSI enhancements for MIMO          Intel Corporation

R1-2400397         CSI Enhancement for NR MIMO    Google

R1-2400429         Discussion on CSI enhancements in Rel-19  CATT

R1-2400471         Discussion on CSI enhancements    NEC

R1-2400508         CSI enhancements to support up to 128 CSI-RS ports MediaTek Inc.

R1-2400512         CSI enhancements             TCL

R1-2400522         Discussion on CSI enhancements    Honor

R1-2400554         Discussion on CSI enhancement for larger scale transmit antenna ports and CJT      xiaomi

R1-2400624         CSI enhancements for Rel-19 MIMO            OPPO

R1-2400658         Discussion on CSI enhancement for R19 MIMO evolution              China Telecom

R1-2400728         Views on Rel-19 CSI enhancements              Samsung

R1-2400753         CSI enhancements for large antenna arrays and CJT   Ericsson

R1-2400772         Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Fujitsu

R1-2400849         Views on CSI enhancements           Sony

R1-2400918         Discussions on CSI enhancements  LG Electronics

R1-2400957         UE Reporting Enhancement for CJT              Panasonic

R1-2401008         Views on R19 MIMO CSI enhancement       Apple

R1-2401045         CSI enhancements             Sharp

R1-2401113         Discussion on CSI enhancements    NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2401244         CSI enhancements for Rel.19 MIMO             Fraunhofer IIS, Fraunhofer HHI

R1-2401254         Discussion on CSI enhancements    KDDI Corporation

R1-2401272         Discussion on Type-II codebook refinement for 128 port CSI-RS              CEWiT

R1-2401357         Views on CSI Enhancements for MIMO Phase 5        AT&T

R1-2401437         CSI enhancements for up to 128 ports and UE-assisted CJT with non-ideal TRP synchronization       Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2401480         Overview of CSI Enhancements for NR MIMO Evolution              Kyocera (rev of R1-2400817)

 

R1-2401574         Moderator Summary for Monday offline session on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2400727         Moderator summary on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)

From Tuesday session

Agreement

For the Rel-19 NR Type-I/II codebook refinement and CRI-based CSI for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, reuse the EVM agreed for Rel-18 NR Type-II Doppler codebooks (cf. R1-2205289) for SLS with the following refinement:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 NR CJT calibration reporting, reuse the EVM agreed for Rel-18 NR Type-II CJT codebooks (cf. R1-2205289) for SLS with the following refinement:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 NR CJT calibration reporting, use the following EVM for LLS with the following refinement:

·       Purpose: alternative to SLS to observe the impact of misalignment and gain by proposed solutions, as the frequency offset/time misalignment have impacts in granularities of subcarrier/symbol levels

Parameter

Value

Duplex, Waveform

TDD, OFDM

Carrier Frequency

3.5 GHz

Channel Model

CDL-C channel model in TR 38.901

Delay Spread

300ns

BS antenna configuration

(M, N, P, Mg, Ng; Mp, Np) =

 (2, 8, 2, 1, 1; 2, 8), (dH, dV) = (0.5, 0.8)

TRP number

2

UE antenna configuration

(M, N, P, Mg, Ng; Mp, Np) =

 (1, 2, 2, 1, 1; 1, 2), (dH, dV) = (0.5, 0.5)

UE number

1, 4

MCS

Link Adaption

Bandwidth

20RB, 145RB

Numerology

14 OFDM symbol per slot, 30kHz SCS

MIMO Rank

rank = 2 per UE

UE speed

3km/h

Precoding granularity

2RB, 4RB, 8RB, 16RB, 32RB

SRS periodicity

10ms

DMRS

Type 2 DMRS, double-symbol, or Type 1 DMRS

DL DMRS channel estimation

LMMSE channel estimation

Frequency offset

Uniformly distributed delay difference between [0, x], companies should state the assumed value of x, e.g., 0.05ppm, 0.1ppm.

Delay difference

a uniformly distributed delay difference between [0, y], companies should state the assumed value of y, e.g., CP length, 1.67us, 65ns.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding NZP CSI-RS resource aggregation to attain 32 < P (or PCSI-RS) ≤ 128, support aggregating at least K=2, 3, or 4 legacy NZP CSI-RS resources with equal number of ports

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, in accordance to the WID, the following enhancement areas are supported:

·       Adding new (N1, N2) values for the Rel-16 eType-II regular and Rel-18 Type-II Doppler regular codebooks where 2N1N2 (>32) is the total number of CSI-RS ports across aggregated NZP CSI-RS resources, and O1=O2=4

o   FFS: How to configure the aggregated NZP CSI-RS resources when AP-CSI-RS resources are configured as CMR for Rel-18 Type-II Doppler codebooks

·       Adding new PCSI-RS values for Rel-17 FeType-II Port Selection (PS) codebook where PCSI-RS (>32) is the total number of CSI-RS ports across aggregated NZP CSI-RS resources

There will be separate UE feature groups for each of the enhanced codebooks.

 

Note: Per WID objective 2b,

 

Agreement (modified on Thursday as shown)

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, the following use cases are assumed:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, support the following:

·       The UE is configured with NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets via higher-layer (RRC) signalling where NTRP{1, 2, 3, 4}

o   FFS (by RAN1#116bis): Whether further restriction(s) on applicable NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets need to be introduced (e.g. number of ports, only TRS with multiple resource sets, TD/FD locations, QCL assumptions)

·       For the purpose of CJT calibration reporting, decide, by RAN1#116bis, from the following

o   Opt1:  The UE reports for all the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets

o   Opt2: The UE reports for N out of NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets where the selection of N resources/resource sets is dynamically signalled by the NW to the UE

o   Opt3: The UE reports for N out of NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets where the selection of N resources/resource sets is performed by the UE and included in the CSI report

·       Interference measurement is not supported, hence neither CSI-IM nor NZP CSI-RS resource for interference measurement can be configured (analogous to Rel-18 TDCP)

·       FFS: One-part or two-part UCI on PUSCH (analogous to Rel-18 TDCP)

·       The priority of the CSI report(s) is the same as CSI report(s) not carrying L1-RSRP or L1-SINR (analogous to Rel-18 TDCP)

 

R1-2401649         Moderator Summary for Tuesday offline session on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2401650         Moderator Summary#2 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: ROUND 2           Moderator (Samsung)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, given the NTRP configured NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets and the selected N resources/resource sets, support reporting, in one CSI reporting instance, {(Dn,offset, dn), n=0, 1, …, N – 1} where

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, in addition to the already agreed use cases, the following use cases are assumed:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I codebook refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, at least for RI=1-4, study and decide, by RAN1#116bis, from the following:

·       Scheme1 (baseline): Adding new (N1, N2) values for the Rel-15 Type-I single-panel codebook where 2N1N2 (>32) is the total number of CSI-RS ports across aggregated NZP CSI-RS resources

o   FFS: Whether to further down-select between mode-1 (L=1) and mode-2 (L=4)

o   FFS: For rank-3/4, follow legacy mechanisms for <16 ports, or for >=16 ports

·       Scheme2: Adding new (N1, N2) values where 2N1N2 (>32) is the total number of CSI-RS ports across aggregated NZP CSI-RS resources, and

o   W1 structure:

§  For each layer, reuse legacy Rel-16 eType-II SD basis with L=1 to determine the DFT-based SD basis candidates

·       FFS: Whether the indication of selected SD basis indices follows Rel-16 eType II or Rel-15 Type I

§  For 4≥RI>1, L=1 SD basis vector is independently selected for different layers

·       FFS: SD basis selection restriction to reduce SD overhead for RI>4

o   W2 structure: Layer-specific inter-polarization M-PSK co-phasing where M is further down-selected from {2, 4, 8, 16}

o   FFS: Common SD vector selection for a pair of layers (reduced total number of bits for SD basis vector selection); layer multiplexing via orthogonal polarization co-phasing for the layer pairs with common SD vector (reduced number of bits for co-phasing indication for the layer pairs with common SD vector).

o   FFS: Additional support for L>1

·       Scheme2B: Adding new (N1, N2) values where 2N1N2 (>32) is the total number of CSI-RS ports across aggregated NZP CSI-RS resources, and

o   W1 structure:

§  For each layer, determine L=1 DFT-based SD basis candidate

·       FFS: Whether the indication of selected SD basis indices follows Rel-16 eType-II or Rel-15 Type-I

§   

§  For 4≥RI>1, L=1 SD basis vector is independently selected for different layers

§  FFS: Common SD vector selection for a pair of layers (reduced total number of bits for SD basis vector selection), SD basis selection restriction to reduce SD overhead for RI>4

o   W2 structure:

§  Option 1: Layer-specific inter-polarization amplitude and phase scaling (single scaling coefficient per polarization)

·       FFS: WB/SB amplitude and phase reporting.

§  Option 2: Layer-specific intra-polarization (two scaling coefficients per polarization) amplitude and phase scaling.

·       FFS: WB/SB amplitude and phase reporting.

§  FFS: Rel-15 3-bit WB amplitude and M-PSK co-phasing and M is further down-selected from {2, 4, 8, 16}.

·       Scheme3: Adding new (N1, N2) values where 2N1N2 (>32) is the total number of CSI-RS ports across aggregated NZP CSI-RS resources, and

o   W1 structure:

§  Reuse legacy Rel-16 eType-II SD basis with L>1 to determine the DFT-based SD basis candidates, and indication of SD basis indices follows Rel-16 eType-II

§  For 4≥RI>1, L>1 SD basis vectors are commonly selected across layers

·       FFS: SD basis selection restriction to reduce SD overhead for RI>4

o   W2 structure:

§  Option 1: Layer-specific sub-band SD basis selection (1 out of L) and inter-polarization M-PSK co-phasing where M is further down-selected from {2, 4, 8, 16}

§  Option 2: Layer-specific wideband SD basis linear combination and inter-polarization scaling coefficient (e.g., amplitude scaling + M-PSK co-phasing) where M is further down-selected from {2, 4, 8, 16}

·       Scheme4: Using legacy Rel-15 Type-I codebook including legacy (N1, N2) values per NZP CSI-RS resource (or port group) where the PMI (associated with W1 and W2) is calculated according to

o   W1 structure: Reuse legacy Rel-15 Type-I SD basis with L=1 or L=4 for either each or some of the NZP CSI-RS resources (or port groups)

o   W2 structure: inter-NZP CSI-RS resource (or port group) co-phasing along with reusing legacy Rel-15 Type-I inter-polarization co-phasing per NZP CSI-RS resource (or port group)

§  inter-CSI-RS resource (or port group) co-phasing is used to combine the different PMIs to come up with a single precoder with >32 ports

·       Scheme5: Adding new (N1, N2) values where 2N1N2 (>32) is the total number of CSI-RS ports across aggregated NZP CSI-RS resources, and extending the set of orthogonal beams for the selection of the second beam based on the Rel-15 Type-I single-panel codebook

o   (i1,1, i1,2) is used to refer to the 1st beam as in legacy Rel-15 Type-I

o   The 2nd beam is selected from the extended set of orthogonal beams of size:

o   FFS: whether to apply any restrictions to the extended orthogonal set of beams

·       Scheme6: Adding new (N1, N2) values where 2N1N2 (>32) is the total number of CSI-RS ports across aggregated NZP CSI-RS resources, and

o   Beam(s) is(are) selected for each antenna group or NZP CSI-RS resource.

o   Inter-group (or CSI-RS resource) co-phasing along with inter-polarization co-phasing per group (or CSI-RS resource) are used to combine different beam(s), FFS using scalar quantization or vector quantization for the co-phasings

FFS (by RAN1#116bis): Down-select (O1, O2) value between (2,2) and (4,4), whether (O1, O2) and/or (q1, q2) is layer-common or layer-specific

FFS (by RAN1#116bis): Whether extension of Rel-15 Type-I MP codebook for Rel-19 Type-I is also supported

FFS (by RAN1#116bis): Whether to introduce larger L values (e.g. 6, 8, 10)

FFS: Whether to refine CBSR design to reduce RRC overhead

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports,

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I codebook refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, support also RI=5-8, with lower priority than RI=1-4:

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, at least support the legacy time-domain behaviours for CSI reporting (and the applicable CSI-RS time-domain behaviors). That is,

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, in accordance to the WID, extend the Rel-15 CRI-based CSI reporting as follows:

FFS: detailed UCI design/optimization (e.g. overhead reduction)

FFS: Whether solution to allow CSI reporting for larger number of CSI-RS resources across multiple CSI reports is supported

FFS: whether further restriction(s) on CMR configuration is needed, including relation with IMR

FFS: the packing order of the information of M “quadruplets”, CSI omission rule

FFS: Whether all the K CSI-RS resources are associated with a same CSI-RS resource set or not

FFS: Whether KS, maximum # ports per resource, and X depend on codebook type

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, the supported combinations of KS value and the maximum number of ports per NZP CSI-RS resource are as follows:

KS

Maximum # ports per resource

2, 3, 4

32

5, 6, 7, 8

16

 

Conclusion

The Rel-17 NCJT CSI is not extended to accommodate the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports.

 

Agreement (further modified on Thursday as shown in red)

For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement based on Rel-16 eType-II and Rel-18 Type-II Doppler for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, as well as Rel-19 Type-I codebook refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, support the following (N1, N2) values:

Total # CSI-RS ports across aggregated resources (=P)

(N1, N2)

48

(8,3)

(6,4)

64

(16,2)

(8,4)

128

(16,4)

(8,8)

The support of total # CSI-RS ports across aggregated resources (=P) and (N1, N2) is subject to UE capability.

 

R1-2401723         Moderator Summary for Thursday offline session on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2401724         Moderator Summary#3 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: ROUND 3           Moderator (Samsung)

From Thursday session

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, in addition to the already agreed use cases, the following use cases are assumed for study:

Whether there is any spec support associated with this use case is FFS

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, given the NTRP configured NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets and the selected N resources/resource sets, support reporting, in one CSI reporting instance, {FOn , n=0, 1, …, N – 1, n≠nref}, where FOn denotes the measured frequency offset associated with the n-th CSI-RS resource/resource set relative to the reference CSI-RS resource/resource set nref

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, given the NTRP configured NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets and the selected N resources/resource sets, study and decide, by RAN1#116bis, whether to support reporting, in one CSI reporting instance, {n,m n=0, 1, …, N – 1, n≠nref, m=0,1,…,M-1}, where n,m denotes the measured phase offset between the n-th CSI-RS resource/resource set and the reference CSI-RS resource/resource set/ nref for the m-th frequency unit

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding the supported codebook(s) for calculating CQI/PMI/RI on each of the M CRI(s), decide, in RAN1#116bis, between the two alternatives:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-II refinement based on Rel-17 FeType-II PS, support the following PCSI-RS value(s) {48, 64}.

·       For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement based on Rel-17 FeType-II PS, PCSI-RS =64 is supported as a part of the respective basic feature, while PCSI-RS =48 is supported as a separate UE capability.

9.2.3       Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions

R1-2400625         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              OPPO

·       Proposal 1: Following non-coherent codebooks involving different transmission layers can be used for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmission.

Transmission layers

Precoding matrix

Single layer

  

   

Two layers

   

  

Three layers

·       Proposal 2: TPMI field could be 2 or 3bits for 3-antenna-port transmission

o   For maxRank equals to 1, TPMI field could be 2 bits for DFT-s-OFDM and CP-OFDM.

o   For maxRank equals to 2 or 3, TPMI field could be 3 bits for CP-OFDM.

·       Proposal 3: Following two alternatives are considered to achieve 3-port SRS resource

o   Alt 1: Adapt a 4-port SRS resource to function as a 3-port SRS resource.

§  A predefined rule is required to utilize three of the four SRS ports.

o   Alt 2: Combine 1-port and/or 2-port SRS resources to achieve a 3-port SRS resource.

§  Further study is required on the configuration of the SRS resource set and SRI enhancement.

Decision: The document is noted.

 

R1-2400163         On Support of CB-based UL for 3TX UE  InterDigital, Inc.

·       Proposal 1: 3TX sounding procedure is based on the 4-port SRS resources with the mapping of 3TX to the 4 ports.

·         Proposal 2: An SRS resource set for 3TX is configured with  4-port SRS resources, where .

 

·       Proposal 3: Study the UE behaviour for power control with 3TX.

·       Proposal 4: The baseline precoders for 3TX ‘nonCoherent’ are:

o      Single layer: 

o      Two layers:

o      Three layers:  .

·       Proposal 5: Rel-19 specifies new codebooks for 3TX which include TPMIs for 1-, 2-, and 3-layer transmission configured with the ‘nonCoherent’ codebook subset.

Decision: The document is noted.

 

R1-2400051         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Spreadtrum Communications

R1-2400106         On codebook for 3-antenna-port UL transmission       Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2400196         Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Lenovo

R1-2400206         Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Transsion Holdings

R1-2400239         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based uplink transmissions      vivo

R1-2400280         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              ZTE

R1-2400323         Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions      CMCC

R1-2400383         Support for 3Tx UL MIMO             Intel Corporation

R1-2400398         Uplink 3 Port Codebook based Transmission Google

R1-2400430         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              CATT

R1-2400472         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              NEC

R1-2400509         Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              MediaTek Inc.

R1-2400513         Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              TCL

R1-2400523         Discussion on 3-port codebook-based transmissions   Honor

R1-2400555         Discussion on the support of 3-antenna-port CB based transmissions      xiaomi

R1-2400729         Views on Rel-19 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Samsung

R1-2400773         Discussion on uplink enhancement for UE with 3Tx   Fujitsu

R1-2400850         Considerations on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions      Sony

R1-2400919         Discussions on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions  LG Electronics

R1-2400940         On the support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell

R1-2401009         Views on R19 3Tx codebook based transmission        Apple

R1-2401046         Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmission              Sharp

R1-2401077         Support for 3 Tx UL transmissions Ericsson

R1-2401114         Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions      NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2401438         3 Tx UL MIMO transmissions        Qualcomm Incorporated

 

R1-2401578         FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; First Round              Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

From Tuesday session

Agreement

For non-coherent uplink precoding by a 3TX UE, at least following precoders are supported for single-layer transmission.

 

Agreement

For non-coherent uplink precoding by a 3TX UE, at least following precoders are supported for two-layer transmission.

, ,  

 

Agreement

For non-coherent uplink precoding by a 3TX UE, at least following precoders are supported for three-layer transmission.

 

Agreement

For SRS configuration supporting codebook-based UL transmission by a 3TX UE, down-select one of

·       Alt1 – Support configuration of X 4-port SRS resources in a resource set where one the ports is muted

·       Alt2 – Support configuration of X SRS resources with equal/unequal number of ports (e.g. 2 + 1 or 1 + 1 + 1) in a resource set,

The value for X is FFS, and it will be determined according to the selected alternative.

 

Agreement

For a 3TX UE, down-select one of the following options for the number of PTRS ports,

·       Option-1: A single PTRS port is supported.

·       Option-2: Up to 2 PTRS port may be configured.

Agreement

For a 3-antenna-port codebook-based UL transmission, study PTRS-DMRS association.

 

Agreement

For a 3-antenna-port codebook-based UL transmission, study power split for each port of SRS and PUSCH.

 

Agreement

For codebook-based uplink transmission by a 3TX UE, support full-power Mode 0, subject to UE capability.

 

Conclusion

There is no consensus in RAN1 to support antenna switching for 3TX UE in Rel-19

 

Agreement

For performance evaluation of 3TX UE, adopt the following Table as the reference EVM for LLS evaluation

·       Companies may provide additional evaluation results per their case of interest

·       LLS is optionally used for 3Tx UL evaluation, if needed

Parameter

Value

Carrier Frequency

3.5 GHz

Waveform

CP-OFDM

SCS

30 KHz

System bandwidth

20 MHz, 100 MHz

Scheduled PRBs

5, 25, 50, 260 PRBs

gNB RX antenna setup and port layouts

(𝑀,𝑁,𝑃,𝑀𝑔,𝑁𝑔,𝑀𝑝,𝑁𝑝)

(8,8,2,1,1,4,8) with (𝑑H, 𝑑V) = (0.5, 0.8)𝜆

(4,4,2,1,1,4,4) with (𝑑H, 𝑑V) = (0.5, 0.8)𝜆

(2,2,2,1,1,2,2) with (dH , dV ) = (0.5, 0.5)λ

UE speed

3 Km/h

Number of Layers

Adaptive, Fixed (reported by company) 

AMC

Adaptive, Fixed (reported by company) 

DMRS configuration

Type 1; 1 front loaded + 1 additional symbol

Channel estimation

Real

Channel Model

CDL-A (30ns), CDL-B (100ns), CDL-C (300ns)

 

 

R1-2401579         FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; Second Round   Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

For performance evaluation of 3TX UE, adopt the following Table as the reference EVM for SLS evaluation.

·       Companies may provide additional evaluation results per their case of interest.

Note: The considered EVM is to be used as a baseline set of assumption for future potential studies related to 3TX.

 

Parameter

Value

Frequency range

3.5 GHz

Multiple access

OFDMA 

Numerology

14 CP-OFDM symbol slot

SCS , 30 KHz  

Scenario

eMBB:

Dense Urban (200m), 3.5GHz

 

Outdoor FWA:

UMa (500m), 3.5GHz

UE Outdoor/Indoor (%)

eMBB:

80%, 20%

 

Outdoor FWA:

100%, 0%

System bandwidth

20 MHz, 100 MHz 

gNB RX antenna setup and port layouts

(𝑀,𝑁,𝑃,𝑀𝑔,𝑁𝑔,𝑀𝑝,𝑁𝑝

(8,8,2,1,1,4,8) with (𝑑H, 𝑑V) = (0.5, 0.8)𝜆

(4,4,2,1,1,4,4) with (𝑑H, 𝑑V) = (0.5, 0.8)𝜆

 

Optional: 

Classical: two 8x1 xpols, 4λ apart; 4 TXRUs tilt=[104°]

gNB antenna radiation pattern parameters

-        Outdoor/Indoor

Per 38.901, Table 7.3-1 

gNB receiver noise figure

5dB 

gNB receiver

MMSE-IRC

gNB scheduler

Single user with proportional fair

Modulation

-    Up to 64 QAM  

-    Up to 256QAM  

MIMO scheme

SU-MIMO with rank adaptation

UE speed

3 Km/h

UE antenna config 

 

eMBB:

-        Xpol+1pol; isotropic ULA

-        Xpol+1pol; 110°, 4 dBi

 

Outdoor FWA:

-        Xpol+1pol; isotropic ULA

-        3 directional 1pol: 110°, 4 dBi

Traffic model

-    FTP model 1: Packet size 500KB, RU= 50% and suggested low/high RU of values of 20% and 70%

-   Full buffer (optional) 

Suggested benchmarking

Rel-15 2Tx non-coherent

Precoder granularity

Wideband

Power control

Open loop, 

-    alpha = 0.8

-    P= -50, -80 dBm  to be selected according to the deployment scenario 

UE power rating

eMBB:

23 dBm, UL FPTx mode 0 or Rel-15 power scaling

 

Outdooe FWA:

31 dBm, UL FPTx mode 0

Metric

UL mean-user throughput, 5%-ile and 95%-ile UPT

 

Agreement

For performance evaluation of 3TX UE, consider following reference configurations,

 

Agreement

For SRS configuration supporting codebook-based UL transmission by a 3TX UE, one SRS resource set is configured for single TRP operation.

 

 

R1-2401798         FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; Third Round              Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

From Thursday session

Agreement

For codebook-based transmission by a 3TX UE,

Above is only for single panel transmission.

 

 

R1-2401580         Recommended Direction on 3TX CB-based Uplink in RAN1#116bis      Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

9.2.44       Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios

R1-2400281         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios ZTE, China Telecom

Proposal 1: Support to configure a second separate closed loop for SRS in SRS resource set, i.e., the higher layer parameter srs-PowerControlAdjustmentStates in SRS-ResourceSet.

Proposal 2: Support to introduce a closed loop indicator field with 1-bit size in DCI format 2_3 to indicate TPC command for SRS power adjustment if configured with two separate closed loops, regardless of whether the higher layer parameter SRS-CarrierSwitching is configured or not.

Proposal 3: Support to configure pathloss offset for PL-RS in UL TCI state.

Proposal 4: Support to further justify whether/how to apply dedicated pathloss offset values for different UL channels/signals.

Proposal 5: Support to further discuss whether/how to dynamically indicate/update pathloss offset values for UL transmission towards to UL TRP(s).

Proposal 6: For asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios, at least separate DL/UL TCI indication framework should be supported for both cases of ‘Rel-17 unified TCI for sTRP/ICBM’ and ‘Rel-18 unified TCI for sDCI based mTRP’.

·       To clarify TCI indication for the above cases, e.g.,

o   When Rel-17 unified TCI applied for sTRP/ICBM: one DL TCI state + one UL TCI state

§  Note: Rel-17 mechanism(s) to update spatial relation of the SRS not sharing the indicated Rel-17 TCI state can be used to update UL TCI state of SRS for DL CSI acquisition.

o   When Rel-18 unified TCI applied for sDCI based mTRP: one DL TCI state + up to two UL TCI states

Decision: The document is noted.

 

R1-2401115         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios NTT DOCOMO, INC.

Proposal 1: For asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios, at least the following Rel-17/18 unified TCI framework should be supported.

·       For intra-cell TCI state indication:

o   Rel-17 unified TCI for single TRP or Rel-18 unified TCI for single DCI based multi-TRP/panel.

·       For inter-cell (intra-DU) TCI state indication:

o   Rel-17 unified TCI for single TRP.

·       Note: Rel-18 unified TCI for multi-DCI based multi-TRP/panel is not suitable, because gNB needs to send PDCCH corresponding to each coresetPoolIndex, which is not aligned with the scenario of “DL sTRP” in the WID.

Proposal 2: Support configuration of “one or two SRS resource set(s) with same CL-PC adjustment state as PUSCH” and the other “one or two SRS resource set(s) with CL-PC adjustment state separate from PUSCH” in a BWP in a CC.

·       Introduce 2nd CL-PC adjustment state separate from PUSCH (e.g. k={0,1}).

·       Index of {1st, 2nd} CL-PC adjustment state separate from PUSCH is configured per SRS resource set.

Proposal 3: Support {1st, 2nd} CL-PC adjustment states separate from PUSCH as independent feature from SRS carrier switching.

·       Note: This feature can be applied regardless of the configuration of PUSCH or SRS carrier switching.

·       Introduce new RRC parameter to enable {1st, 2nd} CL-PC adjustment state separate from PUSCH per SRS resource set.

o   Support both srs-TPC-PDCCH-Group = {typeA, typeB}.

Proposal 4: Whether to support joint configuration of the following features in a CC should be discussed.

·       UE feature 1: Legacy one CL-PC adjustment state separate from PUSCH for SRS carrier switching.

·       UE feature 2: New {1st, 2nd} CL-PC adjustment states separate from PUSCH.

Proposal 5: DCI format 2_3 is used to indicate TPC commands for CL-PC adjustment states separate from PUSCH.

·       Alt.1: One group common DCI (e.g. DCI format 2_3) can indicate two TPC commands associated with both 1st and 2nd CL-PC adjustment states separate from PUSCH in a CC.

o   Introduce 2nd TPC command (2-bit) for the 2nd CL-PC adjustment state separate from PUSCH.

·       Alt.2: One group common DCI (e.g. DCI format 2_3) can indicate one TPC command associated with either 1st or 2nd CL-PC adjustment state separate from PUSCH in a CC.

o   Alt.2-1: Introduce 1-bit to indicate which one of {1st, 2nd} CL-PC adjustment states separate from PUSCH is associated to the TPC command.

o   Alt.2-2: Implicit indication of which one of {1st, 2nd} CL-PC adjustment states separate from PUSCH is associated to the TPC command (e.g. by SRS request field).

Proposal 6: MAC CE/DCI can indicate PL-offset value, depending on which UL/DL TRP UE transmits. The number of PL-offset values configured in a BWP/CC is at least larger than or equal to 4.

Proposal 7: PL-offset configuration should be applied to all UL CH/RS (i.e. SRS, PUSCH, PUCCH, PRACH) after RRC connection set up.

Proposal 8: For PUSCH/PUCCH/SRS, PL-offset is configured in a UL TCI state.

·       If PL-offset is configured in a UL TCI state applied to PUSCH/PUCCH/SRS, and if the UL TCI state is applied to the UL transmission, UE calculates PL using the PL-offset value when UE transmits the PUSCH/PUCCH/SRS.

Proposal 9: For PRACH, a set of PL-offsets is configured in PRACH-Config.

·       PDCCH can indicate one of PL-offset values for PDCCH order PRACH.

Proposal 10: Support two TA for single DCI based multi-TRP/panel or single TRP.

·       Reuse Rel-18 spec. of two TA for multi-DCI based multi-TRP/panel and remove the restriction that coresetPoolIndex needs to be configured.

Decision: The document is noted.

 

R1-2400052         Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Spreadtrum Communications

R1-2400107         On power control enhancements for DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment          Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2400164         On Asymmetric mTRP Deployment              InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2400197         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Lenovo

R1-2400240         Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              vivo

R1-2400267         Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              TCL

R1-2400324         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              CMCC

R1-2400384         Enhancements for asymmetric DL/UL scenarios         Intel Corporation

R1-2400431         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              CATT

R1-2400468         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios  NEC

R1-2400510         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              MediaTek Inc.

R1-2400521         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP scenarios              Ericsson

R1-2400556         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              xiaomi

R1-2400626         Enhancements on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              OPPO

R1-2400659         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              China Telecom

R1-2400730         Views on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Samsung

R1-2400774         Discussion on UL-only mTRP operation       Fujitsu

R1-2400851         Considerations on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios  Sony

R1-2400920         Discussions on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios       LG Electronics

R1-2400941         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Nokia, Nokia Shanghai Bell

R1-2400958         Enhancement for Asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Scenarios              Panasonic

R1-2401010         Views on R19 enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Apple

R1-2401047         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Sharp

R1-2401050         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Hyundai Motor Company

R1-2401472         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP deployment scenarios        NTPU    (rev of R1-2401052)

R1-2401257         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios  Google

R1-2401439         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment scenarios        Qualcomm Incorporated

 

R1-2401489         Summary #1 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Moderator (OPPO)

Presented in Tuesday session

 

R1-2401490         Summary #2 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Moderator (OPPO)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

For the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP deployment scenarios, support to associate a UL TCI state with a PL offset:

Further study whether/how to apply a PL offset on PDCCH-order PRACH transmission too.

 

Agreement

To facilitate the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP deployment scenarios, support configuring two closed-loop PC adjustment states for SRS in one CC, both of which are separate from that of the PUSCH.

 

Agreement

Study how to indicate TPC command for those two SRS CLPC adjustment states through DCI when the UE is configured two SRS CLPC adjustment states, down-select from the following options:

For the Options1, 2, 3 and 5, consider at least the following Alts as possible examples:

 

Agreement

To support two SRS CLPC adjustment states, study and possibly down-select at least one from the following Alts:

Note: Other alternatives are not precluded

 

 

R1-2401491         Summary #3 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Moderator (OPPO)

From Thursday session

Agreement

Down-select one from the following alternatives:

 

Agreement

For the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP deployment scenarios, separate DL/UL TCI state mode of Rel-17/18 unified TCI framework can be configured for both FR1 and FR2.

·       Joint TCI state mode can be configured at least for FR1


 RAN1#116-bis

9.2      NR MIMO Phase 5

Please refer to RP-240087 for detailed scope of the WI.

 

[116bis-R19-MIMO] – Eko (Samsung)

Email discussion on Rel-19 MIMO Phase 5

-        To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc

9.2.1       Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management

R1-2402017         On UE initiated/event-driven beam management        Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2402051         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              FUTUREWEI

R1-2402063         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        ZTE

R1-2402079         Rel-19 UE/Event-Driven Beam Management              InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2402098         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Spreadtrum Communications

R1-2402138         Enhancements for event driven beam management     Intel Corporation

R1-2402155         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              MediaTek Inc.

R1-2402235         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              vivo

R1-2402321         Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              OPPO

R1-2402376         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              CATT

R1-2402457         Views on Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Samsung

R1-2402496         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Lenovo

R1-2402529         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Langbo

R1-2402558         Discussion on  enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        CMCC

R1-2402632         UE-initiated beam management      LG Electronics

R1-2402659         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Xiaomi

R1-2402684         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Transsion Holdings

R1-2402718         Discussion on UE initiated report    ASUSTeK

R1-2402721         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Honor

R1-2402758         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management             NEC

R1-2402791         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Fujitsu

R1-2402806         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              ITRI

R1-2402838         Enhancements to facilitate UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Nokia

R1-2402874         Views on UE-initiated beam management    Apple

R1-2402961         Discussion on UE initiated beam management            Sony

R1-2402982         Enhancements for UE-initiated beam management     Ericsson

R1-2403015         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              ETRI

R1-2403055         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              CEWiT

R1-2403068         Discussions on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Ruijie Networks Co. Ltd

R1-2403088         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management             Google

R1-2403108         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Sharp

R1-2403113         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Panasonic

R1-2403187         UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2403237         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2403354         Views on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management.       KDDI Corporation

 

R1-2402711         Offline summary for Rel-19 MIMO UEIBM Moderator (ZTE)

R1-2402712         Moderator Summary #1 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

Presented in Monday session

 

R1-2402713         Moderator Summary #2 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Tuesday session

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, following modes are supported:

·       Mode A (dynamically scheduling UCI by gNB):

o    Step 1: UE transmits a first PUCCH (one-bit/multi-bit) to request a resource for a second UL channel to carry beam report

§  FFS: Request format, e.g., SR or a new UCI type.

o    Step 2: UE detects the DCI format to indicate a resource for a second UL channel to carry beam report.

o    Step 3: Beam report is transmitted in second UL channel.

§  FFS: Details on the second UL channel, e.g., whether the second UL channel is PUCCH, PUSCH or both

o    This option is basic UE capability (i.e. all UE supporting UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting should support this feature).

o    No new DCI format is introduced.

·       Mode B (UCI in pre-configured resource(s) for second UL channel):

o    Step 1: UE transmits a first PUCCH (one-bit/multi-bit) notifying a second UL channel to carry beam report

§  FFS: Notification format, e.g., SR or a new UCI type.

o    Step 2: UE transmits the beam report in the second UL channel.

§  FFS: Details on the second UL channel, e.g., whether the second UL channel is PUCCH, PUSCH or both

o    The notification in Step1 is in a separate reporting instance from the beam report in Step 2.

FFS: Whether UE receives acknowledge information with response to each step for all options

For above procedures, cross-CC beam reporting is supported for both options.

 

 

R1-2402714         Moderator Summary #3 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Wednesday session

Agreement (updated as shown in red in Thursday session)

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding trigger-event detection for beam reporting, at least support Event-2: Quality of at least one new beam, such as L1-RSRP, becomes a threshold value better than the current beam.

 

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, the threshold value is RRC configured.

 

 

R1-2403690         Summary #4 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Moderator (ZTE)

From Thursday session

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, ‘current beam’ is a beam corresponding to the indicated TCI state.

·          Regarding RS measurement for the current beam for Event-2, Option-2a is supported:

o   Option-2a (implicit manner): The RS for current beam is implicitly derived from a QCL RS of indicated TCI state.

§  FFS: The RS for current beam can be either the QCL RS in the indicated TCI state or the SSB which is QCLed with the QCL RS in the indicated TCI state.

o   FFS: Option-2c (explicit manner): The RS for current beam is explicitly configured by RRC or MAC-CE.

§  Note: SSB or CSI-RS can be configured

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, further study the following trigger events:

·          Event-1: Quality of the current beam is worse than a certain threshold.

·          Event-3: Quality of a new beam is better than a certain threshold.

·          Event-4: Quality of the current beam is worse than a threshold 1, and quality of at least one new beam is better than a threshold 2.

·          Event-5: Absolute value of the difference between the quality of the current beam and the quality of at least one new beam is lower than a threshold.

·          Event-6: When the current beam is not in the best K>1 beams (out of configured beams for measurement and reporting).

·          Event-7a: Quality of at least one new beam, such as L1-RSRP, becomes a threshold value better than the RS derived from the activated TCI state with the worst quality.

·          Event-7b: Quality of at least one new beam, such as L1-RSRP, becomes a threshold value better than the RS derived from the activated TCI state with the best quality.

·          Event-8: Quality of M>1 new beams, such as L1-RSRP, become a threshold value better than the current beam.

·          Event-9: Quality of at least one new beam, such as L1-RSRP, becomes a threshold value better than the configured reference RS (can be SSB or CSI-RS).

 

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding UL signaling content(s) of L1-RSRP report depending on Event-2, in a report instance, the following options are provided for down-selection (other options are not precluded) in RAN1#117

9.2.2       CSI enhancements

Including support for up to 128 CSI-RS ports on FR1 and UE reporting enhancement for CJT

 

R1-2402018         On 128 CSI-RS ports and UE reporting enhancement Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2402064         Discussion on CSI enhancements    ZTE

R1-2402080         Rel-19 Enhancements of CSI           InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2402099         Discussion on CSI enhancements    Spreadtrum Communications

R1-2402127         CSI Enhancements for NR MIMO Evolution Kyocera Corporation

R1-2402139         CSI enhancements for MIMO          Intel Corporation

R1-2402156         CSI enhancements to support up to 128 CSI-RS ports MediaTek Inc.

R1-2402180         Discussion on CSI enhancements    TCL

R1-2402236         Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      vivo

R1-2402281         CSI Enhancement for NR MIMO    Google

R1-2402322         CSI enhancements for Rel-19 MIMO            OPPO

R1-2402377         Discussion on Rel-19 MIMO CSI enhancements        CATT

R1-2402406         CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5      Tejas Network Limited

R1-2403485         Views on Rel-19 CSI enhancements              Samsung              (rev of R1-2403424; rev of R1-2402460)

R1-2402497         Discussion on CSI enhancements    Lenovo

R1-2402538         Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      New H3C Technologies Co., Ltd.

R1-2402559         Discussion on CSI enhancements    CMCC

R1-2402633         Discussions on CSI enhancements  LG Electronics

R1-2402660         Discussion on CSI enhancement for up to 128 ports and CJT              Xiaomi

R1-2402722         Discussion on CSI enhancements    Honor

R1-2402767         Discussion on CSI enhancements    NEC

R1-2402792         Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Fujitsu

R1-2403555         CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5      Nokia     (rev of R1-2403452; rev of R1-2402839)

R1-2402875         Views on R19 MIMO CSI enhancement       Apple

R1-2403476         CSI enhancements for large antenna arrays and CJT   Ericsson              (rev of R1-2402928)

R1-2402962         Further views on CSI enhancements              Sony

R1-2403056         CSI Enhancements            CEWiT

R1-2403109         CSI enhancements             Sharp

R1-2403130         Discussion on UE reporting enhancement for CJT      Panasonic

R1-2403145         Views on Rel-19 CSI enhancements              AT&T

R1-2403425         CSI enhancements for >32 ports and UE-assisted CJT with non-ideal TRP synchronization Qualcomm Incorporated    (rev of R1-2403188)

R1-2403238         Discussion on CSI enhancements    NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2403327         CSI enhancements for Rel.19 MIMO             Fraunhofer IIS, Fraunhofer HHI

R1-2403365         Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5              KDDI Corporation

 

R1-2402458         Moderator summary for OFFLINE discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2402459         Moderator summary on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)

From Monday session

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, given the NTRP configured NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets and the selected N resources/resource sets, support reporting, in one CSI reporting instance, {Fn,s , n=0, 1, …, N – 1, n≠nref, s=0,1,…,S-1}, where Fn,s denotes the measured phase offset between the n-th CSI-RS resource/resource set and the reference CSI-RS resource/resource set nref for the s-th frequency unit

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, for a given CJT calibration report of one [or more] CJT calibration report type, the nref is selected by the UE and reported as a part of the CJT calibration report

·       Note: CJT calibration report type refers to the Doffset/d report, FO report, and, TDD PO report

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting of {FOn , n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref}, the value of FOn indicates a uniformly quantized frequency offset between 0 and AFO.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting of {(Dn,offset, dn), n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref}, regarding the interval  which Dn,offset falls into,  is uniformly spaced between 0 and AD, i.e. , with  and  represent ‘out-of-range’.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, the UE reports for all the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets.

·       FFS (by RAN1#116bis): Whether an ‘invalid’ or ‘out-of-range’ quantization state/hypothesis is supported for all the types of CJT calibration reporting. Note that ‘out-of-range’ is supported for the (Dn,offset, dn) reporting.

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I single-panel (SP) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, for RI=1-4, support the following:

·       Scheme-B (based on Scheme2 in RAN1#116 agreement): Adding new (N1, N2) values where 2N1N2 (>32) is the total number of CSI-RS ports across aggregated NZP CSI-RS resources, and

o   W1 structure:

§  For each layer, reuse legacy Rel-16 eType-II SD basis with L=1 to determine the DFT-based SD basis candidates

§  For 1<RI≤4, L=1 SD basis vector is independently selected for different layers

·       The SD basis selection indication includes layer-common (q1,q2) and  bits for each layer

·       Note: This implies that each of the SD basis vectors is selected from a group of N1N2 orthogonal basis vectors

o   W2 structure: Layer-specific inter-polarization co-phasing with the alphabet {+1, +j, -1, -j}

FFS (RAN1#116bis): For Rel-19 Type-I SP, whether to support Mode-C based on Scheme5 in RAN1#116 agreement with L=1 for RI=2-4

FFS (RAN1#116bis): For Rel-19 Type-I SP, whether inter-polarization amplitude for Mode-B can also be supported

FFS: Discuss further if Rel-19 Type-I MP extension based on scheme 4 is needed

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I single-panel (SP) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, for RI=1-4, O1=O2 is 4

·       FFS: Additional support for O1=O2 is 2 when RI=1-4 (including separate UE capability)

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding the mapping from CSI-RS resource index/port index per resource and port index to CSI/PMI calculation, support NW to configure UE with one of the following mapping methods via higher-layer (RRC) signaling,

·       Mapping method 1: Sequential ordering/indexing within (1st resource, 1st polarization), then (2nd resource, 1st polarization), …, then (Kth resource, 1st polarization), then (1st resource, 2nd polarization), then (2nd resource, 2nd polarization), …, then (Kth resource, 2nd polarization) 

·       Mapping method 2: Sequential ordering/indexing within (where K*n2 = N2):

o   for the 1st polarization, (1st n2 ports in 1st resource, 1st polarization), (1st n2 ports in 2nd resource, 1st polarization), …, (1st n2 ports in Kth resource, 1st polarization), then (2nd n2 ports in 1st resource, 1st polarization), (2nd n2 ports in 2nd resource, 1st polarization), …, (2nd n2 ports in Kth resource, 1st polarization), … then (N1th n2 ports in 1st resource, 1st polarization), (N1th n2 ports in 2nd resource, 1st polarization), …, (N1th n2 ports in Kth resource, 1st polarization) ,

o   and then for the 2nd polarization, (1st n2 ports in 1st resource, 2nd polarization), (1st n2 ports in 2nd resource, 2nd polarization), …, (1st n2 ports in Kth resource, 2nd polarization), then (2nd n2 ports in 1st resource, 2nd polarization), (2nd n2 ports in 2nd resource, 2nd polarization), …, (2nd n2 ports in Kth resource, 2nd polarization), … then (N1th n2 ports in 1st resource, 2nd polarization), (N1th n2 ports in 2nd resource, 2nd polarization), …, (N1th n2 ports in Kth resource, 2nd polarization)

FFS: Exact port indexing within each CSI-RS resource or across K CSI-RS resources

FFS: Whether the following is also supported:

o   for the 1st polarization, (1st n2 ports in 1st resource, 1st polarization), (1st n2 ports in 2nd resource, 1st polarization), then (2nd n2 ports in 1st resource, 1st polarization), (2nd n2 ports in 2nd resource, 1st polarization), …, then (n1th n2 ports in 1st resource, 1st polarization), (n1th n2 ports in 2nd resource, 1st polarization),

o   for the 1st polarization, (1st n2 ports in 3rd resource, 1st polarization), (1st n2 ports in 4th resource, 1st polarization), then (2nd n2 ports in 3rd resource, 1st polarization), (2nd n2 ports in 4th resource, 1st polarization), then (n1th n2 ports in 3rd resource, 1st polarization), (n1th n2 ports in 4th resource, 1st polarization),

o   and then for the 2nd polarization, (1st n2 ports in 1st resource, 2nd polarization), (1st n2 ports in 2nd resource, 2nd polarization), then (2nd n2 ports in 1st resource, 2nd polarization), (2nd n2 ports in 2nd resource, 2nd polarization), … then (n1th n2 ports in 1st resource, 2nd polarization), (n1th n2 ports in 2nd resource, 2nd polarization),

o   and then for the 2nd polarization, (1st n2 ports in 3rd resource, 2nd polarization), (1st n2 ports in 4th resource, 2nd polarization), then (2nd n2 ports in 3rd resource, 2nd polarization), (2nd n2 ports in 4th resource, 2nd polarization), then (n1th n2 ports in 3rd resource, 2nd polarization), (n1th n2 ports in 4th resource, 2nd polarization),

·       Other methods are not precluded

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding NZP CSI-RS resource aggregation to attain 32 < P (or PCSI-RS) ≤ 128, all K NZP CSI-RS resources shall be located within 1 slot or 2 consecutive slots (following legacy principle from Rel-18 Type-II CJT), and are associated with a same CSI-RS resource set:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, the legacy resource configuration for interference measurement is reused, i.e. only one NZP CSI-RS resource for interference measurement or only one CSI-IM resource can be configured where the one IM resource is associated with all the K CSI-RS resources in the CSI-RS resource set for channel measurement.

 

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, on SD basis selection indication, there is no consensus on additional spec enhancement. Therefore, the same approach as legacy (using a layer-common -bit indicator) is reused.

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, on CBSR, refine the legacy CBSR as follows:

FFS: Whether/how to enable shared CBSR in RRC configuration for Type-I/-II codebooks with a same (N1,N2).

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports based on Rel-18 Type-II Doppler codebook,

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, the (N1,N2) values for P=64 are supported as a part of the respective basic feature, while those for P=48 and P=128 are supported as two separate UE capabilities.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports,

FFS: The determination of M reported beams

Note: Selection algorithm of CRI(s) from measurement of KS>1 NZP-CSI-RS resources is up to UE implementation.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, support the following time-domain behaviours:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, the following report quantities are supported:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, on the configured KS>1 NZP CSI-RS resources, reuse the legacy CMR and IMR rules for the Rel-15 CRI-based reporting. This includes:

·       All the KS NZP CSI-RS resources are associated with a same CSI-RS resource set

·       KS CSI-IM resources can be configured (implying one-to-one correspondence between KS CMRs and KS CSI-IMs)

FFS: Whether all the KS NZP CSI-RS resources share a same Pcoffset and PcoffsetSS

FFS: Whether or not NZP CSI-RS resource for interference measurement can be configured. FFS further details.

 

 

R1-2403524         Moderator Summary for Tuesday OFFLINE session on Rel-19 CSI enhancements             Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2403523         Moderator Summary#2 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: ROUND 2           Moderator (Samsung)

From Tuesday session

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, assuming the Rel-17/18 unified TCI framework, regarding TCI/QCL, the following is assumed:

·       Based on the legacy support of up to 2 TCI states for PDSCH-CJT.

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the applicable type(s) of the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd’ (Doffset+d) or ‘cjtc-F’ (frequency offset), periodic TRS (‘CSI-RS for tracking’) resource set is used for each of the NTRP NZP CSI-RS resource sets

·       Extend the maximum allowed number of TRS resource sets to 4 (note: legacy supports max. 3 from Rel-18 TDCP)

·       FFS: Whether all the resources across the NTRP TRS resource sets are configured with the same bandwidth

·       FFS: Whether aperiodic TRS resource set can also be used

·       FFS: Whether CSI-RS for CSI can also be used

·       FFS: Whether different RE locations (FDM) are supported for the RSs

·       FFS: additional time separation between RSs

·       FFS: The exact number of CSI-RS resource(s) within each TRS resource set

·       FFS: applicable type(s) if joint reporting of both Doffset/d and FO is supported

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the applicable type(s) of the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), single-port CSI-RS(s) for CSI is used.

·       FFS: Whether multi-port CSI-RS for CSI can also be used

·       FFS: Whether all the ‘CSI-RS for CSI’ resources within each resource set follow the legacy pre-Rel-19 rules of CSI-RS resources associated with a same resource set, and whether only 1 or NTRP >1 resource sets are used

·       FFS: The exact number of CSI-RS resource(s) within each resource set

·       FFS: Whether different RE locations (FDM) are supported for the RSs

·       FFS: additional restrictions e.g. time separation between RSs, bandwidth

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding phase offset reporting, the value Fn,s indicates a uniformly quantized phase between 0 and 2p.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, the dynamic range and resolution parameters for delay offset reporting Dn,offset, i.e. (AD, MD), are NW-configured via higher-layer (RRC) signalling from the following candidate values:

In addition, the inside/outside range for the 1-bit indicator dn is equal to [0, CP].

FFS: Further implicit/explicit restriction(s) on candidate value(s) depending on the CSI-RS configuration.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, an ‘invalid’ quantization state/hypothesis is supported for frequency offset and phase offset CJT calibration reporting.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, at least for a CJT calibration report consisting only one type, support one-part UCI on PUSCH.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I multi-panel (MP) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, for RI=1-4, decide, by RAN1#117, whether to support Type-I multi-panel (MP) codebook refinement in Rel-19.

If supported, decide from the following alternatives:

o   W1 structure: Reuse legacy Rel-15 Type-I SP SD basis selection with L=1 independently for each of the K NZP CSI-RS resources

o   W2 structure:

If so, decide, by RAN1#117, whether port mapping scheme similar to, e.g. Rel-18 Type-II CJT, needs to be specified.

Note: This topic is lower priority compared to the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement.

 

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports with RI=1-4, there is no consensus on supporting the following additional enhancements: Mode-C, inter-polarization amplitude for Scheme-B, larger values of L (>1, including 2, …, 10).

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding NZP CSI-RS resource aggregation to attain 32 < P (or PCSI-RS) ≤ 128, support the following refinement on the K>1 CSI-RS resources associated with a same CSI-RS resource set:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding NZP CSI-RS resource aggregation to attain 32 < P (or PCSI-RS) ≤ 128, all the K>1 NZP CSI-RS resources also share the same QCL, PCoffset, and PCoffsetSS. In addition:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports based on the Rel-18 Type-II Doppler codebook, support the following aperiodic CMR configuration:

FFS: the determination of CSI-RS resource group that a CSI-RS resource is associated with.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, for M>1, the M CRIs (each with  bits) are separated indicated

·       FFS: whether to support NW configuring/requesting the UE to report CRI/RI/PMI/CQI associated with MR (<M) of KS CSI-RS resources, including whether further reduction in the number of hypotheses is supported, i.e. reporting (MMR) CRIs (each with  bits)

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP and Type-II codebook refinements for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports via aggregating K>1 CSI-RS resources, regarding timeline, introduce two UE capabilities:

FFS: CPU occupation and active resource counting

Note:

 

 

R1-2403603         Moderator Summary for Wednesday OFFLINE session on Rel-19 CSI enhancements             Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2403602         Moderator Summary#3 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: ROUND 3           Moderator (Samsung)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding frequency offset reporting,  and  represents an ‘invalid’ state.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, the dynamic range and resolution parameters for frequency offset reporting FOn, i.e. (AFO, MFO), are NW-configured via higher-layer (RRC) signalling from the following candidate values:

·       AFO = {0.01ppm, 0.1ppm, 0.2ppm, f, f/2, f/4,f/8, 1/(4t), 1/(8t), 1/(16t), 1/(32t), 1/(512t)} where f and t denote the SCS and duration of one OFDM symbol, respectively

o   FFS: Further down-selection of the above candidate values for AFO, including the use of a same unit for all supported values

·       MFO = {16,32}

FFS: Whether additional restriction(s) based on CSI-RS configuration is supported, including implicit configuration of quantization range.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, the resolution parameters for n, i.e. M, are NW-configured via higher-layer (RRC) signalling from the candidate values {16, 32}, where .

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding QCL assumptions, each of the NTRP DL-RSs can be configured with a TCI state via RRC signaling

·       ‘The DL-RS’ refers to the CSI-RS configured for CJT calibration measurement

·       FFS: Whether additional constraints are needed for the TCI state of the ‘DL-RS’

Agreement

For a UE indicated with two TCI states, regarding QCL assumptions for PDSCH, at least the following are supported:

Per Rel-18, the support of two TCI states is a UE capability

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, the UCI parameters are captured in the tables below for Scheme-A and Scheme-B:

 

Scheme-A

Parameter

UCI

Details/description

Status

RI

Part 1

Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP: RI=v

Complete

Wideband CQI for the first TB

Part 1

Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP

Complete

Subband differential CQI for the first TB (*)

Part 1

Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP

Complete

Wideband CQI of the second TB

Part 2


Wideband

Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP

Only present when v >4

Complete

Subband CQI of the second TB (*)

Part 2

 

Subband

Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP

Only present when v >4

Complete

First SD basic vector selection indicator

Part 2

 

Wideband

v=1-4: Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP with the scheme following < 16-port design of Rel-15 Type-I SP codebookMode=1

v=5-8: FFS

v=1-4: Complete

v=5-8: Pending

Second SD basis vector selection indicator

Part 2

 

Wideband

v=1-4: Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP with the scheme following < 16-port design of R15 Type-I codebookMode=1

v=5-8: FFS

v=1-4: Complete

v=5-8: Pending

Inter-pol co-phase selection indicator

Part 2

 

Wideband or Subband (**)

v=1-4: Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP with the scheme following < 16-port design of R16 Type-I codebookMode=1

v=5-8: FFS

v=1-4: Complete

v=5-8: Pending

 

Scheme-B

Parameter

UCI

Details/description

Status

RI

Part 1

Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP: RI=v

Complete

Wideband CQI for the first TB

Part 1

Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP

Complete

Subband differential CQI for the first TB (*)

Part 1

Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP

Complete

Wideband CQI of the second TB

Part 2


Wideband

Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP

Only present when v>4

Complete

Subband CQI of the second TB (*)

Part 2

 

Subband

Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP

Only present when v >4

Complete

SD basis oversampling (rotation) factor q1, q2

Part 2


Wideband

v=1-4: Values of q1, q2 follow Rel-16 eType-II,  bit indicator

v=5-8: FFS

v=1-4: Complete

v=5-8: Pending

SD basis vector selection indicator for each layer

Alt1: Part 1

Alt2: Part 2

 

Wideband

v=1-4:

-                Alt1:  bit indicator per layer l=1, …, RIMAX

-                Alt2:  bit indicator per layer l=1, …, v

v=5-8: FFS

Pending

Inter-pol co-phase selection indicator for each layer

Part 2

 

Wideband or Subband (**)

v=1-4:

-        Alt1: QPSK with orthogonality constraints across v layers

-        Alt2: QPSK: 2-bit indicator per layer l=1,…,v

v=5-8: FFS

Pending

(*): Not included when CQI reporting granularity is set to ‘wideband’

(**): Wideband when PMI reporting is set to ‘wideband’, Subband when PMI reporting granularity is set to ‘subband’

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports with RI=5-8, decide, by RAN1#117, from the following schemes:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, except for Parameter Combination 8 from Rel-17 FeType-II PS, all legacy Parameter Combinations from Rel-16 eType-II (regular), Rel-18 Type-II Doppler (regular), and Rel-17 FeType-II PS are supported.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding CBSR design:

FFS: Whether/how to enable shared CBSR in RRC configuration for Type-I/II codebooks with a same (N1,N2).

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, on the configured KS>1 NZP CSI-RS resources, Pcoffset and PcoffsetSS are CSI-RS-resource-specific (i.e. configured independently across resources).

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, for M>1, SD basis selection is independently signalled per CRI (per CSI-RS resource).

 

 

Thursday

R1-2403649         DRAFT LS to RAN2 on CBSR for Rel-19 MIMO  Samsung

Decision: Draft LS in 3649 is endorsed. Final LS is approved in R1-2403650.

 

R1-2403642         Moderator Summary for Thursday OFFLINE session on Rel-19 CSI enhancements             Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2403641         Moderator Summary#4 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: ROUND 4           Moderator (Samsung)

From Thursday session

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, in addition to reporting one type of CJT calibration report in one report, at least support reporting {(Dn,offset, dn), n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref1} and {FOn , n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref2} in one report

 

Agreement

For a UE indicated with two TCI states, regarding QCL assumptions for PDSCH, support the following QCL assumption for PDSCH:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports,

 

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, for a given massive TXRU/antenna array, there is no consensus on the need for specification support for cell-specific precoder(s) for many-to-one mapping (virtualization) from multiple TXRUs to each CSI-RS port to facilitate full usage of all TXRUs for a pre-Rel-19 UE (i.e. cell-specific beamformed CSI-RS for pre-Rel-19 UEs).

 

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding the mapping from CSI-RS resource index/port index per resource and port index to CSI/PMI calculation, there is no consensus on supporting mapping method#3 (for K=4, 2x2 aggregation).

9.2.3       Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions

R1-2402019         On codebook for 3-antenna-port UL transmission       Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2402065         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              ZTE

R1-2402081         Rel-19 CB-based UL for 3TX UE   InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2402100         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Spreadtrum Communications

R1-2402140         Support for 3Tx UL MIMO             Intel Corporation

R1-2402157         Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              MediaTek Inc.

R1-2402179         Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              TCL

R1-2402237         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based uplink transmissions      vivo

R1-2402282         Uplink 3 Port Codebook based Transmission Google

R1-2402323         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              OPPO

R1-2402378         Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions      CATT

R1-2402461         Views on Rel-19 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Samsung

R1-2402498         Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Lenovo

R1-2402530         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Langbo

R1-2402560         Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions      CMCC

R1-2402634         Discussions on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions  LG Electronics

R1-2402661         Discussion on the support of 3-antenna-port CB based transmissions      Xiaomi

R1-2402685         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Transsion Holdings

R1-2402723         Discussion on the 3-port codebook-based transmission              Honor

R1-2402768         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              NEC

R1-2402793         Discussion on uplink enhancement for UE with 3Tx   Fujitsu

R1-2402840         On the support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Nokia

R1-2402876         Views on R19 3Tx codebook based transmission        Apple

R1-2403099         Support for 3 Tx UL transmissions Ericsson

R1-2403110         Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmission              Sharp

R1-2403189         3 Tx UL MIMO transmissions        Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2403239         Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions      NTT DOCOMO, INC.

 

R1-2402083         FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; Preparatory              Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

From Monday session

Agreement

To support codebook-based UL transmission by a 3TX UE, the agreed rank1 precoders in RAN1#116 can also be used when transform precoding is enabled (DFT-s-OFDM ).

 

Agreement

To indicate precoding information for codebook-based UL transmission by a 3TX UE,

 

Agreement

For SRS configuration supporting codebook-based UL transmission by a 3TX UE, support Alt1,

where X can be up to 2, subject to UE capability.

 

 

R1-2402084         FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; First Round              Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

From Tuesday session

Agreement

For codebook-based UL transmission by a 3TX UE, when 2 PTRS ports are configured by maxNrofPorts in PTRS-UplinkConfig, PTRS-DMRS association indication is as follows:

Value of MSB

DMRS port

Value of LSB

DMRS port

0

1st DMRS port which shares PTRS port 0

0

1st DMRS port which shares PTRS port 1

1

2nd DMRS port which shares PTRS port 0

1

2nd DMRS port which shares PTRS port 1

·       Note: PUSCH antenna port 1000 and 1002 in indicated TPMI(s) share PT_RS port 0, and PUSCH antenna port 1001 is associated with PT_RS port 1

·       Number of bits used for the indication:

o   1 bit

Agreement

For a 3TX UE, to support 3-port SRS transmission with reusing a 4-port SRS resource, support the following for muting one of the ports of the configured 4-port SRS resource.

·       Option 3: Always a same port is muted, e.g., the 4th port.

Agreement

For a 3TX UE, to support 3-port SRS transmission with reusing a 4-port SRS resource, UE splits a linear SRS power equally across the 3 unmuted antenna ports of the 4-port SRS resource.

 

Agreement

For 3-port codebook-based PUSCH transmission for a 3TX UE, scale factor s should be the ratio of the number of antenna ports with a non-zero PUSCH transmission power to 3 (except for full-power Mode 0).

·       FFS: Whether specification needs to be updated to reflect the above.

 

R1-2402085         FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; Second Round   Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

For codebook-based UL transmission by a 3TX UE, when 1 PTRS port is configured by maxNrofPorts in PTRS-UplinkConfig, PTRS-DMRS association indication is as follows:

·       Alt2: 2-bit indication

PTRS-DMRS association when 1 PT-RS port is configured

Value

DMRS port

0

1st scheduled DMRS port

1

2nd scheduled DMRS port

2

3rd scheduled DMRS port

3

4th scheduled DMRS port

Reserved

 

Agreement

For a 3TX UE, support Rel-17 M-TRP PUSCH repetition where,

·       Two SRS resource sets, each with up to 2 of 4-port SRS resources are configured,

Note: The configured 4 port SRS resources are used to enable 3-port SRS transmission.

 

 

R1-2402086         Recommended Direction on 3TX CB-based Uplink in RAN1#117              Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

9.2.44       Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios

R1-2402020         Discussion on power control enhancements for DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment             Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2402066         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              ZTE, China Telecom

R1-2402070         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Ericsson

R1-2402082         Rel-19 Asymmetric mTRP Operation            InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2402101         Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Spreadtrum Communications

R1-2402141         Enhancements for asymmetric DL/UL scenarios         Intel Corporation

R1-2402158         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              MediaTek Inc.

R1-2402238         Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              vivo

R1-2402288         Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              TCL

R1-2402324         Enhancements on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              OPPO

R1-2402379         Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              CATT

R1-2402462         Views on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Samsung

R1-2402499         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Lenovo

R1-2402507         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              China Telecom, ZTE

R1-2402531         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Langbo

R1-2402561         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              CMCC

R1-2402635         Discussions on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios       LG Electronics

R1-2402662         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Xiaomi

R1-2402686         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Transsion Holdings

R1-2402719         Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP   ASUSTeK

R1-2402724         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Honor

R1-2402759         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios  NEC

R1-2402794         Discussion on UL-only mTRP operation       Fujitsu

R1-2402841         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Nokia

R1-2402877         Views on R19 enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Apple

R1-2402963         Considerations on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios  Sony

R1-2403016         Discussion on asymmetric DL_UL mTRP operation   ETRI

R1-2403089         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios  Google

R1-2403111         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Sharp

R1-2403132         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Panasonic

R1-2403190         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment scenarios        Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2403240         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              NTT DOCOMO, INC.

 

R1-2403414         Summary #1 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Moderator (OPPO)

From Monday session

Agreement

For a UE configured with two SRS CLPC adjustment states, support Alt2 for indicating one of the SRS CLPC adjustment states to SRS:

Ericsson raised concerns on Alt2 due to potential issues with beam management.

 

Agreement

For indicating TPC command for those two SRS CLPC adjustment states through DCI when the UE is configured with two SRS CLPC adjustment states, support Option3:

·       Option 3: enhance the legacy DCI format 2_3 of higher layer parameter srs-TPC-PDCCH-Group = typeA and typeB,

Agreement

For enhancing DCI format 2_3 for indicating TPC command for two SRS CLPC adjustment states, support Alt2:

Note: this 1-bit indicator is present for the CC where two SRS CLPC adjustment states are configured.

 

Agreement

For FR1, a joint TCI state can be associated with a PL offset.

 

 

R1-2403415         Summary #2 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Moderator (OPPO)

From Tuesday session

Agreement

Support applying PL offset on PDCCH-order PRACH towards a UL TRP in FR1.

 

Agreement

Consider and down-select one from the following alts for indicating a PL offset for PDCCH-order PRACH transmission at least for FR1.

Note: Other alternatives are not precluded.

 

 

R1-2403416         Summary #3 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Moderator (OPPO)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

For the association between PL offset and joint/UL TCI state, consider and down-select one from the following Alts:

Other alternatives are not precluded.

 

Agreement

For the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP deployment scenarios, study whether and how to indicate TPC command for SRS CLPC adjustment states through DCI format 1_1 and/or 0_1 when the UE is configured two SRS CLPC adjustment states.


 RAN1#117

9.2      NR MIMO Phase 5

Please refer to RP-240087 for detailed scope of the WI.

 

[117-R19-MIMO] – Eko (Samsung)

Email discussion on Rel-19 MIMO Phase 5

-        To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc

9.2.1       Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management

R1-2403846         Discussion on Rel-19 UE/Event-Driven Beam Management              InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2403872         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              FUTUREWEI

R1-2403877         Discussion on Rel-19 Enhancement for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management             New H3C Technologies Co., Ltd.

R1-2403900         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              MediaTek Inc.

R1-2403944         On UE initiated/event-driven beam management        Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2403985         Enhancements for event driven beam management     Intel Corporation

R1-2404019         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Spreadtrum Communications

R1-2404106         Views on Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Samsung

R1-2404170         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              vivo

R1-2404239         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        ZTE

R1-2404277         Enhancements for UE-initiated beam management     Apple

R1-2404336         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Lenovo

R1-2404394         Views on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              CATT

R1-2404449         Discussion on  enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        CMCC

R1-2404475         Enhancements for UE-initiated/Event-Driven Beam Management               Panasonic

R1-2404494         Discussion on UE initiated beam management            Sony

R1-2404550         UE-initiated beam management      LG Electronics

R1-2404574         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              HONOR

R1-2404587         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Fujitsu

R1-2404611         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Xiaomi

R1-2404657         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management             NEC

R1-2404739         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Hyundai Motor Company

R1-2404746         Enhancements for UE-initiated beam management     Ericsson

R1-2404770         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              ETRI

R1-2404813         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Transsion Holdings

R1-2404882         Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              OPPO

R1-2404918         Enhancements to facilitate UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Nokia

R1-2404970         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Sharp

R1-2405035         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2405111         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              ITRI

R1-2405122         Discussions on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Ruijie Networks Co. Ltd

R1-2405148         UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2405187         Discussion on UE initiated beam management            ASUSTeK

R1-2405205         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              NICT

R1-2405238         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              CEWiT

R1-2405258         Discussions on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        KDDI Corporation

R1-2405271         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management             Google

 

R1-2404712         Offline summary for Rel-19 MIMO UEIBM (9.2.1) pre-RAN1#117           Moderator (ZTE)

R1-2404713         Moderator Summary #1 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Monday session

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding UL signaling content(s) of L1-RSRP report depending on Event-2, in a report instance, at least Option-3 is supported

 

 

R1-2404714         Moderator Summary #2 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Tuesday session

Working Assumption

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting

 

Agreement

Regarding RS measurement for the current beam for Event 2, for Option-2a, support the both schemes as follows.

 

Agreement

Regarding RS measurement for the new beam for Event 2, at least Option-3a is supported

 

 

R1-2404715         Moderator Summary #3 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding L1-RSRP report format Option-3 depending on Event-2, for a report instance where N ≥ 1 beam(s) are reported, the following is supported.

·       RRC can enable or disable whether current beam is always reported

o   When enabled by RRC, the current beam + N beams from the measurement RSs for new beam(s) are reported

§  Note: The reported current beam is NOT counted in the N reported beams.

o   When disabled by RRC, N beams are reported.

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Mode-A, the DCI format in Step-2 comprises UL-grant DCI format, and the second channel in Step-3 is at least PUSCH.

 

 

R1-2405638         Moderator Summary #4 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Thursday session

Agreement

Regarding the triggering event determination for Event 2:

Above feature is subject to UE capability.

·       Basic feature: Once the L1-RSRP of the new beam becomes a threshold value better than the current beam, UE initiated beam report occurs

FFS: Whether the above is captured in RAN1 or RAN2 specification.

 

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding trigger events, the following Event-1 and 7a/7b, are provided for down-selection or combination in RAN1#118 (possible outcome is that no new event is supported)

·       Event-1: Quality of the current beam is worse than a certain threshold.

·       Event-7a: Quality of at least one new beam, such as L1-RSRP, becomes a threshold value better than the RS derived from the activated TCI state with the worst quality.

·       Event-7b: Quality of at least one new beam, such as L1-RSRP, becomes a threshold value better than the RS derived from the activated TCI state with the best quality.

Agreement

Regarding explicit RS configuration for new beam measurement for Event 2, down-select the following options in the RAN1#118:

·       Option-1: The RS(s) for new beam(s) are explicitly configured in one RS resource set associated with an CSI reporting configuration;

o   FFS: The RS in the RS resource set can be updated by MAC-CE.

·       Option-2: A list of RS(s) for new beam measurement can be configured by RRC, and a subset can be activated for new beam measurement by MAC-CE.

o   FFS: If a list size is small, MAC-CE activation is not needed

·       Option-3: A list of RS resource (s) for new beam measurement can be configured by RRC, and a subset of RS resource(s) in the list can be provided for new beam measurement by indicated TCI state.

·       Others are not precluded.

·       FFS: Each RS for new beam measurement should be associated with a configured joint/DL TCI state which can be used as the indicated TCI state

Agreement

Regarding RS measurement for the current beam for Event 2, for Option-2a, besides for scheme-1 and scheme-2, further study the following for handling the case that only one TRS is configured in the indicated TCI state.

·       Option-1: Introducing additional scheme: the RS for current beam can be a CSI-RS for beam management derived from the QCL RS in the indicated TCI state;

·       Option-2: Further support TRS as measurement RS of current beam for determining L1-RSRP

·       Option-3: Introducing additional scheme: The RS for current beam is explicitly configured by RRC or MAC-CE (Option-2C in RAN1 116b agreement).

·       Option-4: No further enhancement (i.e., in such case, Scheme-2 is used)

·       Others are not precluded.

 

9.2.2       CSI enhancements

Including support for up to 128 CSI-RS ports on FR1 and UE reporting enhancement for CJT

 

R1-2403847         Discussion on Rel-19 Enhancements of CSI  InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2403876         Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      New H3C Technologies Co., Ltd.

R1-2403884         CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5      Tejas Networks Limited

R1-2405340         CSI enhancements to support up to 128 CSI-RS ports MediaTek Inc.        (rev of R1-2403901)

R1-2405445         On 128 CSI-RS ports and UE reporting enhancement Huawei, HiSilicon             (rev of R1-2403945)

R1-2403981         CSI enhancements for MIMO          Intel Corporation

R1-2404004         Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      TCL

R1-2404020         Discussion on CSI enhancements    Spreadtrum Communications

R1-2405382         Views on Rel-19 CSI enhancements              Samsung              (rev of R1-2405365; rev of R1-2404109)

R1-2404171         Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      vivo

R1-2404240         Discussion on CSI enhancements    ZTE

R1-2404278         Views on R19 MIMO CSI enhancement       Apple

R1-2404337         Discussion on CSI enhancements    Lenovo

R1-2404395         Views on MIMO CSI enhancements in Rel-19            CATT

R1-2404450         Discussion on CSI enhancements    CMCC

R1-2404495         Additional views on CSI enhancements        Sony

R1-2404551         Discussions on CSI enhancements  LG Electronics

R1-2404575         Discussion on CSI enhancements    HONOR

R1-2404588         Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Fujitsu

R1-2404612         Discussion on CSI enhancement     Xiaomi

R1-2404668         Discussion on CSI enhancements    NEC

R1-2404687         CSI Enhancement for NR MIMO    Google

R1-2404883         CSI enhancements for Rel-19 MIMO            OPPO

R1-2404919         CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5      Nokia

R1-2404923         CSI enhancements for Rel.19 MIMO             Fraunhofer IIS, Fraunhofer HHI

R1-2404971         CSI enhancements             Sharp

R1-2405005         CSI enhancements for large antenna arrays and CJT   Ericsson

R1-2405036         Discussion on CSI enhancements    NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2405149         CSI enhancements for >32 ports and UE-assisted CJT              Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2405206         CSI enhancements             NICT

R1-2405239         CSI Enhancements            CEWiT

R1-2405255         Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5              KDDI Corporation

 

R1-2404107         Moderator summary for OFFLINE discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2404108         Moderator summary on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)

From Monday session

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the dynamic range for delay offset reporting Dn,offset, i.e. AD, at least support the following values: {0.5CP, CP}

·       Decide, by RAN1#117, whether any of the following candidate values are supported: {0.75CP, 1.5CP, ,}

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the dynamic range for frequency offset reporting FOn, i.e. AFO, at least support the following values: {0.1ppm, 0.2ppm}

·       Decide, by RAN1#117, whether any of the following candidate values are supported: {0.025ppm, 0.05ppm, 1/(8Dt), 1/(16Dt), 1/(32Dt)}

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), =1 only (agreed in RAN1#116bis) implies that the measured/reported phase offsets {n,, n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref} are associated with the entire configured CSI reporting band (i.e. ‘wideband’).

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), decide, by RAN1#117, whether to also support S>1 (sub-band reporting) as follows:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset),

 

Agreement (further modified as shown in red in Tuesday session)

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding active resource counting and OCPU, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd’ (Doffset+d) or cjtc-F’ (frequency offset), fully reuse those from Rel-18 TDCP reporting

·       For OCPU, Y=NTRP for each CJT calibration report type

·       OCPU =X.NTRP where X≥1 is defined based on UE capabilities and determined by the UE for each CJT calibration report type

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports based on the Rel-18 Type-II Doppler codebook,

·       Ordering the KDOPPK CSI-RS resources ascendingly by the CSI-RS resource ID and kDOPP ={0,1,…, KDOPP  –1}, CSI-RS resources { kDOPPK, kDOPPK +1, …, (kDOPP+1)K –1} are associated with the kDOPP-th CSI-RS resource group

·       FFS: If the CSI-RS resources in a resource group span two consecutive slots, m is 2.

·       FFS: If the CSI-RS resources in a resource group are located in one slot, m can be configured from {1, 2}

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding aggregation of K NZP CSI-RS resources to attain 32 < P (or PCSI-RS) ≤ 128, support only the following combinations of K and P (or PCSI-RS):

·       For P (or PCSI-RS) = 48, K = 2 (each resource 24 ports) and 3 (each resource 16 ports)

·       For P (or PCSI-RS) = 64, K = 2 (each resource 32 ports) and 4 (each resource 16 ports)

·       For P (or PCSI-RS) = 128, K = 4 (each resource 32 ports)

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding port mapping,

·       Following legacy principle, “sequential ordering/indexing within” a group of Q indices {i0, i1, …, iQ-1} is a linearly increasing sequence such that iq < iq+1 (where q=0, 1, …, Q-2 is the port index within a CSI-RS resource, and iq or iq+1  {0, 1,…, KQ-1}) is the port index for the codebook, across the K>1 CSI-RS resources).

·       After resource aggregation, P (=48, 64, or 128) ports are numbered in accordance to Table 7.4.1.5.3-1 from TS 38.211.

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, for RI=v=1, support the following:

FFS: Whether this can be extended to RI=v>1 as well as Type-II codebook refinement.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, on CBSR, the value of X1 and X2) are separately NW-configured via higher-layer (RRC) signalling from {1, 2, 4, [8, 16]}

·       FFS: Dependence on each supported (X1, X2) value on the configured (N1, N2) value

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP and Type-II codebook refinements (except based on Rel-18 Type-II Doppler) for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding CPU occupation

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding UCI omission, fully reuse the legacy rules for Rel-15 Type-I SP codebook.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding UCI parameters for Scheme-B RI=v=1-4:

·       SD basis vector selection indicator for each layer is in Part 2 (wideband) and  bits per layer l=1, …, v

·       Inter-pol co-phase selection indicator for each layer is in Part 2 (wideband or subband) and 2 bits (representing {+1, +j, -1, -j}) per layer l=1,…,v

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I single-panel (SP) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, for Scheme-A RI=3-4 only, the legacy mapping of i1,3 to (k1,k2) for (N1=3,N2=2) from Table 5.2.2.2.1-4 of TS 38.214 is used for all of the newly supported (N1,N2) values.

·       FFS: whether the i1,3 table (Table 5.2.2.2.1-4 of TS 38.214) needs to be further extended.

Agreement

On the NZP CSI-RS resource aggregation of K=2, 3 or 4 legacy NZP CSI-RS resources to attain a total of 48, 64, and 128 ports (for Rel-19 Type-I/II codebook refinement), support to configure a CSI-RS resource set with the K CSI-RS resources as the associated NZP CSI-RS for each of the SRS resource set(s) with higher layer parameter usage in SRS-ResourceSet set to 'nonCodebook',

·       The previously agreed restrictions on the K resources for Rel-19 Type-I/II codebook refinement apply.

·       Reuse the legacy approach for triggering of the NZP-CSI-RS resources and the legacy timeline for the NZP-CSI-RS resources and SRS.

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports with RI=5-8, support the following schemes:

 

Proposal 1.A.2:

For a UE configured with a total of PSRS=6 or 8 ports across ≥1 SRS resources for antenna switching intended for xT6R or xT8R, respectively, support the following fixed SRS port grouping where (with the PSRS ports indexed in an ascending order according to SRS resource ID and port number within each SRS resource):

No other spec enhancement is introduced, e.g. new CW-to-layer mapping, DL resource allocation, DCI format

Note: The above grouping assumption is to align NW and UE on the association between SRS ports and reported CQIs for the two CWs when reportQuantity = ‘cri-RI-CQI’.

Note: different SRS ports are associated with different UE antenna ports.

Note: if one single CW is scheduled, both SRS port groups can correspond to the same CW

Note: This feature is a separate UE capability and, for UEs supporting this capability, configured via RRC (FFS details on the extend of RRC configuration)

 

Companies are encouraged to evaluate for further discussion in RAN1#118.

 

 

R1-2405487         Moderator summary of Tuesday morning offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2405484         Moderator Summary#2 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 2            Moderator (Samsung)

From Tuesday session

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 Type-I single-panel (SP) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, there is no consensus on additionally supporting O1=O2=2.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, on CBSR, the following (X1, X2) values are supported: (1,1), (2,1), (2,2), (4,1), (4,2), (4,4), 

·       FFS: (1,2), (1,4), (2,4)

Agreement

For the 3-bit scaling scheme for Type-I codebook, the following (X1, X2) values are supported: (2,1), (2,2), (4,1), (4,2), (4,4), 

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 Type-I codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, on the agreed 3-bit group-based scaling factor for RI=v=1, there is no consensus on supporting this feature for codebooks other than for Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, for M>1, support the following:

·       Resource-specific RI, i.e. RI is independently calculated and indicated for each of the selected M NZP CSI-RS resources

o   FFS: If resource-common RI indication is also supported

·       4-bit wideband CQIs are independently calculated and reported for each of the M selected NZP CSI-RS resources

·       2-bit differential SB CQIs are independently calculated and reported for each of the M selected NZP CSI-RS resource

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, for M=2, when Rel-16 eType-II codebook is configured, FD basis selection and indication are resource-specific (per resource).

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, for M=2, when Rel-16 eType-II codebook is configured, RRC configuration of Parameter Combination is resource-common.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports:

·       Active resource counting = KS (following legacy)

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, the UCI parameters are captured in the tables below:

·       FFS: Mapping order

·       FFS: Whether it is possible not to report dn

When ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd’ (Doffset+d)

Parameter

Details/description

nref

Reference TRS resource set index, based on the ordering from RRC configuration:  bits

{Dn,offset,

 n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref }

Delay offset for CSI-RS resource n:

 bits

{dn,

n=0, 1, …, N TRP – 1, n≠nref }

1-bit inside/outside indicator for CSI-RS resource n:  bits

 

When ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-F’ (frequency offset)

Parameter

Details/description

nref

Reference TRS resource set index, based on the ordering from RRC configuration:  bits

{FOn ,

n=0, 1, …, NTRP –1, n≠nref}

Frequency offset for CSI-RS resource n:

 bits

 

When ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd-F’ (joint Doffset+d and FO)

Parameter

Details/description

nref1

Reference TRS resource set index for Doffset+d, based on the ordering from RRC configuration:

 bits

nref2

Reference TRS resource set index for FO, based on the ordering from RRC configuration:  bits

{Dn,offset,

 n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1 n≠nref1}

Delay offset for CSI-RS resource n:

 bits

{dn,

n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref1 }

1-bit inside/outside indicator for CSI-RS resource n:  bits

{FOn ,

n=0, 1, …, NTRP –1, n≠nref2}

Frequency offset for CSI-RS resource n:

 bits

 

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the ‘out of range’ or ‘invalid’ quantization state/hypothesis, there is no consensus on specifying a condition/event for such state.

 

 

R1-2405488         Moderator summary of Tuesday afternoon offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2405485         Moderator Summary#3 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 3            Moderator (Samsung)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset),

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding timeline, fully reuse those from Rel-18 TDCP reporting.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the applicable type(s) of the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd’ (Doffset+d) or ‘cjtc-F’ (frequency offset), all the resources across the NTRP TRS resource sets are configured with the same bandwidth.

 

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the applicable type(s) of the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd’ (Doffset+d) or ‘cjtc-F’ (frequency offset), there is no consensus on:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the applicable type(s) of the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset),

·       all the ‘CSI-RS for CSI’ resources within each resource set follow the legacy pre-Rel-19 rules of CSI-RS resources associated with a same resource set

·       all the resources across the NTRP CSI-RS resources/resource sets are configured with the same bandwidth.

 

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the applicable type(s) of the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), there is no consensus on:

 

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports based on the Rel-18 Type-II Doppler codebook, there is no consensus on specifying further restriction on m values based on the slot location(s) of the CSI-RS resources in a resource group.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, on CBSR,

P

(N1, N2)

(X1, X2)

48

(8,3)

(1,1), (2,1), (4,1)

(6,4)

(1,1), (2,1), (2,2),

64

(16,2)

(1,1), (2,1), (2,2), (4,1), (4,2)

(8,4)

(1,1), (2,1), (2,2), (4,1), (4,2)

128

(16,4)

(1,1), (2,1), (2,2), (4,1), (4,2)

(8,8)

(1,1), (2,1), (2,2), (4,1), (4,2)

 

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, there is no consensus on supporting the following report quantities when Rel-15 Type-I SP codebook: ‘cri-RI-i1-CQI’, ‘cri-RI-i1’, cri-RI-CQI’.

 

 

R1-2405678         Moderator summary of Thursday offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2405486         Moderator Summary#4 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 4            Moderator (Samsung)

From Thursday session

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the applicable type(s) of the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), one ‘CSI-RS for CSI’ resource set with NTRP resources is supported

 

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the applicable type(s) of the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), there is no consensus on supporting any additional time separation between RSs beyond what’s already permissible by the use of TRS resource sets.

 

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the applicable type(s) of the configured NTRP NZP CSI-RS resources/resource sets when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd’ (Doffset+d) or ‘cjtc-F’ (frequency offset), there is no consensus on supporting the following:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd-F’ (joint Doffset+d and FO)

·       Fully reuse timeline and active resource counting from Rel-18 TDCP reporting.

·       OCPU = 2X.NTRP where X≥1 is defined based on UE capabilities and determined by the UE for each CJT calibration report type.

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, for A-CSI only, the NW can configure MR (<M) of KS CSI-RS resources to be selected as part of reporting the M “quadruplets”:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I multi-panel (MP) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, for RI=1-4, support the following (compromise between Scheme1 and Scheme2 described in RAN1#116bis):

Rel-19 Type-I MP does not support RI=5-8.

Reuse Rel-15 Type-I MP legacy designs for UCI omission, and CBSR.

For CSI calculation, reuse Rel-18 Type II CJT CSI-RS port ordering for UE assumption on the transmitted PDSCH symbols across antenna ports.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding CBSR and RI restriction, down-select (by RAN1#118) one from the following alternatives:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), if  S>1 (sub-band reporting) is supported, select one from option 1 and option 2, by RAN1#118, from the following:

Note: Companies to report whether their evaluation is based on precoded or non-precoded CSI-RS.

9.2.3       Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions

R1-2403848         Discussion on Rel-19 CB-based UL for 3TX UE         InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2403902         Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              MediaTek Inc.

R1-2403946         On codebook for 3-antenna-port UL transmission       Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2403983         Support for 3Tx UL MIMO             Intel Corporation

R1-2404021         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Spreadtrum Communications

R1-2404046         Discussion on Rel-19 CB-based UL transmission for 3TX UE              TCL

R1-2404110         Views on Rel-19 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Samsung

R1-2404172         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based uplink transmissions      vivo

R1-2404241         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              ZTE

R1-2404279         Views on R19 3Tx codebook based transmission        Apple

R1-2404338         Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Lenovo

R1-2404396         Views on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions      CATT

R1-2404451         Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions      CMCC

R1-2404552         Discussions on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions  LG Electronics

R1-2404589         Discussion on uplink enhancement for UE with 3Tx   Fujitsu

R1-2404613         Discussion on the support of 3-antenna-port CB based transmissions      Xiaomi

R1-2404669         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              NEC

R1-2404688         Uplink 3 Port Codebook based Transmission Google

R1-2404814         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Transsion Holdings

R1-2404884         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              OPPO

R1-2404920         On the support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Nokia

R1-2404972         Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmission              Sharp

R1-2405037         Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions      NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2405119         Support for 3 Tx UL transmissions Ericsson

R1-2405150         3 Tx UL MIMO transmissions        Qualcomm Incorporated

 

R1-2403850         Summary of Offline Discussions on 3TX CB-based Uplink              Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

R1-2403851         FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; First Round              Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

From Monday session

Agreement

·       Update the agreement made in RAN1 #116bis as the following.

Agreement

For a 3TX UE, to support 3-port SRS transmission with reusing a 4-port SRS resource, support the following for muting one of the ports of the configured 4-port SRS resource,

Option 3: Always a same port is muted, e.g., i.e., the 4th port

 

Agreement

For codebook-based M-TRP PUSCH repetition by a 3TX UE, scheduled by DCI format 0_1/0_2,

·       Reuse Rel-17 M-TRP PUSCH repetition design, where the second precoding information field only indicates TPMI index, and applies same rank as indicated by the first precoding information field.

Agreement

For codebook-based M-TRP PUSCH repetition by a 3TX UE, scheduled by DCI format 0_1/0_2,

Bit field

codebookSubset=NonCoherent

0

1 layer: TPMI=0

1

1 layer: TPMI=1

2

1 layer: TPMI=2

3

Reserved

o   Table II: Second precoding information for 3 antenna ports if maxRank=2

Bit field

codebookSubset=NonCoherent

0

1 layer: TPMI=0

1

1 layer: TPMI=1

2

1 layer: TPMI=2

3

1 layer: Reserved

0

2 layer: TPMI=0

1

2 layer: TPMI=1

2

2 layer: TPMI=2

3

2 layer: Reserved

o   Table III: Second precoding information for 3 antenna ports if maxRank=3

Bit field

codebookSubset=NonCoherent

0

1 layer: TPMI=0

1

1 layer: TPMI=1

2

1 layer: TPMI=2

3

1 layer: Reserved

0

2 layer: TPMI=0

1

2 layer: TPMI=1

2

2 layer: TPMI=2

3

2 layer: Reserved

0

3 layer: TPMI=0

1~3

3 layer: reserved

 

Agreement

For codebook-based M-TRP PUSCH repetition by a 3TX UE, for indication of PTRS-DMRS association,

 

Agreement

For codebook-based UL transmission by a 3TX UE, subject to its capability,

Note: SRS resource definition is not changed nor the number of SRS ports in the SRS resource.

 

 

R1-2403852         FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; Second Round   Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

Presented in Wednesday session.

 

R1-2403853         Recommended Direction on 3TX CB-based Uplink in RAN1#118              Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

9.2.44       Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios

R1-2403849         Discussion on Rel-19 Asymmetric mTRP Operation  InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2403903         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              MediaTek Inc.

R1-2403947         Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2403984         Enhancements for asymmetric DL/UL scenarios         Intel Corporation

R1-2404022         Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Spreadtrum Communications

R1-2404111         Views on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Samsung

R1-2404173         Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              vivo

R1-2404242         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              ZTE, China Telecom

R1-2404280         Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP    Apple

R1-2404339         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Lenovo

R1-2404397         Views on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios CATT

R1-2404424         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              China Telecom, ZTE

R1-2404452         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              CMCC

R1-2404476         Enhancement for Asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Scenarios              Panasonic

R1-2404496         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Sony

R1-2404532         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP scenarios              Ericsson

R1-2404553         Discussions on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios       LG Electronics

R1-2404568         Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              TCL

R1-2404590         Discussion on UL-only mTRP operation       Fujitsu

R1-2404614         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Xiaomi

R1-2404658         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios  NEC

R1-2404771         Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP operation              ETRI

R1-2404815         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Transsion Holdings

R1-2404885         Enhancements on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              OPPO

R1-2404921         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Nokia

R1-2404973         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Sharp

R1-2405038         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2405151         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment scenarios        Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2405188         Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP   ASUSTeK

R1-2405272         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios  Google

 

R1-2405346         Summary #1 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Moderator (OPPO)

From Tuesday session

Proposal 3.1:

To fulfil the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP deployment scenarios, support two TAs for single DCI based multi-TRP/panel and single TRP.

Companies are encouraged to consider above for further discussion in RAN1#118.

 

Agreement

For indicating a PL offset for PDCCH-order PRACH transmission at least for FR1, further study and down-select one from the Alt1 and Alt3 by RAN1#118 meeting:

 

Agreement

In Rel-19, the value range of starting bit of block in DCI format 2-3 is extended from 1~31 to 1~X.

FFS: Condition under which the above is applicable.

 

Agreement

Introduce a new RRC parameter per BWP/CC to indicate that two separate SRS CLPC adjustment states are configured for SRS in a BWP/CC.

 

Agreement

For the association between PL offset and joint/UL TCI state, support the following

 

Conclusion

There is no consensus on the following proposal:

Proposal 1.6: Support to update a UL PL for a joint/UL TCI state as follows:

·       When this joint/UL TCI state is activated and it is not in the current active TCI state list, a UL PL is calculated as: UL PL = PL estimated from DL PL RS – the value of PL offset.

·       When this joint/UL TCI state is activated and it is in the current active TCI state list, the UE updates the UL PL as: new UL PL = current UL PL + the updated delta indicated by the NW.

 

 

R1-2405347         Summary #2 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Moderator (OPPO)

From Thursday session

Agreement

For the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios, study and decide the value range and candidate values of PL offset value.

 

Agreement

For the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios, study whether/how to consider PL offset in PHR calculation, including Type 1 PHR based on actual PUSCH transmission, Type 1 PHR based on reference PUSCH, Type 3 PHR based on actual SRS and Type 3 PHR based on reference SRS.

 

Conclusion

For the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP deployment scenario, reuse the rel-17 unified TCI/ICBM and rel-18 unified TCI framework:

 

 

Final summary in R1-2405348.


 RAN1#118

9.2      NR MIMO Phase 5

Please refer to RP-240087 for detailed scope of the WI.

 

[118-R19-MIMO] – Eko (Samsung)

Email discussion on Rel-19 MIMO Phase 5

-        To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc

 

R1-2406648         List of RRC and MAC CE impact for Rel-19 MIMO Ph5              Samsung

 

From Thursday session

R1-2407284         DRAFT LS to RAN2 on RRC and MAC CE impacts for Rel-19 NR MIMO Ph5            Moderator (Samsung)

Decision: The draft LS to RAN2 is endorsed. Final LS is approved in R1-2407285.

9.2.1       Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management

R1-2405814         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              FUTUREWEI

R1-2405870         On UE initiated/event-driven beam management        Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2405875         On Rel-19 UE/Event-Driven Beam Management        InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2405887         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              MediaTek Inc.

R1-2405903         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Spreadtrum Communications

R1-2405980         Discussion on  enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        CMCC

R1-2406027         Enhancements for event driven beam management     Intel Corporation

R1-2406028         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        ZTE Corporation, Sanechips

R1-2406043         Offline summary for Rel-19 MIMO UEIBM (9.2.1) pre-RAN1#118           Moderator (ZTE)

R1-2406177         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              vivo

R1-2406260         Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              OPPO

R1-2406279         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Xiaomi

R1-2406310         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Fujitsu

R1-2406363         On UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        CATT

R1-2406420         UE-initiated beam management      LG Electronics

R1-2406454         Enhancements for UE-initiated/Event-Driven Beam Management              Panasonic

R1-2406467         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Sony

R1-2406521         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Lenovo

R1-2406531         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              TCL

R1-2406543         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management             NEC

R1-2406574         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Hyundai Motor Company

R1-2406576         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              HONOR

R1-2406595         Discussions on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Ruijie Networks Co. Ltd

R1-2406642         Views on Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Samsung

R1-2406682         Discussions on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        KDDI Corporation

R1-2406700         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Transsion Holdings

R1-2406722         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              ETRI

R1-2406745         Enhancements to facilitate UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Nokia

R1-2406831         Enhancements for UE-initiated beam management     Apple

R1-2406887         Enhancements for UE Initiated Beam Management    Meta Ireland

R1-2406925         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2407002         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Sharp

R1-2407024         UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2407066         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              ITRI

R1-2407075         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              CEWiT

R1-2407111         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management             Google

R1-2407122         Discussion on UE initiated beam report        ASUSTeK

R1-2407143         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              NICT

R1-2407145         Enhancements for UE-initiated beam management     Ericsson

 

R1-2406044         Moderator Summary #1 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Monday session

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, for regarding Mode-B, the pre-configured resource(s) for the second channel in Step-2 is at least type 1 CG-PUSCH.

·       FFS: PUCCH as the second channel

·       FFS: Whether the PUSCH can be with UL data

Agreement

Regarding explicit RS configuration for new beam measurement for Event 2, at least Option-1 is supported

·       Option-1: The RS(s) for new beam(s) are explicitly configured in one RS resource set associated with an CSI reporting configuration

o   If legacy UE capability signaling cannot be reused, introduce a UE capability signaling of indicating the maximum number of the configured RS(s) in the RS resource set.

o   FFS: The RS in the RS resource set can be updated by MAC-CE

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding L1-RSRP report format Option-3 depending on Event-2, the following differential L1-RSRP report format is supported.

CRI or SSBRI #1

CRI or SSBRI #2

CRI or SSBRI #N

L1-RSRP #1

Differential L1-RSRP #2

Differential L1-RSRP #N

Differential L1-RSRP for current beam, if report mode that current beam is always reported is enabled by RRC

Note: Other contents are not precluded

.

·       Differential L1-RSRP #2~#N/current beam is determined based on the difference between measured L1-RSRP corresponding to the CRI/SSBRI #2~#N/current beam and the measured L1-RSRP corresponding to CRI/SSBRI #1

o   L1-RSRP#1 is the largest measured RSRP among reported ones, and an absolute L1-RSRP.

o   FFS: range and step size of differential L1-RSRP

·       FFS: Whether/how to report additional indication of which CRI/SSBRI(s) satisfy the condition of Event-2.

·       FFS: Additional report content(s) (e.g., reporting configuration ID, indication for synchronization state, event ID, or cell ID).

 

 

R1-2406045         Moderator Summary #2 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Tuesday session

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the dedicated RRC signaling for first PUCCH channel configuration for Mode-A, down-select one of the following

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the dedicated RRC signaling for first PUCCH channel configuration for Mode-B, down-select one of the following

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the triggering procedure in Step-2 of Mode-A, select one of the following options

·       Option-1: Introduce a new 1-bit field in DCI format 0_1/0_2 to trigger the transmission of the UEI beam report

o   FFS: DCI format 0_3

·       Option-2: Reuse CSI request field in DCI format 0_1/0_2 to trigger the transmission of the UEI beam report

o   FFS: DCI format 0_3

·       FFS: Whether/how to handle the case that multiple CSI report configuration(s) for the UE-initiated/event-driven beam report are associated with the same first PUCCH resource and/or the same scheduled PUSCH

Comeback on Thursday for down-selection: agreement stays as is.

 

Conclusion

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Mode-A, there is no RAN1 consensus on additionally supporting that the DCI format in Step-2 comprises DL-grant DCI format, and the second channel in Step-3 is PUCCH.

 

 

R1-2406046         Moderator Summary #3 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding L1-RSRP report format Option-3 depending on Event-2, the candidate value of ‘N’ at least comprises {1, 2, 3, 4}

 

Agreement

Regarding RS measurement for the current beam for Event 2, for Option-2a, besides for scheme-1 and scheme-2, further down-select one of the following for handling the case that only one TRS is configured in the indicated TCI state in RAN1#118bis

Note: If there is no consensus in RAN1 on one of Options 1/2/3, Option 4 will be taken.

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, for the case the pre-configured Type-1 CG PUSCH carry the beam report, for the second UL channel in Mode-B, at least one or both of the following should be supported:

·       Option-1: The same Type-1 CG PUSCH can carry UL-SCH and the beam report.

·       Option-2: The Type-1 CG PUSCH is a dedicated type-1 CG PUSCH for carrying the beam report.

o   Note: This PUSCH can NOT carry UL-SCH. This PUSCH can NOT carry any other UCI.

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Mode-B, UEI beam report is carried on a first available transmission occasion of the second UL channel X symbols after sending the last symbol of report notification on the first PUCCH channel.

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding resource mapping/configuration between first and second channel in Mode-B, for a given CSI report configuration, the following is provided for down-selection.

·       Option-1 (one-to-one): Only one first PUCCH resource and only one pre-configured resource for second UL channel can be associated with the CSI report configuration for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting.

·       Option-2 (one-to-M): Only one first PUCCH resource and one or more pre-configured resource(s) for second UL channel can be associated with CSI report configuration for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting.

 

 

R1-2407470         Moderator Summary #4 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Thursday session

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, for at least Mode-B, the beam report should be carried in the second UL channel in the CC where the corresponding CSI report configuration is configured.

·       Above applies to both cross-CC and same-CC beam report.

·       Note: Above is applied to the case that second UL channel is PUSCH.

·       FFS: Whether the first and second channels can be from the same/different CC.

Working Assumption

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding trigger events, besides for Event-2, Event-1 and Event-7 are both supported.

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Mode-A and/or Mode-B, further study the following for first PUCCH transmission

Whether/how to apply prohibit-timer or maximum number of (re)transmission(s) for first PUCCH channel.

9.2.2       CSI enhancements

Including support for up to 128 CSI-RS ports on FR1 and UE reporting enhancement for CJT

 

R1-2405871         On 128 CSI-RS ports and UE reporting enhancement Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2405876         On Rel-19 Enhancements of CSI     InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2405888         CSI enhancements to support up to 128 CSI-RS ports MediaTek Inc.

R1-2405904         Discussion on CSI enhancements    Spreadtrum Communications

R1-2405936         CSI enhancements             Tejas Networks Limited

R1-2405943         CSI enhancements for Rel. 19 MIMO            Fraunhofer IIS, Fraunhofer HHI

R1-2405955         CSI Enhancement for NR MIMO    Google

R1-2405981         Discussion on CSI enhancements    CMCC

R1-2406024         CSI enhancements for MIMO          Intel Corporation

R1-2406029         Discussion on CSI enhancements    ZTE Corporation, Sanechips

R1-2406178         Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      vivo

R1-2406261         CSI enhancements for Rel-19 MIMO            OPPO

R1-2406280         Views on CSI enhancement             Xiaomi

R1-2406311         Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Fujitsu

R1-2406364         Views on Rel-19 MIMO CSI enhancements CATT

R1-2406431         CSI enhancements             TCL

R1-2406468         More views on CSI enhancements  Sony

R1-2406522         Discussion on CSI enhancements    Lenovo

R1-2406548         Discussion on CSI enhancements    NEC

R1-2406577         Discussion on CSI enhancements    HONOR

R1-2406643         Moderator summary for OFFLINE discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2407262         Views on Rel-19 CSI enhancements              Samsung              (rev of R1-2406645)

R1-2406723         Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      ETRI

R1-2406746         CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5      Nokia

R1-2406832         Views on R19 MIMO CSI enhancement       Apple

R1-2407308         CSI enhancements for large antenna arrays and CJT   Ericsson              (rev of R1-2406907)

R1-2406926         Discussion on CSI enhancements    NTT DOCOMO, INC., NTT CORPORATION

R1-2407003         CSI enhancements             Sharp

R1-2407184         CSI enhancements for >32 ports and UE-assisted CJT              Qualcomm Incorporated    (rev of R1-2407025)

R1-2407074         CSI Enhancements            CEWiT

R1-2407126         Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5              KDDI Corporation

R1-2407144         CSI enhancements             NICT

 

R1-2406644         Moderator summary on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Moderator (Samsung)

From Monday session

Conclusion:

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), regarding the number of configured associated SRS resource(s) (=Q) for antenna switching xTyR and the number of SRS ports (=PSRS) corresponding to the ‘reference UE antenna port’, there is no consensus to support the following:

Note: This implies no support for configuring >1 SRS resource sets for associated SRS when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset).

Note: There is a source R1-2407184 showing performance benefit of using multiple UE antenna ports non-coherent with each other.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset),

FFS:

·       Whether/how to identify the transmission occasion of the Q=1 associated SRS resource to determine the reference UE antenna port in relation to the CSI request and/or SRS triggering

·       The supported time-domain behaviour(s) for the associated SRS resource (periodic, semi-persistent, aperiodic)

o   In case the NW configures the Q=1 associated SRS resource from an existing SP and/or AP SRS antenna switching resource configuration for DL CSI acquisition (which utilizes dynamic signalling), whether/how to identify the Q=1 associated SRS resource

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, to facilitate UE-specific delay offset pre-compensation on PDSCH by the NW, decide, by RAN1#118, whether to support configuring a UE (via RRC signaling) to perform PMI calculation for the Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI report assuming pre-compensation using the UE-reported delay offset (when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd’). And if supported, whether any of the following is additionally supported or not:

FFS: AP-CSI-RS can be configured for the Rel-18 eType-II CJT report.

The above only applies when the CMRs do not share common QCL source for average delay indication.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, to facilitate UE-specific frequency offset pre-compensation on PDSCH by the NW, decide, by RAN1#118, whether to support configuring a UE (via RRC signaling) to perform PMI calculation for the Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI report assuming pre-compensation using the UE-reported frequency offset (when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-F’). And if supported, whether any of the following is additionally supported or not:

FFS: AP-CSI-RS can be configured for the Rel-18 eType-II CJT report.

The above only applies when the CMRs do not share common QCL source for Doppler shift indication.

 

Conclusion:

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, there is no consensus to support the following reporting formats:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the resolution for frequency offset reporting FOn, additionally support MFO = 256.

 

Conclusion:

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the dynamic range for delay offset reporting Dn,offset and frequency offset reporting FOn, there is no consensus on supporting additional values of dynamic range.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, the UCI mapping order is as follows:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports with RI=5-8, regarding Scheme-B, reuse the legacy Rel-15 Type-I layer pairing scheme, and fixed mapping between SD basis vectors and layers:

LG denotes the number of layer groups per previous agreement.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement based on Rel-18 Type-II Doppler for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports,

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I MP codebook refinements for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding OCPU, timeline, active resource counting, and CMR restriction (FDM/TDM, EPRE offset), fully reuse those for the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I MP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, the UCI parameters are captured in the tables below:

·       Note: The second column includes the location of the parameters when reported with two-part UCI.

Parameter

UCI

Details/description

RI

Part 1

Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP: RI=v={1,2,3,4}

Wideband CQI for the first TB

Part 1

Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP 

Subband differential CQI for the first TB (*)

Part 1

Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP

First SD basis vector selection indicator

Part 2

 

Wideband

One indicator per each of the Ng resources:

·     Each of the Ng indicators is the same as Rel-15 Type-I SP with the scheme following < 16-port design of Rel-15 Type-I SP codebookMode=1

Second SD basis vector selection indicator

Part 2

 

Wideband

One indicator per each of the Ng resources:

·     Each of the Ng indicators is the same as Rel-15 Type-I SP with the scheme following < 16-port design of R15 Type-I SP codebookMode=1 

Inter-pol co-phase selection indicator

Part 2

 

Wideband or Subband (**)

One (set of) indicator per each of the Ng resources:

·     Same as Rel-15 Type-I SP with the scheme following < 16-port design of R15 Type-I codebookMode=1

Inter-resource co-phasing

Part 2

 

Wideband

QPSK (2-bit) co-phasing on resource k=2,…,K relative to the first resource, layer-common

(*): Not included when CQI reporting granularity is set to ‘wideband’

(**): Wideband when PMI reporting is set to ‘wideband’, Subband when PMI reporting granularity is set to ‘subband’

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, the UCI parameters are captured in the tables below for Scheme-A for RI=5-8:

Scheme-A

Parameter

UCI

Details/description

First SD basis vector selection indicator

Part 2

 

Wideband

v=5-8: Decide (by RAN1#118) Alt1 vs Alt2

Alt1. Same as legacy Rel-15 Type-I SP, separate (i1, i2) indicators of  bits and  bits, respectively 

Alt2: Separate (i1, i2) indicators of  bits and  bits, respectively; and separate (q1, q2) indicators of   bits and  bits, respectively.

Second SD basis vector selection indicator

Part 2

 

Wideband

v=5-8: Freely select the other nSDBV=2 (v=5-6) or 3 (v=7-8) SD basis vectors such that they are orthogonal in at least one dimension (horizontal or vertical).

 

Decide (by RAN1#118) the indication scheme.

Inter-pol co-phase selection indicator

Part 2

 

Wideband or Subband (**)

v=5-8: Same as legacy Rel-15 Type-I SP

(*): Not included when CQI reporting granularity is set to ‘wideband’

(**): Wideband when PMI reporting is set to ‘wideband’, Subband when PMI reporting granularity is set to ‘subband’

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding NZP CSI-RS resource aggregation to attain 32 < P (or PCSI-RS) ≤ 128, for AP-CSI-RS where the K NZP CSI-RS resources are located in two consecutive slots,

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding the port subset indication (from the Rel-18 SD NES Type-1), extend the bitmap (i.e., port-subsetIndicator) by adding p48, p64, and p128 along with their appropriate lengths

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I multi-panel (MP) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding the W2 structure, clarify that:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding UCI parameters when two-part UCI/CSI is used:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, if MR is configured, the supported value(s) of MR are as follows:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding CBSR and RI restriction, support resource-specific specific CBSR.

·       FFS (by RAN1#118): Whether RI restriction is resource-common or resource-specific.

 

 

R1-2407282         Moderator Summary on Tuesday offline for Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2407279         Moderator Summary#2 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 2            Moderator (Samsung)

From Tuesday session

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding first SD basis vector selection indicator for Scheme-A for RI=5-8, reuse the legacy Rel-15 Type-I SP scheme, i.e. separate (i1, i2) indicators of  bits and  bits, respectively.

 

Agreement

At least for type 1 single panel, for the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding UCI omission for the UCI reported in CSI part-2, other than priority 0 (G0), the UCI packing order and the 2M consecutive priority levels are defined w.r.t the M CRIs (including the non-reported MR CRIs) as follows:

Note: For UCI fields in wideband (G0), even sub-bands (G1), and odd sub-bands (G2), legacy design is fully reused.

 

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, the UCI parameters are captured in the tables below for Scheme-B for RI=5-8:

·       Note: The second column includes the location of the parameters when reported with two-part UCI

Scheme-B

Parameter

UCI

Details/description

SD basis oversampling (rotation) factor q1, q2

Part 2


Wideband

v=5-8: Values of q1, q2 follow Rel-16 eType-II,  bit indicator

SD basis vector selection indicator for each layer

Part 2

 

Wideband

v=5-8:  bit indicator, where LG=3 for v=5-6, and 4 for v=7-8

 

Inter-pol co-phase selection indicator for each layer

Part 2

 

Wideband or Subband (**)

v=5-8: QPSK: 2-bit indicator per layer group l=1, …,

(*): Not included when CQI reporting granularity is set to ‘wideband’

(**): Wideband when PMI reporting is set to ‘wideband’, Subband when PMI reporting granularity is set to ‘subband’

 

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, conditioned in UE capabilities, a UE can be configured with either the group-based hard CBSR, or the 3-bit SD basis group-based scaling factor, or both, or none of the two.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), the selection of PSRS=1 SRS port corresponding to the ‘reference UE antenna port’ (out of available port(s)) is NW-configured via higher-layer (RRC) signalling.

 

Working Assumption

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), the configured associated SRS resource can be either periodic, semi-persistent, or aperiodic.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the resolution for delay offset reporting Dn,offset, additionally support MD = {128, 256}.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), regarding the support of sub-band reporting (S>1):

Note: UE is not required to perform DO/FO compensation for sub-band phase offset calculation

Note: There is a source R1-2407184 showing for frequency-domain-MRT-precoded CSI-RSs, inter-TRP phase has a linear rotation in frequency-domain, and is associated with a single delay component.

 

Agreement

For the 3-bit scaling scheme for Type-I SP codebook, support, in addition, (X1, X2)=(8,1).

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, support resource-specific RI restriction.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, OCPU = KS.

 

 

R1-2407283         Moderator Summary on Wednesday offline for Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2407280         Moderator Summary#3 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 3            Moderator (Samsung)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, for Scheme-A RI=5-8, the UCI parameters for the selection scheme for the other  SD basis vectors (in Part 2 UCI, wideband) are as follows:

Note: It is up to the editor how this is captured in the specification

Note: (q1,q2) is analogous to (q1,q2) for Type-II CSI

Note (from previous agreement): nSDBV=2 (v=5-6) or 3 (v=7-8)

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding UCI omission for the UCI reported in CSI part-1, CSI part-1 is either reported entirely or dropped entirely, with the following UCI packing order:

·       CSI part-1 associated with the first configured CMR among the non-reported MR CRIs

·      

·       CSI part-1 associated with the last configured CMR among the non-reported MR CRIs

·       CSI part-1 of the 1st reported CRI,

·      

·       CSI part-1 of the (M-MR)th reported CRI,

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), regarding the support of sub-band reporting (S>1) {(Fn,0, Fn,1, ..., Fn,NSB-P -1), n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref}:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports based on Rel-16 eType-II, regarding UCI omission for the UCI reported in CSI part-2, other than priority 0 (G0), the UCI packing order and the 2M consecutive priority levels are defined w.r.t the M CRIs (including the non-reported MR CRIs) as follows:

Note: For UCI fields in wideband (G0), G1 PMI components (based on Rel-16 eType-II CB in Section 6.3.2.1.2, TS 38.212), and G2 PMI components, legacy design is fully reused.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (PO) and S=1:

Parameter

Details/description

nref

Reference CSI-RS resource index, based on the ordering from RRC configuration:  bits

{Fn,

n=0, 1, …, NTRP –1, n≠nref}

DL/UL phase offset for CSI-RS resource n:

 bits

 

o   nref,

o   {Fn, n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref} ordered from the lowest to highest CSI-RS resource ID

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding timeline:

·       Multiply legacy Z’ by a factor of 2

·       Multiply legacy Z by a factor of 2

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, to facilitate UE-specific delay offset pre-compensation on PDSCH by the NW, support configuring a UE (via RRC signaling) to perform PMI calculation for the Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI report assuming pre-compensation using the UE-reported delay offset (when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd’).

FFS: NW indicates the delay offset value to be compensated for the Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI report

FFS: Whether only AP-CSI-RS, or any type of CSI-RS (P, SP, or AP) can be configured as the CMR for the Rel-18 eType-II CJT reporting

FFS: Support for SP-CSI for CJTC report

FFS: Whether this is also applicable for Rel-19 Type-I MP codebook

The above only applies when the CMRs do not share common QCL source for average delay indication

The above is UE optional feature.

 

 

R1-2407466         Moderator Summary on Thursday offline for Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2407281         Moderator Summary#4 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 4            Moderator (Samsung)

From Thursday session

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, study, for RI=  >1, applying the 3-bit scaling factor(s) as agreed in RAN1#117, where a per-layer scaling factor applied to the  selected SD basis vector is given by e.g. , where unit scaling factor “1” is associated with the PDSCH-to-CSIRS EPRE offset “portion” contributed by the  selected SD basis vector without the 3-bit scaling factor  configured, e.g.  is the scaling factor associated with the  SD basis vector, and  is the number of layers transmitted using the  SD basis vector.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding resource-specific CBSR,

9.2.3       Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions

R1-2405872         On codebook for 3-antenna-port UL transmission       Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2405877         On Rel-19 CB-based UL for 3TX UE            InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2405889         Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              MediaTek Inc.

R1-2405905         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Spreadtrum Communications

R1-2405956         Uplink 3 Port Codebook based Transmission Google

R1-2405982         Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions      CMCC

R1-2406025         Support for 3Tx UL MIMO             Intel Corporation

R1-2406030         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              ZTE Corporation, Sanechips

R1-2406179         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based uplink transmissions      vivo

R1-2406262         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              OPPO

R1-2406281         Discussion on the support of 3-antenna-port CB based transmissions      Xiaomi

R1-2406312         Discussion on uplink enhancement for UE with 3Tx   Fujitsu

R1-2406365         On support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              CATT

R1-2406523         Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Lenovo

R1-2406549         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              NEC

R1-2406646         Views on Rel-19 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Samsung

R1-2406747         On the support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Nokia

R1-2406833         Views on R19 3Tx codebook based transmission        Apple

R1-2406927         Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions      NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2407004         Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmission              Sharp

R1-2407026         3 Tx UL MIMO transmissions        Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2407182         Support for 3 Tx UL Transmissions Ericsson

 

R1-2405879         Summary of Offline Discussions on 3TX CB-based Uplink              Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

R1-2405880         FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; First Round              Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

From Monday session

Proposal:

Support introduction of a new RRC parameter for enabling a configured 4-port SRS resource with port 1003 disabled.

Objected by vivo, Xiaomi

 

Conclusion:

Support to reuse SRS features (i.e., cyclic shift hopping, and comb offset hopping) in Rel-18 for SRS resource set with usage of codebook based 3TX PUSCH transmission, without introducing new UE capabilities (i.e., reusing Rel-18 UE capabilities).

Note: The conclusion does not include the Rel-18 8-port-specific SRS features.

 

 

R1-2405881         FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; Second Round   Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

From Wednesday session

Proposal:

Support introduction of a new RRC parameter for enabling a configured 4-port SRS resource with port 1003 disabled.

 

From Thursday session

Agreement

For a UE reporting UE capability of 3TX operation, support introduction of a new RRC parameter for enabling a configured 4-port SRS resource with port 1003 disabled.

 

 

R1-2405882         Recommended Direction on 3TX CB-based Uplink in RAN1#118b         Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

9.2.44       Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios

R1-2405873         Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2405878         On Rel-19 Asymmetric mTRP Operation      InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2405890         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              MediaTek Inc.

R1-2405906         Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Spreadtrum Communications

R1-2405937         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Tejas Networks Limited

R1-2405983         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              CMCC

R1-2406026         Enhancements for asymmetric DL/UL scenarios         Intel Corporation

R1-2406031         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              ZTE Corporation, Sanechips, China Telecom

R1-2406086         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              China Telecom, ZTE

R1-2406180         Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              vivo

R1-2406263         Enhancements on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              OPPO

R1-2406265         Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              TCL

R1-2406282         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Xiaomi

R1-2406313         Discussion on UL-only mTRP operation       Fujitsu

R1-2406366         On asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios            CATT

R1-2406455         Enhancement for Asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Scenarios              Panasonic

R1-2406469         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Sony

R1-2406524         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Lenovo

R1-2406544         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios  NEC

R1-2406647         Views on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Samsung

R1-2406701         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Transsion Holdings

R1-2406724         Discussion on UL enhancement through asymmetric DL and UL              ETRI

R1-2406748         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Nokia

R1-2406803         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP scenarios              Ericsson

R1-2406834         Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP    Apple

R1-2406928         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2407005         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Sharp

R1-2407027         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment scenarios        Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2407112         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios  Google

R1-2407123         Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP   ASUSTeK

 

R1-2407189         Summary #1 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Moderator (OPPO)

From Monday session

Agreement

For indicating a PL offset for PDCCH-order PRACH transmission at least for FR1, support Alt3:

 

Agreement

For the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios, the value range of PL offset includes at least [-10, 60] dB.

 

Agreement

For the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios, support to include PL offset in the calculation of Type 1 PHR based on actual PUSCH transmission and Type 1 PHR based on reference PUSCH.

 

 

R1-2407190         Summary #2 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Moderator (OPPO)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

Study whether to support Type 3 PHR reporting in a serving cell/BWP where the UE is configured with two separate SRS CLPC adjustment states.

 

Agreement

About the extended value range 1~X of starting bit of blocks in DCI format 2_3 in Rel-19, down-select one from the following Alts in RAN1#118bis:

 

Agreement

 

 

Final summary in R1-2407191.


 RAN1#118-bis

9.2      NR MIMO Phase 5

Please refer to RP-242394 for detailed scope of the WI.

 

[118bis-R19-MIMO] – Eko (Samsung)

Email discussion on Rel-19 MIMO Phase 5

-        To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc

 

R1-2408641         List of RRC and MAC CE impact for Rel-19 MIMO Ph5              Samsung, MediaTek, CMCC, Interdigital, OPPO, ZTE

9.2.1       Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management

R1-2407622         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              FUTUREWEI

R1-2407678         On UE initiated/event-driven beam management        Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2407698         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Spreadtrum Communications

R1-2407773         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        ZTE Corporation, Sanechips

R1-2407812         UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              MediaTek Inc.

R1-2407853         Remaining issues on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              vivo

R1-2407897         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        CMCC

R1-2407961         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Xiaomi

R1-2408039         Enhancement for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              CATT

R1-2408083         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              TCL

R1-2408108         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Fujitsu

R1-2408117         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Transsion Holdings

R1-2408164         Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              OPPO

R1-2408187         Discussion on Rel-19 UE/Event-Driven Beam Management              InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2408199         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Lenovo

R1-2408223         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management             NEC

R1-2408230         Discussion on the UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              HONOR

R1-2408296         Enhancements for Event-driven Beam Management   Intel Corporation

R1-2408317         Offline summary for Rel-19 MIMO UEIBM (9.2.1) pre-RAN1#118bis      Moderator (ZTE)

R1-2408336         UE-initiated beam management      LG Electronics

R1-2408348         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Sharp

R1-2408368         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management             Google

R1-2408382         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Ruijie Networks Co. Ltd

R1-2408404         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Sony

R1-2408457         Enhancements for UE-initiated beam management     Apple

R1-2408562         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              ETRI

R1-2408610         Remaining issues for UE-initiated beam management Ericsson

R1-2408635         Views on Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Samsung

R1-2408738         Enhancements to facilitate UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Nokia

R1-2408748         Enhancements for UE Initiated Beam Management    Meta

R1-2408778         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2408827         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              ITRI

R1-2408842         UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2408881         Enhancements for UE-initiated/Event-Driven Beam Management              Panasonic

R1-2408890         Discussion on UE initiated beam report        ASUSTeK

R1-2408911         Discussions on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        KDDI Corporation

R1-2408925         Enhancements for UEiBM CEWiT

R1-2408940         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management             NICT

 

R1-2408318         Moderator Summary #1 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Monday session

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding L1-RSRP report format Option-3 depending on Event-2,

·       The differential L1-RSRP is quantized to a 4-bit value with 2 dB step size

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the triggering procedure in Step-2 of Mode-A

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, resource mapping/configuration between first and second UL channel in Mode-B, at least Option-1 is supported 

·       Option-1 (one-to-one): Only one periodic PUCCH resource for the first channel and only one pre-configured resource for second UL channel can be associated with the CSI report configuration for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting.

o   Down-select one of the following in RAN1#118bis

§  Option-1A: Same periodicity between first PUCCH resource and pre-configured resource for second UL channel.

§  Option-1B: No restriction in terms of periodicity.

 

 

R1-2408319         Moderator Summary #2 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Tuesday session

Agreement

On cross-CC beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, for both Mode-A and Mode-B, the first PUCCH and the second PUSCH can be from the same or different CC(s)

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, for the case the pre-configured Type-1 CG PUSCH carry the beam report, for the second UL channel in Mode-B, at least option3 is supported:

·       Option-1: The same Type-1 CG PUSCH can carry UL-SCH, any other UCI, and the beam report.

·       Option-2: The Type-1 CG PUSCH is a dedicated type-1 CG PUSCH for carrying the beam report

o   Note: This PUSCH can NOT carry UL-SCH. This PUSCH can NOT carry any other UCI.

·       Option-3: The Type-1 CG PUSCH is a type-1 CG PUSCH for carrying the beam report

o   Note: This PUSCH can NOT carry UL-SCH. This PUSCH can carry any other UCI.

FFS: whether Type-1 CG PUSCH can be transmitted if the pre-configured Type-1 CG PUSCH does NOT carry the beam report.

 

Working Assumption

The following working assumption in RAN1#118 is revised in red.

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding trigger events, besides for Event-2, Event-1 and Event-7 are both supported.

·       Event-1: Quality of the current beam is worse than a certain threshold.

·       Event-7: Quality of at least one new beam, such as L1-RSRP, becomes a threshold value better than the RS derived from the activated TCI state with the M-th Q-th best quality.

o    M Q is RRC configured with subjective to UE capability signalling

§  UE may only indicate a single candidate value or not support Event-7.

·       The additionally supported events will reuse the same design as event 2 – unless there is consensus to do otherwise

·       The additionally supported events will be lower priority compared to event 2.

 

 

R1-2408320         Moderator Summary #3 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding resource mapping/configuration between first and second UL channel associated with a same CSI report configuration in Mode-B,

·       The UE expects that there is the same periodicity (in ms) between first PUCCH resource and pre-configured resource for second UL channel.

o   FFS: Whether first PUCCH resource and pre-configured resource for second UL channel can have different periodicities (in ms).

 

Agreement

Regarding RS measurement for the current beam for Event 2, for Option-2a, besides for scheme-1 and scheme-2, there is no RAN1 consensus on the following enhancement for handling the case that only one TRS is configured in the indicated TCI state in RAN1#118bis

Note 3: When only one TRS is configured in the indicated TCI state, either Scheme-1(working assumption) or Scheme-2 is used where enabling one of either Scheme-1 or Scheme-2 is selected by NW.

When the Scheme-1 is used, the UE assumes that the CSI-RS resource in the indicated TCI state is configured in a CSI-RS resource set configured with repetition.

 

 

R1-2409212         Moderator Summary #4 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Thursday session

Agreement

Regarding RS measurement for the current beam for Event 2, for Option-2a, confirm the following working assumption

·       Note 3: When only one TRS is configured in the indicated TCI state, either Scheme-1(working assumption) or Scheme-2 is used where enabling one of either Scheme-1 or Scheme-2 is selected by NW.

Agreement

Regarding RS measurement for the current beam for Event 2, for Option-2a, the following working assumption in RAN1#117 is confirmed with modification:

 

Agreement

Regarding RS measurement for the current beam for Event 2, for enabling one of either Scheme-1 or Scheme-2 by NW in Option-2a, the following implicit manner is supported:

·       If the RS(s) for new beam are CSI-RS configured in a CSI-RS resource set configured with repetition, Scheme-1 is enabled; otherwise, Scheme-2 is enabled.

Agreement

Regarding the triggering event determination for Event 2, the event instance(s) counting is per new beam. Further study candidate condition(s) of resetting the counting including whether resetting is needed.

 

Agreement

Regarding the triggering event determination for Event 2, down-select among the following alternatives for the evaluation periodicity for determining Event-2 instance [at least when DRX is not configured]

FFS: Whether the periodicity of the current beam RS should be the same as that of the new beam RS(s).

Note: There is the same periodicity for the new beam RS(s).

 

Agreement

On cross-CC beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, the following is supported

·       For new beam measurement, in a CSI report configuration, configure legacy RRC parameter carrier that indicates the CC that the RS resource set associated with the CSI reporting configuration can be found

·       FFS: Whether the current beam RS and new beam RS(s) can be in the same CC or in different CCs, regarding cross-CC beam measurement.

·       FFS: Whether the indicated TCI state and new beam RS(s) can be in the same CC or in different CCs, regarding cross-CC beam measurement.

Conclusion

There is no RAN1 consensus on the following proposal:

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding L1-RSRP report format Option-3 depending on Event-2, the candidate value of ‘N’ can further comprise {5, 6, 7, 8}, besides for previously agreed candidate value of {1, 2, 3, 4}.

9.2.2       CSI enhancements

Including support for up to 128 CSI-RS ports on FR1 and UE reporting enhancement for CJT and SRS port grouping for TDD low-complexity 6/8RX receiver.

 

R1-2407679         On 128 CSI-RS ports and UE reporting enhancement Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2407699         Discussion on CSI enhancements    Spreadtrum Communications

R1-2407755         CSI enhancements             Tejas Network Limited

R1-2407774         Discussion on CSI enhancements    ZTE Corporation, Sanechips

R1-2407813         CSI enhancements             MediaTek Inc.

R1-2407824         Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      New H3C Technologies Co., Ltd.

R1-2407854         Remaining issues on Rel-19 CSI enhancements          vivo

R1-2407898         Discussion on CSI enhancements    CMCC

R1-2407962         Discussion on Rel-19 MIMO CSI enhancements        Xiaomi

R1-2407993         CSI Enhancement for NR MIMO    Google

R1-2408040         On Rel-19 MIMO CSI enhancements            CATT

R1-2408109         Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Fujitsu

R1-2408165         CSI enhancements for Rel-19 MIMO            OPPO

R1-2408188         Discussion on Rel-19 Enhancements of CSI  InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2408200         Discussion on CSI enhancements    Lenovo

R1-2408210         Discussion on CSI enhancements    NEC

R1-2408231         Discussion on CSI enhancements    HONOR

R1-2408295         CSI enhancements for MIMO          Intel Corporation

R1-2408337         Discussions on CSI enhancements  LG Electronics

R1-2408349         CSI enhancements             Sharp

R1-2408395         CSI enhancements for Rel. 19 MIMO            Fraunhofer IIS, Fraunhofer HHI

R1-2408405         More views on CSI enhancements  Sony

R1-2408458         Views on R19 MIMO CSI enhancement       Apple

R1-2408496         Discussion on CSI enhancements    TCL

R1-2408563         Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      ETRI

R1-2408638         Views on Rel-19 CSI enhancements              Samsung

R1-2408739         CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5      Nokia

R1-2408779         Discussion on CSI enhancements    NTT DOCOMO, INC., NTT CORPORATION

R1-2408843         CSI enhancements for >32 ports and UE-assisted CJT              Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2408876         CSI enhancements for large antenna arrays and CJT   Ericsson

R1-2408926         CSI Enhancements            CEWiT

R1-2408948         Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5              KDDI Corporation

R1-2408964         Discussion on CSI enhancements    NICT

 

R1-2408636         Moderator summary for OFFLINE discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Samsung (Moderator)

R1-2408637         Moderator summary on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Samsung (Moderator)

From Monday session

Agreement

For a UE configured with a total of PSRS=6 or 8 ports across ≥1 SRS resources for antenna switching intended for xT6R or xT8R, respectively, support the following fixed SRS port grouping where (with the PSRS ports indexed in an ascending order according to SRS resource ID and port number within each SRS resource):

·       SRS port group 0, corresponding to CW0, comprises the even PSRS/2 out of PSRS ports; and

·       SRS port group 1, corresponding to CW1, comprises the odd PSRS/2 out of PSRS ports

The above feature is applicable only for reportQuantity = ‘cri-RI-CQI’.

No other spec enhancement is introduced on new CW-to-layer mapping, DL resource allocation, CSI feedback, and DCI format

Note: The above grouping assumption is to align NW and UE on the association between SRS ports and reported CQIs for the two CWs when reportQuantity = ‘cri-RI-CQI’.

Note: different SRS ports are associated with different UE antenna ports.

Note: if one single CW is scheduled, both SRS port groups can correspond to the same CW, i.e. no enhancement is needed for the single-CW case.

Note: This feature is a separate UE capability and, for UEs supporting this capability, configured via RRC (FFS details on the extend of RRC configuration).

Note: Whether to support 6Rx with more than 4 layers is to be decided in RAN4 Rel-19 RF enhancements WI.

FFS (by RAN1#118bis): Whether there is impact on mapping between CWs to CSI-RS ports.

For SRS antenna switching with multiple aperiodic SRS resource sets, PSRS ports indexed in an ascending order according to SRS resource set ID and SRS resource ID in a set and port number within each SRS resource.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP and Type-II codebook refinements (except based on Rel-18 Type-II Doppler) for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, active resource counting is:

·       For Capability 1 timeline: 1

·       For Capability 2 timeline: 1

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding the support for the 3-bit scaling factor(s) for RI=v >1, support only for RI=v=2 without per-SD-basis-vector/layer power adjustment/boosting

This feature is a separate UE capability from soft scaling for RI=v=1. Introduce new RRC parameter to enable the feature.

Note: This doesn’t preclude the use of power boosting at the NW side by implementation.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, the inter-pol co-phase selection indicator row from the UCI parameter table for Scheme-B for RI=5-8 is amended as follows:

 

Scheme-B

Parameter

UCI

Details/description

Inter-pol co-phase selection indicator for each layer

Part 2

 

Wideband or Subband (**)

v=5-8: QPSK: 2-bit indicator per layer group l=1, …,

v=5, 7: QPSK:

·        For a layer group with 2 layers: 1-bit indicator {(1, -1), (j, -j)}

·        For a layer group with 1 orphan layer: 2-bit indicator {1, -1, j, -j}

v=6, 8: QPSK:

·        1-bit indicator for each layer group {(1, -1), (j, -j)} 

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for P (the total number of aggregated ports)=48, 64, 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding timeline for the port subset indication for the SD NES Type-1,

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for P (the total number of aggregated ports)=48, 64, 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding active resource/port counting for the port subset indication for the SD NES Type-1,

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, when a CSI-RS resource set for aggregating K NZP CSI-RS resources (to attain a total of 48, 64, and 128 ports) is configured as the associated NZP CSI-RS for each of the SRS resource set(s) with higher layer parameter usage in SRS-ResourceSet set to ‘nonCodebook’, support to change the starting position of the time gap between CSI-RS and SRS from the last symbol of the reception of the aperiodic NZP-CSI-RS resource to the last symbol of the reception of the aperiodic NZP-CSI-RS resource set.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, except for that based on the Rel-18 Type-II Doppler, the following rule is supported:

·       After the CSI report (re)configuration, serving cell activation, BWP change, or activation of SP-CSI, the UE reports a CSI report only after receiving at least one CSI-RS transmission occasion for each of the CSI-RS resources in the corresponding CSI-RS resource set for channel measurement and at least one CSI-RS and/or CSI-IM resource transmission occasion for each of the CSI-RS and/or CSI-IM resources in the corresponding resource set for interference measurement no later than the CSI reference resource and within the same DRX active time, when DRX is configured, and drops the report otherwise.

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports based on the Rel-18 Type-II Doppler, the following rule is supported:

·       After the CSI report (re)configuration, serving cell activation, BWP change, or activation of SP-CSI, the UE reports a CSI report only after receiving at least one aperiodic or KP consecutive periodic/semi-persistent CSI-RS transmission occasion(s) for each of the CSI-RS resources in each CSI-RS resource group in the corresponding CSI-RS resource set for channel measurement and at least one CSI-RS and/or CSI-IM resource transmission occasion for each of the CSI-RS and/or CSI-IM resources in the corresponding resource set for interference measurement no later than the CSI reference resource and within the same DRX active time, when DRX is configured, and drops the report otherwise.

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding priority 0 (G0) in CSI part 2, the UCI packing order is as follows:

The entire G0 is either reported or dropped entirely, following the legacy principle.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports,

the following rule is supported:

·       After the CSI report (re)configuration, serving cell activation, BWP change, or activation of SP-CSI, the UE reports a CSI report only after receiving at least one CSI-RS transmission occasion for each of the CSI-RS resources in the corresponding CSI-RS resource set for channel measurement and at least one CSI-RS and/or CSI-IM resource transmission occasion for each of the CSI-RS and/or CSI-IM resources in the corresponding resource set for interference measurement no later than the CSI reference resource and within the same DRX active time, when DRX is configured, and drops the report otherwise.

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), the selection of PSRS=1 SRS port (corresponding to the ‘reference UE antenna port’) out of the y available SRS ports (from an xTyR SRS resource for antenna switching) can be configured per CSI reporting setting.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), regarding the configured associated SRS resource,

·       When periodic or semi-persistent associated SRS resource is configured, the SRS transmission occasion for determining the reference UE antenna port corresponds to the latest SRS transmission occasion before the occasions of the NTRP CSI-RS resources used for measuring ‘cjtc-P’ report

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured, confirm the following working assumptions as agreement with the following refinement:

FFS: Whether an additional UE procedure is needed when the reported DO value is ‘out of range’

FFS: Whether the Dd report codepoints need to be reinterpreted from intervals/ranges to values when the linkage mechanism is configured, or in general, a rule is needed to determine the value of DO for the compensation for each CMR for CJT CSI report (including if multiple Dos are reported)

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured, support at least AP-CSI-RS as the CMR for the Rel-18 eType-II CJT reporting

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured with two separate triggers, support to include an indicator in the trigger for a Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI, which indicates whether the UE should perform delay offset (DO) compensation based on the linked CJTC Dd report when calculating the Rel-18 Type-II CJT CSI or not.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (PO) and >1:

·       The UCI parameters are captured in the tables below:

Parameter

Details/description

nref

Reference CSI-RS resource index, based on the ordering from RRC configuration:  bits

{(n,, n,,n,NSB-P), n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref}

DL/UL phase offsets for CSI-RS resource n, (n=0, 1, …, NTRP – 1, n≠nref):

bits

 

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding active resource counting and OCPU, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (phase offset), for both =1 and >1, fully reuse those from Rel-18 TDCP reporting

·       OCPU =X.NTRP where X≥1 is defined based on UE capabilities and determined by the UE

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd’ (delay offset), ‘cjtc-F’ (frequency offset), or, ‘cjtc-Dd-F’ (joint delay + frequency offset), 

·       after the CSI report (re)configuration, serving cell activation, BWP change, the UE reports a CSI report only after receiving at least one CSI-RS transmission occasion for each CSI-RS resource in the  CSI-RS Resource Sets of the CSI-RS Resource Setting for channel measurement no later than the CSI reference resource within the same DRX active time, when DRX is configured, and drop the report otherwise

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset),

·       after the CSI report (re)configuration, serving cell activation, BWP change, the UE reports a CSI report only after receiving at least one CSI-RS transmission occasion for each of the CSI-RS resources in the corresponding CSI-RS Resource Set for channel measurement no later than the CSI reference resource within the same DRX active time, when DRX is configured, and drop the report otherwise.

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), regarding the support of sub-band reporting (>1), the maximum value of configured NSB-P is 16 per CSI reporting setting.

 

 

R1-2409061         Moderator Summary for 1st offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements              Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2409058         Moderator Summary#2 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 2            Moderator (Samsung)

From Tuesday session

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding one-part CSI wideband CQI/PMI reporting, the UCI packing order is as follows:

 

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured with a joint trigger, there is no consensus in supporting P/SP CSI-RS as the CMR for the Rel-18 eType-II CJT reporting (in addition to the agreed AP CSI-RS).

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding per-layer scaling factor applied to each of the selected SD basis vectors associated with RI=v {2} for the 3-bit scaling factor(s), decide, by RAN1#119, from the following alternatives:

Where ri denotes the number of layers associated with the i-th SD basis vector.

The same scheme applies to both Mode-A and Mode-B.

Note:  as agreed in RAN1#117.

Normalization of precoder should be taken into account in the final specification design.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for P (the total number of aggregated ports)=48, 64, 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding CPU occupation for the port subset indication for the SD NES Type-1,

 

 

Timeline capability 1

Timeline capability 2

P-report (L subConfigs)

AP/SP-report (N triggered)

 

 

R1-2409062         Moderator Summary for 2nd offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements              Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2409059         Moderator Summary#3 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 3            Moderator (Samsung)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured with two separate triggers, to indicate whether or not the UE should perform delay offset (DO) compensation based on the latest linked CJTC Dd report when calculating the Rel-18 Type-II CJT CSI, introduce a 1-bit indicator per CSI trigger state:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured with a joint trigger:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured, support linking the CMRs in the two CSI Report Settings so that UE knows which CMRs in the two report settings correspond to the same TRP.

FFS: linking, when the number of resources configured for CJT CSI is < number of resource sets configured for CJT Dd, in case of separate triggers.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP and Type-II codebook refinements (except based on Rel-18 Type-II Doppler) for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, change the maxNumberTxPortsPerResource to maxNumberTxPortsPerReport for Rel-19 codebook triplet capability

 

 

R1-2409063         Moderator Summary for 3rd offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements              Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2409060         Moderator Summary#4 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 4            Moderator (Samsung)

From Thursday session

Conclusion

For a UE configured with a total of PSRS=6 or 8 ports across ≥1 SRS resources for antenna switching intended for xT6R or xT8R, respectively, when SRS port grouping is configured, regarding the mapping between CSI-RS ports and SRS port groups, no additional specification support is introduced

-          It is up to gNB implementation to ensure adequate operation of this feature

 

 

Thursday decision: The following are withdrawn; postponed to RAN1#119 (Orlando).

R1-2409064         DRAFT LS to RAN2 on RRC and MAC CE impacts for Rel-19 NR MIMO Ph5    Samsung

R1-2409065         LS to RAN2 on RRC and MAC CE impacts for Rel-19 NR MIMO Ph5          RAN1, Samsung

9.2.3       Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions

Including support 3T6R SRS antenna switching.

 

R1-2407680         Discussion on 3-antenna-port UL transmission           Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2407700         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Spreadtrum Communications

R1-2407775         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              ZTE Corporation, Sanechips

R1-2407814         3-antenna-port UL transmissions    MediaTek Inc.

R1-2407855         Remaining issues on 3-antenna-port codebook-based uplink transmissions      vivo

R1-2407899         Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions      CMCC

R1-2407963         Discussion on the support of 3-antenna-port CB based transmissions      Xiaomi

R1-2407994         Uplink 3 Port Codebook based Transmission Google

R1-2408041         Enhancement for  3-antenna-port UL transmissions    CATT

R1-2408110         Discussion on uplink enhancement for UE with 3Tx   Fujitsu

R1-2408166         Discussion on 3-antenna-port uplink transmissions     OPPO

R1-2408189         Discussion on Rel-19 CB-based UL for 3TX UE         InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2408201         Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Lenovo

R1-2408211         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              NEC

R1-2408293         Support for 3Tx UL MIMO             Intel Corporation

R1-2408338         Discussions on 3-antenna-port UE   LG Electronics

R1-2408350         Support for 3-antenna-port transmission       Sharp

R1-2408459         Views on R19 MIMO 3Tx transmission        Apple

R1-2408639         Views on Rel-19 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Samsung

R1-2408740         On the support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Nokia

R1-2408768         Support for 3 Tx UL Transmissions Ericsson

R1-2408780         Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions      NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2408844         3 Tx UL MIMO transmissions        Qualcomm Incorporated

 

R1-2408191         FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; First Round              Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

From Monday session

Agreement

To support 3T6R antenna switching for a 3TX UE,

Note: This is not meant to be a text proposal to be captured for the specifications.

 

 

R1-2408192         FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; Second Round   Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

To support non-codebook-based PUSCH transmission by a 3TX UE,

-       UE reports a capability of up to a maximum of 3 layers.

 

Conclusion

To support non-codebook-based precoding by a 3TX UE, for SRI indication, re-use the legacy-based solution according to NSRSmaxNumberSRS-ResourcePerSet.

 

 

From Friday session

Conclusion

To support non-codebook-based PUSCH transmission by a 3TX UE,

·       For sTRP, a single SRS resource set, with up to NSRS ≤ maxNumberSRS-ResourcePerSet single-port SRS resources, can be configured,

·       For Rel-17 M-TRP PUSCH repetition, two SRS resource sets, each with up to NSRS ≤ maxNumberSRS-ResourcePerSet single-port SRS resources, can be configured.

 

Final summary in R1-2408193.

9.2.44       Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios

Including support for 2TA without CoresetPoolIdx association for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP.

 

R1-2407681         Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2407701         Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Spreadtrum Communications

R1-2407729         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              China Telecom, ZTE

R1-2407756         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Tejas Network Limited

R1-2407776         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              ZTE Corporation, Sanechips, China Telecom

R1-2407815         Asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP deployments           MediaTek Inc.

R1-2407821         Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              TCL

R1-2407856         Remaining issues on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              vivo

R1-2407900         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              CMCC

R1-2407964         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Xiaomi

R1-2408042         Enhancement for  asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              CATT

R1-2408111         Discussion on UL-only mTRP operation       Fujitsu

R1-2408118         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Transsion Holdings

R1-2408167         Enhancements on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              OPPO

R1-2408190         Discussion on Rel-19 Asymmetric mTRP Operation  InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2408202         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Lenovo

R1-2408224         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios  NEC

R1-2408294         Enhancements for asymmetric DL/UL scenarios         Intel Corporation

R1-2408339         Discussions on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios       LG Electronics

R1-2408351         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Sharp

R1-2408369         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios  Google

R1-2408406         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Sony

R1-2408460         Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP    Apple

R1-2408564         Discussion on UL enhancement in asymmetric TRP scenarios              ETRI

R1-2408584         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP scenarios              Ericsson

R1-2408640         Views on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Samsung

R1-2408741         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Nokia

R1-2408781         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2408845         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment scenarios        Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2408891         Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP   ASUSTeK

 

R1-2408995         Summary #1 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Moderator (OPPO)

From Monday session

Agreement

·       The lower limit of the value range of PL offset is extended to -12 dB.

 

R1-2408996         Summary #2 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Moderator (OPPO)

From Tuesday session

Agreement

Support 2TA for the asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP deployment scenarios:

 

Agreement

For indicating PL offset for PDCCH-order PRACH, introduce a new 1-bit DCI field in DCI format 1_0:

 

 

R1-2408997         Summary #3 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Moderator (OPPO)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

For indicating PL offset for PDCCH-order PRACH, when two joint/UL TCI states are indicated in Rel-18 unified TCI, down-select one from the following Alts for the 1-bit DCI field in DCI 1_0 which indicates the application of PL offset on PRACH transmission:

FFS: If other information can be indicated by this same 1-bit DCI field for the PDCCH-order PRACH transmission

 

 

R1-2409254         Summary #4 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Moderator (OPPO)

From Thursday session

Agreement

About the extended value range 1~X of starting bit of blocks in DCI format 2_3 in Rel-19, support Alt1:

 

Agreement

Support DCI format 1_1 to indicate TPC command for SRS CLPC adjustment state(s) separate from PUSCH:


 RAN1#119

9.2      NR MIMO Phase 5

Please refer to RP-242394 for detailed scope of the WI.

 

[119-R19-MIMO] – Eko (Samsung)

Email discussion on Rel-19 MIMO Phase 5

-        To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc

 

R1-2409592         List of RRC and MAC CE impact for Rel-19 MIMO Ph5              Samsung (Moderator)

From Thursday session

R1-2410757         DRAFT LS to RAN2 on RRC and MAC CE impacts for Rel-19 NR MIMO Ph5            Moderator (Samsung)

Decision: The LS to RAN2 on RRC and MAC CE impacts is endorsed. Final LS is approved in R1-2410758.

9.2.1       Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management

R1-2409370         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              MediaTek Inc.

R1-2409377         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        ZTE Corporation, Sanechips

R1-2409427         On UE initiated/event-driven beam management        Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2409459         Further Details on Rel-19 UE/Event-Driven Beam Management              InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2409504         Discussion on  enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        CMCC

R1-2409563         Remaining issues for UE-initiated beam management Ericsson

R1-2409586         Views on Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Samsung

R1-2409629         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Spreadtrum, UNISOC

R1-2409673         Remaining issues on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              vivo

R1-2409710         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              TCL

R1-2409748         Enhancements for Event-driven Beam Management   Intel Corporation

R1-2409792         Enhancements for UE-initiated beam management     Apple

R1-2409842         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Ruijie Networks Co. Ltd

R1-2409857         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management             NEC

R1-2409888         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Xiaomi

R1-2409933         Views on Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              CATT

R1-2409961         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Transsion Holdings

R1-2409969         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Lenovo

R1-2410035         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              FUTUREWEI

R1-2410053         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Fujitsu

R1-2410108         Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              OPPO

R1-2410116         Offline summary for Rel-19 MIMO UEIBM (9.2.1) pre-RAN1#119           Moderator (ZTE)

R1-2410164         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management             Google

R1-2410171         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Hyundai Motor Company

R1-2410175         Discussion on the UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              HONOR

R1-2410197         UE-initiated beam management      LG Electronics

R1-2410219         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Sony

R1-2410262         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              ETRI

R1-2410315         Enhancements to facilitate UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Nokia

R1-2410346         Enhancements for UE Initiated Beam Management    Meta

R1-2410381         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2410427         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              ITRI

R1-2410435         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Sharp

R1-2410471         UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2410533         Enhancements for UE-initiated/Event-Driven Beam Management               Panasonic

R1-2410538         Discussion on UE initiated beam report        ASUSTeK

R1-2410540         Discussions on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        KDDI Corporation

R1-2410573         Enhancements for UEiBM CEWiT

R1-2410585         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        NICT

 

From Monday session

R1-2410117         Moderator Summary #1 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, for the case the pre-configured Type-1 CG PUSCH does NOT carry the beam report, for the second UL channel in Mode-B, Option-2 is supported:

·       Option-2: Type-1 CG PUSCH can NOT be transmitted

Agreement

On cross-CC beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, the following is supported

·       the first PUCCH and the second PUSCH associated for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting are from the same PUCCH group.

·       (working assumption) the first PUCCH and the second PUSCH associated for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting are from different PUCCH groups

o   Subject to separate UE capability

Conclusion

On cross-CC beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, the case that the first PUCCH and the second PUSCH are from the different CG is NOT supported.

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding first PUCCH channel configuration, down-select one of Alt-1 and Alt-2 for both mode-A and mode-B.

Note: Further details on first PUCCH retransmission for mode A and mode B will be separately discussed.

 

 

R1-2410118         Moderator Summary #2 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Tuesday session

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, for Event 7, the scheme-1 and scheme-2 for deriving ‘RS for current beam’ on Event-2 is reused with the following further interpretation:

·          Scheme-1: ‘RS for current beam’ is the QCL RS in the activated TCI state with the Q-th best quality.

·          Scheme-2: ‘RS for current beam’ is the SSB which is QCLed with the QCL RS in the activated TCI state with the Q-th best quality.

·          Basic feature of the triggering event determination for Event-7: Once quality of at least one new beam becomes a threshold value better than the RS derived from the activated TCI state with the Q-th best quality, UE initiated beam report occurs

Note: For Event-2, we have the following definition for scheme-1 and scheme-2

·          Scheme-1: RS for current beam is the QCL RS in the indicated TCI state

·          Scheme-2: RS for current beam is the SSB which is QCLed with the QCL RS in the indicated TCI state.

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, for Event 1, down-select at least one among the following options for RS measurement

·          Option-1: RS resource set for new beam is NOT configured in the CSI reporting configuration, and an explicit RRC selection for scheme-1 and scheme-2 is introduced.

·          Option-2: RS resource set for new beam is configured in the CSI reporting configuration, and the following implicit manner for enabling one of either scheme-1 or scheme-2 is used:

·          If the RS(s) for new beam are CSI-RS configured in a CSI-RS resource set configured with repetition, Scheme-1 is enabled; otherwise, Scheme-2 is enabled.

 

R1-2410119         Moderator Summary #3 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding first PUCCH channel configuration, Alt-2 is supported for both mode-A and mode-B: the first PUCCH channel is a new UCI type

Note: Further details on first PUCCH retransmission (if supported) for mode A and mode B will be continue to be separately discussed in RAN1.

 

Agreement

Confirm the following working assumption in RAN1#117:

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting

·       For mode-A, at least support one-bit indication in the first PUCCH channel to request a resource for a second UL channel to carry beam report.

o    In such case, a periodic PUCCH resource (with PUCCH format 0/1) is configured by dedicated RRC signaling. 

·       For mode-B, at least support one-bit indication in the first PUCCH channel to notify a second UL channel to carry beam report.

o    In such case, a periodic PUCCH resource (with PUCCH format 0/1) is configured by dedicated RRC signaling. 

·       FFS: Whether/how to support multi-bit indication in the first PUCCH for mode-A and mode-B, e.g., when multi-event(s) are approved.

·       FFS: details on the dedicated RRC signaling

·       Above applies at least for the single CC case.

 

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, at least one of the following is supported as an extension on L1-RSRP report format depending on Event-2.

·       Option-1: For each of reported CRI/SSBRI, to introduce additional indication of whether the CRI/SSBRI satisfies the condition of Event-2.

o   The presence of this field is enabled by RRC with subjective to UE capability.

o   The presence of this field is only for the case that N > 1 and the time window and M are configured

·       Option-2: For each of reported CRI/SSBRI, to introduce additional indication of the number of Event-2 instances for the CRI/SSBRI(s) within a time window.

o   The presence of this field is enabled by RRC with subjective to UE capability.

o   The presence of this field is only for the case that N > 1 and the time window and M are configured.

·       Option-3: No further enhancement.

Note: As agreed in RAN1#117, at least one of the reported CRI/SSBRI(s) should satisfy the condition of Event-2

FFS: Whether/how to handle the case if UE has not sent any first PUCCH associated for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, for Mode-A.

 

 

R1-2410872         Moderator Summary #4 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Thursday session

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the triggering procedure in Step-2 of Mode-A, down-select one of the following options in RAN1#120

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the multiplexing/dropping rule(s) of 1-bit first PUCCH, further study at least the following cases:

·       Case-1: The 1-bit first PUCCH is collided/overlapped with a PUCCH carrying normal SR and/or a PUCCH with normal LRR

·       Case-2: The 1-bit first PUCCH is collided/overlapped with a PUSCH

·       Case-3: The 1-bit first PUCCHs corresponding to different CSI configuration for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting are overlapping in the time domain.

Agreement

Study the following to reduce beam application latency after a UEI/ED beam report is sent

·    Alt-1: After confirmation/acknowledgement from NW, apply new beam without RRC configuration signaling or MAC-CE signaling

o   after sending a UE-initiated beam report, the UE could store the QCL properties of the SSB associated with the reference signal reported in the beam report

o   update TCI state(s) with the reported new beam(s)

o   activate new beam(s) without additional SSB reception

·    Alt-2: After receiving a TCI state activation command to activate a TCI state(s), if the new beam(s) associated with the TCI state(s) is reported as synchronized in the UEI/ED beam report, the TCI state(s) becomes applicable for DL reception without additional SSB reception.

o   Note: A reported new beam is determined as synchronized by UE, if the UE stores the QCL properties associated with the reported new beam(s) after the UEI/ED beam report is sent

o   FFS: How to inform a reported new beam in a UEI/ED beam report (i.e., introducing one-bit indicator for each reported new beam or all the reported new beam are assumed to be synchronized)

·    Alt-3: After sending a UE-initiated beam report, the UE could store the QCL properties of the SSB associated with the reference signal reported in the beam report.

o   In such case, at the reception of a subsequent reception of Unified TCI States Activation/Deactivation MAC CE, the UE activates new beam(s) without additional SSB reception.

·    Other alternatives are not precluded.

 

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding trigger events, the following working assumption in RAN1#118bis is confirmed:

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding trigger events, besides for Event-2, Event-1 and Event-7 are both supported.

 

Agreement

Regarding for the evaluation periodicity for determining Event-2 instance [at least when DRX is not configured], at least Alt-1 is supported for the single-CC beam reporting (for case that the CSI report configuration and RS for the current beam and new beam(s) are in the same CC).

·       Alt-1: The periodicity of the current beam RS should be the same as that of the new beam RS(s).

o   The evaluation periodicity is the same as the periodicity of the current and new beam RS(s).

·       Alt-2: The periodicity of the current beam RS can be different from that of the new beam RS(s)

o   Alt-2_1: The evaluation periodicity is the same as the periodicity of the current beam RS.

o   Alt-2_2: The evaluation periodicity is the same as periodicity of the new beam RS.

o   Alt-2_3: The evaluation periodicity is the same as shortest periodicity of the current beam RS and new beam RS(s).

o   Alt-2_4: The evaluation periodicity is the maximum of {X ms, shortest periodicity of the current beam RS and new beam RS(s)}.

o   Alt-2_5: The evaluation periodicity is the same as largest periodicity of the current beam RS and new beam RS(s).

Note: There is the same periodicity for the new beam RS(s).

FFS: Down-selection among above Alt(s) for cross-CC beam reporting.

Strong concerns were expressed by Huawei and CATT that if only Alt-1 is supported in the end, the feature will not be practical.

Send an LS to RAN4.

 

From Friday session

R1-2410913         [DRAFT] LS to RAN4 on event-instance evaluation periodicity for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management            Moderator (ZTE)

Decision: Draft LS is endorsed and final version is approved in R1-2410914.

9.2.2       CSI enhancements

Including support for up to 128 CSI-RS ports on FR1 and UE reporting enhancement for CJT and SRS port grouping for TDD low-complexity 6/8RX receiver.

 

R1-2409371         CSI enhancements             MediaTek Inc.

R1-2409378         Discussion on CSI enhancements    ZTE Corporation, Sanechips

R1-2409428         On 128 CSI-RS ports and UE reporting enhancement Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2409432         CSI enhancements for Rel. 19 MIMO            Fraunhofer IIS, Fraunhofer HHI

R1-2409460         Further Details  on Rel-19 Enhancements of CSI         InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2409505         Discussion on CSI enhancements    CMCC

R1-2409589         Views on Rel-19 CSI enhancements              Samsung

R1-2409630         Discussion on CSI enhancements    Spreadtrum, UNISOC

R1-2409674         Remaining issues on Rel-19 CSI enhancements          vivo

R1-2409747         CSI enhancements for MIMO          Intel Corporation

R1-2409761         CSI enhancements             Tejas Networks Limited

R1-2409793         Views on R19 MIMO CSI enhancement       Apple

R1-2409851         Discussion on CSI enhancements    NEC

R1-2409889         Further discussion on Rel-19 MIMO CSI enhancements              Xiaomi

R1-2410657         Views on NR MIMO CSI enhancements Phase 5        CATT              (rev of R1-2409934)

R1-2409970         Discussion on CSI enhancements    Lenovo

R1-2410040         CSI enhancements             TCL

R1-2410054         Discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Fujitsu

R1-2410109         CSI enhancements for Rel-19 MIMO            OPPO

R1-2410154         CSI Enhancement for NR MIMO    Google

R1-2410176         Discussion on CSI enhancements    HONOR

R1-2410220         Further views on CSI enhancements              Sony

R1-2410303         Discussion on Open Issues of CSI Enhancement         Rakuten Mobile, Inc

R1-2410667         CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5      Nokia     (rev of R1-2410316)

R1-2410353         Remaining issues on CSI enhancements for large antenna arrays and CJT Ericsson

R1-2410382         Discussion on CSI enhancements    NTT DOCOMO, INC., NTT CORPORATION

R1-2410436         CSI enhancements             Sharp

R1-2410472         CSI enhancements for >32 ports and UE-assisted CJT              Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2410549         Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5              KDDI Corporation

R1-2410586         Discussion on CSI enhancements    NICT

 

R1-2409587         Moderator summary for OFFLINE discussion on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Samsung (Moderator)

R1-2409588         Moderator summary on Rel-19 CSI enhancements Samsung (Moderator)

From Monday session

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured with two separate triggers, to indicate whether or not the UE should perform delay offset (DO) compensation based on the latest linked CJTC Dd report when calculating the Rel-18 Type-II CJT CSI, the 1-bit indicator per CSI trigger state applies to all the NTRP configured CSI-RS resources.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured with a joint trigger, the timeline (Z/Z’) is determined as Z/Z’ associated with the Rel-18 eType-II CJT, plus Drelax

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, if the UCI associated with each of the M CRIs comprises two parts and is multiplexed on PUCCH, the UE determines the PUCCH resource, the number of PRBs for the PUCCH resource, assuming that the CSI associated with each of the M reported CRIs corresponds to rank 1.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured, regarding linking the CMRs in the two CSI Report Settings, for separate triggering, the UE expects that the number of configured CSI-RS resources associated with the Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI is always the same as the number of TRS resource sets associated with the Rel-19 CJTC Dd report.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding UCI reported in CSI part-1, if resource-specific RI restriction is configured, zero padding bits are introduced in CSI part 1 for each of the (MMR) reported CRIs:

·       For a k-th CRI from the (MMR) reported CRIs (where k=1, 2, …, (MMR)),  zero padding bits are inserted where:

o          

§         , where is the size of RI field corresponding to the i-th CRI, and  is the set of CRIs corresponding to the (KsMR) resources

§             is the size of RI field corresponding to the k-th CRI

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured with two separate triggers, to indicate whether or not the UE should perform delay offset (DO) compensation based on the latest linked CJTC Dd report when calculating the Rel-18 Type-II CJT CSI, when a single CSI trigger state associated with >1 Rel-18 Type-II CJT CSI reports, the 1-bit indicator per CSI trigger state applies to all the Rel-18 Type-II CJT CSI reports linked with the CJTC Dd report(s).

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding per-layer scaling factor applied to each of the selected SD basis vectors associated with RI=v=2 for the 3-bit scaling factor(s):

 

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding packing order and priority levels of NRep CSI reports with M CRIs, the UCI packing order and the consecutive priority levels (higher to lower) follows the legacy specifications.

 

 

R1-2410754         Moderator Summary for 1st offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements              Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2410755         Moderator Summary for 2nd offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements              Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2410751         Moderator Summary#2 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 2            Moderator (Samsung)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding wideband P/SP-CSI reported using one-part CSI, if resource-specific RI restriction is configured, the zero padding bits for each of the M reported CRI are determined as follows:

Note: Here k, j=1, 2, …, KS

Note: How this is captured in the spec (including exact formulation) is up to the editor(s).

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding aperiodic CSI-RS resource configuration, an RRC-configured resource-level slot offset (relative to the resource-set-level slot offset, using the same design as Rel-19 Type-I/II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 ports) is supported for aperiodic CSI-RS resource set.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for P=48, 64, 128 CSI-RS ports, when the UE reports or multiplexes the CSI that include Part 2 CSI reports on PUCCH, the PUCCH resource, the number of PRBs for the PUCCH resource, and/or the number of Part 2 CSI reports are determined based on the RI value that results in the largest UCI payload.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured with a joint triggering carried on a same PUSCH (hence on a same slot), the UCI associated with the CJTC Dd report is multiplexed in CSI Part 1.

Note: The above proposal reuses the legacy UCI design principles, where the UCI associated with the CJTC Dd is placed in the part of UCI as TS 38212 Table 6.3.1.1.2-13; the CSI part 1 of Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI is placed in the part of UCI as TS 38.212 Table 6.3.1.1.2-13 and the CSI part 2 of Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI is placed in the part of UCI as TS 38.212 Table 6.3.1.1.2-14.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), the UE assumes that the NTRP CSI-RS resources are transmitted without DL/UL switching in between the NTRP resources.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding per-layer scaling factor applied to each of the selected SD basis vectors associated with RI=v=2 for the 3-bit scaling factor(s),.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding per-layer scaling factor applied to each of the selected SD basis vectors for the 3-bit scaling factor(s), the configuration of the  value (3-bit indicator per SD basis vector group) is RI-common (a same configuration is used for RI=1 and RI=2).

 

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports with the Rel-15 Type-I SP codebook, joint operation with the Rel-18 NES framework is not supported.

 

 

R1-2410752         Moderator Summary#3 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 3              Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2410756         Moderator Summary for 3rd offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements              Moderator (Samsung)

9.2.3       Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions

Including support 3T6R SRS antenna switching.

 

R1-2409372         Enhancements for 3-antenna-port transmissions         MediaTek Inc.

R1-2409379         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              ZTE Corporation, Sanechips

R1-2409429         Discussion on 3-antenna-port UL transmission           Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2409461         Further Details on Rel-19 CB-based UL for 3TX UE  InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2409506         Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions      CMCC

R1-2409590         Views on Rel-19 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Samsung

R1-2409675         Remaining issues on 3-antenna-port codebook-based uplink transmissions      vivo

R1-2409794         Remaining issues on R19 MIMO 3Tx transmission    Apple

R1-2409890         Discussion on the support of 3-antenna-port CB based transmissions      Xiaomi

R1-2409935         Views on 3-antenna-port uplink transmissions            CATT

R1-2409971         Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Lenovo

R1-2410055         Discussion on uplink enhancement for UE with 3Tx   Fujitsu

R1-2410110         Discussion on 3-antenna-port uplink transmissions     OPPO

R1-2410155         Uplink 3 Port Codebook based Transmission Google

R1-2410317         On the support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Nokia

R1-2410341         Remaining issues for 3 Tx UL transmissions Ericsson

R1-2410383         Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions      NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2410437         Support for 3-antenna-port transmission       Sharp

 

R1-2409463         FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; First Round              Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

From Monday session

Conclusion

To support 3T6R antenna switching for a 3TX UE,

 

Agreement

The following capabilities are introduced for Rel-19

·       't3r3' for 3T3R.

·       't3r6' for 3T6R.

 

From AI 5

R1-2409353         LS on UE RF issues for Rel-19 MIMO enhancement              RAN4, Huawei

From Monday session

Agreement

Support the following replies to Questions 2 and 3 in RAN4 LS,

Question 2: RAN4 would like to check with RAN1 whether a 3Tx UE supporting UL full power transmission mode 0 needs to achieve the same maximum output power with both 1Layer and 2Layers.

 

Question 3: RAN4 would like to check with RAN1 whether 3Tx UE can support UL full power transmission mode 0 with 2Layer 3-port codebooks but not support 1Layer 3-port codebooks.

 

Reply to Q2: Yes, a 3Tx UE supporting UL full power transmission mode 0, delivers the same maximum output power with both 1- and 2-layer precoders.

Reply to Q3: No, a 3Tx UE supporting UL full power transmission mode 0, shall support full power with both 1- and 2-layer 3-port codebook.

 

 

R1-2409464         FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; Second Round   Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

From Wednesday session

R1-2410762         Draft Reply to RAN4 LS on UE RF issues for Rel-19 MIMO Enhancement     InterDigital, OPPO

Decision: The draft LS is endorsed and final version is approved in R1-2410870.

 

Agreement

For a UE operating with 3TX,

A UE does not expect an SRS resource to be configured in both codebook and antenna switching resource sets with conflicting (disabled state) configuration for the port 1003.

 

 

Final summary in R1-2409465.

9.2.44       Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios

Including support for 2TA without CoresetPoolIdx association for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP.

 

R1-2409373         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              MediaTek Inc.

R1-2409380         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              ZTE Corporation, Sanechips, China Telecom

R1-2409430         Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2409462         Further Details  on Rel-19 Asymmetric mTRP Operation              InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2409507         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              CMCC

R1-2409591         Views on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Samsung

R1-2409631         Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Spreadtrum, UNISOC

R1-2409676         Remaining issues on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              vivo

R1-2409709         Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              TCL

R1-2409746         Enhancements for asymmetric DL/UL scenarios         Intel Corporation

R1-2409762         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Tejas Networks Limited

R1-2409769         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP scenarios              Ericsson

R1-2409795         Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP    Apple

R1-2409858         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios  NEC

R1-2409891         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Xiaomi

R1-2409936         Views on Rel-19  asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              CATT

R1-2409962         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Transsion Holdings

R1-2409972         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Lenovo

R1-2409997         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              China Telecom, ZTE

R1-2410056         Discussion on UL-only mTRP operation       Fujitsu

R1-2410111         Enhancements on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              OPPO

R1-2410165         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios  Google

R1-2410198         Discussions on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios       LG Electronics

R1-2410221         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Sony

R1-2410263         Discussion on DL single TRP and UL mTRP operation              ETRI

R1-2410318         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Nokia

R1-2410384         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2410438         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Sharp

R1-2410473         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment scenarios        Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2410534         "Enhancement for Asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Scenarios"              Panasonic

R1-2410539         Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP   ASUSTeK

 

R1-2410649         Summary #1 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Moderator (OPPO)

Presented in Monday session

 

R1-2410650         Summary #2 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Moderator (OPPO)

From Tuesday session

Agreement

Support to apply PL offset on PDCCH-order PRACH in FR2

Note: there is no extra enhancement for Tx beam determination for PDCCH-order PRACH in FR2 in Rel-19.

 

Agreement

Support DCI format 1_1 to indicate TPC command for SRS CLPC adjustment state(s) separate from PUSCH:

 

Agreement

For a UE supporting the UE capability of “Overlapping UL transmission reduction” of Rel-19 2TA:

 

Agreement

For an SRS resource set not configured with followUnifiedTCI-StateSRS, regarding how to determine the PL offset and the CLPC adjustment state, down-select from the following Alts:

 

From AI 5

R1-2409353         LS on UE RF issues for Rel-19 MIMO enhancement              RAN4, Huawei

From Tuesday session

(Question 1: RAN4 would like to inquire if the UL TRP(s) can transmit SSBs per the scope of the WID.)

 

Agreement

The answer to the Question 1 in LS R1-2409353 is:

·        From the perspective of UE: if UE is configured with PL offset in joint/UL TCI state(s), UE does not expect to receive SSB from UL TRP(s), else, UE may expect to receive SSB from UL TRP(s).

 

See final reply LS in R1-2410870.

 

 

Final summary in R1-2410651.


 RAN1#120

9.2      NR MIMO Phase 5

Please refer to RP-242394 for detailed scope of the WI. Additional RAN guidance on Rel-19 NR MIMO can be found in RP-243265.

Rapporteur to provide initial input on higher layer signalling under agenda item 9.2. For input on higher layer signalling from any other source, please include it as part of your tdoc to relevant sub-agenda items.

 

[120-R19-MIMO] – Gilwon (Samsung)

Email discussion on Rel-19 MIMO Phase 5

-        To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc

 

R1-2500844         List of RRC impact for Rel-19 MIMO Ph5   Moderator (Samsung)

 

R1-2500845         Draft LS to RAN2 on MAC impact for Rel-19 MIMO Ph5              Samsung, MediaTek

From Thursday session

Agreement

LS to RAN2 on MAC impacts for Rel-19 NR MIMO Ph5 is endorsed. Final LS is approved in R1-2500846.

9.2.1       Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management

R1-2500056         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              FUTUREWEI

R1-2500097         On UE initiated/event-driven beam management        Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2500104         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              MediaTek Inc.

R1-2500115         Remaining Details on Rel-19 UE/Event-Driven Beam Management        InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2500163         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Spreadtrum, UNISOC

R1-2500217         Views on enhancement for Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management             CATT

R1-2500240         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              TCL

R1-2500241         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        ZTE Corporation, Sanechips

R1-2500279         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        CMCC

R1-2500342         Remaining issues on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              vivo

R1-2500377         Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              China Telecom Corporation Ltd.

R1-2500470         Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              OPPO

R1-2500513         On UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Ofinno

R1-2500569         UE-initiated beam management      LG Electronics

R1-2500592         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management             NEC

R1-2500645         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Sony

R1-2500671         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Ruijie Networks Co. Ltd

R1-2500699         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Lenovo

R1-2500725         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Xiaomi

R1-2500771         Remaining issues for UE-initiated beam management Apple

R1-2500839         Views on Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Samsung

R1-2500896         Enhancements to facilitate UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Nokia

R1-2500905         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              ETRI

R1-2500930         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Fujitsu

R1-2500963         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Transsion Holdings

R1-2500977         Enhancements for UE-initiated/Event-Driven Beam Management               Panasonic

R1-2501084         Enhancements for UE Initiated Beam Management    Meta

R1-2501087         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Hyundai Motor Company

R1-2501105         Discussion on the UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              HONOR

R1-2501127         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Sharp

R1-2501149         UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2501195         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2501230         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              ITRI

R1-2501236         Discussion on UE initiated beam report        ASUSTeK

R1-2501245         Remaining issues for UE-initiated beam management Ericsson

R1-2501264         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              KT Corp.

R1-2501309         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        NICT

R1-2501334         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management             Google

R1-2501341         Discussions on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        KDDI Corporation

 

R1-2500942         Offline summary for Rel-19 MIMO UEIBM (9.2.1) pre-RAN1#120           Moderator (ZTE)

R1-2500943         Moderator Summary #1 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Monday session

Agreement

On cross-CC beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, the following working assumption is confirmed with the following modification.

·       The first PUCCH and the second PUSCH associated for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting are from different PUCCH groups

o   Subject to separate UE capability

·       Note: From RAN1 perspective, the above does NOT introduce any spec impact except for UE capability signaling

 

Agreement

On cross-CC beam report measurement for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, the following is supported

 

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, for Event 7, the candidate value of RRC parameter Q = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8}

·          Note: The UE does not expect that the configured Q is greater than the number of the activated DL/joint TCI state(s).

 

Conclusion

There is no RAN1 consensus on the following proposal:

·          On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, multi-bit indication in the first PUCCH is supported.

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Mode-B, the value of X symbols for determining available transmission occasion of the second UL channel is configured by RRC (FFS: subject to a corresponding UE capability).

 

 

R1-2500944         Moderator Summary #2 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Tuesday session

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, support the following option of dropping rule for the Case-1: the 1-bit first PUCCH is collided/overlapped with a PUCCH carrying normal SR and/or a PUCCH with normal LRR

·       Option-1: LRR > first PUCCH > normal SR

Note: When the 1-bit first PUCCH is collided/overlapped with a PUCCH carrying normal SR and/or a PUCCH with normal LRR, only one of them is transmitted based on the above priority rule

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the triggering procedure in Step-2 of Mode-A, the following Option-1 is supported.

·         Option-1: A CSI trigger state corresponding to UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting can NOT be associated with legacy AP-CSI report configuration.

 

Agreement

Regarding triggering event determination for Event 2, at least Candidate #2 is supported for resetting the counting.

·       Candidate#1: RS reconfiguration/update or MAC-CE signaling (if supported) for new beam is received;

o   FFS: whether to reset the counting for all new beams.

o   FFS: whether to maintain the counting whose new beam is NOT updated.

·       Candidate#2: [The measured current beam based on] indicated TCI state is updated;

o   In such case, the UE need to reset the counting for all new beams.

·       Candidate#3: UEI beam report is transmitted;

o   FFS: Only reset the counting of new beams fulfilling triggering condition and reported by the UEI beam report

·       Candidate#4: NW response (e.g., DCI in step-2 of Mode-A) is detected.

·       Candidate#5: The time window expires

·       Candidate#6: The threshold for event evaluation is re-configured by RRC signaling

·       (FFS) Candidate#7: The RRC parameter(s) associated with the CSI report configuration for UEI beam report is reconfigured.

o   FFS: RRC parameter(s)

·       FFS: Other candidates

Note: Whether this proposal is captured in RAN1 or RAN2 is a separate discussion point.

 

 

R1-2500945         Moderator Summary #3 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, for Event 1, support Option-2 for RS measurement:

 

Agreement

Regarding triggering event determination for Event 2, on the measurement window for initiating the UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting procedure, further study the following options for possible down-selection

 

 

R1-2501556         Moderator Summary #4 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       Moderator (ZTE)

From Thursday session

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, Option-1 is supported as an extension on L1-RSRP report format depending on Event-2.

Above is NOT applicable for event 1.

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, one PUCCH resource of first PUCCH can be associated with one or multiple CSI report configurations, regarding Event-2.

FFS: Alt-2 Multiple UEI beam reports associated with the same PUCCH resource for first PUCCH can be transmitted in the second PUSCH.

·       If RAN1 cannot converge on the support of Alt-2 in RAN1#120bis, this alternative will be dropped from Rel-19

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the multiplexing/dropping rule(s) of 1-bit first PUCCH, down-select one of the following rule for the Case-2: the 1-bit first PUCCH is collided/overlapped with a PUSCH

9.2.2       CSI enhancements

Including support for up to 128 CSI-RS ports on FR1 and UE reporting enhancement for CJT and SRS port grouping for TDD low-complexity 6/8RX receiver.

 

R1-2500098         On 128 CSI-RS ports and UE reporting enhancement Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2500105         CSI enhancements             MediaTek Inc.

R1-2500116         Remaining Details on Rel-19 Enhancements of CSI    InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2500164         Discussion on CSI enhancements    Spreadtrum, UNISOC

R1-2500218         Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5              CATT

R1-2500242         Discussion on CSI enhancements    ZTE Corporation, Sanechips

R1-2500280         Discussion on CSI enhancements    CMCC

R1-2500343         Remaining issues on Rel-19 CSI enhancements          vivo

R1-2500471         CSI enhancements for Rel-19 MIMO            OPPO

R1-2500484         Discussion on Rel-19 CSI Enhancements      Tejas Network Limited

R1-2500485         CSI enhancements for Rel. 19 MIMO            Fraunhofer IIS, Fraunhofer HHI

R1-2500550         CSI Enhancement for NR MIMO    Google

R1-2500598         Discussion on CSI enhancements    NEC

R1-2500646         Discussion of CSI enhancements    Sony

R1-2500700         Discussion on CSI enhancements    Lenovo

R1-2500726         Further discussion on Rel-19 MIMO CSI enhancements              Xiaomi

R1-2500772         Views on R19 MIMO CSI enhancement       Apple

R1-2500841         Views on Rel-19 CSI enhancements              Samsung

R1-2500897         CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5      Nokia

R1-2500906         Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5              ETRI

R1-2500931         Remaining issues on Rel-19 CSI enhancements          Fujitsu

R1-2501073         Discussion on Open Issues of CSI Enhancement         Rakuten Mobile, Inc

R1-2501106         Discussion on CSI enhancements    HONOR

R1-2501128         CSI enhancements             Sharp

R1-2501150         CSI enhancements for >32 ports and UE-assisted CJT              Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2501196         Discussion on CSI enhancements    NTT DOCOMO, INC., NTT CORPORATION

R1-2501272         Remaining issues on CSI enhancements for large antenna arrays and CJT               Ericsson

R1-2501297         Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5              KDDI Corporation

R1-2501307         Discussion on CSI enhancements    NICT

 

R1-2500840         Moderator Summary#1 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 1            Moderator (Samsung)

From Monday session

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when linking CJTC Dd and Rel-18 eType-II CJT CSI reports is configured with a joint trigger, regarding timeline, the value of drelax will be decided in UE feature session.

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), regarding the support of sub-band reporting (>1),

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for P=48, 64, 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding Scheme-B, when the UE is configured to report wideband CSI on PUCCH:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for P=48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding the CSI reference resource

 

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement based on Rel-18 Type-II Doppler for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, whether to change the maxNumberTxPortsPerResource to maxNumberTxPortsPerResourceGroup for Rel-19 codebook triplet capability is to be discussed in UE feature session.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding the value of the RRC-configured resource-level slot offset (relative to the resource-set-level slot offset) for aperiodic CSI-RS resource set, at least the following values are supported: {0, 1, 2, 3}

 

 

R1-2501362         Moderator Summary for 1st offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements              Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2501361         Moderator Summary#2 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 2            Moderator (Samsung)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for P=48, 64, 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding Scheme-B, when the UE is configured to report wideband CSI on PUCCH formats 3 and 4, one-part CSI is used.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 CRI-based CSI refinement for up to 128 CSI-RS ports, regarding the value of the RRC-configured resource-level slot offset (relative to the resource-set-level slot offset) for aperiodic CSI-RS resource set, in addition to the agreed values of {0, 1, 2, 3}, the following values are supported: {4, 5, 6, 7}.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for P=128 CSI-RS ports, with Capability 2 timeline, when periodic or semi-persistent CSI reporting is configured, nCSI_ref is the smallest value greater than or equal to , such that it corresponds to a valid downlink slot.

 

 

R1-2501571         Moderator Summary#3 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 3            Moderator (Samsung)

From Thursday session

Agreement

Following agreement from RAN1#118bis is updated (in RED):

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-P’ (DL/UL phase offset), regarding the configured associated SRS resource,

·       When periodic or semi-persistent associated SRS resource is configured, the SRS transmission occasion for determining the reference UE antenna port corresponds to the latest SRS transmission occasion before the occasions of the NTRP CSI-RS resources used for measuring ‘cjtc-P’ report

9.2.3       Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions

Including support for 3T3R and 3T6R SRS antenna switching.

 

R1-2500099         Discussion on 3-antenna-port UL transmission           Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2500106         3-antenna-port UL transmissions    MediaTek Inc.

R1-2500117         Remaining Details on Rel-19 CB-based UL for 3TX UE              InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2500219         Views on 3Tx uplink transmissions CATT

R1-2500243         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              ZTE Corporation, Sanechips

R1-2500281         Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions      CMCC

R1-2500344         Remaining issues on 3-antenna-port codebook-based uplink transmissions      vivo

R1-2500472         Discussion on 3-antenna-port uplink transmissions     OPPO

R1-2500539         Remaining issues for 3 Tx UL transmissions Ericsson

R1-2500551         Uplink 3 Port Codebook based Transmission Google

R1-2500701         Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Lenovo

R1-2500727         Discussion on the support of 3-antenna-port CB based transmissions      Xiaomi

R1-2500773         Remaining issues on R19 MIMO 3Tx transmission    Apple

R1-2500842         Views on Rel-19 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Samsung

R1-2500879         Discussions on 3-antenna-port codebook-based UL transmission              China Telecom Corporation Ltd.

R1-2500898         On the support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Nokia

R1-2500932         Discussion on uplink enhancement for UE with 3Tx   Fujitsu

R1-2501129         Support for 3-antenna-port transmission       Sharp

R1-2501151         Remaining issues for 3Tx CB based PUSCH Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2501197         Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions      NTT DOCOMO, INC.

 

R1-2500119         FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; First Round              Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

From Monday session

Agreement

For 3T3R antenna switching, reuse the same mechanism as xTxR for the SRS configuration as follows:

·       Up to two SRS resource sets each with one SRS resource can be configured, where the number of SRS ports for each resource is equal to 4 with port 1003 disabled if the UE is not indicating srs-AntennaSwitching2SP-1Periodic.

·       Up to two SRS resource sets configured with resourceType in SRS-ResourceSet set to 'semi-persistent' and one SRS resource set configured with resourceType in SRS-ResourceSet set to 'periodic' can be configured and the two SRS resource sets configured with 'semi-persistent' are not activated at the same time, or up to two SRS resource sets can be configured, if the UE is indicating srs-AntennaSwitching2SP-1Periodic, where each SRS resource set has one SRS resource, the number of SRS ports for each resource is equal to 4 with port 1003 disabled.

·       For 3T=3R, the UE shall not expect to be configured or triggered with more than one SRS resource set with higher layer parameter usage set as 'antennaSwitching' in the same symbol.

Note: This is not meant to be a text proposal to be captured for the specifications.

 

Conclusion

To support 3T3R antenna switching for a 3TX UE,

 

Conclusion

For a 3TX UE, following agreements for codebook-based transmission can also be extended for non-codebook-based transmission,

Agreement

For codebook-based transmission by a 3TX UE,

-        Option- 2: Subject to UE capability, up to 2 PTRS ports may be configured in PTRS-UplinkConfig,

o    FFS whether a single bit or 2 bits are used for PTRS-DMRS association indication.

Above is only for single panel transmission.

 

Agreement

For codebook-based UL transmission by a 3TX UE, when 1 PTRS port is configured by maxNrofPorts in PTRS-UplinkConfig, PTRS-DMRS association indication is as follows:

-        Alt2: 2-bit indication

PTRS-DMRS association when 1 PT-RS port is configured

Value

DMRS port

0

1st scheduled DMRS port

1

2nd scheduled DMRS port

2

3rd scheduled DMRS port

3

4th scheduled DMRS port

Reserved

 

Agreement

For non-codebook-based UL transmission for a 3TX UE, when 2 PTRS ports are configured by maxNrofPorts in PTRS-UplinkConfig, PTRS-DMRS association indication for the two DMRS ports that share a PTRS port is as follows:

Value of MSB

DMRS port

Value of LSB

DMRS port

0

1st DMRS port which shares the PTRS port

0

1st DMRS port which shares PTRS port 1

1

2nd DMRS port which shares the PTRS port

1

2nd DMRS port which shares PTRS port 1

 

Conclusion

For a 3TX UE, following agreements for codebook-based transmission can also be extended for non-codebook-based transmission,

Agreement

For codebook-based M-TRP PUSCH repetition by a 3TX UE, for indication of PTRS-DMRS association,

-        When 1 PTRS port is configured by maxNrofPorts in PTRS-UplinkConfig, reuse Rel-17 multi-TRP TDM repetition,

-        When 2 PTRS ports are configured by maxNrofPorts in PTRS-UplinkConfig, and maxRank = 2 or 3,

o    A second PTRS-DMRS association field (1 bit) is used to indicate the association between PTRS ports and DMRS ports for the 2nd SRS resource set (i.e.,2nd TRP).

 

Agreement

For 3T3R and 3T6R antenna switching, support the following separate UE capabilities for SRS configuration,

·       “srs-AntennaSwitching3T6R2SP-1Periodic” to extend srs-AntennaSwitching2SP-1Periodic to the case of 3T6R.

·       “srs-AntennaSwitching3T3R2SP-1Periodic” to extend srs-AntennaSwitching2SP-1Periodic to the case of 3T3R.

 

 

Final summary in:

R1-2500121         Summary of Discussion on 3TX CB-based Uplink in RAN1#120              Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

9.2.44       Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios

Including support for 2TA without CoresetPoolIdx association for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP.

 

R1-2500100         Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2500107         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              MediaTek Inc.

R1-2500118         Remaining Details  on Rel-19 Asymmetric mTRP Operation              InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2500165         Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Spreadtrum, UNISOC

R1-2500220         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              CATT

R1-2500239         Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              TCL

R1-2500244         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              ZTE Corporation, Sanechips, China Telecom

R1-2500256         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              China Telecom, ZTE

R1-2500282         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              CMCC

R1-2500345         Remaining issues on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              vivo

R1-2500473         Enhancements on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              OPPO

R1-2500495         Remaining issues on asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP scenarios              Ericsson

R1-2500498         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP     Tejas Network Limited

R1-2500514         Enhancements on asymmetric DL STRP/UL MTRP scenarios              Ofinno

R1-2500570         Discussions on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios       LG Electronics

R1-2500593         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios  NEC

R1-2500647         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Sony

R1-2500702         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Lenovo

R1-2500728         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Xiaomi

R1-2500774         Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP    Apple

R1-2500843         Views on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Samsung

R1-2500899         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Nokia

R1-2500907         Discussion on UL mTRP and DL single TRP operation              ETRI

R1-2500933         Discussion on UL-only mTRP operation       Fujitsu

R1-2500964         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Transsion Holdings

R1-2500978         "Enhancement for Asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Scenarios "              Panasonic

R1-2501121         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              Sharp

R1-2501152         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment scenarios        Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2501198         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2501237         Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP   ASUSTeK

R1-2501335         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios  Google

 

R1-2501358         Summary #1 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Moderator (OPPO)

From Monday session

Agreement

For a UE provided with SSB-MTC-AddtionalPCI and not configured with multi-DCI based mTRP, support to reuse the DCI field ‘PRACH association indicator’ in DCI format 1_0 to indicate PL RS for PDCCH-order PRACH:

 

Conclusion

There is no RAN1 consensus to support the following proposal:

Support the UE to report either Type1 PHR or Type 3 PHR in a serving cell configured with one UL carrier and two separate SRS CLPC adjustment states. The UE determines to report Type1 PHR or Type 3 PHR according to:

This is subject to UE capability.

This is feature is enabled by one new RRC parameter.

 

 

R1-2501359         Summary #2 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Moderator (OPPO)

From Tuesday session

Conclusion

There is no consensus to introduce the restriction that only one of the indicated joint/UL TCI states can be configured with PL offset.

 

Conclusion

There is no consensus to include PL offset in Type 3 PHR calculation.

 

Conclusion

In asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP deployment scenario, the PDCCH-order PRACH to UL TRP is CFRA.

 

Agreement

7.3.1       UE behavior

*** Unchanged parts are omitted ***

-          is jointly coded with other TPC commands in a PDCCH with DCI format 2_3, as described in clause 11.4 or provided by TPC command field XXX in a PDCCH with DCI format 1_1

*** Unchanged parts are omitted ***

-          if the UE is not configured for PUSCH transmissions on active UL BWP  of carrier  of serving cell , or if srs-PowerControlAdjustmentStates indicates separate power control adjustment states between SRS transmissions and PUSCH transmissions, and tpc-Accumulation is provided, and the UE detects a DCI format 2_3 or DCI format 1_1 carrying DCI field XXX  symbols before a first symbol of SRS transmission occasion , where absolute values of  are provided in Table 7.1.1-1

*** Unchanged parts are omitted ***

o   Note: how to capture this in specification is up to editor.

·       In Rel-19, the TPC command for separate SRS CLPC adjustment state(s) indicated in DCI format 1_1 and the TPC command for separate SRS CLPC adjustment states indicated in DCI format 2_3 are applicable to periodic SRS, semi-persistent SRS and aperiodic SRS.

 

 

R1-2501360         Summary #3 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP              Moderator (OPPO)

From Thursday session

Agreement

Study whether/how to reset the CLPC of PUSCH/PUCCH/SRS based on the following alternatives (including if any enhancement is necessary and other alternatives are not precluded)


 RAN1#120-bis

9.2       NR MIMO Phase 5

Please refer to RP-242394 for detailed scope of the WI. Additional RAN guidance on Rel-19 NR MIMO can be found in RP-243265.

 

[120bis-R19-MIMO] – Gilwon (Samsung)

Email discussion on Rel-19 MIMO Phase 5

-        To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc

 

R1-2502361         List of RRC impact for Rel-19 MIMO Ph5   Moderator (Samsung)

 

R1-2502364         Draft Stage-2 CR for Rel-19 NR MIMO Ph5 in TS38.300        Samsung

R1-2503093         Summary of discussion on Draft CR on TS38.300 for Rel-19 MIMO     Moderator (Samsung)

 

R1-2502362        Draft LS to RAN2 on MAC impact for Rel-19 MIMO Ph5  Moderator (Samsung)

Thursday decision: RAN1 consensus that such LS is not needed and not pursued.

9.2.1        Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management

R1-2501716         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management               FUTUREWEI

R1-2501742         On Specifications of Rel-19 UE/Event-Driven Beam Management         InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2501780         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management    ZTE Corporation, Sanechips

R1-2501799         Remaining issues on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        vivo

R1-2501850         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management             MediaTek Inc.

R1-2501862         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management    Spreadtrum, UNISOC

R1-2501985         On enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management       CATT

R1-2502038         On UE-initiated/event-driven beam management        Ofinno

R1-2502053         Remaining issues for UE-initiated beam management Ericsson

R1-2502065         Discussions on UEIBM     China Telecom

R1-2502079         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management               NEC

R1-2502103         UE-initiated beam management      LG Electronics

R1-2502107         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management             Lenovo

R1-2502119         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management               Fujitsu

R1-2502153         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management               CMCC

R1-2502224         On UE initiated/event-driven beam management        Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2502293         Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management   OPPO

R1-2502312         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management             Sony

R1-2502356         Views on Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Samsung

R1-2502414         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management               Ruijie Networks Co. Ltd

R1-2502434         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management               Xiaomi

R1-2502505         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management             ETRI

R1-2502524         Enhancements to facilitate UE-initiated/event-driven beam management               Nokia

R1-2502538         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management             Transsion Holdings

R1-2502545         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management    TCL

R1-2502598         Remaining issues for UE-initiated beam management Apple

R1-2502665         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management             Sharp

R1-2502687         Discussion on the UE-initiated/event-driven beam management             HONOR

R1-2502744         Offline summary for Rel-19 MIMO UEIBM (9.2.1) pre-RAN1#120b    Moderator (ZTE)

R1-2502759         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management    NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2502793         Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management    ITRI

R1-2502812         Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management             Panasonic

R1-2502833         UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2502877         Discussion on UE initiated beam report        ASUSTeK

R1-2502888         Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management               Google

R1-2502897         Discussions on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management               KDDI Corporation (TTC)

 

R1-2502745        Moderator Summary #1 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management               Moderator (ZTE)

From Monday session

Agreement

Regarding triggering event determination for Event 2, on resetting the counting, the following modification on the agreed Candidate #2 in RAN1#120 is supported.

·           Candidate#2: [The measured current beam RS is updated based on] indicated TCI state is updated;

o   In such case, the UE needs to reset the counting for all new beams.

o   FFS: Further details on the update (if necessary).

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, support the following interpretation on each of the codepoints of the ‘1-bit’ condition met indicator as follows:

·           ‘0’ – indicating that the Event-2 instances for corresponding CRI/SSBRI within the time window doesn’t reach the configured number M.

·           ‘1’ – indicating that the Event-2 instances for corresponding CRI/SSBRI within the time window reach the configured number M.

FFS: whether/how to introduce the ‘1-bit’ condition met indicator for Event 7.

 

Agreement

On cross-CC beam report measurement for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, introduce an RRC parameter to indicate ServCellIndex on which the indicated TCI state used to determine the current beam RS is applied.

·           FFS: Indication of the cell that corresponds to the configured first PUCCH resource in CSI report config including whether it is necessary

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, for the case the pre-configured Type-1 CG PUSCH carry the beam report, for the second UL channel in Mode-B, reuse the intra-UE multiplexing/prioritization rules of PUSCH with SP-CSI for Type-1 CG PUSCH with UEI-BR for Mode B.

 

Agreement

Regarding triggering event determination for Event 2, on the measurement window for initiating the UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting procedure, down-select one of the following options in RAN1#120bis.

 

 

R1-2502746        Moderator Summary #2 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management               Moderator (ZTE)

From Tuesday session

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, support the following for Event 1:

 

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding current beam report on Event 1, reuse RRC parameter enabledCurrentBeamReport-r19 to enable/disable the RSRP report of current beam.

 

Conclusion

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the case that one PUCCH resource of first PUCCH can be associated with one or multiple CSI report configurations, there is NO RAN1 consensus on supporting multiple UEI beam reports carrying in a second PUSCH.

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the multiplexing/dropping rule(s) of 1-bit first PUCCH, support the following rule for the Case-4: the 1-bit first PUCCH is collided/overlapped with a PUCCH format 0/1 carrying HARQ.

 

Conclusion

Regarding resource mapping/configuration between first and second UL channel associated with a same CSI report configuration in Mode-B, there is NO consensus on further supporting the case that first PUCCH resource and pre-configured resource for second UL channel can have different periodicities (in ms).

 

 

R1-2502747        Moderator Summary #3 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management               Moderator (ZTE)

From Wednesday session

Agreement

Regarding triggering event determination for Event 2, on the measurement window for initiating the UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting procedure, support Option-4.

Above agreement is captured in RAN1 specifications.

 

Agreement

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, the procedure of triggering event determination is captured in RAN1 spec.

 

 

R1-2503092        Moderator Summary #4 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management               Moderator (ZTE)

From Thursday session

Conclusion

There is no RAN1 consensus on the following proposal:

On UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, support at least Option-1 of following for Event 7 as an extension on report format for Event-2

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting for a CSI report configuration, down-select at least one of the following candidates in RAN1#121:

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the multiplexing/dropping rule(s) of 1-bit first PUCCH, down-select one of the following rules for the Case-2: the 1-bit first PUCCH is collided/overlapped with a PUSCH, in RAN1#121

 

Conclusion

There is no RAN1 consensus on the following. No spec change needed.

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the multiplexing/dropping rule(s) of 1-bit first PUCCH, support one of the following rule for the Case-3: the 1-bit first PUCCHs corresponding to different CSI configuration for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting are overlapping in the time domain.

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, confirming the following working assumption with the following modification.

·        For Mode-A, the multiple CSI report configurations associated with the same PUCCH resource should be associated with a same CSI-AperiodicTriggerState.

·        FFS: For Mode-A, the multiple CSI report configurations associated with the same CSI-AperiodicTriggerState should be associated with a same PUCCH resource.

Conclusion

There is no RAN1 consensus on the following. No spec change needed.

For event 2, when one PUCCH resource of first PUCCH can be associated with one or multiple CSI report configurations, and if multiple UE initiated beam report procedures occur, down-select one of the following options:

9.2.2        CSI enhancements

Including support for up to 128 CSI-RS ports on FR1 and UE reporting enhancement for CJT and SRS port grouping for TDD low-complexity 6/8RX receiver.

 

R1-2501743         On Specifications of Rel-19 Enhancements of CSI      InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2501781         Discussion on CSI enhancements    ZTE Corporation, Sanechips

R1-2501800         Remaining issues on Rel-19 CSI enhancements          vivo

R1-2501851         CSI enhancements             MediaTek Inc.

R1-2501863         Discussion on CSI enhancements    Spreadtrum, UNISOC

R1-2501950         CSI Enhancement for NR MIMO    Google

R1-2501986         Remaining issues on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5             CATT

R1-2502011         Discussion on Rel-19 CSI Enhancements      Tejas Network Limited

R1-2502074         Discussion on CSI enhancements    NEC

R1-2502108         Discussion on CSI enhancements    Lenovo

R1-2502120         Remaining issues on Rel-19 CSI enhancements          Fujitsu

R1-2502154         Discussion on CSI enhancements    CMCC

R1-2502225         On 128 CSI-RS ports and UE reporting enhancement Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2502294         CSI enhancements for Rel-19 MIMO            OPPO

R1-2502313         Further discussion of CSI enhancements       Sony

R1-2502358         Views on Rel-19 CSI enhancements              Samsung

R1-2502435         Maintenance on CSI enhancement for up to 128 ports and CJT Xiaomi

R1-2502506         Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5          ETRI

R1-2502525         CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5      Nokia

R1-2502551         Discussion on the Remaining Issues of CSI Enhancement        Rakuten Mobile, Inc

R1-2502599         Views on R19 MIMO CSI enhancement       Apple

R1-2502666         CSI enhancements             Sharp

R1-2502688         Discussion on CSI enhancements    HONOR

R1-2502730         Discussion on Beamforming Template for CSI Enhancement   China Unicom

R1-2502760         Discussion on CSI enhancements    NTT DOCOMO, INC., NTT CORPORATION

R1-2502811         Maintenance on CSI for large antenna arrays and CJT Ericsson

R1-2502834         CSI enhancements for >32 ports and UE-assisted CJT              Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2502904         CSI enhancements for Rel. 19 MIMO            Fraunhofer IIS, Fraunhofer HHI

R1-2502932         Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5          KDDI Corporation

 

R1-2502357        Moderator Summary#1 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 1        Moderator (Samsung)

From Monday session

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I multi-panel (MP) codebook refinement for a given P{48, 64, 128} CSI-RS ports, the mapping of i1,3 to (k1,k2) for RI=2-4 is the same as that used in the Rel-19 Type-I SP Scheme-A for RI=2-4 and .

·        Note: How this is captured is up to the TS38.214 editor.

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I multi-panel (MP) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, support only the following (Ng, N1, N2) values (revision from the current version of editor draft CR on TS 38.214):

 

Number of
CSI-RS antenna ports,
 

48

(2,4,3)

(2,6,2)

(2,12,1)

64

(2,4,4)

(2,8,2)

(2,16,1)

(4,4,2)

(4,8,1)

128

(4,4,4)

(4,8,2)

(4,16,1)

 

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, when the Rel-18 SD NES Type-I is configured for the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook, the powerOffset parameter can be configured in all the respective subConfiguration IEs

·        The supported values for powerOffset follow the legacy specification.

Conclusion

There is no RAN1 consensus on the following proposal:

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration reporting, regarding the dynamic range for delay offset reporting Dn,offset, i.e. AD, also support 

AD = {0.1CP, 0.2CP}.

·        Each of the above values of the dynamic ranges is subject to a separate UE capability.

·        Each of the above values of the dynamic ranges is applicable when the bandwidth of configured TRS is no smaller than 52 PRBs

 

 

R1-2503013         Moderator Summary for 1st offline on Rel-19 CSI enhancements            Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2503011        Moderator Summary#2 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 2        Moderator (Samsung)

From Wednesday session

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 Type-I multi-panel (MP) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, there is no need to support any mapping from CSI-RS resource index and CSI-RS resource port index per resource to port index for CSI/PMI calculation.

 

Conclusion

There is no consensus to support the following proposal:

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II (except for Type-II Doppler) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, when the K>1 aggregated NZP aperiodic CSI-RS resources for CMR are within two consecutive slots, the triggering offset of the associated aperiodic CSI-IM follows the associated NZP CSI-RS resource(s) for CMR in the first slot.

9.2.3        Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions

Including support for 3T3R and 3T6R SRS antenna switching.

 

R1-2501744         On Specifications of Rel-19 CB-based UL for 3TX UE             InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2501782         Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions   ZTE Corporation, Sanechips

R1-2501801         Remaining issues on 3-antenna-port codebook-based uplink transmissions           vivo

R1-2501852         3-antenna-port UL transmissions    MediaTek Inc.

R1-2501941         Remaining issues for 3 Tx UL transmissions Ericsson Japan K.K.

R1-2501951         Uplink 3 Port Codebook based Transmission Google

R1-2501987         Remaining issues on 3-antenna-port uplink transmission          CATT

R1-2502109         Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions        Lenovo

R1-2502155         Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions               CMCC

R1-2502226         Discussion on 3-antenna-port UL transmission           Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2502295         Discussion on 3-antenna-port uplink transmissions     OPPO

R1-2502359         Views on Rel-19 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              Samsung

R1-2502436         Discussion on the support of 3-antenna-port CB based transmissions     Xiaomi

R1-2502526         On the support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions           Nokia

R1-2502600         Remaining issues on R19 MIMO 3Tx transmission    Apple

R1-2502667         Support for 3-antenna-port transmission       Sharp

R1-2502761         Discussion on support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions              NTT DOCOMO, INC.

 

R1-2501746        FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; First Round         Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

From Monday session

Agreement

Adopt the following changes in Clause 6.3.1.5 in TS38.211.

6.3.1.5     Precoding

The block of vectors  shall be precoded according to

where , . The set of antenna ports  shall be determined according to the procedure in [6, TS 38.214].

For non-codebook-based transmission, the precoding matrix  equals the identity matrix.

For codebook-based transmission, the precoding matrix  depends on the number of antenna ports used for the transmission:

-         for single-layer transmission on a single antenna port, ;

-         for transmissions using 2, or 4 antenna ports,  is given by Tables 6.3.1.5-1 to 6.3.1.5-7;

-         for transmissions using 3 antenna ports when 4portSRS_3TX is configured, the UE does not transmit on antenna port 1003 and  is given by Tables 6.53.1.5-48 to 6.3.1.5-50;

 

Agreement

Adopt the following changes in Clause 6.2.1.2 in TS38.214.

6.2.1.2     UE sounding procedure for DL CSI acquisition

-------------------------------------------Unchanged parts are omitted-------------------------------------------

·      For 1T=1R, 2T=2R, 3T=3R, 4T=4R or 8T=8R, up to two SRS resource sets each with one SRS resource can be configured, where the number of SRS ports for each resource is equal to 1, 2, 4 with port 1003 disabled by higher layer parameter [RRC_parameter] is configured, 4 or 8 if the UE is not indicating srs-AntennaSwitching2SP-1Periodic or [srs-AntennaSwitching3T3R2SP-1Periodic]. Up to two SRS resource sets configured with resourceType in SRS-ResourceSet set to 'semi-persistent' and one SRS resource set configured with resourceType in SRS-ResourceSet set to 'periodic' can be configured and the two SRS resource sets configured with 'semi-persistent' are not activated at the same time, or up to two SRS resource sets can be configured, if the UE is indicating srs-AntennaSwitching2SP-1Periodic, srs-AntennaSwitching8T8R2SP-1Periodic, or [srs-AntennaSwitching3T3R2SP-1Periodic], where each SRS resource set has one SRS resource, the number of SRS ports for each resource is equal to 1, 2, 4 with port 1003 disabled by higher layer parameter [RRC_parameter] is configured, 4, or 8 or

-------------------------------------------Unchanged parts are omitted-------------------------------------------

·      For 3T6R, zero or one or two SRS resource sets configured with a different value of resourceType in SRS-ResourceSet set to 'periodic' or 'semi-persistent' and with higher layer parameter [RRC_parameter] is configured if the UE is not indicating [srs-AntennaSwitching2SP-1Periodic] or [srs-AntennaSwitching3T6R2SP-1Periodic], or up to two SRS resource sets configured with 'semi-persistent' and up to one SRS resource set configured with 'periodic' if the UE is indicating [srs-AntennaSwitching2SP-1Periodic] or [srs-AntennaSwitching3T6R2SP-1Periodic], where the two SRS resource sets configured with 'semi-persistent' are not activated at the same time. Each SRS resource set has two SRS resources transmitted in different symbols, each SRS resource in a given set consisting of a four SRS ports with port 1003 disabled, and the SRS ports of the resource in the set are associated with a different UE antenna ports, or

·      -  For 3T6R, zero or one or two SRS resource sets configured with resourceType in SRS-ResourceSet set to 'aperiodic' and with higher layer parameter [RRC_parameter] is configured, where in the case of one resource set has two SRS resources transmitted in different symbols, each SRS resource in a given set consisting of a four SRS ports with port 1003 disabled, and the SRS ports of the resource in the set are associated with a different UE antenna ports. In the case of two resource sets a total of two SRS resources are transmitted in different symbols of two different slots, and where the SRS ports of each SRS resource in the given two sets are associated with a different UE antenna ports.

-------------------------------------------Unchanged parts are omitted-------------------------------------------

 

 

From Tuesday session

Agreement

For a 3TX UE, when configured to ‘nonCodebook’, to distinguish UE behavior for PTRS-DMRS association between the Rel-19 and Rel-18 behavior,

 

 

From Wednesday session

Agreement

Adopt the following changes in Clause 6.2.1 in TS38.214.

6.2.1        UE sounding procedure

-------------------------------------------Unchanged parts are omitted-------------------------------------------

[The UE does not transmit SRS on antenna port 1003 if [RRC_parameter] is configured.] where [RRC_parameter] is only applicable when SRS resource(s) are configured with 4 ports with usage as codebook or antenna switching.

-------------------------------------------Unchanged parts are omitted-------------------------------------------

 

 

From Thursday session

Agreement

Adopt the following changes in Clause 7.1 - TS38.213 (Rel-19 endorsed draftCR in R1-2501661).

7.1          Physical uplink shared channel

For a PUSCH transmission on active UL BWP , as described in clause 12, of carrier  of serving cell , a UE first calculates a linear value  of the transmit power , with parameters as defined in clause 7.1.1. For a PUSCH transmission scheduled by a DCI format other than DCI format 0_0, or configured by ConfiguredGrantConfig or semiPersistentOnPUSCH, if txConfig in PUSCH-Config is set to 'codebook',

·     -  if ul-FullPowerTransmission in PUSCH-Config is provided, the UE scales  by  where:

-------------------------------------------Unchanged parts are omitted-------------------------------------------

·     -  else, if each SRS resource in the SRS-ResourceSet with usage set to 'codebook' has more than one SRS port, the UE scales the linear value by the ratio of the number of antenna ports with a non-zero PUSCH transmission power to the maximum number of SRS ports supported by the UE in one SRS resource [if 4portSRS_3Tx is not provided, or to 3 if 4portSRS_3Tx is provided].

-------------------------------------------Unchanged parts are omitted-------------------------------------------

 

 

R1-2501748         Summary of Discussion on 3TX CB-based Uplink in RAN1#120bis      Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

9.2.44        Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios

Including support for 2TA without CoresetPoolIdx association for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP.

 

R1-2501745         On Specifications of Rel-19 Asymmetric mTRP Operation      InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2501783         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios        ZTE Corporation, Sanechips, China Telecom

R1-2501802         Remaining issues on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios            vivo

R1-2501853         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios   MediaTek Inc.

R1-2501864         Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Spreadtrum, UNISOC

R1-2501988         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios               CATT

R1-2502012         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP      Tejas Network Limited

R1-2502019         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios               China Telecom, ZTE

R1-2502039         Enhancements on asymmetric DL STRP/UL MTRP scenarios Ofinno

R1-2502080         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios               NEC

R1-2502104         Discussions on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios       LG Electronics

R1-2502106         Remaining issues on asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP scenarios            Ericsson

R1-2502110         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios   Lenovo

R1-2502156         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios               CMCC

R1-2502227         Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2502296         Enhancements on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios  OPPO

R1-2502314         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios   Sony

R1-2502360         Views on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios   Samsung

R1-2502437         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios               Xiaomi

R1-2502507         Discussion on asymmetric UL MIMO operation         ETRI

R1-2502527         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios   Nokia

R1-2502536         Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios        TCL

R1-2502539         Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios               Transsion Holdings

R1-2502601         Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios Apple

R1-2502670         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios   Sharp

R1-2502762         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios         NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2502813         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios   Panasonic

R1-2502835         Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment scenarios               Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2502889         Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios               Google

 

R1-2502953        Summary #1 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP     Moderator (OPPO)

From Monday session

Agreement

Answer the question of RAN4 as follows:

 

Agreement

 

Agreement

For an SRS resource set not configured with followUnifiedTCI-StateSRS, regarding how to determine the PL offset and the CLPC adjustment state

When the UE is configured with Rel-19 2 TA, the above design is also applied to TAG.

 

 

From Wednesday session

R1-2502956        Draft Reply to RAN4 LS on DL timing reference to support two TA enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/ UL mTRP               Moderator (OPPO)

Agreement

Reply to RAN4 LS on DL timing reference to support two TA enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/ UL mTRP is approved in R1-2503091.

 

 

R1-2502954        Summary #2 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP     Moderator (OPPO)

From Thursday session

Conclusion

There is no RAN1 consensus on the following proposal:

If the PL offset associated with the indicated joint/UL TCI state is included in the PRACH transmission power for PDCCH-order PRACH transmission, the pathlossReferenceRS-Id in the same indicated joint/UL TCI state is used to determine PL RS for the PDCCH-order PRACH transmission.

 

Companies are encouraged to consider the following for RAN1#121:

Regarding whether/how to reset the CLPC of PUSCH/PUCCH/SRS, further study and down-select one from the following alternatives:


 RAN1#121

9.2       NR MIMO Phase 5

Please refer to RP-242394 for detailed scope of the WI. Additional RAN guidance on Rel-19 NR MIMO can be found in RP-243265.

 

[121-R19-MIMO] Email discussion on Rel-19 MIMO Phase 5 – Eko (Samsung)

-        To be used for sharing updates on online/offline schedule, details on what is to be discussed in online/offline sessions, tdoc number of the moderator summary for online session, etc

 

R1-2503559            List of RRC impact for Rel-19 MIMO Ph5           Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2503560            Draft LS to RAN2 on MAC impact for Rel-19 MIMO Ph5  Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2503561            LS to RAN2 on MAC impact for Rel-19 MIMO Ph5            Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2503562            Draft Stage-2 CR for Rel-19 NR MIMO Ph5 in TS38.300   Samsung

R1-2503721            AnImproved DOAEstimation Method Based  on Sparse Reconstruction                 BUPT

Late submission

R1-2503722            An Improved DOA Estimation Method Based on Sparse Reconstruction                 BUPT

R1-2504568            Discussions on DOA estimation algorithm for MIMO          BUPT

 

9.2.1        Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management

R1-2503237            Remaining issues for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management                 FUTUREWEI

R1-2503275            On UE initiated/event-driven beam management Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2503303            Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management         MediaTek Inc.

R1-2503351            Remaining issues on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management     vivo

R1-2503433            Remaining Details of Rel-19 UE/Event-Driven Beam Management    InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2503509            Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management                Spreadtrum, UNISOC

R1-2503554            Views on Rel-19 UE-initiated/event-driven beam management           Samsung

R1-2503612            Remaining issues for UE-initiated beam management          Ericsson

R1-2503668            Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management                 ZTE Corporation, Sanechips

R1-2503729            On UE-initiated/event-driven beam management Ofinno

R1-2503786            Remaining issues on UE-initiated/event-driven beam report CATT

R1-2503816            Enhancements for UE-initiated/Event-Driven Beam Management      Panasonic

R1-2503824            Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management                 CMCC

R1-2503876            Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management                 Xiaomi

R1-2503912            Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management         Lenovo

R1-2503928            Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management                 NEC

R1-2503953            Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management                 Ruijie Networks Co. Ltd

R1-2503985            UE-initiated beam management             LG Electronics

R1-2504061            Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management         Sony

R1-2504076            Enhancements to facilitate UE-initiated/event-driven beam management                 Nokia

R1-2504084            Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management                 Fujitsu

R1-2504095            Discussion on the UE-initiated/event-driven beam management          HONOR

R1-2504117            Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management                 Hyundai Motor Company

R1-2504133            Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management         ETRI

R1-2504172            Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management         Transsion Holdings

R1-2504228            Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              OPPO

R1-2504297            Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated or event-driven beam management                 Google

R1-2504312            Remaining issues for UE-initiated beam management          Apple

R1-2504388            UE-initated/event-driven beam management        Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2504444            Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management         Sharp

R1-2504453            Discussions on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management              China Telecom

R1-2504476            Remaining issues on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management           KDDI Corporation (TTC)

R1-2504495            Discussion on enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management                 NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2504535            Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management                ITRI, Acer Incorporated

R1-2504572            Discussion on UE initiated beam report ASUSTeK

R1-2504579            Discussion on Enhancements for UE-initiated/event-driven beam management                 NICT

R1-2504607            Discussion on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management                TCL

 

R1-2504471            Moderator Summary #1 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management                 Moderator (ZTE)

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the multiplexing a number of L (L>=1) PUCCH format 0/1 with UEIRIs are collided/overlapped with a PUCCH format 2/3/4 carrying HARQ/CSI, reuse the legacy SR multiplexing rule.

·      The value of  bits is based on an ascending order of the values of PUCCH resource ID associated with the first PUCCHs.

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the multiplexing a number of L (L>=1) first PUCCH is collided/overlapped with a PUCCH format 2/3/4 carrying HARQ/CSI/SR.

·      Option-1: Extend the SR field of   bits to a field of  bits of representing at most one of positive SR or positive UEIRI

o   The value in the field is based the ascending order of SR ID first and then the ascending order of the PUCCH resource ID associated with the first PUCCHs.

o     If one of the SRs is a positive LRR, the value of the  bits indicates the positive LRR, else, if one of the UEIBRs is a positive UEIBR, the value of the  bits indicates the positive UEIBR.

o     An all-zero value for the  bits represents a negative SR and UEIRI value across all  LRR/SRs and/or L UEIRIs.

 

R1-2504472            Moderator Summary #2 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management                 Moderator (ZTE)

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding occupied CPU(s), OCPU = 1 is occupied for a CSI report configuration.

-            Note: That is the same number of occupied CPU for legacy L1-RSRP measurement.

 

Agreement

Regarding triggering event determination, on candidate values of supported RRC parameters,

-        Support the following as RRC candidate values for a threshold value eventThreshold-r19 for trigger event detection regarding Event-2 or Event-7.

o   Option-2: 0, 1, …, 30, 31 dB

-        Support the following as RRC candidate values for a threshold value eventThreshold-Event1-r19 for trigger event detection regarding Event-1.

o   Reusing RSRP-Range in RRC

§  Note: only values 14, …,113 in RSRP-Range are valid

-        Support the following as RRC candidate values for the time window length for triggering event determination eventDetectionTimeWindowLength-r19

o   4, 5, 8, 10, 16, 20, 40, 80, 160, 320, 640, 1280 ms

-        Support the following as RRC candidate values for the counting threshold eventInstanceCount-r19

o   Option-1: 2, …, 16

 

Agreement

On cross-CC beam report measurement for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-2, introduce an RRC parameter to indicate one from {SpCell, PUCCH-Scell} as the cell of the configured PUCCH.

-            Note: It is up to NW implementation to configure same or different PUCCH resource IDs in different serving cells

 

R1-2504473            Moderator Summary #3 on UE-initiated/event-driven beam management                 Moderator (ZTE)

 

Agreement

On cross-CC beam report measurement for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the evaluation periodicity for determining event instance, the periodicity of the current beam RS should be the same as that of the new beam RS(s).

-           The evaluation periodicity is the same as the periodicity of the current and new beam RS(s).

Above applies for all events.

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the value of X symbols for determining available transmission occasion of the second UL channel on Mode-B

-           Support Option-1 of the following as RRC candidate values for X symbols

·           Option-1: 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512

·           Note: X is based on the SCS of the first PUCCH.

·           Minimum value of X is subject to UE capability

-           Regarding ‘available’ transmission occasion of the second UL channel, the transmission restriction for of the second UL channel reuses the legacy rule of PUSCH with SP-CSI.

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding the multiplexing/dropping rule(s) of 1-bit first PUCCH, support Option-3 of the following rules for the Case-2: the 1-bit first PUCCH is collided/overlapped with a PUSCH

-        Option-3: Piggyback 1-bit indication of first PUCCH into the PUSCH.

o   The 1-bit indication is always multiplexed in the PUSCH, regardless that UEI beam report procedure is triggered.

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding CSI reference resource definition for a UEI beam report, the CSI reference resource for a CSI reporting is defined by a single downlink slot , where slot n is determined according to the uplink slot n’ in which the second PUSCH is transmitted, and

-        For mode-A, the legacy CSI reference definition of aperiodic CSI reporting is used. 

-        For mode-B, nCSI_ref is the smallest value greater than or equal to , such that slot n- nCSI_ref corresponds to a valid downlink slot, where Z' corresponds to the delay requirement as defined in Clause 5.4.

In the report, a condition met indicator for new beam RS is determined according to the measurement(s) triggering the first PUCCH transmission.

Note: Strong concern was raised by vivo on the necessity of the above proposal especially considering the RAN4 status.

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding Event-1 and Event-7, one PUCCH resource of first PUCCH can be associated with one or multiple CSI report configurations.

 

Agreement

On beam report transmission procedure for UE-initiated/event-driven beam reporting, regarding priority rules for CSI report multiplexing/dropping, UEI beam report for both mode-A and mode-B is prioritized over Semi-persistent CSI reports on PUCCH and Periodic CSI reports on PUCCH

-            UEI beam report for mode-A > Aperiodic CSI report > UEI beam report (for mode-B) > Semi-persistent CSI reports on PUSCH

Note-1: The intra-UE multiplexing/prioritization rules of PUSCH with A-CSI for PUSCH is reused for UEI-BR for Mode A.

Note-2: How to capture the above is up to Editor.

 

9.2.2        CSI enhancements

Including support for up to 128 CSI-RS ports on FR1 and UE reporting enhancement for CJT and SRS port grouping for TDD low-complexity 6/8RX receiver.

 

R1-2503276            On 128 CSI-RS ports and UE reporting enhancement           Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2503352            Remaining issues on Rel-19 CSI enhancements   vivo

R1-2503434            Remaining Details of Rel-19 Enhancements of CSI              InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2503510            Remaining issues on CSI enhancements                Spreadtrum, UNISOC

R1-2503555            Moderator Summary#1 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 1           Moderator (Samsung)

R1-2503556            Views on Rel-19 CSI enhancements      Samsung

R1-2503669            Discussion on CSI enhancements          ZTE Corporation, Sanechips

R1-2503711            Discussion on Rel-19 CSI Enhancements              Tejas Network Limited

R1-2503787            Remaining issues on Rel-19 CSI enhancements   CATT

R1-2503825            Discussion on CSI enhancements          CMCC

R1-2503860            Discussion on the Remaining Issues of CSI Enhancement   Rakuten Mobile, Inc

R1-2503877            Further discussion on the remained issues for CSI enhancement          Xiaomi

R1-2503910            CSI enhancements for Rel. 19 MIMO   Fraunhofer IIS, Fraunhofer HHI

R1-2503913            Discussion on CSI enhancements          Lenovo

R1-2503917            Discussion on CSI enhancements          NEC

R1-2504028            CSI Enhancement for NR MIMO           Google

R1-2504062            Discussion of CSI enhancements           Sony

R1-2504077            CSI enhancement for NR MIMO Phase 5              Nokia

R1-2504085            Remaining issues on Rel-19 CSI enhancements   Fujitsu

R1-2504096            Discussion on CSI enhancements          HONOR

R1-2504134            Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5     ETRI

R1-2504229            CSI enhancements for Rel-19 MIMO    OPPO

R1-2504389            Maintenance on CSI for >32 ports and UE-assisted CJT      Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2504445            CSI enhancements Sharp

R1-2504451            Maintenance on CSI enhancements for large antenna arrays and CJT Ericsson

R1-2504496            Discussion on CSI enhancements          NTT DOCOMO, INC.

R1-2504549            Discussion on CSI enhancements for NR MIMO Phase 5     KDDI Corporation

 

R1-2503555            Moderator Summary#1 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 1           Moderator (Samsung)

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 aperiodic standalone CJT calibration (CJTC) reporting, when ReportQuantity is ‘cjtc-Dd’ (delay offset), add the following definition of the measurement quantity in TS38.215 as follows (analogous to the Rel-18 TDCP):

-        For FR1, the reference point shall be the antenna connector of the UE.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, when configured with port subset indication (from the Rel-18 SD NES Type-1), the actual number of ports (the number of 1s in the port-subsetIndicator bitmap) can correspond to a supported value of PCSI-RS for the Rel-19 Type-I SP codebook (i.e. either 48, 64, or 128), or to a supported value of PCSI-RS for the Rel-15 Type-I SP codebook (i.e., either 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32), respectively

·        The supported number of ports for port subset of the full PCSI-RS ports, is according to UE capability

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports based on the Rel-18 Type-II Doppler codebook, when the KDOPP CSI-RS resource groups are configured for aperiodic CMR, where each CSI-RS resource group comprises K>1 aggregated NZP aperiodic CSI-RS resources, the triggering offset of an associated aperiodic CSI-IM follows the associated NZP CSI-RS resource(s) for CMR in the first slot (in the time domain).

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement based on Rel-18 Type-II Doppler for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, for Capability 1, further clarify the previous agreement that

 

R1-2504728            Moderator Summary#2 on Rel-19 CSI enhancements: Round 2           Moderator (Samsung)

 

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 Type-I and Type-II (except for Type-II Doppler) codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports, when the K>1 aggregated NZP aperiodic CSI-RS resources for CMR are within two consecutive slots, following the legacy spec, the aperiodic triggering offset configured with the NZP CSI-RS resource set for interference measurement is the same as that of the associated NZP CSI-RS resource set for CMR.

 

Conclusion

For the Rel-19 Type-II codebook refinement for 48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports based on the Rel-18 Type-II Doppler codebook, when the KDOPP >1 NZP aperiodic CSI-RS resource groups for CMR are configured, following the legacy spec, the aperiodic triggering offset configured with the NZP CSI-RS resource set for interference measurement is the same as that of the associated NZP CSI-RS resource set for CMR.

 

Agreement

For the Rel-19 Type-I SP and Type-II codebook refinement for P=48, 64, and 128 CSI-RS ports with K>1 aggregated NZP aperiodic CSI-RS resources for CMR, to implement the previous agreements on the mapping from CSI-RS resource index/port index per resource and port index to CSI/PMI calculation

·        In TS38.211, extend the enumeration of antenna port p=3000+p’ with p’=0 …P–1

·        In TS38.214, remove the term ‘port index for CSI/PMI calculation’

 

9.2.3        Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions

Including support for 3T3R and 3T6R SRS antenna switching.

 

R1-2503277            Discussion on 3-antenna-port UL transmission     Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2503353            Remaining issues on 3-antenna-port codebook-based uplink transmissions                 vivo

R1-2503435            Remaining Details of Rel-19 CB-based UL for 3TX UE       InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2503438            Summary of Discussion on 3TX CB-based Uplink in RAN1#121       Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

R1-2503557            Views on Rel-19 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions          Samsung

R1-2503670            Discussion on 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions               ZTE Corporation, Sanechips

R1-2503723            Remaining issues for 3 Tx UL transmissions        Ericsson Japan K.K.

R1-2503788            Maintenance on 3-antenna-port uplink transmission             CATT

R1-2503914            Support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions   Lenovo

R1-2504029            Uplink 3 Port Codebook based Transmission        Google

R1-2504078            On the support for 3-antenna-port codebook-based transmissions        Nokia

R1-2504230            Discussion on 3-antenna-port uplink transmissions               OPPO

R1-2504313            Remaining issues on R19 MIMO 3Tx transmission              Apple

R1-2504446            Support for 3-antenna-port transmission                Sharp

R1-2504456            Discussions on 3-antenna-port UL transmission   China Telecom

 

R1-2503437            FL Summary Support for 3TX CB-based Uplink; First Round             Moderator (InterDigital, Inc.)

 

Conclusion

For codebook-based PUSCH transmission by a 3TX UE, PUSCH scheduling by DCI format 0_3 is not supported.

-        Agreement: Adopt the following TP in red text for TS 38.214 section 6.1.1.1.

-------------------------------------------Unchanged parts are omitted----------------------------------

For codebook based transmission with three antenna ports, the UE determines its codebook subsets based on TPMI(s) and upon the reception of higher layer parameter codebookSubset in pusch-Config for PUSCH associated with DCI format 0_1 or 0_3 and codebookSubsetDCI-0-2in pusch-Config for PUSCH associated with DCI format 0_2 which may be configured with 'nonCoherent'.

-----------------------------------------Unchanged parts are omitted------------------------------------------

 

 

9.2.44        Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios

Including support for 2TA without CoresetPoolIdx association for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP.

 

R1-2503278            Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios             Huawei, HiSilicon

R1-2503304            Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios               MediaTek Inc.

R1-2503354            Remaining issues on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios         vivo

R1-2503436            Remaining Details of Rel-19 Asymmetric mTRP Operation InterDigital, Inc.

R1-2503511            Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios             Spreadtrum, UNISOC

R1-2503558            Views on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios               Samsung

R1-2503671            Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios                 ZTE Corporation, Sanechips, China Telecom

R1-2503712            Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP                Tejas Network Limited

R1-2503730            Enhancements on asymmetric DL STRP/UL MTRP scenarios             Ofinno

R1-2503789            Remaining issues on asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios  CATT

R1-2503817            Enhancement for Asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP Scenarios             Panasonic

R1-2503826            Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios                 CMCC

R1-2503878            Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios                 Xiaomi

R1-2503915            Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios               Lenovo

R1-2503929            Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios                 NEC

R1-2503978            Remaining issues on asymmetric DL sTRP UL mTRP scenarios         Ericsson

R1-2503986            Discussions on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios  LG Electronics

R1-2504063            Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios               Sony

R1-2504079            Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios               Nokia

R1-2504135            Remaining issues in asymmetric UL MIMO operation         ETRI

R1-2504173            Discussion on enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios                 Transsion Holdings

R1-2504231            Enhancements on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios              OPPO

R1-2504298            Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP scenarios                 Google

R1-2504314            Enhancements for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios             Apple

R1-2504390            Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP and UL mTRP deployment scenarios                 Qualcomm Incorporated

R1-2504458            Enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios               Sharp

R1-2504462            Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios   TCL

Late submission

R1-2504463            Discussion on asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios   TCL

R1-2504497            Discussion on enhancement for asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP scenarios                 NTT DOCOMO, INC.

 

R1-2504655            Summary #1 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP     Moderator (OPPO)

 

Conclusion

When the UE transmits a PUCCH with HARQ-ACK information in slot n corresponding to the PDSCH carrying the MAC CE command updating PL offset of TCI state(s), the updated PL offset(s) shall be applied starting from the first slot that is after  where μ is the SCS configuration for the PUCCH.

 

Conclusion

Regarding whether/how to reset the CLPC of PUSCH/PUCCH/SRS, no further additional enhancement in Rel-19

 

R1-2504656            Summary #2 on Rel-19 asymmetric DL sTRP/UL mTRP     Moderator (OPPO)